<jasonjgw> No luck connecting with WebEx so far - I'll keep working on it.
<scribe> scribe: janina
<jasonjgw> Janina responded to one of the comments related to WCAG. Janina thinks we've addressed those issues.
<jasonjgw> Janina: on the editorial side, some additional language was changed and Janina wants to confirm the edits.
<jasonjgw> Where the draft stated that Latin charcter sets have predominated, Janina changed this to "predominate", as this tends to continue.
<jasonjgw> Janina: notes the discussion with Google regarding ReCAPTCHA. There are changes to be made regarding ReCAPTCHA v3. If a third-party developer implementing ReCAPTCHA v3 receives an inadequate score in a user interaction, the developer can choose to fall back to ReCAPTCHA v2.
<jasonjgw> Janina notes that this fall-back strategy is not controlled by Google.
<jasonjgw> Janina notes the process: the review period closes on Sunday; we'll need to decide whether to issue a further review draft (there will be at least one internal draft).
<jasonjgw> Janina will propose a revision of the ReCAPTCHA mateiral in the draft.
<jasonjgw> Janina notes the simplicity of log-in via biometric authentication and that once this is done, the fact that a user is logged in can be provided to third parties.
<jasonjgw> Janina agrees with Jason that comments are suggesting the issues of authentication (including biometrics), third-party services and CAPTCHA are not adequately disambiguated.
<jasonjgw> Janina notes additional protocol development that has been raised in the comments.
<jasonjgw> Scott maintains that we needn't treat the proposed protocols in etail.
<jasonjgw> Janina: the most we can say is that work is being done in this direction.
<scott_h> apologies everyone connection dropped out
<jasonjgw> Janina notes the query in comments regarding the relaitonship between biometrics and CAPTCHA.
<jasonjgw> Judy suggests and Janina agrees that we should clarify the relationship of biometrics to CAPTCHA.
<scott_h> can't reconnect - will follow along on IRC
<jasonjgw> Janina would like to find a suitable reference on biometrics.
<scott_h> Agree with clarificaiton of biometrics
<jasonjgw> Janina acknowledges the need for a good security/privacy review within W3C, and that we still need a suitable reference on biometrics.
<scott_h> judy: yes I'm still on IRC, followign along
Scott, do you hear us?
<scott_h> janina: no, can't get back on audio.
<scott_h> at this stage don't worry, just keep minuting and I'll contribute via IRC
<scott_h> Biometrics definitions and discussions might be useful: https://www.ieee.org/membership-catalog/productdetail/showProductDetailPage.html?product=ONL232
Thanks, Scott! Will look
\/leave
<scott_h> sorry for technical issues eveyrone, look forward to joining next week
<jasonjgw> Actions: to examine whether these protocols have developed beyond initial ideas in Git repositories (e.g., to published paper), and determine what comment to add to the document, if any.
<jasonjgw> Jason will review.
<jasonjgw> Remaining agenda postponed to next week.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Default Present: jasonjgw, janina, scott_h Present: jasonjgw janina scott_h Found Scribe: janina Inferring ScribeNick: janina WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 20 Mar 2019 People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]