20:47:18 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 20:47:18 logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-irc 20:47:27 rrsagent, make logs public 20:47:29 chair: alejandra 20:48:13 Meeting: DCAT-Telecon2019.02.20 20:48:27 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2019.02.20 20:49:47 rrsagent, generate minutes v2 20:49:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 20:50:03 rrsagent, generate minutes v2 20:50:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 20:50:20 rrsagent, make logs public 20:50:25 rrsagent, generate minutes v2 20:50:25 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 20:53:08 regrets+ DaveBrowning 20:53:12 rrsagent, generate minutes v2 20:53:12 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 20:53:24 PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat 20:57:50 Makx has joined #dxwgdcat 20:58:26 present+ Makx 20:59:36 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 20:59:40 present+ 20:59:43 rrsagent, generate minutes v2 20:59:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 21:04:00 SimonCox has joined #dxwgdcat 21:04:06 present+ 21:04:07 present+ 21:04:42 scribenick: SimonCox 21:04:48 scribe: SimonCox 21:04:54 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2019.02.20#Main_agenda 21:04:58 topic: confirm agenda 21:05:19 riccardoAlbertoni has joined #dxwgdcat 21:05:30 present+ 21:06:01 q? 21:06:29 topic: confirm minutes of previous meetings 21:06:42 https://www.w3.org/2019/02/05-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:06:43 https://www.w3.org/2019/02/05-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:06:55 +1 21:07:01 +1 21:07:03 +1 21:07:03 +1 21:07:04 q+ 21:07:07 +1 21:07:10 ack AndreaPerego 21:07:24 +1 21:07:30 resolved: 2019-02-05 approved 21:07:35 https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:07:50 +1 21:07:53 0 21:07:55 +1 21:07:57 +1 21:08:02 +1 21:08:02 +1 21:08:18 resolved: 2019-02-06 approved 21:08:27 https://www.w3.org/2019/02/13-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:08:32 +1 21:08:37 +1 21:08:37 0 (was not there) 21:08:42 +1 21:08:51 +1 21:08:54 +1 21:08:57 resolved: 2019-02-13 approved 21:09:09 topic: Publication schedule 21:09:11 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:09:11 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:09:29 present+ alejandra 21:09:31 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:09:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:09:35 Makx email comment on deadlines 21:10:39 Sprints are not aligned with work packages for the identified WDs 21:10:39 q? 21:10:57 ... propose that next WD is the last before CR 21:11:23 ... though team has decided to focus on sprints and the ED, rather than new formal WD 21:11:40 ... propose one final WD mid-March 21:11:45 q? 21:11:57 ... going to CR mid-April 21:12:35 Makx's mail: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Feb/0358.html 21:12:45 alejandra: sprints were explicitly separate from milestones; rather focussed on groups of issues or themes that were important and not being given enough time 21:13:03 ... team already decided to focus on content. 21:13:03 q+ 21:13:15 q? 21:13:19 ack SimonCox 21:13:55 SimonCox: I think we decided to also, in lieu of more WD, send significant changes to the editors draft to the list 21:14:07 q? 21:14:23 q? 21:14:47 q+ 21:14:52 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:15:04 +1 to riccardoAlbertoni 21:15:24 q? 21:15:26 afaik it is before 21:15:32 Yes. 21:15:36 riccardoAlbertoni: do we need to collect implementation evidence before CR? 21:15:42 PWinstanley: yes 21:16:08 riccardoAlbertoni: implementation evidence is now a priority then 21:16:10 q? 21:16:18 mid march final version 21:16:28 q? 21:16:28 Never done myself, but better start soon. 21:16:30 q+ 21:16:44 ack AndreaPerego 21:17:03 alejandra: if CR is mid-April, we need a final WD mid-March so we can spend that month working on implementation evidence 21:17:32 AndreaPerego: must start on implementation evidence now 21:17:34 here is the milestones calculator: https://w3c.github.io/spec-releases/milestones/ 21:17:51 For example, to publish the Recommendation on June 27, the latest day to publish the Candidate Recommendation would be April 11: https://w3c.github.io/spec-releases/milestones/?rec=2019-06-27 21:18:16 AndreaPerego: 160 class/property combos - unlikely that we can provide evidence for all of these 21:19:00 ... classes and properties for which we have no evidence might need to be marked 'non-normative' 21:19:07 q+ 21:19:18 q? 21:20:02 ... but particularly need to provide evidence for the added terms 21:20:04 +q to ask about evidence for 'abstract' classes 21:20:37 q? 21:20:56 q+ to mention about user surveys that PROV did 21:21:23 ... in some cases we might have to appeal to 'indirect evidence' - particularly around the services structures 21:21:53 ... GeoDCAT-AP provides evidence for the requirement 21:22:49 DWBP implementation report: http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-implementation-report.html 21:23:33 +1 to collect implementation in order to discover gaps in implementation, and decide if we can provide evidence on our own or drop from the normative part. 21:23:33 ... DWBP did include some 'forward looking' evidence in a way that was convincing enough to progress to Rec 21:23:46 ... we should adopt similar approach 21:24:05 ... all are requested to add material to AndreaPerego spreadsheet 21:24:10 s/implementation/implementations 21:24:18 ack SimonCox 21:24:38 q+ 21:24:39 SimonCox: I'm not convinced that covering all combos is required 21:24:52 ... we didn't do that in the spatial data on the web wg 21:25:42 ... Evidence of all combinations is a big challenge, esp where inheritance is involved 21:25:47 DCAT 2014 implementation report: https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_Implementations#Summary_of_terms_usage 21:26:52 q? 21:27:01 ack alejandra 21:27:01 alejandra, you wanted to ask about evidence for 'abstract' classes and to mention about user surveys that PROV did 21:27:04 ... consult with Dave Raggett 21:27:51 q+ 21:27:58 q? 21:28:00 ack AndreaPerego 21:28:05 alejandra: need to be sensible about evidence of 'abstract' classes 21:28:14 ... shoudl we send out a survey? 21:28:28 AndreaPerego: not enough time for a real survey 21:28:41 ... need evidence of 2 implementation for each normative elements 21:28:58 +q 21:29:00 ... we are already in pretty good shape for much of it 21:29:02 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:29:35 riccardoAlbertoni: some of the implementations can be from group members 21:29:59 alejandra: can riccardoAlbertoni provide some implementations? 21:30:29 The spreadsheet for collecting implementation evidence is here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eEVUuPFAGO2GjS5ocxylY8T1AlpqlwnOTc3er_Mhcv4/edit?usp=sharing 21:30:32 riccardoAlbertoni: catalog of thesauri, might be able to upgrade this to fill gaps 21:30:33 q+ 21:30:39 ack AndreaPerego 21:30:59 AndreaPerego: asks riccardoAlbertoni to look at the list and see the gaps 21:31:56 ... of course these are more glaring for the new elements 21:32:44 ... risk of misunderstanding of inheritance e.g. Catalog inherits dct:temporal, but few catalogs describe themselves this way 21:33:25 q? 21:33:29 ... inheritance of a set of (optional) properties from an abstract class is a useful feature, but implications must be clear 21:33:45 I will get in touch with dsr 21:33:58 q+ 21:34:18 Action: PWinstanley to contact DSR to verify timeline, and what artefacts are required at each stage 21:34:18 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:34:25 q? 21:34:30 ack AndreaPerego 21:34:51 AndreaPerego: we should invite DSR to DCAT call? 21:34:53 q+ 21:35:04 ack SimonCox 21:35:44 PWinstanley: better to get it in writing (first) 21:35:50 q? 21:35:50 +1 21:36:00 +q 21:36:04 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:36:44 riccardoAlbertoni: also need to ask DSR about references to 3rd Party vocabs in normative parts 21:37:15 q? 21:37:29 ... esp. in relation to dependencies on non-normative specs or non-normative parts of normative specs 21:37:43 ... e.g. DQV, parts of ADMS 21:38:24 rrsagent, generate minutes v2 21:38:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 21:38:25 AndreaPerego: the key criterion is stablility and an orderly governance process, so they won't disappear unexpectedly 21:39:15 q? 21:39:20 ... also cannot be changed arbitrarily. There is lots of normative use of non-normative/informal dependencies. 21:39:45 q? 21:39:50 ... this should be done sensibly. 21:39:56 q+ 21:40:14 ack SimonCox 21:41:06 s/stablility/stability 21:41:06 q? 21:41:09 SimonCox: I raised the matter of references to non-normative things - respec has some rules, and I was tripping over ones relating to the organisation of the bibliography 21:41:55 q? 21:41:56 alejandra: do we need another sprint? e.g. implementation report 21:42:15 q? 21:42:15 +1 from me 21:42:17 q+ 21:42:20 +1 to a spring for the implementation report 21:42:22 ack PWinstanley 21:42:25 s/spring/sprint/ 21:43:44 topic: outstanding actions 21:43:45 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open 21:43:56 Mine are yet to be done - sorry. 21:44:57 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:44:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:45:44 Annette's services proposal - she was requested to provide some worked examples 21:45:47 q? 21:46:03 topic: public comments list 21:46:09 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:46:09 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:46:31 AndreaPerego: to draft response to Luca 21:46:46 topic: closing issues 21:46:49 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22due+for+closing%22+label%3A%22dcat%22 21:47:18 q? 21:47:35 I think it can be closed. 21:47:40 +q 21:47:50 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/759 21:47:57 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:48:26 issue: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/675 21:48:26 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:48:48 proposed close issue https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/675 21:48:51 +1 21:48:52 +1 21:48:54 +1 21:48:57 +1 21:49:07 s/proposed /proposed: / 21:49:07 resolved: close #675 21:49:13 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:49:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:49:16 q? 21:50:29 discussed issue https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/530 21:50:32 can be closed 21:50:39 as we replied to Clemens 21:51:22 q? 21:52:11 PR: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/746 21:52:29 scribenick: PWinstanley 21:52:33 alejandra: next point is PR with Makx proposal about packaging & compression. 5 voted for proposal 2 21:52:33 voting in the issue: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/746#issuecomment-462699155 21:53:40 Makx: I created 2 properties with definitions and links, I put a line in the change log and included a couple of lines in the Turtle file. 21:54:39 alejandra: I noticed SimonCox had made a change request on the Turtle file, so maybe you did it in a different branch. I added the changes to the turtle file and the change log. 21:55:29 Makx: I made the changes in my branch and pushed upstream, my file has the changes 21:55:39 Makx's latest changes are in a different branch: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/commit/6e5950888905fa4cce456bce4c767ac7f3ddc061 21:56:18 two branches: dcat-makx-packaging 21:56:25 alejandra: I will investigate and see how we can merge your change 21:56:34 and makxdekkers-patch-1 21:56:37 Makx: I made one branch and SimonCox made another 21:56:48 alejandra: I will look at this and sort out 21:57:33 Makx: the definitions in dcat-makx-packaging are what I did today 21:59:40 proposed: agree on Makx's proposal of adding two properties: dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat 21:59:43 +1 21:59:45 +1 21:59:46 +1 21:59:46 0 21:59:46 +1 21:59:47 q+ 21:59:51 ack AndreaPerego 22:00:10 AndreaPerego: I have no strong opinion on this 22:01:04 ... the media type determines if it is compressed or packaged 22:01:06 ... the only thought I have is that looking at how people will have to use these properties introduces decisions that they might not be able to make. 22:01:23 ... and software is able to behave correctly based on mediatype 22:01:37 q? 22:01:41 ... this is therefore treated transparently by software agents 22:02:03 ... additional properties might make this more complicated for people 22:02:20 q? 22:02:28 alejandra: is a super-prop required? people might just use that 22:02:51 Makx: my initial proposal was for one, but I created two and the vote went for that 22:04:05 alejandra: we need to look at examples; if it is too complex then we can determine if we roll back this decision 22:04:22 +1 22:04:27 +1 22:04:27 +1 to go ahead 22:04:30 resolved: agree on Makx's proposal of adding two properties: dcat:compressFormat and dcat:packageFormat 22:04:36 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:04:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:04:59 Thanks, bye bye! 22:05:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:05:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:05:16 rrsagent, create minutes v2 22:05:16 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html PWinstanley 22:05:28 alejandra: we might organise another sprint, but otherwise, same time next week 22:05:38 thanks Simon and Peter for scribing! 22:06:09 meeting: DXWG DCAT subgroup telecon 22:06:10 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:06:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:06:28 rrsagent, create minutes v2 22:06:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html PWinstanley