IRC log of pwg on 2019-09-15
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 23:02:13 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #pwg
- 23:02:13 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/09/15-pwg-irc
- 23:02:14 [ivan]
- rrsagent, set log public
- 23:02:14 [ivan]
- rrsagent, this meeting spans midnight
- 23:02:14 [ivan]
- Meeting: Publishing Working Group F2F in Fukuoka — First day
- 23:02:14 [ivan]
- Date: 2019-09-16
- 23:02:14 [ivan]
- Agenda: http://tinyurl.com/y366u6u8
- 23:02:15 [ivan]
- ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Agenda 2019-09-19: http://tinyurl.com/y366u6u8
- 23:02:16 [ivan]
- Regrets+
- 23:02:16 [ivan]
- Chair: wendy, garth
- 23:08:40 [ivan]
- ivan has joined #pwg
- 23:15:19 [skk]
- skk has joined #pwg
- 23:19:33 [toshiakikoike]
- toshiakikoike has joined #pwg
- 23:19:48 [wendyreid]
- wendyreid has joined #pwg
- 23:22:59 [wendyreid]
- rrsagent, set log public
- 23:23:21 [wendyreid]
- rrsagent, this meeting spans midnight
- 23:23:51 [wendyreid]
- Meeting: Publishing Working Group F2F Day 1
- 23:23:58 [wendyreid]
- Chair: Wendy
- 23:24:18 [wendyreid]
- Date: 2019-09-16
- 23:24:28 [wendyreid]
- Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q8PUjzMY04peuYZdTkA6A0BBoFea_BSK4ygJlphkzh8/edit
- 23:28:25 [Avneesh]
- Avneesh has joined #pwg
- 23:32:36 [marisa]
- marisa has joined #pwg
- 23:32:37 [romain]
- romain has joined #pwg
- 23:32:38 [George]
- George has joined #pwg
- 23:38:02 [romain_]
- romain_ has joined #pwg
- 23:38:55 [JuanCorona]
- JuanCorona has joined #pwg
- 23:39:03 [marisa]
- marisa has joined #pwg
- 23:41:04 [JunGamo]
- JunGamo has joined #pwg
- 23:41:25 [CharlesL]
- CharlesL has joined #pwg
- 23:41:34 [CharlesL]
- present+
- 23:41:36 [laudrain]
- laudrain has joined #pwg
- 23:41:44 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 23:41:45 [laudrain]
- present+
- 23:42:05 [romain]
- present+ Romain Deltour, DAISY
- 23:42:07 [wendyreid]
- present+
- 23:42:13 [toshiakikoike]
- toshiakikoike has joined #pwg
- 23:42:20 [romain]
- present?
- 23:42:31 [toshiakikoike]
- presetn+
- 23:42:36 [gpellegr_]
- gpellegr_ has joined #pwg
- 23:42:59 [Yanni]
- Yanni has joined #pwg
- 23:43:08 [laurent]
- laurent has joined #pwg
- 23:43:08 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 23:43:22 [JunGamo]
- present+
- 23:43:43 [laurent]
- present+
- 23:43:47 [JuanCorona]
- present+
- 23:44:05 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 23:44:32 [gpellegrino]
- present+
- 23:44:36 [romain]
- zakim, who's here?
- 23:44:36 [Zakim]
- Present: CharlesL, laudrain, Romain, Deltour, DAISY, wendyreid, JunGamo, laurent, JuanCorona, gpellegrino
- 23:44:38 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see duga, gpellegrino, laurent, Yanni, toshiakikoike, laudrain, CharlesL, JunGamo, marisa, JuanCorona, romain, George, Avneesh, wendyreid, ivan, RRSAgent, Zakim, mattg,
- 23:44:38 [Zakim]
- ... plinss_, Travis, bigbluehat, astearns, jyasskin
- 23:44:57 [duga]
- present+
- 23:45:01 [George]
- present+
- 23:45:04 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 23:45:05 [JuanCorona]
- muting/unmuting for now to prevent feedback
- 23:45:08 [MKitahara]
- MKitahara has joined #pwg
- 23:45:12 [Yanni]
- present+
- 23:47:43 [Rachel]
- Rachel has joined #pwg
- 23:48:29 [Rachel]
- present+
- 23:49:41 [marisa]
- scribe+ marisa
- 23:50:07 [Rachel]
- zakim, who is here?
- 23:50:07 [Zakim]
- Present: CharlesL, laudrain, Romain, Deltour, DAISY, wendyreid, JunGamo, laurent, JuanCorona, gpellegrino, duga, George, Yanni, Rachel
- 23:50:09 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Rachel, MKitahara, dauwhe, duga, gpellegrino, laurent, Yanni, toshiakikoike, laudrain, CharlesL, JunGamo, marisa, JuanCorona, romain, George, Avneesh, wendyreid, ivan,
- 23:50:09 [Zakim]
- ... RRSAgent, Zakim, mattg, plinss_, Travis, bigbluehat, astearns, jyasskin
- 23:50:11 [Avneesh]
- present+
- 23:50:21 [mattg]
- present+
- 23:50:41 [Rachel]
- present+ marisa
- 23:51:10 [marisa]
- agenda+ plan for this f2f
- 23:51:28 [marisa]
- wareid: going to CR for audiobooks, pub-manifest, sync media update
- 23:51:37 [marisa]
- s/wareid/wendyreid
- 23:51:46 [marisa]
- ...meeting with aria and mathML groups too
- 23:52:18 [urata]
- urata has joined #pwg
- 23:52:45 [Ariel]
- Ariel has joined #pwg
- 23:52:53 [Rachel]
- present+ bigbluehat
- 23:53:12 [Rachel]
- present+ dauwhe
- 23:53:17 [ayukiyoshida]
- ayukiyoshida has joined #pwg
- 23:53:20 [ryokuroda]
- ryokuroda has joined #pwg
- 23:54:21 [marisa]
- laurent: at dev meetup tonight, we'll demonstrate comics on readium at 6pm. location TBA.
- 23:54:47 [marisa]
- topic: lightweight packaging format
- 23:54:59 [laurent]
- https://w3c.github.io/lpf/
- 23:55:58 [marisa]
- laurent: draft note is available. shows how to put the pieces together and transmit them. small spec with specific use cases. main use cases explained in the doc.
- 23:56:08 [Rachel]
- present+ ayukiyoshida
- 23:56:17 [Rachel]
- present+ ryokuroda
- 23:56:18 [marisa]
- ... provide the finalized packaged publication from the publisher to the conversion house. useful for audio books going between the publisher and audio studio
- 23:56:23 [ivan_]
- ivan_ has joined #pwg
- 23:56:38 [marisa]
- ... can also be used to download packaged publication from the distribution point to the user agent
- 23:57:12 [marisa]
- ... the spec goes over some very simple terminology, originating from epub 3.2 or web pub document
- 23:57:17 [laudrain]
- W3C Developer Meetup – Argos D, 1F, 18:00 – 20:30
- 23:57:20 [marisa]
- ... based on zip
- 23:57:31 [marisa]
- ... viewed as an iso standard
- 23:58:00 [marisa]
- ... we defined a file and dir structure for what ppl have to put inside the zip. it's totally compatible with the packaging of the pub manifest.
- 23:58:39 [marisa]
- ... we have specified a standard name for the manifest ('publication.json'). an html entry page, if present, has to be called 'index.html'
- 23:59:06 [marisa]
- ... manifest could be embedded inside primary entry page. only one of manifest or entry page are mandatory.
- 23:59:12 [marisa]
- ... these two core files must not be encrypted
- 23:59:29 [marisa]
- ... the zip also contains all the resources of the publication, and they may live in any internal folder of the zip
- 23:59:45 [marisa]
- ... resources may be compressed
- 00:00:13 [marisa]
- ... note that streaming compressed audio files is more complex and we recommend to not compress them
- 00:00:46 [marisa]
- ... there is an algorithm to extract the manifest from this file, taken from web pub document and simplified
- 00:01:02 [Daihei]
- Daihei has joined #pwg
- 00:01:10 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 00:01:11 [marisa]
- ... UA conformance section: UA must be capable of exploiting the archive format and opening and processing the manifest
- 00:01:27 [marisa]
- ... placeholder for examples
- 00:02:24 [marisa]
- ... the file extension is .lpf and the mime type is application/lpf+zip
- 00:03:08 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 00:03:10 [marisa]
- ... right now, each bookseller has its own requirements for how creators should submit their content. this should solve this problem.
- 00:03:12 [romain]
- q+
- 00:04:08 [marisa]
- dauwhe: UA conformance section - can these statements naturally lead to tests? epub spec is not successful in this regard.
- 00:04:25 [marisa]
- ... to support LPF, all you have to do is be able to access the files i the zip and present them to the next step in the processing chain
- 00:04:30 [romain]
- +1, "is capable of exploiting the archive format and file structure" sound too vague to be testable?
- 00:04:43 [ReinaldoFerraz]
- ReinaldoFerraz has joined #pwg
- 00:04:53 [marisa]
- ... is this only a subset of a web publicatio user agent
- 00:05:07 [marisa]
- laurent: if you are a UA capable of supporting web pub, you don't need to open a zip
- 00:05:16 [marisa]
- s/publicatio/publication
- 00:05:25 [skk]
- skk has joined #pwg
- 00:05:36 [marisa]
- ... e.g. readium can open a zip and extract the manifest and expose the different resources as an internal web pub
- 00:05:57 [Rachel]
- present+ Daihei
- 00:05:59 [marisa]
- ... the two first steps may not be among the capabilities of a web pub UA
- 00:06:18 [marisa]
- ... bullet points could be more precise in referring to the previous sections in the same document
- 00:06:20 [Rachel]
- present+ ReinaldoFerraz
- 00:06:24 [marisa]
- dauwhe: current structure is hard to write tests for
- 00:07:08 [laudrain]
- q?
- 00:07:20 [wendyreid]
- ack romain
- 00:07:24 [dauwhe]
- q+ for a second question
- 00:07:34 [marisa]
- romain: is it backwards compatible with the packing spec in epub?
- 00:07:38 [marisa]
- laurent: yes totally compatible
- 00:07:41 [laudrain]
- q+
- 00:07:57 [marisa]
- ... we could have zip with an epub and then add the manifest. then you'll have an LPF.
- 00:08:10 [marisa]
- .. it would have to have the mime type file at the start
- 00:08:39 [marisa]
- romain: this packaging format may not work for all kinds of pubs - e.g. resources might be remote
- 00:08:51 [marisa]
- ... is there a way to document which part of the target publications do not work?
- 00:09:23 [marisa]
- laurent: this is not a way to "freeze" a publication. it's a way to make an epub-lite and expose it on the web later. no link to https.
- 00:09:27 [Makoto__]
- Makoto__ has joined #pwg
- 00:09:42 [marisa]
- ... if we want to fetch resources via hyperlink, you can still put the ? in there
- 00:09:53 [Makoto__]
- +q
- 00:10:06 [marisa]
- ... it's intended to be used before the publication is visible on the web, i don't see the point
- 00:10:16 [marisa]
- romain: it says LPF is used to exchange in-progress publications
- 00:10:44 [marisa]
- ... web pub is given as an example of a publication, but not all web publications can be packaged with LPF. there's a venn diagram here.
- 00:10:51 [marisa]
- laurent: yes true
- 00:11:04 [marisa]
- ... does not cover the need to take any web pub and freeze it
- 00:11:17 [marisa]
- romain: this could be stated more clearly
- 00:11:25 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 00:11:25 [Zakim]
- dauwhe, you wanted to discuss a second question
- 00:11:43 [marisa]
- dauwhe: there's a statement: "a package must include all resources within the bounds of the publication... "
- 00:12:03 [marisa]
- ... i wonder if we should add a note addressing for example are we explicitly forbidding things like web fonts
- 00:12:30 [Makoto__]
- -q
- 00:12:30 [marisa]
- ... is there some way to clarify that, like epub, there are certain exceptions for what can go in the package in general
- 00:12:49 [duga]
- q+
- 00:12:51 [marisa]
- ... epub tends to provide more explicit lists of what types of things should be in the package
- 00:13:03 [wendyreid]
- ack laudrain
- 00:13:03 [marisa]
- laurent: we should review the epub spec and extract some wording from there
- 00:13:17 [marisa]
- laudrain: +1 to dauwhe re testing
- 00:13:40 [romain]
- Resources Location in EPUB: https://www.w3.org/publishing/epub32/epub-spec.html#sec-resource-locations
- 00:13:41 [marisa]
- ... testing must be very clear and this doc must be testable.
- 00:13:51 [marisa]
- ... epub 3.2 work can help here
- 00:13:55 [wendyreid]
- ack duga
- 00:13:57 [Makoto__]
- Here I would like to say that I'm sympathetic to Dave about non-testable requirements. IMHO, non-testable requirements are nothing but dreams.
- 00:14:18 [marisa]
- duga: to go back to the web font topic, we initially said everything has to be in the package, and then we started making exceptions
- 00:14:34 [marisa]
- ... this was not planned nor architecturally sound. it was an escape route from the corner we'd backed ourselves into.
- 00:15:03 [marisa]
- ... go back to beginning: does everything has to go in the package? is a better approach than just poking holes and making exceptions
- 00:15:26 [marisa]
- s/does everything has/does everything have
- 00:15:27 [laudrain]
- q?
- 00:15:47 [CharlesL]
- q+
- 00:15:49 [marisa]
- wendyreid: if the resource has changed, it's the fault of our relationship with the web
- 00:16:03 [marisa]
- ... it's ok to ref the web with the caveat that what you referenced may not be what you expected
- 00:16:14 [wendyreid]
- ack CharlesL
- 00:16:40 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 00:16:43 [marisa]
- CharlesL: can lightweight packaging format be used offline? e.g. on a USB stick in an offline environment?
- 00:17:01 [marisa]
- ... are we poking holes and creating a requirement to be online?
- 00:17:16 [marisa]
- wendyreid: getting dangerously close to best practice territory
- 00:17:24 [marisa]
- ... responsibility lies with content creator
- 00:17:41 [mattg]
- q+
- 00:17:48 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 00:18:02 [marisa]
- dauwhe: in the case of fonts, the web knows what to do if you can't find a font
- 00:18:22 [wendyreid]
- ack marisa
- 00:18:26 [wendyreid]
- ack mattg
- 00:18:42 [marisa]
- mattg: a lot of this are prob things that we should discuss in regards to audiobooks
- 00:18:59 [marisa]
- ... this spec may not be where we solve these questions
- 00:19:14 [George]
- q+
- 00:19:17 [George]
- Because testing is so important, is it possible to incorporate the tests into the spec instead of having testing being derived after the fact?
- 00:19:19 [romain]
- q+
- 00:19:22 [marisa]
- wendyreid: many audiobooks do reference resources on the web due to sheer size and streaming feature
- 00:19:28 [wendyreid]
- ack George
- 00:19:57 [marisa]
- George: i'm wondering about dauwhe's testing questions - can we figure out which tests we would be looking at as the spec develops, rather than writing the spec first and coming up with tests later?
- 00:20:00 [wendyreid]
- ack romain
- 00:20:12 [marisa]
- romain: +1 to mattg re not solving these things in this particular spec
- 00:20:31 [ayukiyoshida]
- ayukiyoshida has left #pwg
- 00:20:40 [marisa]
- ... idea to have a manifest property that indicates whether it is packagable or not. might be awkward though.
- 00:20:45 [laurent]
- q+
- 00:20:49 [wendyreid]
- ack laurent
- 00:20:52 [marisa]
- ... i think we should loosen the current restriction
- 00:21:12 [marisa]
- laurent: we can loosen the spec - we specify that URLs in reading order must be relative
- 00:21:19 [Makoto__]
- I would like to drop User Agent Conformance.
- 00:21:33 [marisa]
- ... we can say if we see an absolute URL, we won't require it to be in the package
- 00:21:55 [Makoto__]
- +q
- 00:22:02 [wendyreid]
- ack Makoto__
- 00:22:10 [marisa]
- Makoto__: i've been involved in OPC (open xml package format)
- 00:22:26 [marisa]
- ... conformance requirements in applications are difficult and dangerous to specify
- 00:22:32 [marisa]
- ... we should only provide data conformance
- 00:22:59 [marisa]
- ... if we are going to spend a lot of time creating test cases and methodology, we should stay away from UA conformance. it's a waste of time.
- 00:23:03 [dauwhe]
- q=
- 00:23:06 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 00:23:17 [marisa]
- ... at least 3 formats have tried this and failed
- 00:23:22 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 00:23:26 [marisa]
- dauwhe: +1 to this idea
- 00:23:59 [marisa]
- ... it seems impossible to test, and i'm not sure what testing gives us in this case. if the application cannot process this format, then it is not conformant.
- 00:24:18 [marisa]
- ... aka how would you write a bad implementation of this spec - what would it do wrong
- 00:24:27 [marisa]
- laurent: if you don't get the manifest in any situation...
- 00:24:36 [marisa]
- dauwhe: then you can't do any further processing and you're stuck
- 00:24:53 [romain]
- q+
- 00:24:56 [marisa]
- ... if you want to work with this data - we've described the format in enough data, so have at it, devs
- 00:25:17 [marisa]
- laurent: the UA conformance here is paraphrasing the description of the format in other sections. not so useful.
- 00:25:34 [wendyreid]
- ack romain
- 00:25:48 [marisa]
- romain: one thing we can test is obtaining the manifest, because there is an algo fo rit
- 00:25:49 [mattg]
- q+
- 00:26:02 [wendyreid]
- ack mattg
- 00:26:13 [marisa]
- mattg: not to make light of testing, if it's just a note, there's no TR process
- 00:26:18 [marisa]
- s/fo rit/for it
- 00:26:26 [CharlesL]
- q+
- 00:26:30 [wendyreid]
- ack CharlesL
- 00:26:35 [Makoto__]
- Then, the shorter, the better.
- 00:28:26 [laudrain]
- q+
- 00:28:28 [marisa]
- wendyreid: i will write a proposal to remove UA conformance section
- 00:29:08 [marisa]
- laudrain: i wonder if there will be an AudioBookCheck (a la epubcheck) - then we will need some conformance verification for the audiobook spec *and* the packaging spec
- 00:29:08 [CharlesL]
- ack laudrain
- 00:29:20 [marisa]
- ... some tests would have to be written
- 00:29:21 [romain]
- q+
- 00:29:32 [wendyreid]
- ack romain
- 00:29:45 [marisa]
- romain: there are two things here - UA conformance and content conformance. we're talking about eliminating the former, not the latter.
- 00:29:58 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 00:30:34 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 00:30:51 [marisa]
- dauwhe: packaging part should be simple and difficult to screw up
- 00:31:41 [wendyreid]
- Proposed: Remove the User Agent Conformance section from LPF.
- 00:31:49 [Rachel]
- +1
- 00:31:50 [wendyreid]
- +1
- 00:31:50 [marisa]
- ... web world less interested in validating things; rather, let's define what happens when things go wrong
- 00:31:53 [marisa]
- +1
- 00:31:57 [toshiakikoike]
- +1
- 00:31:58 [JunGamo]
- +1
- 00:32:01 [duga]
- +1
- 00:32:03 [Makoto__]
- +1
- 00:32:04 [dauwhe]
- +1
- 00:32:04 [mattg]
- +1
- 00:32:05 [gpellegrino]
- +1
- 00:32:07 [laurent]
- 0
- 00:32:09 [bigbluehat]
- +1
- 00:32:15 [romain]
- +1
- 00:32:17 [wendyreid]
- RESOLVED: Remove the User Agent Conformance section from LPF.
- 00:32:18 [JuanCorona]
- +1
- 00:32:20 [CharlesL]
- 0
- 00:32:34 [laudrain]
- +1
- 00:32:49 [marisa]
- wendyreid: laurent, are there any open issues or questions you need answers for?
- 00:33:08 [marisa]
- laurent: no, just waiting for the finalization of ? document to get a link to it
- 00:33:36 [marisa]
- topic: horizontal reviews
- 00:33:37 [laurent]
- s/?/the Publication Manfifest /
- 00:33:52 [laurent]
- s/Manfifest/Manifest/
- 00:33:52 [dauwhe]
- do we want to switch scribes yet?
- 00:33:53 [Makoto__]
- Deflate only? ZIP allows more efficient ones.
- 00:34:10 [marisa]
- wendyreid: ping joining us. also i18n and a11y reviews happening.
- 00:34:16 [laurent]
- deflate only, in order to stay simple.
- 00:34:17 [marisa]
- ... i18n mostly complete (thanks ivan! )
- 00:34:42 [Rachel]
- s/do we want to switch scribes yet?/ /
- 00:35:20 [marisa]
- wendyreid: the only outstanding question is the potential for multilingual text in the manifest
- 00:35:38 [mattg]
- q+
- 00:35:44 [marisa]
- ... ivan_'s resolution is that we prob require html markup to do so
- 00:36:16 [wendyreid]
- ack marisa
- 00:36:19 [wendyreid]
- ack mattg
- 00:36:51 [marisa]
- mattg: one open issue under discussion w. addison and richard is whether or not valid/well-formed lang tags are required in all the places where we reference PCP 47
- 00:37:01 [marisa]
- ... a well-formed one only has to conform to the ???
- 00:37:10 [marisa]
- ... a valid one also has to have registered subtags
- 00:37:46 [Makoto__]
- Check against the BNF. That's enough, I would say.
- 00:37:49 [marisa]
- ... the issue i had initially with it is that if it's well-formed then you can use whatever you want, so long as it is 2-8 chars (e.g. looks roughly like a lang tag)
- 00:38:12 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 00:38:19 [marisa]
- ... i18n group says well-formedness is what matters, not so much validity
- 00:38:42 [Makoto__]
- +q
- 00:38:44 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 00:38:59 [marisa]
- dauwhe: i think well-formedness is fine. restricting authors without a really good reason is a bad idea.
- 00:39:24 [wendyreid]
- ack marisa
- 00:39:28 [wendyreid]
- ack Makoto__
- 00:39:29 [marisa]
- Makoto__: +1 to dauwhe
- 00:39:50 [marisa]
- ... ppl don't specify strange language tags. they use standard ones. if they choose otherwise, ok, but it's not common.
- 00:40:03 [mattg]
- q+
- 00:40:07 [CharlesL]
- q+
- 00:40:09 [r12a]
- r12a has joined #pwg
- 00:40:30 [wendyreid]
- ack mattg
- 00:40:58 [marisa]
- mattg: i tend to agree that well-formedness is fine. should we say that the first part of the language tag should be valid, or do we not care at all?
- 00:41:14 [Makoto__]
- +q
- 00:41:17 [marisa]
- q+
- 00:41:23 [wendyreid]
- ack CharlesL
- 00:41:40 [marisa]
- CharlesL: do checkers need to be aware?
- 00:41:49 [wendyreid]
- ack Makoto__
- 00:42:07 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 00:42:07 [marisa]
- Makoto__: tts engine supports limited set of language tags, even if a tag is well-formed, there's no guarantee that it's supported
- 00:42:16 [marisa]
- marisa: we are getting into best practice territory
- 00:42:19 [wendyreid]
- ack marisa
- 00:42:39 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 00:42:41 [marisa]
- dauwhe: +1 marisa
- 00:43:35 [marisa]
- bigbluehat: do we need a resolution on the BCP-47 question?
- 00:43:49 [marisa]
- wendyreid: no, we can just leave it be, go write your book in klingon
- 00:44:05 [r12a]
- hi Wendy, this is Richard Ishida (r12a). The internationalisation WG would like to talk with the pub-manifest folks about the rewrites of the language sections in that spec some time this week (wer're here all week). Is there at time that would be useful for your group to meet together ?
- 00:44:18 [Avneesh]
- q+
- 00:45:01 [wendyreid]
- Hi r12a we'd love to discuss, let's figure out a time :)
- 00:45:14 [wendyreid]
- ack Avneesh
- 00:46:10 [marisa]
- avneesh: thurs we will find if there are issues with a11y horizontal review. i have made a suggestion to the html files re issue #13.
- 00:46:19 [r12a]
- s/hi Wendy, this is Richard Ishida (r12a). The internationalisation WG would like to talk with the pub-manifest folks about the rewrites of the language sections in that spec some time this week (wer're here all week). Is there at time that would be useful for your group to meet together ?//
- 00:46:55 [marisa]
- bigbluehat: zip supports all kinds of compression algos - not just deflate
- 00:47:28 [marisa]
- ... we should be clear about what we support. likely that only supporting deflate will frustrate someone. we should be up front about why.
- 00:48:10 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 00:48:23 [marisa]
- Makoto__: if we use a better algo, it could be 30% smaller. deflate has a big advantage though.
- 00:48:30 [marisa]
- laurent: deflate was chosen for epub
- 00:48:46 [marisa]
- ... even if zip libraries offer a choice, end user tools usually don't
- 00:49:09 [marisa]
- ... we won't deflate binary content. just the text.
- 00:49:34 [marisa]
- the 30% size reduction is not worth the complexity
- 00:49:43 [Ralph]
- Ralph has joined #pwg
- 00:49:48 [marisa]
- s/the 30% size/... the 30% size
- 00:49:57 [marisa]
- bigbluehat: why aren't we compressing media files?
- 00:50:02 [marisa]
- laurent: we copied that part from epub
- 00:50:10 [Ralph]
- present+
- 00:50:20 [marisa]
- ... when you want to stream from the zip, deflate makes it complex
- 00:50:29 [Ralph]
- [Ralph arrives (pseudo-Ivan), with apologies for being tardy]
- 00:50:50 [dauwhe]
- q?
- 00:51:36 [marisa]
- bigbluehat: if we make these choices to suit end user tools, then what i produce with an end user tool should give me an LPF
- 00:51:48 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 00:51:51 [marisa]
- laurent: use of deflate is a should
- 00:52:00 [marisa]
- dauwhe: policing the zip details didn't help the epub world
- 00:52:08 [marisa]
- ... we should let the libraries do what they do
- 00:52:59 [laudrain]
- +1 ot Dave
- 00:53:04 [laudrain]
- s/ot/to/
- 00:53:33 [marisa]
- wendyreid: ping coming at 11 for horizontal review. anything from the ping survey to discuss ahead of time?
- 00:53:46 [marisa]
- duga: someone added privacy + security sections. there were one or two comments to maybe delete.
- 00:54:15 [marisa]
- ... we have no APIs or protocols
- 00:54:23 [marisa]
- ... should be pretty straightforward
- 00:54:57 [marisa]
- Ralph: duga is mostly right
- 00:55:17 [marisa]
- ... suspect ping will have looked at what metadata we're requiring in the manifest
- 00:55:18 [marisa]
- ... we're prob in good shape
- 00:56:01 [marisa]
- ... they will want to make sure we're not requiring things that will be misused
- 00:58:02 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 00:58:53 [romain]
- romain has joined #pwg
- 00:59:14 [romain]
- romain has joined #pwg
- 00:59:49 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 01:07:22 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 01:10:49 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 01:24:39 [Avneesh]
- Avneesh has joined #pwg
- 01:24:48 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 01:25:28 [ReinaldoFerraz]
- ReinaldoFerraz has joined #pwg
- 01:27:15 [marisa]
- marisa has joined #pwg
- 01:29:31 [romain_]
- romain_ has joined #pwg
- 01:30:30 [MKitahara]
- MKitahara has joined #pwg
- 01:31:40 [laudrain]
- laudrain has joined #pwg
- 01:34:20 [Yanni]
- Yanni has joined #pwg
- 01:34:51 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 01:36:35 [Ariel]
- Ariel has joined #pwg
- 01:36:40 [JunGamo]
- JunGamo has joined #pwg
- 01:42:00 [marisa]
- wendyreid: a few administrative things
- 01:42:05 [toshiakikoike]
- toshiakikoike has joined #pwg
- 01:42:05 [wendyreid]
- ack Ralph
- 01:42:18 [marisa]
- Ralph: welcome a new WG member Kaleeg Cainsworth from BrightWing media
- 01:43:38 [Ralph]
- s/Cain/Hain
- 01:48:24 [CharlesL]
- CharlesL has joined #pwg
- 01:51:11 [rkuroda]
- rkuroda has joined #pwg
- 01:52:28 [marisa]
- duga: ping questionnaire asks how we handle data, prevent unauth access, if we track ppl, how much user data we expose, how much metadata do we include
- 01:52:49 [marisa]
- ... many q's are not applicable to us as we have no APIs or protocols
- 01:53:16 [marisa]
- ... anyone who allows access to this data has to be careful re how it's exposed, but that's not a concern for our spec
- 01:53:38 [marisa]
- ... we could add a comment in our privacy section that says we could potentially id and track a user who has downloaded files
- 01:54:32 [marisa]
- ... we have a very limited set of data that's required, most of it is optional
- 01:54:42 [marisa]
- ... we will expose things about authors like their names but that's not extraordinary
- 01:55:00 [marisa]
- ... security implications of using json/html/css/jpegs/pngs but we don't have control over that
- 01:55:22 [marisa]
- wendyreid: mattg and i added security + privacy considerations to audiobooks and pub-manifest specs
- 01:56:19 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 01:56:25 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 01:56:41 [marisa]
- bigbluehat: i don't think author data is a privacy concern per se because it's on web pages and everywhere else - it's public info
- 01:56:52 [marisa]
- ... GDPR would not consider it private
- 01:57:35 [marisa]
- ... if and when we reintroduce discovery + apis, web publications and audio books could be used for private publications as well, but we're not close to that
- 01:58:03 [marisa]
- duga: author name doesn't seem like it's PII but there is concern that any automated system used to create these could share that information and might reveal pennames
- 01:58:13 [JuanCorona]
- just got that the meeting ended
- 01:58:17 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 01:58:32 [George]
- We just lost audio on the dial in
- 01:59:59 [marisa]
- duga: what should i do with these answers?
- 02:00:04 [marisa]
- wendyreid: log as an issue on pub-manifest
- 02:00:48 [Makoto]
- Makoto has joined #pwg
- 02:02:33 [marisa]
- we are joined by Christine Runnegar from Ping
- 02:02:58 [Christine]
- Christine has joined #pwg
- 02:03:02 [kaleeg]
- kaleeg has joined #pwg
- 02:04:13 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 02:05:28 [Ralph]
- [Christine Runnegar, representing PING, joins]
- 02:05:32 [wendyreid]
- https://github.com/w3c/pub-manifest/issues/61
- 02:06:02 [ivan]
- ivan has joined #pwg
- 02:06:15 [marisa]
- wendyreid: we completed the self-review last week
- 02:06:34 [marisa]
- duga: i reviewed pub-manifest and audiobook profile
- 02:06:49 [marisa]
- ... we are not defining an API or transmission protocol so there are not so many privacy and security issues
- 02:07:05 [marisa]
- ... most of the data in a publication is publicly available anyway
- 02:07:18 [marisa]
- ... we're fairly limited in the amt of data that we require in the files but we have a lot of optional info
- 02:07:54 [marisa]
- ... we don't allow for any user tracking
- 02:08:03 [marisa]
- ... info in our files will have been put there intentionally by the creator
- 02:08:26 [marisa]
- ... we use existing formats and protocols - jsonld/css/html - no diff from web as a whole - and we don't change any of the processing models
- 02:08:48 [bigbluehat]
- q+ to explain "more secure" than the Web comment
- 02:09:01 [marisa]
- ... you could ID users by the files they've downloaded but that's generally true - we don't expose a mechanism to reveal this info
- 02:09:21 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 02:09:21 [Zakim]
- bigbluehat, you wanted to explain "more secure" than the Web comment
- 02:09:40 [marisa]
- bigbluehat: we don't have protocol so there are no concerns that come with HTTP or origins
- 02:11:31 [marisa]
- Christine: we would love feedback about what made sense and what didn't
- 02:12:40 [marisa]
- ... privacy is not just concerned with what is private and what is public - it is concerned with info shared in one context being used in another context - so public info could still have privacy requirements
- 02:13:04 [marisa]
- ... dataset could be annotated with a note, e.g. "this dataset contains personal info"
- 02:13:45 [marisa]
- duga: e.g. list of publications that a user has downloaded is extremely sensitive
- 02:14:20 [marisa]
- ... could also figure out who you are by what you've read
- 02:14:31 [marisa]
- ... however, we don't have a way of exposing this info
- 02:14:36 [marisa]
- Christine: agree
- 02:15:17 [bigbluehat]
- q+ to ask about context(s)
- 02:15:57 [marisa]
- ... i would like to read your analysis of the security + privacy review and take a quick look at the spec, but it sounds like you're prepared
- 02:16:00 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 02:16:00 [Zakim]
- bigbluehat, you wanted to ask about context(s)
- 02:16:17 [Yanni]
- Yanni has joined #pwg
- 02:16:25 [bobbytung]
- bobbytung has joined #pwg
- 02:16:27 [marisa]
- bigbluehat: i like context perspective rather than public/private
- 02:17:01 [marisa]
- ... e.g. what if i download someone's voicemails and package it as an audiobook
- 02:17:15 [marisa]
- ... no way to tell from the json file what is private or public
- 02:17:44 [marisa]
- ... we've relied on other layers to take care of privacy, on top of the data
- 02:18:12 [marisa]
- ... the data itself in the json file does not contain any info about privacy/security
- 02:18:43 [marisa]
- Christine: generally what we've noticed in ping is that WGs may say that privacy is an implementation concern
- 02:18:52 [marisa]
- ... the problem is that there are good and bad implemens
- 02:19:07 [marisa]
- ... we shouldn't leave it up to the browsers et al to be the police
- 02:19:08 [ReinaldoFerraz_]
- ReinaldoFerraz_ has joined #pwg
- 02:19:28 [wendyreid]
- q+
- 02:19:36 [wendyreid]
- ack Ralph
- 02:19:36 [Zakim]
- Ralph, you wanted to ask about "advice to users"
- 02:19:54 [marisa]
- Ralph: q for Christine - what is the current advice to implementors
- 02:20:06 [marisa]
- ... what's the pref of the community for giving best practice advice
- 02:20:53 [marisa]
- Christine: good question, don't want to speak for the community, but my preference would be to be as clear and direct as possible, and all WGs should strive to do the best that they can for privacy, so saying for implementors that you should do it this way to avoid risks
- 02:21:08 [marisa]
- ... researchers or govt people can police implementors
- 02:21:19 [marisa]
- ... how can you make privacy choices detectable?
- 02:21:41 [marisa]
- ... classic case is fingerprinting - no way to easily tell that a server is fingerprinting a user if it's passive
- 02:21:49 [marisa]
- ... active fingerprinting is at least detectable
- 02:21:58 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 02:22:09 [Rachel]
- ack wendyreid
- 02:22:16 [wendyreid]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/audiobooks/#security-privacy
- 02:22:21 [wendyreid]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/pub-manifest/#security-privacy
- 02:22:41 [marisa]
- wendyreid: a content creator can put any info in any of the fields
- 02:23:22 [marisa]
- ... was hard to phrase this - we wanted to suggest that if you are going to be including identifiable info (name, url), you should get explicit approval where possible
- 02:23:49 [marisa]
- ... weren't sure if that suggestion oversteps our bounds
- 02:24:05 [marisa]
- Christine: I'm very happy to ask the Ping group to take a look
- 02:25:01 [marisa]
- ... on the point of best practices, the WG may create a separate document
- 02:25:31 [duga]
- q+
- 02:25:32 [marisa]
- ... other groups have done a group note document that covers what they'd like to see regarding this
- 02:25:35 [wendyreid]
- ack duga
- 02:25:50 [marisa]
- duga: i don't like this idea that you should get explicit consent - we should not make this decision for people
- 02:25:54 [bigbluehat]
- q+ to ask about parsing as the security vector--not content
- 02:25:54 [marisa]
- ... that's the role of laws
- 02:26:31 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 02:26:31 [Zakim]
- bigbluehat, you wanted to ask about parsing as the security vector--not content
- 02:27:07 [marisa]
- bigbluehat: security tends to put it on the file format itself. in our situation, is the privacy vector on what you can record in the content
- 02:27:22 [marisa]
- ... you can't prevent someone from putting whatever they want in text plain
- 02:27:49 [marisa]
- ... are there privacy concerns around extensible formats like json-ld?
- 02:28:06 [marisa]
- ... we can prevent privacy infringing things but then we prevent many valid use cases
- 02:28:26 [marisa]
- ... e.g. a pub manifest that points to private data is a valid use case
- 02:28:47 [bobbytung]
- bobbytung has joined #pwg
- 02:29:18 [Rachel]
- bigbluehat: You have to do something to the plain text file
- 02:29:31 [Rachel]
- scribe+
- 02:29:46 [Rachel]
- christine: I need clarification on the use cases
- 02:30:16 [Rachel]
- bigbluehat: audiobooks limits it to audio files but manifests hits a broader number of specs
- 02:30:40 [Rachel]
- ...it can be created by hand or through an automated parser
- 02:32:11 [Rachel]
- christine: so you're capturing a bunch of information in a format. Anyone can put anything in it, even though it's designed for a publication purpose. I think you're right to draw a distinction. I hear duga in that laws have a role here.
- 02:32:29 [Rachel]
- ...I think this has been very helpful for clarification
- 02:32:35 [CharlesL]
- q?
- 02:32:55 [Rachel]
- ...I will take this analysis and wording back to PING
- 02:33:08 [Rachel]
- wendyreid: I am sending all the links etc via email
- 02:33:54 [Rachel]
- christine: in general, we want to be helpful - please share them. PING = W3C Privacy Interest Group. We want to improve privacy on the web
- 02:35:13 [Ralph]
- -> https://www.w3.org/Privacy/ ᅜPrivacy Activity" (of which PING -- the Privacy Interest Group -- is a part)
- 02:37:31 [Rachel]
- Topic: Sync narration
- 02:37:57 [Rachel]
- marisa: Can I show off the work I did?
- 02:41:39 [Rachel]
- marisa: moving highlight will use CSS pseudoclasses
- 02:42:05 [Rachel]
- ...according to daniel CSS4 is not mature enough so w've left room to grow
- 02:42:22 [Rachel]
- ... also in room to grow is text selectors
- 02:42:52 [Rachel]
- ...also in our list in one text and one audio in a parallel set
- 02:42:59 [marisa]
- https://raw.githack.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/master/samples/single-document/index.html
- 02:44:09 [Rachel]
- marisa: [demo]
- 02:44:13 [kaleeg]
- kaleeg has joined #pwg
- 02:45:30 [Rachel]
- marisa: the text highlight synched with the audio and escapability allowed leaving the the reading which is important to accessibility
- 02:46:16 [wendyreid]
- q?
- 02:46:34 [Rachel]
- Makoto: is it possible to skip to different sections?
- 02:46:55 [Rachel]
- marisa: that would happen in the TOC which is out of scope for this demo
- 02:47:37 [Rachel]
- Makoto: do we need escapability?
- 02:47:57 [Rachel]
- marisa: We need it for structural elements
- 02:48:18 [bigbluehat]
- prior art from EPUB https://idpf.github.io/epub-vocabs/structure/
- 02:48:28 [Rachel]
- ...one of the issues we need to return to is how do we define what needs to be escapable
- 02:49:23 [CharlesL]
- q+
- 02:49:55 [Rachel]
- ...the demo shows js implementation, playback including escapability and test feasbility
- 02:50:02 [Rachel]
- ...we need to pick a mimetype
- 02:50:09 [Makoto]
- +q
- 02:50:16 [Rachel]
- Ralph: you need approval but its proceedural
- 02:50:42 [Rachel]
- marisa: I want an audiobook adjacent format
- 02:50:56 [wendyreid]
- ack CharlesL
- 02:51:02 [wendyreid]
- q+ to talk about duration
- 02:51:21 [Rachel]
- CharlesL: in terms of roles in json - could you have a type like table?
- 02:51:53 [Rachel]
- marisa: that's an open issue - we haven't defined what vocabulary has to be used
- 02:52:07 [wendyreid]
- ack Makoto
- 02:52:07 [Rachel]
- ...another is incorporating into audiobooks
- 02:52:26 [Ralph]
- -> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues Sync Media issues list
- 02:52:27 [Rachel]
- Makoto: is this going to be applicable to any html document?
- 02:52:34 [Rachel]
- marisa: I would think so?
- 02:52:43 [George]
- q+
- 02:52:46 [Rachel]
- Makoto: do we need to coordinate with other groups then?
- 02:53:12 [Avneesh]
- q+
- 02:53:16 [Rachel]
- Ralph: yes - timed text is a good start
- 02:54:05 [Rachel]
- marisa: I shared with them our latest draft but they are interested in going in a different direction (sound effects).
- 02:54:52 [wendyreid]
- ack wendyreid
- 02:54:52 [Zakim]
- wendyreid, you wanted to talk about duration
- 02:55:32 [Rachel]
- wendyreid: I will edit the duration and length issue
- 02:55:38 [wendyreid]
- ack George
- 02:56:17 [Rachel]
- George: recently a discussion came up about alt text and we saw that some UAs allow for alt text to be read aloud
- 02:57:00 [wendyreid]
- ack Avneesh
- 02:57:04 [Rachel]
- ...we also are seeing skippability, the ability to avoid certain elements or collapse them
- 02:57:55 [Rachel]
- Avneesh: we should consider the use case for synch audio for alt text
- 02:58:47 [Rachel]
- marisa: this is an important oversight - we shouldn't say text but say element so to clarify that we are pointing to a media element
- 02:59:19 [Rachel]
- wendyreid: so if you are including supplemental content, publishers should be encouraged to do so as html
- 02:59:50 [Rachel]
- https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues Sync Media issues list
- 03:00:03 [CharlesL]
- q+
- 03:00:13 [wendyreid]
- ack CharlesL
- 03:01:21 [laudrain]
- q+
- 03:01:26 [wendyreid]
- ack laudrain
- 03:01:27 [Rachel]
- CharlesL: in terms of personalization - if the source doc is changed how does that impact the rest of the functionality
- 03:02:11 [Rachel]
- laudrain: as publishers we like to not have to change the content much - in one of your issues you mention web annotation selectors
- 03:02:23 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 03:02:26 [Rachel]
- ...is this something that can be chosen
- 03:02:27 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 03:02:44 [Rachel]
- bigbluehat: the current property is called text
- 03:03:32 [romain]
- q+ to ask about playback styling
- 03:04:29 [Rachel]
- bigbluehat: [says stuff about text pointers]
- 03:04:36 [Rachel]
- marisa: please submit a PR
- 03:05:03 [Rachel]
- bigbluehat: do your narration fils point to what they're narrating?
- 03:05:12 [Rachel]
- marisa: there's an open issue to allow for a url
- 03:05:37 [wendyreid]
- ack romain
- 03:05:37 [Zakim]
- romain, you wanted to ask about playback styling
- 03:05:53 [George]
- q+
- 03:06:20 [Makoto]
- +q
- 03:06:55 [Rachel]
- romain: the html spec says a new metadata name should not be created if the name is for something expected to have processing requirements.
- 03:07:07 [Rachel]
- marisa: I think we were putting this in the manifest
- 03:07:09 [kaleeg]
- kaleeg has joined #pwg
- 03:07:16 [wendyreid]
- ack Ralph
- 03:07:16 [Zakim]
- Ralph, you wanted to ask about re-use of audio files
- 03:07:17 [Rachel]
- ... can you open an issue
- 03:07:42 [Makoto]
- -q
- 03:08:07 [laudrain]
- q+
- 03:09:08 [Rachel]
- bigbluehat: with tools like hypothesis they don't let you record audio but you can imagine it being added and creating a more verbose web annotation
- 03:09:29 [Rachel]
- marisa: open an issue?
- 03:09:53 [Rachel]
- Ralph: so if someone narrates a spec, which changes...
- 03:10:01 [sangwhan]
- sangwhan has joined #pwg
- 03:10:06 [Rachel]
- bigbluehat: web annotatotions give fall back selectors
- 03:10:25 [sangwhan]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 03:10:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/15-pwg-minutes.html sangwhan
- 03:11:22 [romain]
- romain has joined #pwg
- 03:11:41 [wendyreid]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 03:12:04 [George]
- lost you folks again
- 03:12:08 [Rachel]
- marisa: I'm concerned that specifying where the anchoring takes place strays into best practices
- 03:12:26 [bigbluehat]
- s/[says stuff about text pointers]/if the `text` property were changed to `fragment`, then this could work across various text-based formats such as `text/plain` and `text/csv` (etc). There's also interest from Google's Chrome team in bringing some of the Web Annotation style text selectors to HTML URLs, so there may be opportunity to provide more of those features to this spec too.
- 03:12:49 [sangwhan]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 03:12:49 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/15-pwg-minutes.html sangwhan
- 03:13:31 [wendyreid]
- ack George
- 03:13:46 [wendyreid]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 03:14:11 [Rachel]
- George: when I'm reading with a screenreader it anounces the element
- 03:14:24 [laurent]
- laurent has joined #pwg
- 03:14:30 [Rachel]
- ...if I'm escaping, it's helpful to know what I am escaping out of
- 03:14:51 [Rachel]
- marisa: we do have an open issue about role vocabulary - namely how strict it should be
- 03:15:06 [Rachel]
- ...it's a user agent concern
- 03:16:07 [Rachel]
- ...you need the user agents to recognize the roles and terms, etc
- 03:16:13 [Rachel]
- ...it's an important issue
- 03:16:19 [wendyreid]
- ack laudrain
- 03:17:08 [Rachel]
- laudrain: to emphasize the pointer question - the use case of dyslexia to change the presentation of text with colored syllables
- 03:17:22 [Rachel]
- ...this has a huge impact on the source text
- 03:17:49 [Rachel]
- ...we would like to be able to do this in the same style as synch media
- 03:18:28 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 03:18:58 [bobbytung]
- bobbytung has joined #pwg
- 03:19:00 [wendyreid]
- ack Ralph
- 03:19:00 [Zakim]
- Ralph, you wanted to mention Personlization Semantics work https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/WD-personalization-semantics-1.0-20190711/
- 03:19:15 [Rachel]
- Ralph: there is a working group for personalization and accessibilities
- 03:19:23 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 03:19:38 [wendyreid]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 03:19:50 [Rachel]
- bigbluehat: as of yet I don't know how to do a visualization without messing up the DOM
- 03:19:59 [Rachel]
- ...the AOM tries to get there
- 03:20:14 [Rachel]
- ...but you don't want to mess with the AOM
- 03:20:45 [Rachel]
- ... that working group would be good to connect with on this front though
- 03:21:01 [Makoto]
- +q
- 03:21:14 [Rachel]
- marisa: it feels like a user agent space concern
- 03:21:17 [wendyreid]
- ack Makoto
- 03:21:44 [Rachel]
- Makoto: CSS inserts space characters
- 03:22:27 [Rachel]
- ... I'm wondering if changing the spacing would impact what is being done
- 03:22:29 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 03:22:45 [CharlesL]
- q+
- 03:22:50 [bigbluehat]
- q-
- 03:23:04 [wendyreid]
- ack CharlesL
- 03:23:09 [Rachel]
- marisa: it depends on how fine grained the change is... Adding is likely less disruptive than subtracting
- 03:23:22 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 03:23:47 [Rachel]
- CharlesL: at word level it may get more complicated if you have additional spaces?
- 03:24:05 [Rachel]
- marisa: this is agnostic to the level at which you highlight
- 03:24:51 [wendyreid]
- q?
- 03:25:01 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 03:25:05 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 03:25:24 [Rachel]
- bigbluehat: DOM order is not important in synch media except to the author?
- 03:25:27 [Makoto]
- I am summoned by the I18N WG. Will be back.
- 03:25:39 [Rachel]
- marisa: I'm agnostic. footnotes will matter.
- 03:26:07 [Ralph]
- i/bigbluehat: You have to do something/scribenick: Rachel
- 03:26:40 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/15-pwg-minutes.html Ralph
- 03:27:21 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 03:27:28 [Ralph]
- i/scribe+ marisa/scribenick: marisa
- 03:27:33 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/15-pwg-minutes.html Ralph
- 03:27:47 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 03:28:14 [CharlesL]
- CharlesL has joined #pwg
- 03:29:15 [George]
- I will catch up in the minutes about the meeting with Amazon Kindle folks.
- 04:08:40 [ivan]
- ivan has joined #pwg
- 04:09:45 [bobbytung]
- bobbytung has joined #pwg
- 04:09:48 [ivan]
- ivan has joined #pwg
- 04:19:29 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 04:24:03 [CharlesL]
- CharlesL has joined #pwg
- 04:24:48 [skk]
- skk has joined #pwg
- 04:27:02 [laudrain]
- laudrain has joined #pwg
- 04:28:08 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 04:30:52 [rkuroda]
- rkuroda has joined #pwg
- 04:32:53 [romain]
- romain has joined #pwg
- 04:33:27 [garth]
- garth has joined #pwg
- 04:33:34 [garth]
- present+ Garth
- 04:34:30 [dauwhe]
- present+ Ponyo
- 04:34:39 [Avneesh]
- Avneesh has joined #pwg
- 04:34:54 [dauwhe]
- not yet. We are chair-free
- 04:35:00 [Avneesh]
- present+
- 04:36:47 [Avneesh]
- all of us are standing without the chair
- 04:37:09 [skk]
- skk has joined #pwg
- 04:39:40 [marisa]
- marisa has joined #pwg
- 04:39:51 [MKitahara]
- MKitahara has joined #pwg
- 04:41:14 [Yanni]
- Yanni has joined #pwg
- 04:41:32 [marisa]
- s/marisa: moving highlight will use CSS pseudoclasses/marisa: moving highlight will not use CSS pseudoclasses
- 04:42:35 [Ariel]
- Ariel has joined #pwg
- 04:43:16 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 04:43:22 [ReinaldoFerraz]
- ReinaldoFerraz has joined #pwg
- 04:46:34 [JunGamo]
- JunGamo has joined #pwg
- 04:51:09 [ivan]
- ivan has joined #pwg
- 04:51:12 [toshiakikoike]
- toshiakikoike has joined #pwg
- 04:52:33 [dauwhe]
- scribenick: dauwhe
- 04:52:43 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: plans have changed. we're not meeting with Amazon.
- 04:53:03 [dauwhe]
- ... I may be able to arrange a small-scale informal meeting on Thursday.
- 04:53:26 [dauwhe]
- ... this afternoon I'd like to tackle a few things... some open issues...
- 04:53:27 [bobbytung]
- bobbytung has joined #pwg
- 04:54:00 [dauwhe]
- ... and something that wasn't originally on the agenda. A while ago we had a strategy meeting for the publishing activity at w3c
- 04:54:17 [dauwhe]
- ... we can brainstorm about what we want to work in
- 04:54:25 [dauwhe]
- s/in/on/
- 04:54:30 [dauwhe]
- ... first we'll do open issues
- 04:54:55 [wendyreid]
- https://github.com/w3c/pub-manifest/issues/62
- 04:54:59 [dauwhe]
- Topic: Issue #62
- 04:55:06 [dauwhe]
- romain: it's an editorial issue
- 04:55:25 [dauwhe]
- ... some standards use a different terminology
- 04:55:38 [dauwhe]
- ... we talk about raising a warning when something fails
- 04:55:48 [dauwhe]
- ... but other specs use fail/error
- 04:56:20 [dauwhe]
- ... so we should adopt the terminology used elsewhere
- 04:56:27 [laurent]
- laurent has joined #pwg
- 04:56:48 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: we can talk about it with Matt later
- 04:56:52 [wendyreid]
- https://github.com/w3c/pub-manifest/issues/60
- 04:56:55 [dauwhe]
- Topic: Issue #60
- 04:57:02 [kaleeg]
- kaleeg has joined #pwg
- 04:57:22 [dauwhe]
- romain: there's something about if processing does not finish, the manifest is invalid
- 04:57:32 [dauwhe]
- ... and we don't say what we mean by valid
- 04:57:45 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: issue 60 regarding the handling of invalid values
- 04:57:51 [dauwhe]
- ... we say to issue warnings
- 04:57:55 [NJ]
- NJ has joined #pwg
- 04:58:28 [dauwhe]
- ... we should look more closely about what UAs should do in the case of these invalid values
- 04:58:36 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 04:58:41 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 04:59:00 [wendyreid]
- dauwhe: At the risk of sounding like a broken record, we should make it clear for user agents, and make it testable
- 04:59:26 [bigbluehat]
- q+ to note: tests or it isn't a feature
- 04:59:43 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 04:59:43 [Zakim]
- bigbluehat, you wanted to note: tests or it isn't a feature
- 04:59:44 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: we should be specific... if a URL is invalid is different than if a date is invalid
- 05:00:11 [dauwhe]
- bigbluehat: to go through pub process, we need tests
- 05:00:23 [dauwhe]
- ... which presumes testable things
- 05:00:48 [laudrain]
- q+
- 05:00:51 [dauwhe]
- ... so if we're not clear enough we might not get out of CR
- 05:01:03 [dauwhe]
- Ralph: we haven't required comprehensive test suites
- 05:01:07 [dauwhe]
- ... it's up to the WG
- 05:01:42 [dauwhe]
- ... but for vocab, we do want to show that each term is useful, and so it must be used by two implementations
- 05:01:43 [wendyreid]
- ack laudrain
- 05:01:52 [dauwhe]
- laudrain: this brings back the q about audiobook check
- 05:02:04 [dauwhe]
- ... we have to figure out what to do with invalid values
- 05:02:07 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 05:02:22 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 05:02:54 [wendyreid]
- dauwhe: All the people I know working for reading systems deal with invalid EPUBs every day. I'm concerned about dealing with validation.
- 05:03:05 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: as one of the RS people, I deal with bad EPUBs every minute
- 05:03:16 [dauwhe]
- ... we create behaviours for certain common errors
- 05:03:20 [ivan_]
- ivan_ has joined #pwg
- 05:03:25 [dauwhe]
- ... we can deal with RSC-011 :)
- 05:03:25 [bigbluehat]
- q+ to ask about issue 60 specifically
- 05:03:54 [dauwhe]
- ... certain errors like mimetype or missing files are critical failures, but we had to decide based on experience
- 05:04:33 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 05:04:33 [Zakim]
- bigbluehat, you wanted to ask about issue 60 specifically
- 05:04:36 [dauwhe]
- ... technically we should not deal with a book with the RSC-011 but we feel we need to
- 05:04:56 [dauwhe]
- bigbluehat: issue 60 isn't about testing, it's about things like forcing defaults or failing on processing
- 05:05:07 [dauwhe]
- ... we talk about internal representations
- 05:05:25 [dauwhe]
- ... are we now dealing with APIs and such?
- 05:05:49 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: we have to steer towards a data format
- 05:05:57 [dauwhe]
- ... and we still have a section on processing
- 05:06:16 [dauwhe]
- bigbluehat: if we're json-LD, and we already have processing defined--it should choke on an invalid date
- 05:06:24 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: we could refer to JSON-LD
- 05:07:13 [wendyreid]
- https://github.com/w3c/pub-manifest/issues/51
- 05:07:15 [dauwhe]
- Topic: Area 51
- 05:07:25 [dauwhe]
- ... additional values for RPD
- 05:07:37 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: do we need more values?
- 05:07:41 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 05:07:44 [laurent]
- q+
- 05:08:06 [dauwhe]
- laurent: we have a framework, we have a property, we can extend when we want
- 05:08:23 [dauwhe]
- ... we know a future step will introduce visual narratives, but we don't need it yet
- 05:08:28 [wendyreid]
- ack laurent
- 05:08:34 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 05:08:49 [wendyreid]
- dauwhe: In the future we should not discuss this without visual aids
- 05:09:02 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: laurent is right; we can defer to a manga profile
- 05:09:08 [wendyreid]
- ack Ralph
- 05:09:29 [dauwhe]
- Ralph: this may be one place where the spec says we reserve all other values of this property for further work
- 05:09:42 [dauwhe]
- ... so implementations don't crash on values that may come along
- 05:09:48 [skk]
- skk has joined #pwg
- 05:10:56 [wendyreid]
- Proposed: Defer #51 in favour of the future BDCoMa Profile, but Publication Manifest should state that we reserve other values for future work.
- 05:11:04 [wendyreid]
- +1
- 05:11:15 [dauwhe]
- +1
- 05:11:17 [CharlesL]
- +1
- 05:11:34 [romain]
- +1
- 05:11:34 [duga]
- +1
- 05:11:36 [Rachel]
- +1
- 05:11:42 [JuanCorona]
- 0
- 05:11:49 [gpellegrino]
- 0
- 05:12:10 [garth]
- +1
- 05:12:34 [bigbluehat]
- +1
- 05:12:40 [wendyreid]
- RESOLVED: Defer #51 in favour of the future BDCoMa Profile, but Publication Manifest should state that we reserve other values for future work.
- 05:13:12 [dauwhe]
- Topic: Issue #12
- 05:13:13 [wendyreid]
- https://github.com/w3c/pub-manifest/issues/12
- 05:13:19 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: this is my favorite issue!
- 05:13:25 [dauwhe]
- ... what if there's a null base URL?
- 05:13:51 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 05:13:59 [dauwhe]
- ... in light of recent changes to the specification, we have gotten rid of the canonicalization model algorithm
- 05:14:17 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 05:14:24 [dauwhe]
- ... so maybe this is a non-issue
- 05:14:38 [dauwhe]
- bigbluehat: we don't know where these json files are used
- 05:14:43 [dauwhe]
- ... we don't have an origin now
- 05:14:57 [dauwhe]
- ... if LPF would be to go to REC, we might have to figure out how the base url is calculated
- 05:15:24 [dauwhe]
- ... but until this JSON file is related to some HTML document that can express a base URL, we don't need to say anything
- 05:15:30 [dauwhe]
- ... it's blank/null by default
- 05:15:57 [dauwhe]
- ... there are other concerns, but this issue is not an issue
- 05:16:54 [wendyreid]
- Proposed: Close Issue #12, the canonicalization algorithm has been removed, origin is no longer a concern for Publication Manifest
- 05:16:57 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 05:17:04 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 05:17:05 [dauwhe]
- bigbluehat: before we vote
- 05:17:19 [dauwhe]
- ... the canonicalization thing has not been removed but renamed
- 05:17:24 [dauwhe]
- ... maybe leave that bit out
- 05:17:36 [dauwhe]
- ... just say it's a json data document thingy. might not be at a URL
- 05:18:02 [dauwhe]
- Ralph: do you want to capture bigbluehat's thought that this will be a concern in the future when the manifest is part of the web
- 05:18:16 [wendyreid]
- Proposed: Close Issue #12, the canonicalization algorithm has been changed, origin is no longer a concern for Publication Manifest, but should be considered for specifications concerning discovery
- 05:18:28 [bigbluehat]
- +1
- 05:18:30 [Ralph]
- s/part of the web/is included in some future transfer protocol(s)
- 05:18:37 [wendyreid]
- +1
- 05:18:56 [laurent]
- +1
- 05:19:01 [gpellegrino]
- +1
- 05:19:05 [JuanCorona]
- +1
- 05:19:12 [dauwhe]
- +1 with an error of 1
- 05:19:20 [duga]
- +1
- 05:19:24 [toshiakikoike]
- +1
- 05:19:27 [CharlesL]
- +1
- 05:19:37 [wendyreid]
- RESOLVED: Close Issue #12, the canonicalization algorithm has been changed, origin is no longer a concern for Publication Manifest, but should be considered for specifications concerning discovery
- 05:20:01 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: I think this one can be closed
- 05:20:05 [wendyreid]
- https://github.com/w3c/pub-manifest/issues/9
- 05:20:15 [dauwhe]
- Topic: Issue number nine number nine number nine...
- 05:20:26 [dauwhe]
- (wordplay not worthy of being minuted)
- 05:20:38 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: this is step 11 of the canonicalization algo
- 05:20:43 [dauwhe]
- ... there's not a base any more
- 05:20:50 [dauwhe]
- ... that step is gone
- 05:20:54 [dauwhe]
- ... so I think we can close
- 05:21:11 [dauwhe]
- laurent: I agree with the resolution
- 05:21:18 [dauwhe]
- ... it's also true for LPF
- 05:21:37 [dauwhe]
- ... which is about something in a zip and says nothing about how it can be exposed on the web where it needs a URL
- 05:21:52 [wendyreid]
- Proposed: Close Issue #9, recent changes to the specification around the canonicalization algorithm mean there is no longer a base.
- 05:22:01 [dauwhe]
- +9
- 05:22:02 [garth]
- +1
- 05:22:02 [wendyreid]
- +1
- 05:22:03 [CharlesL]
- +1
- 05:22:10 [laurent]
- +1
- 05:22:11 [romain]
- +1
- 05:22:16 [bigbluehat]
- +1
- 05:22:19 [duga]
- +1
- 05:22:24 [toshiakikoike]
- +1
- 05:22:37 [wendyreid]
- RESOLVED: Close Issue #9, recent changes to the specification around the canonicalization algorithm mean there is no longer a base.
- 05:23:33 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: two issues in audiobooks
- 05:23:41 [dauwhe]
- ... one of them will spawn a new issue in pub manifest
- 05:23:55 [wendyreid]
- https://github.com/w3c/audiobooks/issues/12
- 05:23:59 [dauwhe]
- Topic: Issue #12 in audiobooks
- 05:24:11 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: there was a suggestion to include 3 things
- 05:24:16 [dauwhe]
- ... abridged value
- 05:24:18 [dauwhe]
- ... preview
- 05:24:24 [dauwhe]
- ... how to include a preview
- 05:24:31 [dauwhe]
- ... and the last one, which will get a new issu
- 05:24:34 [dauwhe]
- ... e
- 05:24:44 [dauwhe]
- ... the isFamilyFriendly flag
- 05:24:49 [garth]
- q?
- 05:25:04 [dauwhe]
- ... schema doesn't have a MPAA-type rating
- 05:25:19 [dauwhe]
- ... there isn't a standard
- 05:25:35 [dauwhe]
- ... the retailers tend to decide
- 05:25:44 [dauwhe]
- ... kobo ask publishers to identify, and then verify
- 05:25:50 [dauwhe]
- ... it depends on jurisdiction
- 05:25:56 [dauwhe]
- ... i think the flag is worth having
- 05:26:11 [dauwhe]
- ... it's a terrible name, but schema doesn't have a better one
- 05:27:03 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: I'd like to close this issue, and then move the isFamilyFriendly to pub manifest
- 05:27:42 [wendyreid]
- Proposed: Close Audiobooks Issue #12, abridged and preview have been added to the specification, and isFamilyFriendly be moved to Publication Manifest
- 05:27:54 [duga]
- +1
- 05:27:55 [CharlesL]
- +1
- 05:27:56 [Rachel]
- q+
- 05:27:56 [wendyreid]
- +1
- 05:27:56 [romain]
- +1
- 05:28:22 [wendyreid]
- ack Rachel
- 05:28:22 [dauwhe]
- Rachel: when we say move to publication manifest, we're really just saying that we're going to open an issue
- 05:28:28 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: yes, just opening an issue
- 05:28:38 [garth]
- +1 (but don’t think we should do such a thing in pbu manifest, as I think it’s intractable)
- 05:29:08 [wendyreid]
- RESOLVED: Close Audiobooks Issue #12, abridged and preview have been added to the specification, and isFamilyFriendly be moved to Publication Manifest
- 05:29:08 [Rachel]
- +1
- 05:29:17 [dauwhe]
- Plus one
- 05:29:39 [dauwhe]
- Topic: Issue #22 in audiobooks
- 05:29:39 [wendyreid]
- https://github.com/w3c/audiobooks/issues/22
- 05:29:40 [Ralph]
- ["be moved to" as in "raised as an issue for discussion in"]
- 05:29:57 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 05:30:06 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: there's a mention of origin in the privacy and security section of audiobook
- 05:30:27 [dauwhe]
- ... (quoting from spec about where resources should be same-origin)
- 05:30:28 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 05:30:40 [dauwhe]
- bigbluehat: given what we just said about pub manifest
- 05:30:51 [dauwhe]
- ... mentioning it here is confusing
- 05:31:00 [dauwhe]
- ... we should take it out, or talk about how to handle a manifest
- 05:31:08 [dauwhe]
- ... so we should just delete the line
- 05:31:34 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: I'm happy to delete
- 05:31:59 [wendyreid]
- Proposed: Close Audiobooks Issue #22, remove the line from the specification and defer to more qualified groups.
- 05:32:02 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 05:32:08 [bigbluehat]
- +1
- 05:32:10 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 05:32:11 [CharlesL]
- +1
- 05:32:14 [wendyreid]
- +1
- 05:32:17 [duga]
- +1
- 05:32:20 [dauwhe]
- bigbluehat: i want to add that there's something we could call out
- 05:32:26 [dauwhe]
- ... that's the use of base in @context
- 05:32:27 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 05:32:41 [dauwhe]
- ... you can say there's a base of all the URLs in the JSON
- 05:32:50 [dauwhe]
- ... we could have a section that explains how to do that
- 05:33:09 [dauwhe]
- ... the advantage of @base in context is that your resource list uses fewer bytes
- 05:33:34 [wendyreid]
- RESOLVED: Close Audiobooks Issue #22, remove the line from the specification and defer to more qualified groups.
- 05:33:59 [wendyreid]
- Action: wendyreid to edit Audiobooks standard to remove line about the origin.
- 05:34:22 [dauwhe]
- wendyreid: do want to discuss sync media
- 05:34:28 [Makoto]
- Makoto has joined #pwg
- 05:34:32 [Makoto]
- https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Hilton+Fukuoka+Sea+Hawk,+%EF%BC%92%E4%B8%81%E7%9B%AE-%EF%BC%92-%EF%BC%93+%E5%9C%B0%E8%A1%8C%E6%B5%9C+%E4%B8%AD%E5%A4%AE%E5%8C%BA+Fukuoka,+%E7%A6%8F%E5%B2%A1%E7%9C%8C/''/@33.5877455,130.3494776,15z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x35419252ad90b435:0x3bb689fc8164a932!2m2!1d130.3597275!2d33.5945018!1m5!1m1!1s0x354193a481c0dac3:0xb341cf51ede86847!2m2!1d130.357555!2d33.581152!3e2
- 05:34:41 [dauwhe]
- Topic: Fragmentions
- 05:34:45 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 05:34:55 [dauwhe]
- marisa: a way to non-desctructively reference text in an html doc
- 05:35:15 [Makoto]
- The above URL shows the location of the restaurant for our dinner.
- 05:35:32 [duga]
- scribe+
- 05:35:36 [Makoto]
- 24 minutes by foot from here.
- 05:36:20 [duga]
- marisa: Can talk DOM events
- 05:36:39 [duga]
- ... Are these standard events?
- 05:36:51 [CharlesL]
- q?
- 05:36:53 [duga]
- romain: Yes, there are some standard ones
- 05:37:05 [duga]
- ... it is easy to polyfill
- 05:37:07 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 05:37:15 [duga]
- bigbluehat: Back to fragmention thing
- 05:37:30 [duga]
- ... related to the Google thing mentioned earlier
- 05:37:51 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 05:37:54 [duga]
- ... fragmention is only JS, will never be in a standard
- 05:38:15 [duga]
- ... The other one is designed to be a broken URL
- 05:38:28 [duga]
- marisa: Wants bigbluehat and Tantek in the same room to duke it out
- 05:38:41 [duga]
- ... Personally, neutral on the options
- 05:39:10 [duga]
- bigbluehat: If you keep with single string fragment identifier, only a few are refertenceable from a spec
- 05:39:41 [duga]
- ... For HTML probably want the Chrome thing
- 05:39:47 [Makoto]
- <dinner>The current list of participants shows 17 attendees.</dinner>
- 05:40:01 [duga]
- ... Will only show up in the scrollto section, may have spec ramifications
- 05:40:10 [duga]
- marisa: Double has anchors is the previous style
- 05:40:17 [duga]
- s/has/hash/
- 05:40:34 [duga]
- bigbluehat: Big things is want somethign you can reference
- 05:40:48 [duga]
- marisa: I am just a note, I will never be a bill
- 05:40:54 [duga]
- s/bill/rec/
- 05:41:06 [wendyreid]
- q?
- 05:41:14 [Makoto]
- <dinner>If you forgot to add yourself to the list, contact me right now. Otherwise, even if you go there, you will have no food.
- 05:41:32 [duga]
- marisa: Are there and standard DOM events that would apply
- 05:41:41 [romain]
- known interfaces based on Event https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Event#Introduction
- 05:41:43 [duga]
- ... then our own special ones like onCanEscape
- 05:41:54 [duga]
- ... what are the standard playback DOM events
- 05:41:58 [duga]
- ... ?
- 05:42:05 [JuanCorona]
- q+
- 05:42:09 [duga]
- romain: Posted a link
- 05:42:32 [duga]
- JuanCorona: What about a media event?
- 05:42:34 [wendyreid]
- ack JuanCorona
- 05:42:44 [duga]
- ... are you looking for anything that sounds remotely like it?
- 05:42:51 [duga]
- marisa: Just don't want to reinvent
- 05:43:09 [duga]
- JuanCorona: What are the events for an audio or video element?
- 05:43:10 [Ralph]
- -> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/Events/Media_events "Media events" [MDN] -- might be relevant
- 05:43:16 [romain]
- q?
- 05:43:26 [duga]
- romain: I don't we need start or stop events
- 05:43:39 [duga]
- ... Mostly created for the playback moving thing
- 05:43:54 [duga]
- ... so there would be an event for when the element changes
- 05:43:57 [JuanCorona]
- https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMediaElement/play_event
- 05:45:02 [duga]
- ... Playback of page showing highlight moving, and could add a magnification to show the currently spoken text
- 05:45:10 [duga]
- marisa: Could add that to the demo
- 05:45:20 [duga]
- ... In what part of the spec do we define DOM events?
- 05:45:36 [duga]
- ... A lot of it could beyond playback (eg page change events)
- 05:45:57 [Makoto]
- <dinner>JuanCorona, I suppose that you are not coming.</dinner>
- 05:46:21 [duga]
- dauwhe: Did Brady talk about this years ago?
- 05:46:28 [duga]
- duga: Not exactly, that was layout
- 05:47:08 [duga]
- marisa: We define an event, polyfill it, an enabled page would detect that and do something cool
- 05:48:45 [marisa]
- https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/15
- 05:49:02 [duga]
- marisa: Any takers for issue 15?
- 05:49:41 [duga]
- ... Where do you make the association?
- 05:49:44 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 05:50:16 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 05:50:44 [duga]
- ... We don't know how a pub manifest will be processed
- 05:50:49 [duga]
- bigbluehat: Would leave it out
- 05:51:00 [duga]
- marisa: No, needs to be in pub manifest for audiobooks
- 05:51:05 [duga]
- bigbluehat: Oh
- 05:51:31 [bigbluehat]
- q+ to ask marisa to expand on the audiobook thing
- 05:51:35 [duga]
- marisa: HTML pub manifest doesn't really exist yet
- 05:51:46 [duga]
- ... So it is really hard to solve, and we keep going in circles
- 05:51:59 [duga]
- bigbluehat: Sync media is html only?
- 05:52:05 [duga]
- marisa: No, can be an mp3
- 05:52:33 [duga]
- bigbluehat: The demo was text centric, in audiobooks it is opposite
- 05:52:49 [duga]
- marisa: Yeah, but the user experience could still be indentical
- 05:53:32 [duga]
- bigbluehat: Can you get the same result using the TOC with sync media?
- 05:53:46 [duga]
- marisa: No, don't want sync media on TOC
- 05:53:57 [duga]
- general agreement
- 05:54:22 [bigbluehat]
- q-
- 05:54:27 [duga]
- bigbluehat: Index file that comes with audiobooks is just a landing page, right?
- 05:54:38 [duga]
- marisa: Could be, would have to check
- 05:54:43 [bobbytung]
- bobbytung has joined #pwg
- 05:55:02 [Makoto]
- <dinner>Will Ivan attend the dinner? Is he here in Fukuoka?</dinner>
- 05:55:22 [duga]
- marisa: Do we require it in the html head always for consistency? Or leave it optional?
- 05:55:38 [duga]
- ... Don't know, don't feel strongly, but need to decide
- 05:55:48 [Makoto]
- <dinner>Wendy, thanks.</dinner>
- 05:55:48 [duga]
- ... moving on ...
- 05:55:55 [duga]
- ... Format the explainer
- 05:56:12 [duga]
- ... Needs to look like an explainer. Could use some editing help.
- 05:56:24 [marisa]
- https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/13
- 05:56:25 [duga]
- Rachel: I can help
- 05:56:59 [duga]
- marisa: Next issue, 13
- 05:57:09 [duga]
- ... Want to leave this not sctrict
- 05:57:27 [duga]
- s/sctrict/strict/
- 05:57:47 [duga]
- ... Doesn't even have to be the word role
- 05:58:04 [duga]
- bigbluehat: Are you referencing an existing vocab?
- 05:58:11 [duga]
- marisa: No, that is a minefield
- 05:58:20 [duga]
- ... Maybe using "role" itself is dangerous
- 05:58:50 [romain]
- q+
- 05:58:57 [duga]
- ... Any complicated structure you might want to escape, or anything you might want to skip
- 05:59:06 [wendyreid]
- ack romain
- 05:59:09 [duga]
- ... skipability might be ignore page numbers
- 05:59:21 [laudrain]
- q+
- 05:59:26 [duga]
- romain: The issue of not having a finite list, it enters the UX realm
- 05:59:35 [duga]
- ... Need translations etc
- 05:59:37 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 05:59:49 [duga]
- ... if it is set, then the UA knows what roles to expose
- 06:00:25 [duga]
- marisa: In epub, finding the right set of terms was hard, eg how extensible should they be?
- 06:00:35 [duga]
- ... Like language tags, don't be too rigid
- 06:00:37 [wendyreid]
- ack laudrain
- 06:00:56 [duga]
- laudrain: What about the term skippable?
- 06:01:07 [duga]
- marisa: But how will they know what I am skipping?
- 06:01:21 [duga]
- ... eg need to say skip page numbers, but not footnotes
- 06:01:28 [duga]
- ... for escaping it is easy
- 06:01:38 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 06:01:50 [duga]
- dauwhe: It is also a little about how you are presenting the audio to the user
- 06:02:01 [duga]
- ... There was an abandoned attempt in CSS to do that
- 06:02:45 [duga]
- marisa: Please join the list!
- 06:02:58 [duga]
- q+
- 06:03:08 [wendyreid]
- ack duga
- 06:03:34 [wendyreid]
- duga: You need to know why its skippable, can you give it a reason instead of a role
- 06:03:49 [wendyreid]
- marisa: You'd run into translation problems, but the term doesn't need to have meaning outside of the scope
- 06:04:11 [duga]
- laudrain: Reminds me of discussion around "purpose"
- 06:04:38 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 06:04:41 [duga]
- CharlesL: Purpose could be reused
- 06:04:53 [duga]
- laudrain: Where is the discussion on that?
- 06:05:03 [duga]
- CharlesL: Have gone sideways from there
- 06:05:22 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 06:05:25 [bigbluehat]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#motivation-and-purpose
- 06:05:41 [duga]
- bigbluehat: Web annotations has purpose and motivations already
- 06:05:54 [duga]
- ... "this is why I am pointing at something"
- 06:06:36 [duga]
- ... synced media could say "these are the terms we are using"
- 06:06:44 [duga]
- marisa: Yeah, that's what we need to figure out
- 06:06:59 [marisa]
- https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/12
- 06:07:03 [duga]
- bigbluehat: Could steal from the existing work
- 06:07:04 [Rachel]
- dauwhe: it was so... subtle
- 06:07:17 [Rachel]
- s/dauwhe: it was so... subtle//
- 06:07:26 [duga]
- wendyreid: Let's break
- 06:08:30 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 06:21:11 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 06:28:54 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 06:30:07 [MKitahara]
- MKitahara has joined #pwg
- 06:36:24 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 06:38:06 [rkuroda]
- rkuroda has joined #pwg
- 06:41:18 [Avneesh]
- Avneesh has joined #pwg
- 06:41:48 [romain_]
- romain_ has joined #pwg
- 06:42:26 [NJ_]
- NJ_ has joined #pwg
- 06:42:48 [Ariel]
- Ariel has joined #pwg
- 06:43:21 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 06:44:16 [laudrain]
- laudrain has joined #pwg
- 06:44:49 [CharlesL]
- CharlesL has joined #pwg
- 06:45:02 [marisa]
- marisa has joined #pwg
- 06:46:49 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 06:52:17 [CharlesL]
- scribe+
- 06:52:52 [toshiakikoike]
- toshiakikoike has joined #pwg
- 06:53:39 [JunGamo]
- JunGamo has joined #pwg
- 06:54:01 [CharlesL]
- Wendy: strategy meeting, what to work on, ideas, talk business, communities etc. on what the future would hold. Charter expires next year… we can create a new charter and do new things. could be brought to us from others but we can suggest new ideas for future work.
- 06:54:32 [kaleeg]
- kaleeg has joined #pwg
- 06:54:37 [CharlesL]
- … ideas for next strategy meeting, so what should we include
- 06:54:51 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 06:54:54 [CharlesL]
- … could be big ideas
- 06:54:55 [laurent]
- laurent has joined #pwg
- 06:54:56 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 06:55:28 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 06:55:52 [rkuroda]
- rkuroda has joined #pwg
- 06:56:41 [CharlesL]
- BY: open to ideas around web components that could become publications, iframe needs, reinvented transclusion element (toast / switch) web components show them off get developer demand then put them into HTML maybe…
- 06:57:18 [wendyreid]
- s/BY/bigbluehat
- 06:57:38 [CharlesL]
- … could get stuck in JS. early experiments 2 years ago single HTML document and transcluding them singularly styled included. Virtual scroll (web component / standard web component potentially)
- 06:58:04 [CharlesL]
- …, I would like to revisit this, maybe polyfils can also be valid implementation.
- 06:58:11 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 06:58:31 [Rachel]
- q+
- 06:58:37 [bigbluehat]
- q+
- 06:58:42 [JuanCorona]
- q+
- 06:59:05 [wendyreid]
- ack RRSAgent
- 06:59:08 [CharlesL]
- Dave: incubation / experimentation this group may not be the place to do this. this group to take existing proving things and bring them to the finish.
- 06:59:09 [wendyreid]
- ack Rachel
- 06:59:29 [dauwhe]
- s/Dave:/dauwhe:/
- 06:59:35 [romain_]
- q+
- 07:00:14 [CharlesL]
- Rachel: roadmaps to the future this work should be distributed. escalate items from CG to WG
- 07:00:43 [Avneesh]
- q+
- 07:00:54 [wendyreid]
- ack bigbluehat
- 07:03:13 [wendyreid]
- ack JuanCorona
- 07:03:14 [CharlesL]
- BigBlueHat: how to liaison these efforts , would be nice to write a proper spec, but we are not the implementers. what are the large needs when the browsers come into the room that we have a good collective set of deliverables that we need.
- 07:04:00 [CharlesL]
- JunGamo: Likes Marisa's work, will the WG support this work like we saw with the sync media demo
- 07:04:59 [JunGamo]
- s/JunGamo:/JuanCorona:/
- 07:05:15 [CharlesL]
- wendyreid: there is a SyncMedia CG is also is related in the publication manifest and audiobooks. publishing CG EPUB3 CG there is room for that.
- 07:06:09 [CharlesL]
- … depends on how vocal and very specific requirement for us, and the WG has to handle bigger issue of how we handle bringing books to the web.
- 07:06:12 [wendyreid]
- ack romain
- 07:06:21 [Rachel]
- q+
- 07:06:53 [CharlesL]
- romain: can Publishing WG can do horizontal reviews in a publishing context. dont have a spec for this but a lot of groups are interest in us Web Components, CSS etc.
- 07:06:57 [wendyreid]
- ack Avneesh
- 07:07:32 [CharlesL]
- Avneesh: Where do we want to go, these are all ways of getting there but what is the ultimate goal. Do we have any strong business cases.
- 07:07:36 [wendyreid]
- ack Rachel
- 07:07:40 [laudrain]
- q+
- 07:08:20 [CharlesL]
- Rachel: we need to consider epub3.2 needs to move from Final specification to a Rec Track which would move from CG to WG.
- 07:08:21 [wendyreid]
- ack laudrain
- 07:08:34 [duga]
- +1 Rachel
- 07:09:36 [wendyreid]
- q+
- 07:10:31 [CharlesL]
- laudrain: we need new standards to do more types of publications. I am against having EPUB as a recomendation;
- 07:11:40 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 07:11:53 [kaleeg]
- q+
- 07:12:14 [Rachel]
- q+
- 07:12:44 [CharlesL]
- … CPU on reading devices are getting faster better etc. but we can infuse new capabilities for the web, use incubation in community groups to foster this experimentation etc. and see what we can take further in the WG.
- 07:13:09 [duga]
- q+
- 07:13:11 [JuanCorona]
- +1 laudrain, on large DOM ideas
- 07:14:16 [wendyreid]
- ack wendyreid
- 07:14:16 [CharlesL]
- … new standards personalization for renderings new ways to display info without changing it. new work on JSONLD an metadata. standard packaging format CSS issues still for rendering content. we need to have more effort in publishing companies EDRLab to enable more work in CSS rendering for publications. Horizontal Accessibility etc.
- 07:14:54 [CharlesL]
- wendyreid: ProRectrack for EPUB3.2. incubation is important (web publications we didn't have incubation and proof that it would work.)
- 07:16:24 [CharlesL]
- … which is why we didn't have this incubation and is why we decided to go in the direction we did. But with EPUB we have 20 years of incubation and know what we will get. We can then go to these issues to other groups if we are moving this to publication. for CSS, packaging etc.
- 07:17:53 [CharlesL]
- … we know what the problems are and what the business needs and they are not ready to move away from EPUB. I think we can move EPUB to rec, track and can web publishing, scholarly publishing, newspapers etc we can work with them.
- 07:17:56 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 07:18:47 [CharlesL]
- dauwhe: EPUB and large documents we don't require chunking but went that way due to limitations of a sony reader at the time.
- 07:19:27 [wendyreid]
- ack kaleeg
- 07:19:29 [CharlesL]
- … abstain from EPUB rec track.
- 07:22:37 [CharlesL]
- kaleeg: I have been making EPUBs for over 20 years. Publishing WG is critical for me to look for W3C specs. Humanity in this world, I think we have the opportunity to take the publication (web;book sites) to take their own place in the world and a different kind of publishing model
- 07:23:13 [romain]
- q?
- 07:23:18 [CharlesL]
- … we have the opportunity to create our own space and new publishing model
- 07:23:40 [CharlesL]
- … we can reach out and expand in populations across the planet.
- 07:23:43 [wendyreid]
- ack Rachel
- 07:25:05 [Makoto_]
- Makoto_ has joined #pwg
- 07:25:15 [CharlesL]
- Rachel: Dave mention that he splits books into separate files but we must split them because large textbooks has to be split or they can't be loaded on these reading systems.
- 07:25:35 [wendyreid]
- ack duga
- 07:26:27 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 07:27:01 [CharlesL]
- duga: you can't change the world by writing a spec, but if no one asks for it it won't matter ,but people are asking for an EPUB spec.
- 07:27:03 [kaleeg]
- Q+
- 07:27:21 [wendyreid]
- q+
- 07:27:26 [Makoto_]
- +q
- 07:27:28 [wendyreid]
- ack RRSAgent
- 07:27:29 [CharlesL]
- … I don't want to work on things unless there are more than 2 parties that are interested.
- 07:27:30 [wendyreid]
- ack Ralph
- 07:28:59 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 07:29:24 [CharlesL]
- Ralph: EPUB3 recommendation: better EPUB/PDF if there is enough interest we can do both. we shouldn't obsess over it. for web to get better that Dave and others to force CSS to improve and the quickest way to do this for EPUB3.3 (rec track) or we should do something further reaching.
- 07:29:52 [CharlesL]
- … we should be doing more horizontal review this group has more experience and continue telling CSS to do that.
- 07:30:01 [Makoto_]
- <dinner>We have to leave here around 19:30.</dinner>
- 07:30:28 [CharlesL]
- … it will be a lot of work as Dave points out,
- 07:30:42 [JN]
- JN has joined #pwg
- 07:30:48 [Makoto_]
- <dinner>If we are late, our seats might be cancelled.</dinner>
- 07:30:55 [CharlesL]
- … lets figure out Ebooks work on the web. whats better than PDF, but we have to do better.
- 07:31:10 [Rachel]
- i/Rachel: Dave mention that he splits books into separate files but we must split them because large textbooks has to be split or they can't be loaded on these reading systems./ This future that you describe sounds exciting and the incubation that will take place in the community groups sounds as though it will be fun to participate in but what is the standard that we use with user agents, browsers, and others now? We have a carefully incubated and
- 07:31:10 [Rachel]
- negotiated for consensus document that is ready to go to forward to the PWG and benefit a broader audience./
- 07:31:14 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 07:31:17 [CharlesL]
- … lets use the talents to get that. not to the exclusion of EPUB3
- 07:32:07 [wendyreid]
- ack kaleeg
- 07:32:08 [CharlesL]
- dauwhe: there are lots of things we can do we can make EPUB better, its a 3 million dollar industry. 10 years from now there will be a lot of EPUB still around.
- 07:32:11 [CharlesL]
- kaleeg:
- 07:33:36 [CharlesL]
- … EPUB specs not changing the world, it changed my world a w3c spec in that I have seen the w3c spec/reports specs like decloration and when I read some specs reports and the publishing WG and I saw the possibility of an EPUB could be a a 10 billion dollar industry.
- 07:34:26 [CharlesL]
- … new future is possible and new directions ahead our world changing every year a new million people gain access to the web.
- 07:34:48 [Avneesh]
- q+
- 07:34:49 [CharlesL]
- … w3c has that guiding light.
- 07:34:54 [dauwhe]
- ack wen
- 07:35:21 [Ralph]
- s/obsess over it./obsess over whether which to do as if we must choose only one thing to work on.
- 07:36:21 [CharlesL]
- wendyreid: we have the capacity / knowledge we can bring EPUB to recomendation… and there is a growing number of folks publishing on the web main stream publishing with massive (fanFiction) communities already doing this
- 07:36:21 [bigbluehat]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 07:36:21 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/15-pwg-minutes.html bigbluehat
- 07:36:42 [CharlesL]
- … having trouble tagging their content, apply metadata
- 07:37:01 [bigbluehat]
- q?
- 07:37:15 [CharlesL]
- … we know how self publishers do it, why are they doing it on the web, and not using EPUB.
- 07:37:19 [laurent]
- q+
- 07:37:47 [CharlesL]
- … we need to reach out to this community, publishing we mean trade books but thats not the only publishing we are talking about.
- 07:37:50 [wendyreid]
- ack Makoto_
- 07:38:58 [CharlesL]
- Makoto_: proceedure: we are deviating the w3c process. stearing committee when IDPF was absolved in W3C. we need some changes, either we give up or we ask w3c team/committee.
- 07:39:16 [CharlesL]
- 3.2 as a w3c rec is not possible without changes to the process.
- 07:39:49 [laudrain]
- s/stearing/steering/
- 07:39:49 [CharlesL]
- … we can not remove these backward compatability.
- 07:40:18 [CharlesL]
- … we are expecting a new charter if Browser vendors are involved and part of the steering committee.
- 07:40:30 [dauwhe]
- q?
- 07:40:33 [dauwhe]
- q+
- 07:40:34 [wendyreid]
- ack Avneesh
- 07:41:16 [toshiakikoike]
- toshiakikoike has joined #pwg
- 07:41:25 [CharlesL]
- Avneesh: 2/3 steps after this would be great. energy on this group is low. we need a strong business case. or exciting reason to move fwd. maybe within the w3c
- 07:42:19 [CharlesL]
- … explore within w3c maybe see web publishing working or a strong vision to get our members excited. we need to do something different.
- 07:42:19 [wendyreid]
- ack laurent
- 07:43:04 [CharlesL]
- laudrain: EPUB3 as a rec. do we expect more publications as a result in these communities which are not currently using EPUB now?
- 07:43:52 [CharlesL]
- … better document maybe interoperability , technical difficulties due to CSS etc.
- 07:44:05 [Rachel]
- q+
- 07:44:09 [romain]
- q+
- 07:44:13 [laudrain]
- CharlesL : it is Laurent speaking !
- 07:44:50 [Rachel]
- s/laudrain: EPUB3 as a rec. do we expect more publications as a result in these communities which are not currently using EPUB now?/laurent: EPUB3 as a rec. do we expect more publications as a result in these communities which are not currently using EPUB now?
- 07:44:51 [dauwhe]
- s/laudrain:/laurent:/
- 07:45:03 [Makoto_]
- +q
- 07:45:10 [Rachel]
- s/CharlesL : it is Laurent speaking !//
- 07:45:35 [CharlesL]
- wendyreid: EPUB stronger epub light reader how can we open EPUB in a browser. better closer to the web,improving html for rendering, css there is potential there.
- 07:46:25 [CharlesL]
- … a billion dollar industry lets make it easier for them more understandable for reading systems, closer to the web.
- 07:46:27 [wendyreid]
- ack dauwhe
- 07:47:19 [Makoto_]
- Three cheers to Dave
- 07:47:25 [CharlesL]
- dauwhe: as editor of EPUB right now I want to rewrite every word especially with Reading system conformance its difficult for everyone involved… I will do this regardless of rectrack.
- 07:47:52 [laudrain]
- q?
- 07:48:49 [romain]
- q-
- 07:49:00 [CharlesL]
- … there are a lot of problems on how things are organized, how we are going to work on it and what we are going to work on and the relationship between steering and WG and business group and the WG this has created difficulties between the WG/CG and BG. need clearer responsibilities and much of this is outside process there are gaps in these.
- 07:49:01 [romain]
- (dauwhe just covered what q+'ed for: a full rewrite w/b needed, it doesn't necessarily have to happen in a WG)
- 07:49:26 [CharlesL]
- wendyreid: should not talk about process stuff for us
- 07:49:37 [wendyreid]
- ack Ralph
- 07:49:55 [rkuroda_]
- rkuroda_ has joined #pwg
- 07:50:57 [CharlesL]
- Ralph: Marisa and Dave talked about that this is a feature, this community is trying to push web technology that hasn't been pushed this way before. experiment to enhance web technologies.
- 07:51:12 [dauwhe]
- s/Marisa/Makoto/
- 07:52:00 [CharlesL]
- … w3c needs more direction from the business models and direct more of the technical work from a business perspective.
- 07:52:06 [dauwhe]
- s/talked about that this is a feature/talked about that this as a bug, but they perhaps should consider it as a feature/
- 07:52:11 [CharlesL]
- … lets keep those conversations separate
- 07:53:33 [CharlesL]
- … Makoto sayid"W3C specs are not concerned about Longevity" we do care about the content existed.
- 07:54:32 [laudrain]
- q?
- 07:54:37 [CharlesL]
- … 0.001 feature is important "you" get to decide what is important. the whole community reviews our work, Our work will be reviewed and commented on
- 07:54:49 [wendyreid]
- zakim, close the queue
- 07:54:50 [Zakim]
- ok, wendyreid, the speaker queue is closed
- 07:54:57 [laudrain]
- q+
- 07:55:07 [wendyreid]
- ack Rachel
- 07:55:08 [Rachel]
- q-
- 07:55:14 [wendyreid]
- ack Makoto_
- 07:58:47 [CharlesL]
- Luc: EPUB as a rec, why we failed with Web publications and how it will be better if we work on EPUB3 as a rec.
- 07:59:11 [CharlesL]
- wendyreid: End of Day 1!
- 07:59:59 [CharlesL]
- s/3 million/1 billion
- 08:00:45 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 08:01:22 [CharlesL]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 08:01:22 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/09/15-pwg-minutes.html CharlesL
- 08:01:28 [JunGamo]
- JunGamo has left #pwg
- 08:02:00 [Ralph]
- zakim, bye
- 08:02:00 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #pwg
- 08:04:36 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 08:07:22 [shu]
- shu has joined #pwg
- 08:18:00 [Ralph_]
- Ralph_ has joined #pwg
- 08:22:06 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 08:28:28 [gpellegrino]
- gpellegrino has joined #pwg
- 08:43:03 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 08:45:31 [Ralph]
- Ralph has joined #pwg
- 09:08:09 [JuanCorona]
- JuanCorona has joined #pwg
- 09:12:13 [shu]
- shu has joined #pwg
- 09:12:32 [ivan]
- ivan has joined #pwg
- 09:17:08 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 09:46:01 [skk]
- skk has joined #pwg
- 09:48:30 [jroque]
- jroque has joined #pwg
- 09:55:19 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 09:58:03 [plinss_]
- plinss_ has joined #pwg
- 10:14:41 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 10:16:13 [duga]
- duga has joined #pwg
- 10:24:28 [dauwhe]
- dauwhe has joined #pwg
- 10:53:08 [mattg]
- mattg has joined #pwg
- 11:40:00 [Yanni]
- Yanni has joined #pwg
- 12:17:47 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, bye
- 12:17:47 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in https://www.w3.org/2019/09/16-pwg-actions.rdf :
- 12:17:47 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: wendyreid to edit Audiobooks standard to remove line about the origin. [1]
- 12:17:47 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in https://www.w3.org/2019/09/15-pwg-irc#T05-33-59