19:54:30 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 19:54:30 logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-irc 19:54:41 rrsagent, make logs public 19:55:27 chair: DavidBrowning 19:55:39 regrets+ Simon, Alejandra 19:55:51 meeting: DCAT Weekly 19:56:10 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2019.09.25 19:56:23 rrsagent, create minutes v2 19:56:23 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html PWinstanley 19:57:13 DaveBrowning has joined #dxwgdcat 19:57:30 trackbot, start meeting 19:57:33 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:57:36 Meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference 19:57:36 Date: 25 September 2019 19:58:01 meeting: DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 25 September 2019 19:58:06 rrsagent, create minutes v2 19:58:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html PWinstanley 19:58:17 rrsagent, draft minutes v2 19:58:17 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 19:58:44 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2019.09.25 19:58:48 present+ 20:01:40 riccardoAlbertoni has joined #dxwgdcat 20:03:17 present+ 20:03:42 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 20:03:46 rrsagent, draft minutes v2 20:03:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 20:03:52 present+ 20:04:11 present+ 20:05:21 scribenick: PWinstanley 20:05:42 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:05:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:06:29 proposedd: accept https://www.w3.org/2019/09/04-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:06:42 proposed: accept https://www.w3.org/2019/09/04-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:06:47 +1 20:06:48 +1 20:06:50 +1 20:06:52 +1 20:07:01 resolved: accept https://www.w3.org/2019/09/04-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:07:15 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2019.09.25 20:07:20 topic: agenda 20:07:40 s/proposedd/topic/ 20:07:43 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:07:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:07:46 DaveBrowning: the basic purpose is to be able to raise the transition request . for this everything in github needs to be tidy 20:08:04 ... we are pretty much there, but need to go through the topics 20:08:13 +1 to agenda 20:08:27 +1 to agenda 20:08:48 +1 to agenda 20:08:57 q+ 20:09:03 ack AndreaPerego 20:09:37 AndreaPerego: perhaps we can move the topics - before going to CR we need to add the link to the implementation record 20:10:49 DaveBrowning: at present we are using a google spreadsheet for collecting evidence, 20:11:01 plh has joined #dxwgdcat 20:11:15 AndreaPerego: yes, and I'm working on an implementation record. The spreadsheet is to act as a check 20:11:55 q+ to say if we can use a placeholder in the wiki i as we did in dwbp https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/BP_Implementation_Report 20:12:04 ... implementation evidence could be a table or more, depending on time. We might also use either a github HTML page, or use the wiki 20:12:52 Spredsheet collecting implementation evidence: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eEVUuPFAGO2GjS5ocxylY8T1AlpqlwnOTc3er_Mhcv4/edit#gid=1108132380 20:13:55 s/Spredsheet/Spreadsheet/ 20:16:24 AndreaPerego: implementation evidence is for the new classes and properties (excluding dcat:Resource, which is just an abstract class useful as an extension point) 20:17:14 ... for the new properties, they have been created on use cases developed from e.g. gaps in existing profiles 20:18:05 ... so these will be very likely adopted in these profiles, substituting for the fillers that are currently being used. 20:18:46 q- 20:20:25 q+ 20:20:32 plh: no need to give implementation evidence for things like dcat:Resource, and for existing v1. add an explanatory note to the spreadsheet. any time within the next month. we could make a generic statement about the exclusion criteria for implementation evidence 20:20:59 q- 20:21:07 ... you can put in wiki/github (not in google doc, because of accessibility in all countries) 20:21:16 ... I can help if needed 20:21:59 AndreaPerego: we can link from the spec to the companion document, which can then link to wherever the spreadsheet is. 20:23:58 plh: we need to be clear about what we are demonstrating up front. 20:24:28 DaveBrowning: the only class that we are not giving implementation evidence for is dcat:Resource 20:25:03 +1 to me 20:26:50 DaveBrowning: proposed: a companion doc on the github/wiki that has information about exclusions (dcat:Resource etc) and link to doc with the implementation evidence 20:27:14 +1 20:27:20 +1 20:27:30 +1 20:27:32 +1 20:27:47 DaveBrowning: resolved: a companion doc on the github/wiki that has information about exclusions (dcat:Resource etc) and link to doc with the implementation evidence 20:28:03 proposed: a companion doc on the github/wiki that has information about exclusions (dcat:Resource etc) and link to doc with the implementation evidence 20:28:12 resolved: a companion doc on the github/wiki that has information about exclusions (dcat:Resource etc) and link to doc with the implementation evidence 20:28:20 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:28:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:28:37 transition request https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/DCAT:-Draft-Transition-Request-to-CR 20:28:48 topic: Transition Request 20:29:17 AndreaPerego: thanks to plh for recent additions. I think that it is clear to go if we can sort out the evidence 20:29:28 plh: I'm concerned about the tallying of issues 20:29:41 ... what does it mean 'open'? 20:30:03 DaveBrowning: 77 are open for future work. I'll confirm numbers 20:31:31 ... we have 107 closed, so we need to tidy this up, but despite over 100 being closed, there are still some that are remaining for future work. the ambiguity will be sorted in the next few days 20:31:50 plh: ok. what about issue #959? 20:32:09 ... this one is going to be part of the conversation 20:32:09 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/959 20:34:22 DaveBrowning: there was some sense in the discussion of softening of the DC attitude, we also thought there was a moving target, esp of backward compatibility. We are open to the idea, but equally we are not sure that the time is right. So it is in the dcat future work milestone 20:34:53 plh: I'll need an explicit answer from Dysan on this 20:35:38 DaveBrowning: any others? 20:36:40 ... there was feedback around geospatial; permissions and entitlements; but nothing that came back was directive. We responded to all, but sometimes didn't get a response. 20:37:01 s/Dyson/Addison/ 20:37:07 https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/169 20:37:11 s/Dysan/Addison/ 20:37:29 plh: I've copied the TR to the correct place 20:37:54 ... the numbers are indicative 20:38:35 ... If new information arrives then just add it 20:39:39 ... questions will come on github 20:40:15 ... updates will come into that issue 20:40:23 q? 20:41:02 ... don't be surprised if nothing gets changed in the first day or two. it will be done in time for the publication on Thursday 20:41:02 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:41:02 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:42:15 topic: tidy up 20:42:35 +1 to dcat ratification 20:42:50 +1 20:43:25 DaveBrowning: Agenda 4.1 - a new milestone to be used for issues that are supporting dcat ratification. we can include other stuff too, but this is the main content 20:43:43 ... we also have an implementation evidence milestone 20:43:56 ... comments? 20:43:56 q+ 20:43:56 +q 20:44:03 ack AndreaPerego 20:44:29 AndreaPerego: happy with this, just reiterating about the implementation evidence milestone 20:44:44 ack riccardoAlbertoni 20:45:54 riccardoAlbertoni: this ratification is collecting stuff to be completed within the month - things like translation etc. Another issue is from splitting the ttl file and one axiom was deleted and this brings problems when loading in protege. 20:47:07 q+ 20:47:25 ack AndreaPerego 20:47:59 AndreaPerego: the ratification is implementation, editorial, etc? 20:48:16 DaveBrowning: I thought the implementation evidence milestone was fine - leave as is 20:48:29 q+ 20:48:59 ack PWinstanley 20:49:01 DaveBrowning: this is to support ratification 20:49:32 scribenick: AndreaPerego 20:50:28 DaveBrowning: Last week we started using the future work tag 20:50:58 +1 tp keep both 20:51:26 ... This, along the use of the future work milestone, helps people understand that. 20:51:34 +1 from me 20:51:34 +q 20:51:45 ack ric 20:52:16 riccardoAlbertoni: +1 from me. I would keep both the tag and the milestone, as the milestone allows people have the list of issues. 20:53:45 DaveBrowning: PLH also said not to have issues marked as critical, as people will wonder what this would actually mean. 20:54:34 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Adcat+no%3Amilestone+-label%3A%22due+for+closing%22+-label%3Afuture-work+-label%3Aucr 20:54:56 DaveBrowning: Coming to the other two items in the agenda 20:55:16 q+ 20:55:37 ... https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/430 and https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/393 may need some attention. 20:56:13 ... Probably the should be under PROF, and not DCAT. 20:56:20 ack ric 20:56:25 ack riccardoAlbertoni 20:57:12 riccardoAlbertoni: #430 can be moved elsewhere (possibly to future work), whereas #393 is not about DCAT. 20:57:14 q+ 20:57:28 ack AndreaPerego 20:58:45 +1 to andrea #430 is out of the dcat radar.. can we drop the dcat label ? 20:59:27 DaveBrowning: Not sure we can drop the dcat label, as dcat is in the title. 21:00:04 ... But indeed the question about conformance and DCAT profiles is something going beyond the scope of DCAT. 21:01:26 riccardoAlbertoni: Probably the easiest thing is to put it under future work. 21:01:27 +1 21:02:56 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A"DCAT+CR"+-label%3A"due+for+closing" 21:03:14 DaveBrowning: Coming now to the next item, this is about unresolved issues in the DCAT CR milestone. 21:03:58 riccardoAlbertoni: #969 should be under the ratification milestone. 21:05:54 q+ 21:06:57 +1 to me 21:07:11 s\+1 to me\+1 from me 21:07:14 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:08:11 AndreaPerego: To solve https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1065 , only editorial changes are needed, IMO. So, it may go under the ratification milestone. 21:09:06 riccardoAlbertoni: I agree. 21:09:48 DaveBrowning: I also agree this is just editorial. 21:11:29 riccardoAlbertoni: Should we add the future work tag also to the ratification milestone? 21:11:38 DaveBrowning: I would not use it. 21:12:11 DaveBrowning: The next is https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/763 21:13:19 +1 to put it on future work 21:13:43 AndreaPerego: This is not only editorial, as it is about provide guidance on the use of semantically overlapping properties, so I would move it to future work. 21:14:26 DaveBrowning: I agree we can move it to future work. 21:15:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:15:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:15:35 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1089 21:15:58 DaveBrowning: About this one is going to be closed in the next days. 21:17:16 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/144 21:17:32 DaveBrowning: This was very old. 21:17:52 +q 21:18:00 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/144 21:18:04 ack ric 21:18:11 ack ric 21:18:29 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#RDF-representation 21:19:12 q+ 21:19:30 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:19:58 DaveBrowning: This section is also talking about DCAT profiles. 21:20:21 riccardoAlbertoni: Maybe we can drop the profiles line, or point to the old version of DCAT. 21:21:05 DaveBrowning: I tend to agree. We intended to do that, but we eventually didn't. 21:21:06 q+ 21:21:17 ack AndreaPerego 21:27:23 +q 21:27:34 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:30:11 riccardoAlbertoni: The other option is just to say in point 3 that the folder includes the 2014 version of DCAT, and we actually need to add the file. 21:30:21 DaveBrowning: I agree. 21:30:22 +1 21:31:08 action: riccardoAlbertoni to revise point 3 of section RDF representation, and add the DCAT 2014 ttl file 21:31:09 Created ACTION-378 - Revise point 3 of section rdf representation, and add the dcat 2014 ttl file [on Riccardo Albertoni - due 2019-10-02]. 21:31:30 PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat 21:31:40 present+ 21:32:14 q+ 21:32:46 ack AndreaPerego 21:32:58 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Adcat+no%3Amilestone+-label%3A"due+for+closing"+-label%3Afuture-work+-label%3Aucr 21:33:04 AndreaPerego: About the last 2 issue there 21:33:29 ... what we do? 21:33:37 +q 21:34:14 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:34:14 DaveBrowning: I asked Stephen if the issue is closed. 21:34:38 AndreaPerego: But since is about the RDF representation, maybe we can put it into the ratification milestone. 21:34:38 q+ 21:35:00 q+ 21:35:20 ack PWinstanley 21:35:33 DaveBrowning: My feeling this is a problem for the software tool, so it should not impact DCAT. 21:35:33 https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Adcat 21:36:37 PWinstanley: Switching to the i18n comments, there are still some open issues, and an option is to join the i18n meeting. 21:37:12 ... I'll go back to PLH and tell him that we responded to those issues. 21:37:48 ack AndreaPerego 21:40:12 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/175 21:40:42 AndreaPerego: I would move it not to the ratification milestone, and then we have time to sort it out. 21:40:50 DaveBrowning: The other one https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/175 21:41:21 ... This is about a bug in DCAT 2014. 21:41:48 riccardoAlbertoni: I'm not sure we should be concerned with publishing errata for DCAT 2014 as we are publishing the new version. 21:42:41 AndreaPerego: We can move it to the future work milestone, as it is not affecting at all the new version of DCAT. 21:42:54 riccardoAlbertoni: +1 from me. 21:45:14 AndreaPerego: About https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/393 probably we can close it, as we don't have in DCAT any alignment with PROF. 21:45:46 riccardoAlbertoni: About https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/430 , I think we decided to move it to future work. 21:47:06 DaveBrowning: Done #430. I'll update #430 accordingly and close it. 21:47:16 [meeting adjourned] 21:47:22 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:47:22 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:48:53 s/430/393/ 21:48:54 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:48:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:50:02 s/Done #393. I'll update #430 accordingly and close it./Done #430. I'll update #393 accordingly and close it./ 21:50:05 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:50:05 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/25-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego