trackbot, start meeting
<rtoyg_m2> Issues: https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues?page=1&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A"Feature+Request%2FMissing+Feature"
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1427
Continuing with triage of feature requests for V2
<scribe> scribe: mdjp
<rtoyg_m3> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1165
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1098
1165 - resolution. If required, should be proposed with use cases and considered as another node.
back to 1098
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1059
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/938
1059 - for consideration, mdjp to discuss with aes and authors
938 Under consideration for V2, requires further engagement with developers.
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/923
Under consideration for v2
https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/834
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/834
Idea for option to allow direct convolution of multichannel IRs - under consideration for V2
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/786
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/786
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/785
<hoch> https://www.york.ac.uk/sadie-project/
again mdjp to contact experts to allow discussion of hrtf loading in the community group
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/543
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/496
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/468
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/373
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/371
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/313
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/301
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/296
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1662
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A"Web+Audio+v.next"
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/2048
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/2046
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1985
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1968
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1944
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1934
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1912
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1910
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1886
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1872
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1846
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1812
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1806
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1780
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1749
<rtoyg_m2> Same room. Kashi
<rtoyg_m2> Just got back from break
<rtoyg_m2> ADC
<rtoyg_m2> hoch: What to do about user-selectable render size in AudioContext vs ADC
<padenot> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-cg/blob/master/audio-device-client/explainer.md
<rtoyg_m2> Long discussion on what user-selectable size can do and use-cases
<rtoyg_m2> sangwhan here to overview ADC.
<rtoyg_m2> hoch: Gives overview of explainer
<rtoyg_m2> hoch: Including sample code
<rtoyg_m2> sangwhan: Looks reasonable.
<rtoyg_m2> padenot: Question is if ADC is necessary since it takes work to add a new API. But ADC is relatively small (when compared to WebAudio)
<rtoyg_m2> sangwhan: What he sees is that API is fine from TAG. Is ADC behind permission
<rtoyg_m2> hoch: Yes.
<rtoyg_m2> sangwhan: Question: Is there two permissions? One for enumeration, one for creating ADC?
<rtoyg_m2> hoch: Good question, but we ask for input, so permission is required for input access.
<rtoyg_m2> sangwhan: Do we want formal TAG review
<rtoyg_m2> hoch et al: Yes
<rtoyg_m2> sangwhan: Last question: What about WebMIDI?
<rtoyg_m2> padenot: FF has most of the code, but lacks backend code.
<rtoyg_m2> padenot: Lack resources to implement backend, but creating roadmap and potential partners. As cwilso says, a second implemention changes everything
<rtoyg_m2> padenot: Willing to ship everything except sysex due to security issue.
<rtoyg_m2> padenot: Back to user-selectable render size
<rtoyg_m2> padenot: Need more community involvement
<rtoyg_m2> ruth: Can contact more people for CG involvement
<rtoyg_m2> padenot: Really great to get diverse set of people/companies
<rtoyg_m2> padenot: Like pro audio, games, playback, teleconf
<rtoyg_m2> mdjp: What about web developers working group?
<rtoyg_m2> (Oops: web audio developers community group)
<rtoyg_m2> mdjp et al: Consider merging that group with Audio CG.
<rtoyg_m2> Back to triage v.next
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1595
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1551
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1516
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1515
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1319
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1314
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1308
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1112
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1282
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1151
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1091
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/916
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/457
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/359
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/358
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/257
<rtoyg_m2> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/108
trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: Audio Working Group Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 17 September 2019
trackbot, end meeting
trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Default Present: (no_one) Present: (no_one) WARNING: Fewer than 3 people found for Present list! Found Scribe: mdjp Inferring ScribeNick: mdjp WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 17 Sep 2019 People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]