IRC log of dxwg on 2019-09-24
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 19:42:32 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #dxwg
- 19:42:32 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-irc
- 19:42:41 [PWinstanley]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 19:42:50 [PWinstanley]
- chair: PWinstanley
- 19:43:32 [PWinstanley]
- regrets+ Alejandra
- 19:43:40 [PWinstanley]
- meeting: DXWG Plenary
- 19:43:56 [PWinstanley]
- agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2019.09.24
- 19:44:09 [PWinstanley]
- rrsagent, create minutes v2
- 19:44:09 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley
- 19:45:28 [PWinstanley]
- present+
- 19:48:03 [RubenVerborgh]
- RubenVerborgh has joined #dxwg
- 19:56:11 [ncar]
- ncar has joined #dxwg
- 20:01:16 [LarsG]
- LarsG has joined #dxwg
- 20:01:29 [LarsG]
- present+
- 20:01:44 [ncar]
- present+
- 20:02:14 [DaveBrowning]
- DaveBrowning has joined #dxwg
- 20:02:17 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- riccardoAlbertoni has joined #dxwg
- 20:04:47 [DaveBrowning]
- present+
- 20:04:57 [plh]
- plh has joined #dxwg
- 20:05:07 [RubenVerborgh]
- present+
- 20:05:16 [plh]
- present+
- 20:05:19 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- present+
- 20:05:24 [ncar]
- present+
- 20:05:29 [annette_g]
- annette_g has joined #dxwg
- 20:05:35 [annette_g]
- present+
- 20:05:37 [PWinstanley]
- https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes
- 20:05:50 [annette_g]
- +1
- 20:05:55 [ncar]
- +1
- 20:05:56 [DaveBrowning]
- +1
- 20:05:57 [dsr]
- present+
- 20:05:57 [dsr]
- scribenick: dsr
- 20:05:58 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- +1
- 20:06:07 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: asks for approval of last minutes
- 20:06:07 [PWinstanley]
- +1
- 20:06:43 [antoine]
- antoine has joined #dxwg
- 20:06:51 [antoine]
- present+ antoine
- 20:07:47 [AndreaPerego]
- AndreaPerego has joined #dxwg
- 20:07:59 [AndreaPerego]
- present+
- 20:08:16 [AndreaPerego]
- +1
- 20:08:36 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 20:08:36 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 20:08:39 [dsr]
- Resolved: minutes of 17th September are approved
- 20:08:41 [kcoyle]
- kcoyle has joined #dxwg
- 20:08:51 [kcoyle]
- present+
- 20:08:53 [PWinstanley]
- https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/DCAT_to_CR/results
- 20:09:06 [dsr]
- Topic: Ratification of Poll results for DCAT to CR
- 20:09:27 [PWinstanley]
- +1
- 20:09:27 [DaveBrowning]
- +1
- 20:09:28 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- +1
- 20:09:33 [AndreaPerego]
- +1
- 20:09:37 [kcoyle]
- +1
- 20:09:38 [ncar]
- +1
- 20:09:40 [annette_g]
- +1
- 20:09:41 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: does everyone agree that we move DCAT to CR, everyone vote please
- 20:09:55 [antoine]
- +1
- 20:10:56 [AndreaPerego]
- resolved: poll results for DCAT to CR ratified
- 20:11:00 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 20:11:00 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 20:11:42 [dsr]
- PLH: we need to send the transition request by this Thursday …
- 20:11:49 [DaveBrowning]
- Link - https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/DCAT:-Draft-Transition-Request-to-CR
- 20:12:10 [dsr]
- DaveBrowning: see link for a draft request
- 20:12:22 [dsr]
- I have a couple of questions we can deal with right now
- 20:13:23 [dsr]
- The request needs to point to an implementation report, so that the URL is defined
- 20:13:42 [dsr]
- it could be empty at this stage …
- 20:14:27 [dsr]
- PLH: I heard that not all of the use case requirements are met by this version of DCAT
- 20:14:55 [dsr]
- DaveBrowning: We have a little bit of tidying up to do, but are almost finished
- 20:15:15 [dsr]
- PLH: on the transition request, I suggest a couple of changes
- 20:15:56 [dsr]
- People will want to know the changes since the last published Working Draft
- 20:16:08 [dsr]
- I’ve made such tweaks, e.g. marking what features are at risk
- 20:17:06 [dsr]
- We need to clarify which features are future priorities
- 20:17:51 [dsr]
- PLH: as long as this is finished by Friday, it should be good. I plan to sit down with Ralph Swick then to review the transition request
- 20:18:45 [dsr]
- Some discussion about a DXWG review meeting …
- 20:19:08 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: does anyone else have any questions?
- 20:19:26 [dsr]
- I want to give a big congratulations to the DCAT subgroup for getting this far
- 20:19:35 [dsr]
- Topic: Conneg
- 20:19:37 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 20:19:37 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 20:19:45 [PWinstanley]
- https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/CONNEG_to_CR/results
- 20:19:59 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: we still have a poll running until midnight Boston time tonight
- 20:20:07 [ncar]
- q+
- 20:20:27 [PWinstanley]
- ack ncar
- 20:20:45 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: thanks the editors, and notes that we now need to find a way to put this work into safe moorings
- 20:21:17 [dsr]
- ncar: The github branch has addressed some editorial matters
- 20:21:51 [plh]
- rrsagent, generate minutes
- 20:21:51 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html plh
- 20:21:58 [dsr]
- The single vote to not go to CR - a couple of issues were raised, I am in touch with the respondent to understand better
- 20:22:47 [dsr]
- One of the issues raised is that the use of tokens is undermotivated
- 20:23:27 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: are there areas that need to be marked as at risk for CR?
- 20:23:42 [dsr]
- ncar: I am going to say no to that
- 20:24:23 [dsr]
- some discussion around query strings
- 20:24:55 [RubenVerborgh]
- q+ to discuss partitioning
- 20:25:03 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: there seems to be some differences between the different proposals being brought forward
- 20:25:56 [dsr]
- ncar: a lot of people understand the HTTP details, but not in query strings …
- 20:25:58 [antoine]
- q+
- 20:26:00 [PWinstanley]
- ack RubenVerborgh
- 20:26:00 [Zakim]
- RubenVerborgh, you wanted to discuss partitioning
- 20:26:36 [dsr]
- RubenVerborgh: on the IETF perspective, we have a mechanism of content negotiation by profile
- 20:26:46 [dsr]
- I am not a big fan of tokens
- 20:27:27 [dsr]
- With hindsight, perhaps the requirements were too prescriptive
- 20:27:53 [PWinstanley]
- ack antoine
- 20:28:04 [dsr]
- If no one is going to use query strings or tokens, we won’t have a problem
- 20:29:00 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: can I ask PLH to outline our options?
- 20:29:13 [dsr]
- PLH: either you move it to CR or you don’t
- 20:29:36 [dsr]
- My initial impression is that it is a little shaky
- 20:29:57 [dsr]
- There is a high chance that the Director might not approve the transition to CR
- 20:29:59 [annette_g]
- note that the poll is not closed yet either
- 20:31:11 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: if the group is minded to move it to CR, we will need a transition request by this coming Thursday
- 20:31:16 [ncar]
- Conneg draft CR report: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/Conneg:-Draft-Transition-Request-to-CR
- 20:31:23 [dsr]
- any other questions?
- 20:31:48 [dsr]
- PWinstanley invites people to review the draft transition request
- 20:31:49 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 20:31:49 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 20:32:08 [ncar]
- branche with improved definitions: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/conneg-data-profile/conneg-by-ap/index.html
- 20:32:42 [PWinstanley]
- https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/CONNEG_to_CR/results
- 20:32:47 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: what do people think we should be doing, noting that there are several hours yet for the poll to finish
- 20:33:21 [dsr]
- Is it the case that further discussion is needed to clarify matters?
- 20:34:23 [dsr]
- PLH: I will need a story on the breadth of review for the Director
- 20:34:31 [ncar]
- q?
- 20:34:34 [ncar]
- q+
- 20:35:11 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: a prudent suggestion would be to publish the spec as a WG Note
- 20:35:28 [dsr]
- We would need to keep the WG open to maintain the work items
- 20:35:56 [dsr]
- Could we bring the spec to CR at a later stage?
- 20:36:04 [dsr]
- PLH: it would need to be part of the next Charter
- 20:36:25 [dsr]
- The maintenance bit would be pretty straightforward
- 20:36:46 [dsr]
- I can show you what I am doing in that respect with the verifiable claims WG
- 20:37:04 [PWinstanley]
- ack ncar
- 20:37:34 [dsr]
- ncar: can I just clarify, that we need to present a story of engagement in respect to wide review
- 20:38:03 [dsr]
- We have reached out and had feedback, so do we just need to document how the review was handled?
- 20:38:22 [dsr]
- PLH: yes, look at how DCAT has addressed this
- 20:39:54 [dsr]
- In the last 5 mins we’ve had feedback from the person who voted against moving to CR, and we have a way to address this in terms of outstanding issues, which mostly fall into the category of features at risk
- 20:40:16 [dsr]
- PLH: you will indeed need to mark which features are at risk
- 20:40:17 [annette_g]
- https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aprofile-negotiation
- 20:40:37 [dsr]
- PLH: I see that Karen provided some feedback on Section 7
- 20:40:51 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: any other input to this discussion?
- 20:41:08 [dsr]
- [no]
- 20:41:52 [dsr]
- what is the group’s risk appetite?
- 20:42:25 [DaveBrowning]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 20:42:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html DaveBrowning
- 20:42:52 [dsr]
- If the subgroup have address the outstanding work needed to submit a transition request this Thursday, are we going to support that?
- 20:43:04 [annette_g]
- q+
- 20:43:10 [PWinstanley]
- acn annette_g
- 20:43:15 [dsr]
- … recognising that the work will move to a WG Note if the transition is rejected
- 20:43:46 [dsr]
- annette_g: for me it is more a question of whether the spec is good enough
- 20:43:50 [kcoyle]
- q+
- 20:43:58 [dsr]
- ack annette_g
- 20:43:59 [PWinstanley]
- ack kcoyle
- 20:44:35 [dsr]
- kcoyle: there are comments from people who voted yes, and we should review those too
- 20:45:02 [dsr]
- There is a sense that the spec isn’t quite cooked yes
- 20:45:18 [dsr]
- my question to PLH is whether a REC needs to be fully polished?
- 20:45:56 [dsr]
- PLH: if the changes needed are more than editorial then you shouldn’t move it forward to CR
- 20:46:04 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: does anyone who voted yes want to talk about their feedback?
- 20:46:59 [dsr]
- kcoyle: one of the reasons why I abstained is that there is quite a bit of discussion going on, the editors need to tie those issues up
- 20:47:53 [dsr]
- PWinstanley asks kcoyle whether she thinks a WG Note is more appropriate than a CR?
- 20:48:18 [dsr]
- kcoyle: it would be really shame for this not to proposed for transition to CR?
- 20:48:41 [dsr]
- it would have been better if some of these issues had been dealt with a month ago
- 20:49:22 [dsr]
- It may be a matter of showing that the issues have been resolved
- 20:49:43 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: this needs to be done in transparent way, especially given the time pressure
- 20:50:41 [dsr]
- kcoyle: with a clear wrapping up of the issues, some people may change their vote
- 20:51:47 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 20:51:47 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 20:51:52 [dsr]
- we should extend the poll for another 24 hours, and well before then the editors ought to review any open issues and announce their resolutions so that people have the chance to change their votes
- 20:52:09 [antoine]
- +1 for extending the poll
- 20:52:30 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: asks PLH if it is possible to extend this poll?
- 20:52:42 [dsr]
- PLH: yes, but don’t quote me on this :-)
- 20:53:20 [annette_g]
- q+
- 20:53:25 [PWinstanley]
- ack annette_g
- 20:53:30 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: Proposed: we extend the poll for a day
- 20:53:59 [dsr]
- annette_g: what would be the best way for people to respond, given the multiple channels we have right now
- 20:54:21 [dsr]
- kcoyle: are you talking in general or about a specific github issue?
- 20:54:33 [dsr]
- annette_g talks about some email threads
- 20:54:55 [dsr]
- kcoyle: it is up to the editors to gather up the loose ends
- 20:55:23 [dsr]
- they need to show evidence that the loose ends have been addressed
- 20:56:10 [dsr]
- Proposal: we extend the conneg poll by 24 hours
- 20:56:14 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- +1
- 20:56:15 [PWinstanley]
- +1
- 20:56:16 [kcoyle]
- +1
- 20:56:18 [antoine]
- +1
- 20:56:19 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: please vote
- 20:56:21 [LarsG]
- +1
- 20:56:23 [annette_g]
- +1
- 20:56:32 [ncar]
- +1
- 20:56:56 [RubenVerborgh]
- +1
- 20:56:57 [AndreaPerego]
- +1
- 20:57:16 [dsr]
- Resolved: we will extend the conneg poll by 24 hours
- 20:58:14 [dsr]
- Proposal: a clear evidence trail must be prepared by the conneg editors to show satisfactory resolution of the key issues raised in the poll
- 20:58:19 [PWinstanley]
- +1
- 20:58:21 [antoine]
- +1
- 20:58:24 [ncar]
- +1
- 20:58:25 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- +1
- 20:58:28 [LarsG]
- +1
- 20:58:29 [kcoyle]
- action: PWinstanley extend poll 24 hours
- 20:58:29 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-377 - Extend poll 24 hours [on Peter Winstanley - due 2019-10-01].
- 20:58:31 [annette_g]
- +1
- 20:58:32 [kcoyle]
- +1
- 20:58:58 [RubenVerborgh]
- +1
- 20:59:22 [AndreaPerego]
- +1
- 20:59:35 [dsr]
- Resolved: a clear evidence trail must be prepared by the conneg editors to show satisfactory resolution of the key issues raised in the poll
- 20:59:58 [dsr]
- PWinstanley: anything else to discuss?
- 21:00:21 [dsr]
- My thanks to everyone for their contributions
- 21:00:25 [kcoyle]
- we didn't get to issues to close - can we carry those over?
- 21:00:52 [LarsG]
- good night, all
- 21:00:52 [AndreaPerego]
- Thanks, bye bye
- 21:00:58 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 21:00:58 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 21:00:58 [dsr]
- rrsagent, draft minutes v2
- 21:00:58 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html dsr
- 21:00:58 [PWinstanley]
- rrsagent, create minutes v2
- 21:00:58 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley
- 21:00:59 [kcoyle]
- rrsagent, please create minutes v2
- 21:00:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/24-dxwg-minutes.html kcoyle
- 21:32:13 [annette_g]
- annette_g has joined #dxwg
- 22:01:49 [annette_g]
- annette_g has joined #dxwg
- 22:26:26 [annette_g]
- annette_g has joined #dxwg
- 23:19:57 [annette_g]
- annette_g has joined #dxwg
- 23:26:55 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #dxwg
- 23:42:22 [annette_g1]
- annette_g1 has joined #dxwg