IRC log of dxwgcneg on 2019-08-08

Timestamps are in UTC.

11:58:16 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #dxwgcneg
11:58:16 [RRSAgent]
logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/08/08-dxwgcneg-irc
11:58:18 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
11:58:18 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #dxwgcneg
11:58:20 [trackbot]
Meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference
11:58:20 [trackbot]
Date: 08 August 2019
11:58:37 [LarsG]
Meeting: DXWG CNEG Subgroup telecon
11:58:51 [LarsG]
RRSAgent, please make logs public
11:59:04 [LarsG]
RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2
11:59:04 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/08/08-dxwgcneg-minutes.html LarsG
12:00:52 [LarsG]
present+
12:01:23 [ncar]
present+
12:01:32 [roba]
roba has joined #dxwgcneg
12:06:38 [roba]
present+
12:07:02 [LarsG]
Chair: ncar
12:07:07 [LarsG]
scribenick: LarsG
12:07:24 [LarsG]
Topic: Confirm agenda
12:07:29 [LarsG]
+1
12:07:35 [ncar]
+1
12:07:40 [roba]
+1
12:07:42 [LarsG]
RESOLVED: Agenda confirmed
12:07:42 [ncar]
Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:CNEG-Telecon2019.08.08
12:07:55 [LarsG]
Topic: Approve minutes from last meeting – https://www.w3.org/2019/08/01-dxwgcneg-minutes
12:08:00 [LarsG]
+1
12:08:43 [roba]
+1
12:08:44 [ncar]
+1
12:08:47 [LarsG]
RESOLVED: Approve minutes from last meeting
12:08:53 [LarsG]
Topic: Check list of open action items
12:08:58 [ncar]
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/products/4
12:09:11 [LarsG]
action-193?
12:09:11 [trackbot]
action-193 -- Rob Atkinson to Move jmeter test suite to within w3c systems -- due 2018-09-05 -- OPEN
12:09:11 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/193
12:09:20 [LarsG]
roba: still open
12:09:28 [LarsG]
action-347?
12:09:28 [trackbot]
action-347 -- Rob Atkinson to Create new gh issue explaining the problem of redirects and refer to that issue in the wd -- due 2019-07-18 -- OPEN
12:09:28 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/347
12:10:39 [ncar]
This action is already addressed by Issue 603
12:10:49 [LarsG]
roba: there is an issue 683 but is it really reflected in the draft?
12:11:03 [LarsG]
ncar: don't think so
12:11:23 [LarsG]
s/683/603/
12:12:04 [LarsG]
ncar: will go into an early part of the abstract model
12:13:00 [LarsG]
roba: abstract model is correct for web architecture
12:13:13 [LarsG]
ncar: will put that into an existing PR
12:13:27 [LarsG]
... then roba can commit to that PR in the same branch
12:14:01 [LarsG]
... Shall past issue 603 into the document
12:14:13 [LarsG]
... which should resolve the issue
12:14:19 [LarsG]
s/past/paste/
12:15:01 [LarsG]
... Done (reference to 603 is now in the document)
12:15:13 [LarsG]
... and we can close 347
12:15:19 [LarsG]
close action-347
12:15:19 [trackbot]
Closed action-347.
12:15:28 [LarsG]
action-351
12:15:29 [trackbot]
action-351 -- Lars G. Svensson to Review antoine's comments and check if the 3pwd addresses them all -- due 2019-08-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW
12:15:29 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/351
12:16:30 [LarsG]
<LarsG> was dealt with in last week's meeting. can be closed
12:16:37 [LarsG]
close action-351
12:16:38 [trackbot]
Closed action-351.
12:16:44 [LarsG]
action-355
12:16:44 [trackbot]
action-355 -- Lars G. Svensson to Respond to tom baker re uris for profiles inside of documents -- due 2019-08-08 -- PENDINGREVIEW
12:16:44 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/355
12:17:27 [LarsG]
<LarsG> mail has been sent to comments and WG lists. Can be closed
12:17:30 [LarsG]
close action-355
12:17:30 [trackbot]
Closed action-355.
12:17:36 [LarsG]
action-356
12:17:36 [trackbot]
action-356 -- Nicholas Car to Implement antoine's suggestions as laid out in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/575#issuecomment-515982929 -- due 2019-08-08 -- OPEN
12:17:36 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/356
12:17:48 [LarsG]
ncar: not yet complete
12:17:54 [LarsG]
action-357?
12:17:54 [trackbot]
action-357 -- Rob Atkinson to Add examples using 303 redirects -- due 2019-08-08 -- OPEN
12:17:54 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/357
12:18:44 [LarsG]
ncar: there are a number of examples in the doc. the fourth example currently has a 303 redirect
12:19:01 [LarsG]
roba: Need some time to review
12:19:14 [LarsG]
... keep open
12:19:20 [LarsG]
action-358?
12:19:20 [trackbot]
action-358 -- Rob Atkinson to to convene working session to co-develop common model to match link header data and alternates view requirements. -- due 2019-08-08 -- OPEN
12:19:20 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/358
12:19:49 [LarsG]
ncar: has thought about this but not done anything yet.
12:20:08 [LarsG]
roba: have been working through the requirements
12:20:24 [LarsG]
... but need working code
12:20:31 [LarsG]
... will get to it asap
12:20:53 [LarsG]
Topic: Discussion of Antoine's conneg doc edits. We particularly should look at #11 (referencing issue 591)
12:21:04 [LarsG]
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/575#issuecomment-515982929
12:21:40 [LarsG]
ncar: Have done quite some edits but not all.
12:21:53 [LarsG]
... need to discuss #11
12:23:06 [LarsG]
... have done #4, #5, #6, #7 and #15
12:23:45 [LarsG]
... there is a separate branch for this in github
12:24:08 [LarsG]
... #16 is a long one, need to come back to that and the following ones
12:25:16 [LarsG]
... #11: if you want to have a preference order of profiles
12:25:24 [LarsG]
... you need an ordered list
12:25:51 [LarsG]
... Antoines asks what happens when the q-Values differ from that preference list
12:26:25 [LarsG]
... my understanding is that q-values give a preference order
12:26:33 [LarsG]
<LarsG> +1
12:27:17 [LarsG]
... one could use q-values with query string tokens, too
12:27:35 [LarsG]
roba: cannot say if one of the othere is better
12:27:54 [LarsG]
ncar: abstract model says "some kind of list ordering"
12:28:47 [LarsG]
ncar: default is not to have any ordering in QSA
12:28:56 [LarsG]
... so we need to find a way to do it
12:29:07 [LarsG]
roba: seems reasonable
12:36:13 [LarsG]
<Lots of discussion about how q-values are used in conneg and if we need to mimick that exactly in QSA>
12:38:49 [LarsG]
<LarsG>: Those who want to use q-values probably use header-based conneg anyway
12:39:00 [LarsG]
... so we don't really need them in QSA
12:39:57 [LarsG]
ncar: will craft a proposal
12:40:34 [LarsG]
... as part of the ongoing edits
12:40:55 [LarsG]
... #16
12:42:01 [LarsG]
... #17 shall check this one
12:42:13 [LarsG]
... #18 text removal, easy
12:43:14 [LarsG]
... #19 shall look.
12:43:31 [LarsG]
Topic: Status check of 3PWD Issues: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/20
12:44:14 [ncar]
Try this link for ordering: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22Conneg+3PWD%22
12:45:50 [LarsG]
ncar: #538, we should close this one and create new issues for the remaining parts
12:46:03 [LarsG]
... #575 in progress
12:46:49 [LarsG]
... #589 Jaro hasn't responded so let's keep it open for another few days
12:47:40 [LarsG]
... #591 part of #575, too. We must align
12:48:35 [LarsG]
... #678 in on LarsG who hasn't done anything yet
12:50:06 [LarsG]
roba: we don't have a use case
12:50:31 [LarsG]
ncar: #785
12:51:30 [LarsG]
roba: this is to clarify if we need distinct URLs for all representations
12:51:42 [LarsG]
ncar: we've answered it already
12:51:58 [LarsG]
... shall put the link to the new example into the issue
12:52:15 [LarsG]
... and then we can ask Kam if he's fine with that
12:52:49 [LarsG]
... #852
12:53:21 [LarsG]
roba: still open, shall have a look at the 303 examples
12:54:05 [LarsG]
ncar: #904 Is probably closed since we've proposed a solution
12:54:20 [LarsG]
... are we happy with the propsed way?
12:54:43 [LarsG]
roba: shall look closer during my implementation
12:55:06 [LarsG]
ncar: OK, let's close and then re-open if necessary
12:55:08 [LarsG]
+1
12:56:38 [LarsG]
ncar: #932 we've got a recommendation to list all profiles
12:56:58 [LarsG]
roba: then the clients might get a long list ...
12:57:50 [LarsG]
... and then it still needs to figure out which is the most specific one
12:58:18 [LarsG]
ncar: it will take one that it knows from the list, and if it doesn't know any of the profiles
12:58:28 [LarsG]
... then it's not worse out than before
12:58:57 [LarsG]
roba: What is taken as base specification is a context specific choice
12:59:48 [LarsG]
... would like to leave this open a bit more
13:00:02 [LarsG]
... it's easier to think through when you implement
13:00:19 [LarsG]
ncar: #1017
13:00:44 [LarsG]
roba: think we've done that, have written text
13:03:26 [LarsG]
ncar: shall read the discussion and mark due for closing if it's covered
13:03:27 [LarsG]
+1
13:03:41 [LarsG]
ncar: #1022
13:04:43 [LarsG]
roba: there is no functional requirement in conneg to differentiate between "functional" and "data" profiling
13:05:11 [LarsG]
ncar: shall read the last comments and see if it's ok
13:05:50 [LarsG]
Topic: From the plenary
13:06:24 [LarsG]
ncar: if we give the plenary the 3wpd on August 15, they have two weeks time to review and then we can go to publication
13:07:01 [LarsG]
RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2
13:07:01 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/08/08-dxwgcneg-minutes.html LarsG
13:07:20 [LarsG]
bye all
13:07:31 [LarsG]
happy to help
13:07:32 [roba]
bye
13:07:37 [ncar]
bye
14:07:01 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #dxwgcneg