https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-tf/2019Aug/0015.html
<laura> Waynes’ example: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2019JulSep/0177.html
<scribe> scribe: jim
https://www.tsbvi.edu/web/tests/focus-more-visible3.html
<alastairc> https://alastairc.uk/tests/wcag22-examples/focus-more-visible-2.html
<alastairc> Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WBUakVVdJh2alhSpacgUekEQL8HFMK9oMeq6IswdZVw/edit#gid=0
ac: 3 ways to measure focus
style. Things changing - borders, outlines,
... adjacent colors. SC main point is about pixels changing and
the contrast between changes.
... Andy's email. a scale, can have a 1px border if very
contrasty >7
... looking for a score of 1-10.
jon: thought 1.4.11 applied to focus. want to discuss.
<alastairc> Focus (more) visible draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g9_WBgfhViWAaRFIWWt10CP5rBsEVIWm3vT1vWqrHvI/edit?ts=5d124fb5#
ac: current nontext contrast covered contrast in states - radio buttons. focus state indocator does not necessarily need to differentiate.
jon: thought focus state indicator had to have a 3:1,
ac: most think focus state has to have contrast.
jon: not original intent of 1.4.11
ac: 1.4.11 was morfed. the new SC should fix the dynamic state of focus.
jon: disappointed that what LVTF wanted didn't get addressed. 1.4.11 does very little for focus.
ac: we use 1.4.11 for input controls and iconography. focus is covered in best practices
jon: bigger challenge for users is finding focus.
<alastairc> Example 1:
scale of 1-10 - 10 very visible, 1 hardly visible
<alastairc> https://alastairc.uk/tests/wcag22-examples/focus-more-visible-2.html
jon: not talking about the 2 button issues. how to know which button has focus
ac: just looking at visibility of
focus
... all examples have 4 buttons to check as focus moves
jon: comparison with adjacent controls
ac: example 3 has contrast with dark border, but not background.
jon: if it was thicker would not be so much of an issue, or both colors
example 5 - looks pressed not focused.
Jon: example 6 having a border overcomes usability issue
<jon_avila> looks like I got kicked off. But I have to run to another meeting. Thanks. 15d seems like it fails the SC due not being the longest side to me.
<alastairc> Ok, thanks Jon. 15d does have sufficient *area*
<alastairc> which is what the SC is asking for..
<laura> need to drop off now. Bye.
wayne: need research on visual perception, gestalt or preattentive vision, completion principle
<laura> Wonder if we can we correlate LVTF assessed values in the spreadsheet to letter grades?
<laura> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_grading_in_the_United_States
laura - or make it a smaller scale for forced choice.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/though 1/thought 1/ Succeeded: s/force/forced/ Present: jim wayne Jon Laura Alastair No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: JimA Found Scribe: jim WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 05 Sep 2019 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]