<Judy> trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: WAI Coordination Call Teleconference
<Judy> https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/8238
Next meeting Feb 12
<shawn> regrets for 12 Feb
JB: Infoshare for other groups, or highlight participation opportunity? Any requests?
JB: Are there upcoming publications or announcements?
SLH: There is a flurry of
activity for advance notice.
... Shawn is off for two weeks
... what can we do this week? What can wait until Feb 18, or
what will be done without me?
MC: ARIA FPWD doesn't have an estimated date. It hasn't been prepped yet. Same with WCAG 2.2
JB: JOanie, Michael, when will you know the date?
MC: We need to do a CFC to publish. Otherwise we are ready for 1.3
Joanie: We need to talk more.
SLH: Pronunciation explainer
Janina: It will be ready when you get back after the 18th. JAWS will be implementing the Explainer and we would love to have it out by CSUN,
SLH: I've moved it to the
18th.
... The Personalization Requirements is supposed to go out
tomorrow.
JB: There are questions from RQ about limitations of ReSpec. PLH says there are ways of manually overriding ReSpec.
Janina: We need to know how to fix issues with Respec and Pubrules
SLH: XAUR?
Janina: @@
JB: It needs to have the status section fixed.
MC: That will be fixed automatically when it goes to TR.
s/@@ next Tuesday
Janina: Use cases for WebRTC will be after February 18
MC: We need to modify the name to make it consistent with other names.
Janina: The Personalization
Explainer is already out.
... Pronunciation has a Use Cases and Gap Analysis. We need to
show CSS isn't meeting some needs.
MC: Is the COnformance Challenges document coming soon?
Janina: We need to bring it back up to the AGWG chairs.
JB: This is layered on top of the
EdX platform. It went live yesterday.
... there are still accessibility issues with the
platform.
... if you know of anyone with questions about that, let us
know
... we will be looking for help promoting the course.
SLH: THe place to point people is
the blog post.
... as soon as EdX gets their ducks in a row, we will be
promoting it.
JB: This will be offered as a free course.
<shawn> point people to blog post https://www.w3.org/blog/2019/12/free-online-course-introduction-to-web-accessibility/
JB: There is a certificate mode that isn't free. It is a certification of completing the course, not a certification of competence.
JB: Of things tha came out of our last call, there seemed to be a disconnect between what was incoming for 2.2.
Janina: The requirement came out
of COGA, and Rachael was taking lead on that.
... what we understand from Rachael is that her estimate was
50/50 whether they would make it into 2.2.
JB: THere are questions with relevance and fit with architecture and also concerns with maturity.
Janina: I think we are on top of it. Michael and I have identified technical items for the next time as Personalization meets. The right people are talking, but we may need to socialize it more in AGWG.
JB: Jeanne asked if there was
update on the status on that.
... there is a team-side meeting on Friday about this to get
communications input.
MC: Discussion with the chairs
tomorrow
... team side discussion Friday
... possibly to go to AGWG on Tuesday
... update the facilitators on Monday
JB: THere were formal objections
about the name, and I will inform the objectors. They will need
to follow up in AGWG.
... we want a short list of fallback, could-survive-with,
alternatives.
Jeanne: What is the plan and schedule for widely socializing the name?
JB: I remember we wanted to do that, but I'm not sure it is realistic right now.
<Judy> [JB would like that to still be realistic]
JB: what is the date>
Jeanne: Planning for 27 February, might slip a week, but needs to be done before CSUN.
tzviya: What was the objection?
JB: THere was an objection to using the name "Silver". Also there was formal objection that the names exceeeded the scope of web.
Tzviya: I assume they had a definition of "The Web".
JB: We weren't able to clarify a definition.
Tzviya: SOme of us are working on this in the AB. I would be happy to have a conversation with anyone about that.
<shawn> [ Shawn is interested in Tzviya's input, too! ]
Tzviya: If anyone wants to schedule time with me.
SLH: I think there are a lot of people interested in the answer to this.
Tzviya: We are just starting. We are looking at the history of WG, and history of TR. We are doing interviews.
JB: I had announced this two
meetings ago. One meeting ago, I pointed to the workshop
announcements.
... it's important to get people who are knowledgable about
this field.
... there was a suggestion at the last meeting but I didn't
hear of any followup.
Janina: I'm considering
JB: Let's make sure we have some
coverage, then we can add to it.
... if we don't get involved, we will be locked out of that
work for 3 years.
Janaina: Josh is attending. I will go if I can cover the cost.
JB: This has changed since
yesterday. There was a follow up workshop report for work going
forward.
... Dom will confirm in a meeting tomorrow, where there will be
a common repository for status update and synchronization.
There would be people talking together every quarter.
... the plan is to coordinate work across a dozen different
bodies across W3C.
... it's a different way of using Github
... there was a lot of interest in engaging with W3C and follow
up at the Immersive Web workshop.
... some were accessibility groups, others where there was no
normally no accessibility work. THere was concerned about silo
work if there was not on-going coordination.
... the idea was to use Github as a way to coordinate, given
that some of the groups don't work via audio meetings
Janina: We put Roy's name on it, but I'm not sure if that's the right representation.
JB: Roy has been active in the group. He is off for holiday. I think he's a great assignment, consider it done.
JB: Is anyone stuck?
[crickets]
JB: Any other business or informal updates?
[crickets]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/the spec/the Explainer/ WARNING: Bad s/// command: s/@@ next Tuesday Succeeded: s/about this/about this to get communications input/ Succeeded: s/the names weren/the names exceeeded the scope of web./ Present: Joanmarie_Diggs shawn CharlesL janina Regrets: Kerscher SteveLee Katie Joshue No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: jeanne Inferring Scribes: jeanne Found Date: 29 Jan 2020 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]