<riccardoAlbertoni> I would explicitly include an issue about adding more examples for guidance ..
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/Data-aspects-semantics
<DaveBrowning> riccardoAlbertoni: What's the criteria for what is/isnt an example? Perhaps we could tie to the requirements
<DaveBrowning> SimonCox: Existing examples based on a DCAT view of existing publications
<DaveBrowning> ...Are there specific gaps?
<DaveBrowning> riccardoAlbertoni: Planning to look through for gaps. Would be good to cross-reference to requirements. Happy to do some of the dirty work producing cntributions
<DaveBrowning> DaveBrowning: How do we make the decision for a primer?
DaveBrowning: if we add too many more examples, is there a risk of swamping the document?
… should we plan a primer as well?
<AndreaPerego> +1 to riccardoAlbertoni. Indeed, people re-use examples in the spec.
<DaveBrowning> riccardoAlbertoni: Examples do clarify the definitions and are clearer
<DaveBrowning> SimonCox: Perhaps to organise this more clearly into an Annex
AndreaPerego: also should get all examples from GitHub and move them to a WIki page as an ongoing resource
should add a link to worked examples from each definition in chapter 6? (instead of inline examples in chapter 6)
<riccardoAlbertoni> +1 to DaveBrowning !!
<DaveBrowning> SimonCox: I've added an issue to GitHub to capture this
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/470
Action: DaveBrowning to generate a document with issue groupings and priorities, and victims to lead each grouping
<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.
<DaveBrowning> RRSAgent: draft minutes v2
<riccardoAlbertoni> bye!
<DaveBrowning> RRSAgent: draft minutes v2
Succeeded: s/issues/issue
Succeeded: s/RRSAgent: draft minutes v2//
Succeeded: s/RRSAgent: draft minutes v2//
Succeeded: s/clear/clearer/
Succeeded: s/each group/each grouping/