Open issues

LW: We have 135 issues open at the moment.
... Plus 4 PR.
... PR #1635 was editorial (fix a typo) and probably didn't need to be a PR.
... Merged.
... PR #1633 Chaals to review/approve.
... PR #1627 from a first time contributor.
... Chaals to approve contribution for IPR and merge.
... PR #1582 belongs to Chaals.

XW: Chaals needs to fix some things.

LW: Is anyone working on other issues?

PG: Issue #1482
... Step 3 in our version is long, and the WHATWG has split it into five steps.

CMN: It's an obscure piece of the spec.
... There is nothing bad about aligning with the WHATWG.

SG: I looked at your proposal and think you're on the right track with it.

Spec deltas

SG: 4 commits since last time.

<Scott_O> https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/18ca10633ffbcbe2a95dd1d42dfb04c798cc5700

<Scott_O> https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/45ddbd291d1ccd6feab734f6bcd7e222dc7d770e

<Scott_O> https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/5f597504213a10a52536c1f95d15862398dec854

<Scott_O> https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/a6c82816b053fdba53e435d5c6bc3d64f032b2c4

SG: The last one is worth looking at.

LW: Yes.

CMN: The second one (creating a reserved environment) seems to relate to what Patricia is already looking at.
... Related to Service Workers.
... Patricia, can you take a look at this one?

PG: Probably.
... It's the rules for choosing the browsing context for the target?

CMN: It's in navigating documents.

PG: There's nothing about it in the section I'm working on.
... It might be one of the links out that the WHATWG has though.

<scribe> Scribe: Léonie

<chaals> where they use reserved environment

LW: So Patricia can you review this WHATWG commit?

PG: Yes.
... The second from the list above?

CMN: Yes.
... We should probably take the third commit from the list too.

SG: Just looking at the srcset commit, and it seems the WHATWG commit corrects teir spec to match the W3C spec.

LW: Suggest you take this offline?

CMN: Yup.

WD update

LW: Haven't done this since August.
... Editors can you make sure the changelog is up to date for commits made since the last WD?

SG: Sure.

LW: Once that's done, Xiaoqian can you get a WD update out?
... Ok, so Scott if you can update the changelog, then let Xiaoqian know to update the WD?

CMN: Can we do this for Tuesday?

SG: Yes.

XW: Yes.

Next meeting

LW: Next meeting falls in TPAC week.
... Next meeting is therefore Tuesday 6th.
... I won't be available.
... Me either.

CMN: If others want tomeet, someone needs to be chair.
... So next official meeting will be two weeks after that.

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154  of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Present: Léonie (tink) Scott xiaoqian pati_gallardo chaals Patricia
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: tink
Found Scribe: Léonie

WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)