20:46:17 RRSAgent has joined #dxwg 20:46:17 logging to https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-irc 20:46:26 rrsagent, make logs public 20:46:39 chair: PWinstanley 20:47:07 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2020.01.28 20:47:14 meeting: DXWG Plenary 20:47:33 regrets+ Makx, Alejandra 20:47:49 rrsagent, create minutes v2 20:47:49 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 20:47:57 present+ 21:00:47 roba has joined #dxwg 21:02:37 riccardoAlbertoni has joined #dxwg 21:02:54 present+ 21:03:14 present+ 21:03:40 Ana has joined #DXWG 21:04:29 Present+ Ana 21:05:36 plh has joined #dxwg 21:05:40 present+ 21:05:52 scribenick: roba 21:07:29 topic: admin 21:07:39 https://www.w3.org/2020/01/21-dxwg-minutes 21:07:52 Proposed: accept minutes of last meeting' 21:07:58 +1 21:07:58 +1 21:08:11 +0 21:08:14 +1 21:08:15 sorry 21:08:34 resolved: accept minutes of last meeting 21:08:47 topic: DCAT 3 items 21:08:49 +q 21:08:58 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:09:11 topic: DCAT2 publication 21:09:38 riccardoAlbertoni: two reminders for @plh re content negotiation 21:09:42 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/24. 21:10:55 plh: issues assigned to myself to solve - can fix later if need be 21:11:44 riccardoAlbertoni: #1182 is due for closing 21:13:14 ... discussion open about how to support (couldnt catch...) DCAT is ready 21:13:41 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwg 21:14:20 present+ 21:14:31 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:14:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:15:33 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/errata/ 21:15:36 ...discussion about handling errata documents 21:16:14 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/ 21:16:55 plh: should i change status and publish as is ? 21:17:31 riccardoAlbertoni: yes - but open issues like we dont know where the RDF turtle will be 21:18:03 plh: suggest move not to status of document 21:18:13 s/not/note/ 21:18:24 ... did you run pubrules? 21:18:28 q+ to ask about issue posted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2020Jan/0107.html 21:18:42 ack AndreaPerego 21:18:42 AndreaPerego, you wanted to ask about issue posted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2020Jan/0107.html 21:19:01 riccardoAlbertoni: discussion was to leave as note, but open to suggestions... have not run pubrules 21:19:13 plh: will run rules by end of week 21:20:04 AndreaPerego: new version of DCterms has been published: yet to review - should we put in some caveat? 21:20:52 PWinstanley: why not push to v3? - DCterms previous version still valid 21:21:24 +1 to put it in version 3 21:21:32 ...otherwise need to do everything in 2 days, including pub rules 21:21:46 ... safe enough in your opinion? 21:21:54 alejandra has joined #dxwg 21:22:35 present+ 21:22:41 AndreaPerego: option is to modify references to point to previous version - we are using references to the current version 21:23:33 ok 21:23:42 ...I can do a PR to replace link - we can decide it to merge it 21:24:10 ACTION: AndreaPerego to draft a PR with links to specific version of DC terms 21:24:11 Created ACTION-389 - Draft a pr with links to specific version of dc terms [on Andrea Perego - due 2020-02-04]. 21:24:14 +1 21:24:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:24:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:24:41 roba: will there be an issue with the TTL files? 21:24:57 q+ 21:25:02 ack AndreaPerego 21:25:15 PWinstanley: should be handled in PR 21:26:12 q+ 21:26:20 ack plh 21:26:20 AndreaPerego: probably dont have time to review, Dcterms defintions are not complex though 21:27:06 plh: my recommendation is not to do anything - if there is an issue deal with it in V3 or in errata 21:27:09 q+ 21:27:30 ack AndreaPerego 21:27:55 AndreaPerego: happy to move to v3 21:28:44 propose: close new action-389 and create issue for this 21:28:49 +1 21:28:53 +1 21:28:53 +1 21:28:54 +1 21:28:54 +1 21:28:58 +1 21:29:05 +1 21:29:13 resolved: close new action-389 and create issue for this 21:29:33 close action-389 21:29:33 Closed action-389. 21:29:40 plh: what about the blog? 21:29:59 regrets- alejandra 21:30:00 PWinstanley: will have a draft put round by end of the week 21:30:07 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:30:07 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html alejandra 21:30:32 ACTION: PWinstanley to draft blog post for DCAT2 21:30:33 Created ACTION-390 - Draft blog post for dcat2 [on Peter Winstanley - due 2020-02-04]. 21:32:11 PWinstanley: we have a spreadsheet with contacts - need to send emails to this contact list and ask for implementations and errata 21:32:28 ...please email your contacts 21:33:05 I think this is the spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_f5CAZv7rgUjJH5YXkmD6w5xS6GX5X2AmEp_LMptAfQ/edit#gid=0 21:33:19 sure 21:33:23 ... to do after blog. 21:33:32 topic: Conneg 21:34:47 roba: I talked to nick yesterday - I don't know that there's anything we are waiting for re: publication, but I am actively working on implementation and test suites 21:35:25 annette_g has joined #dxwg 21:35:42 plh: next step is to move to CR 21:35:56 ... I am preparing implementations on both QSA and also headers. There are challenges in making tests on these implementations comparible 21:36:16 roba: prefer to get implementations deployed before moving to CR 21:36:26 present+ 21:36:29 created new worksheet on spreadsheet for DCAT2 REC publicity: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_f5CAZv7rgUjJH5YXkmD6w5xS6GX5X2AmEp_LMptAfQ/edit#gid=560881316 21:36:46 PWinstanley: any other comments on conneg? 21:36:54 topic: DCAT version 3 21:37:08 PWinstanley: how are we going to work out what v3 will cover 21:37:54 ...we are probably not representative for this discussion 21:37:56 GH issue about DCTERMS new version just created: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1213 21:38:01 ...should we split repo 21:38:04 q+ 21:38:08 ack roba 21:39:48 roba: I would definitely like to see the repo split. It is a good opportunity to make more visible the issues relating to the work of the specific deliverable. There is also mention in v2 saying that aspects of DCAT 2 would be handled by the profile. We need to incorporate this thinking more explicitly 21:40:29 ... I would also specifically urge against creating specific aspects of DCAT that would be better handled by profiles 21:40:31 +q 21:40:35 ack alejandra 21:41:09 q+ to say not so sure about splitting the report and working on profiles in DCAT 3 21:41:34 q+ 21:41:47 -1 to cloning issues - better to review them and make a case to reopen 21:42:22 plh: recommend to clone repository - keep history of commits - then transfer issues to the clone 21:42:45 ...there is a concept of transferring issues 21:42:46 q? 21:43:10 https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/transferring-an-issue-to-another-repository 21:43:57 great 21:44:13 alejandra: also interested in profiles - we have exampes here 21:44:41 ... should we use the Priimer? 21:44:52 q+ 21:44:55 PWinstanley: we can publish Notes as well 21:44:58 s/Priimer/Primer/ 21:45:02 q- 21:45:15 +1 to keep the issues and maintain the precious discussions we've had.. 21:45:23 alejandra: we have some work on dataset series to revisit 21:45:38 ...create a milestone 21:45:39 q? 21:45:43 ack AndreaPerego 21:45:43 AndreaPerego, you wanted to say not so sure about splitting the report and working on profiles in DCAT 3 21:46:45 this is the milestone we already have with priority for future work in DCAT: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/15 21:46:55 I think we should revise that selection 21:46:57 AndreaPerego: same concerns we may lose issue - so happy to see a possible solution. Re profiles +1 to point by roba - may be domain independent. So far profiles of DCAT made by communities. 21:47:05 q- 21:47:11 ...concerned about potential for conflict. 21:47:39 PWinstanley: isnt point to be instructional - to show how things can be addressed by a profile? 21:47:42 "The Dataset Exchange Working Group will not create application profiles or metadata standards that only apply to very specific domains (such as particle physics, accountancy, oncology etc.)" 21:48:38 AndreaPerego: propose to review issue - if domain-independent can go into V3 otherwise explore options 21:48:51 q+ 21:49:33 ...one issue is that there may be many valid ways of solving a problem, so guidance doesnt always help 21:49:39 ack roba 21:50:36 roba: I think that there is likely to be a middle ground between general cases and application-specific requirements (which should be managed by communities) where we can find good practice patterns 21:50:50 q+ 21:50:55 ack AndreaPerego 21:51:17 AndreaPerego: agree - important to review open issues 21:51:33 +1 for triage of issues first :-) 21:51:54 +q 21:52:03 PWinstanley: we have UCR document too 21:52:09 +1 to look at the UCR for not addressed requirements. 21:52:25 ack alejandra 21:52:56 alejandra: fine to look at UCR - but we have already generated issues 21:53:01 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:53:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:54:09 PWinstanley: who is going to do this? joint activity or alejandra doing as part of milestone review? 21:54:12 s/splitting the report/splitting the repo/ 21:54:46 alejandra: can have my view then we need to discuss 21:56:35 PWinstanley: focus of charter is expanasion of community using FAIR principles - need to get people on board ASAP 21:56:55 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:56:55 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:57:40 topic: open action actions https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open 21:57:51 388 is closed 21:59:01 plh: we can not go to cc0 without 6 weeks loop. we have moved to cc-by4 already 21:59:30 ...need to recharter - so part of move to evergreen process 22:00:04 PWinstanley: can we go back to wikidata and have conversation about cc0 need? 22:00:42 ...now we are clear we need to open discussion with wikidata? 22:01:01 closing 385 22:01:07 close action-385 22:01:07 Closed action-385. 22:01:09 closed 386 22:01:15 close action-386 22:01:15 Closed action-386. 22:01:36 thanks all, and bye! 22:01:38 thank you all, good night 22:01:49 rrsagent, create minutes v2 22:01:49 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 22:01:51 Bye 22:01:52 thanks all, bye 22:04:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:04:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:05:44 regrets+ SimonCox 22:05:46 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:05:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:15:50 regrets+ Antoine 22:15:51 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:15:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego