IRC log of dxwg on 2019-09-17

Timestamps are in UTC.

20:04:37 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #dxwg
20:04:37 [RRSAgent]
logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-irc
20:04:40 [annette_g]
present+
20:04:43 [kcoyle]
rrsagent, make logs public
20:04:52 [ncar]
present+
20:05:05 [kcoyle]
present+
20:05:10 [kcoyle]
rrsagent, create minutes v2
20:05:10 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes.html kcoyle
20:05:26 [DaveBrowning]
present+
20:05:27 [roba]
present+
20:05:39 [TomB]
present+
20:05:42 [kcoyle]
chair: kcoyle
20:06:17 [Makx_]
Makx_ has joined #dxwg
20:06:18 [riccardoAlbertoni]
riccardoAlbertoni has joined #dxwg
20:06:34 [DaveBrowning]
rrsagent, draft minutes v2
20:06:34 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes.html DaveBrowning
20:06:37 [kcoyle]
meeting: DXWG plenary September 17, 2019
20:06:38 [Makx_]
present+
20:07:34 [DaveBrowning]
topic: admin
20:07:43 [kcoyle]
scribenick: DaveBrowning
20:07:52 [DaveBrowning]
rrsagent, draft minutes v2
20:07:52 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes.html DaveBrowning
20:08:07 [DaveBrowning]
topic: minutes of last week
20:08:22 [riccardoAlbertoni]
present+
20:09:03 [DaveBrowning]
proposed: accept minutes of last week
20:09:07 [TomB]
+1 to accept minutes
20:09:10 [annette_g]
+1
20:09:10 [Makx_]
0
20:09:11 [kcoyle]
+1
20:09:12 [DaveBrowning]
+1
20:09:23 [riccardoAlbertoni]
+1
20:09:27 [ncar]
0
20:09:42 [roba]
+0
20:09:51 [DaveBrowning]
resolved: accept minutes of last week
20:10:15 [kcoyle]
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2019.09.17
20:10:40 [roba]
q+
20:10:43 [kcoyle]
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/DCAT_to_CR/
20:10:43 [DaveBrowning]
topic: DCAT vote
20:11:03 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: Still have some people to vote
20:11:33 [annette_g]
done
20:12:18 [roba]
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/881#issuecomment-532267514
20:12:51 [AndreaPerego]
AndreaPerego has joined #dxwg
20:12:53 [riccardoAlbertoni]
+q
20:12:56 [AndreaPerego]
present+
20:13:08 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
20:13:08 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
20:13:44 [riccardoAlbertoni]
q-
20:13:46 [kcoyle]
DaveBrowning: #881 pull request, no change to the namespace; will be done at point of transition; not normative
20:14:18 [kcoyle]
... follow current practice and point to links in html, but if you ask for .ttl you will get that back
20:14:49 [kcoyle]
roba: when you follow link and import seems strange; implementation behavior is not normative
20:15:00 [kcoyle]
... what happens when I import this, what do I get?
20:15:37 [riccardoAlbertoni]
q+
20:15:43 [kcoyle]
ack roba
20:15:55 [kcoyle]
comment: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/881#issuecomment-516859294
20:16:10 [kcoyle]
DaveBrowning: not part of the normative document that is under review
20:16:13 [riccardoAlbertoni]
q-
20:16:52 [kcoyle]
roba: if implementation level stays ok, I guess that's ok
20:17:07 [riccardoAlbertoni]
q+
20:17:11 [kcoyle]
DaveBrowning: ttl files and json-ld are not normative, so a secondary task
20:17:34 [kcoyle]
... depends on w3c practice on namespaces
20:18:31 [riccardoAlbertoni]
q-
20:18:34 [kcoyle]
roba: cardinality issues with format
20:18:40 [kcoyle]
... dct:format
20:19:09 [kcoyle]
DaveBrowning: don't remember that one
20:19:15 [AndreaPerego]
Probably roba refers to https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1055
20:20:08 [kcoyle]
DaveBrowning: we touched on this; discussed last week; will defer for future work
20:20:46 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
20:20:46 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
20:20:49 [kcoyle]
q?
20:23:38 [kcoyle]
DaveBrowning: will say: have put together a draft transition request - https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/DCAT:-Draft-Transition-Request-to-CR
20:24:25 [kcoyle]
... will need to make some things clearer in github to show disposition of milestones and future work
20:24:52 [riccardoAlbertoni]
yes i think 1055 need to be moved in the future development
20:26:41 [PWinstanley]
PWinstanley has joined #dxwg
20:26:59 [DaveBrowning]
topic: conneg readiness for vote
20:27:13 [DaveBrowning]
ncar: draft includes all the changes
20:27:16 [PWinstanley]
present+
20:27:36 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: open for review now, with poll at end
20:27:46 [ncar]
Conneg is ready at https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/
20:28:10 [DaveBrowning]
... so we keep chnages to just editorial
20:28:18 [DaveBrowning]
s/chnages/changes/
20:28:51 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: will ask people to vote yes/no/abstain
20:29:07 [DaveBrowning]
... guidance to be sent out with poll announcement
20:29:36 [DaveBrowning]
ncar: document good to go, no planned conneg sub-group meeting during vote
20:29:58 [DaveBrowning]
... then move to implementation report
20:30:50 [DaveBrowning]
... using test tool to measure what features/risk
20:30:54 [roba]
q+
20:31:03 [TomB_]
TomB_ has joined #dxwg
20:31:37 [roba]
q-
20:31:53 [roba]
q+
20:32:19 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: state of open issues?
20:33:09 [DaveBrowning]
ncar: not many - some marked nofix
20:33:09 [roba]
fewer issues than DCAT - nothing substantive
20:33:39 [DaveBrowning]
rrsagent, draft minutes v2
20:33:39 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes.html DaveBrowning
20:34:19 [DaveBrowning]
roba: probably put DCAT profile in primer or similar
20:34:41 [DaveBrowning]
... major 'at risk' is the http/ietf approach
20:35:15 [DaveBrowning]
... perhaps need to de-scope format/profile example
20:35:50 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: Any questions for conneg before we start review/vote?
20:35:54 [kcoyle]
q?
20:35:57 [PWinstanley]
qa+
20:36:01 [PWinstanley]
q+
20:36:03 [kcoyle]
ack roba
20:36:16 [annette_g]
q+
20:36:24 [kcoyle]
ack PWinstanley
20:36:40 [antoine]
antoine has joined #dxwg
20:36:46 [antoine]
present+
20:36:55 [DaveBrowning]
PWinstanley: Nothing wrong with marking at risk since it saves time later if a risk occurs
20:37:15 [DaveBrowning]
... If there is anything 'weak' then best to mark
20:37:36 [DaveBrowning]
q+ re at risk options
20:38:07 [kcoyle]
ack annette_g
20:38:08 [antoine]
rrsagent, please draft minutes
20:38:08 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes.html antoine
20:38:42 [DaveBrowning]
annette_g: Question about the feature at risk - is it the whole concept of http negotiation?
20:39:07 [DaveBrowning]
roba: No, its really just the alignment with ietf
20:39:47 [ncar]
q+
20:40:19 [kcoyle]
ack DaveBrowning
20:40:19 [Zakim]
DaveBrowning, you wanted to discuss at risk options
20:41:37 [roba]
q+
20:41:53 [ncar]
I have created the "Transition to CR" doc draft for Conneg: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/Conneg:-Draft-Transition-Request-to-CR
20:41:59 [kcoyle]
ack ncar
20:42:36 [DaveBrowning]
ncar: Its not a requirement to use tokens in headers but its not mandatory...
20:42:54 [DaveBrowning]
annette_g: actually, question was on what the rationale on why
20:43:47 [DaveBrowning]
ncar: query string functionality needed something for discovery
20:44:07 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: there is a good discussion written down, perhaps publicise
20:44:31 [ncar]
token discussion in Conneg linked to from here: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1064
20:45:30 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: end time for vote will be next Tuesday
20:45:36 [kcoyle]
ack roba
20:45:52 [annette_g]
@ncar, that doesn't appear to be the right link
20:46:03 [DaveBrowning]
topic: Status of profiles vocab
20:47:06 [DaveBrowning]
roba: Profiles vocab has been handling comments but there is a broad lack of understanding of exchange (vs discovery)
20:47:13 [DaveBrowning]
... has meant many open issues
20:47:36 [DaveBrowning]
... that don't really impact the vocabulary
20:47:43 [ncar]
PROF ED is at https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/prof/
20:48:00 [DaveBrowning]
... This suggests it would be better to call it a note rather than a rec
20:48:35 [DaveBrowning]
... rather than reduce what's in the actual document as it stands.
20:50:12 [DaveBrowning]
... spec is complete but there are many issues that need to be handled.
20:50:42 [DaveBrowning]
... so suggest that it moves as a note
20:51:05 [kcoyle]
PROPOSED: Profiles vocabulary to be moved forward as a potential working group note
20:51:08 [riccardoAlbertoni]
+1
20:51:09 [PWinstanley]
+1
20:51:12 [annette_g]
+1
20:51:14 [Makx_]
+1
20:51:15 [DaveBrowning]
+1
20:51:15 [antoine]
+1
20:51:20 [TomB]
+1
20:51:31 [roba]
+1
20:52:06 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: will still need to be voted on but have much more time
20:52:10 [kcoyle]
+1
20:52:22 [kcoyle]
RESOLVED: Profiles vocabulary to be moved forward as a potential working group note
20:52:30 [ncar]
0
20:54:02 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: since effort on DCAT, conneg should drop off, it should create time to discuss profiles vocab in more depth across the WG
20:54:04 [TomB]
q+ to ask why the PROF Editors' Draft https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/ no longer resolves
20:54:10 [kcoyle]
ack TomB
20:54:10 [Zakim]
TomB, you wanted to ask why the PROF Editors' Draft https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/ no longer resolves
20:54:24 [ncar]
PROF ED is at https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/prof/
20:54:47 [Makx_]
works for me
20:55:53 [DaveBrowning]
roba: should be a re-direct but doesnt seem to work
20:55:56 [DaveBrowning]
kc
20:56:20 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: if someone (roba/ncar) could contact dsr cc chairs.....
20:56:46 [DaveBrowning]
rrsagent, draft minutes v2
20:56:46 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes.html DaveBrowning
20:58:06 [kcoyle]
PROPOSED: All Working Group review Conneg for CR status, with final decision September 24
20:58:11 [riccardoAlbertoni]
+1
20:58:13 [TomB]
link to Conneg?
20:58:15 [PWinstanley]
+1
20:58:15 [Makx_]
+1
20:58:16 [ncar]
+1
20:58:26 [ncar]
https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/
20:58:33 [DaveBrowning]
+1
20:58:34 [kcoyle]
+1
20:58:35 [roba]
+1
20:58:39 [annette_g]
does this mean any ongoing concerns won't get addressed?
20:58:39 [TomB]
Is that stable enough to print out for a long flight coming up?
20:58:50 [TomB]
+1
20:58:50 [ncar]
yes
20:58:54 [TomB]
thanks
20:58:58 [antoine]
+1
20:59:01 [annette_g]
-1
20:59:17 [roba]
q+
21:00:30 [DaveBrowning]
annette_g: Think there are open conversations issues - is there no scope to address
21:01:12 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: there is no time left. So if there are critical issues then it would be a 'no' vote
21:02:10 [DaveBrowning]
roba: what is process
21:02:38 [TomB]
One possible vote is "abstain" if there is doubt, correct?
21:02:42 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: any doubts/issues could be put on github, or talk offline and record appropriately
21:02:43 [annette_g]
0
21:03:11 [PWinstanley]
+1 to TomB
21:03:49 [DaveBrowning]
kcoyle: abstain is important, to show involvement (if that's applicable)
21:04:03 [kcoyle]
RESOLVED: All Working Group review Conneg for CR status, with final decision September 24
21:04:14 [DaveBrowning]
rrsagent, draft minutes v2
21:04:14 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes.html DaveBrowning
21:05:23 [riccardoAlbertoni]
thanks all, bye!
21:05:24 [Makx_]
ok bye
21:05:28 [annette_g]
bye
21:05:30 [roba]
bye
21:05:31 [PWinstanley]
bye
21:05:32 [TomB]
bye all
21:05:50 [antoine]
bye
21:17:18 [annette_g]
annette_g has joined #dxwg
21:29:01 [AndreaPerego]
agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2019.09.17
21:29:03 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
21:29:03 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/17-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego