<scribe> scribe: chaals
[Thanks Xiaoqian, team, ...]
LJW: Thanks for publishing.
... I noticed there were not as many entries in changelog as I
expected, only 2...
... can everyone please check that the channgelog is accurately
reflecting the work they have done?
... Also, in issue breakdown for the current milestone, most
people have a couple of issues, and chaals has a few
more.
... maybe we should rebalance that...
[WfM]
CMN: I'll look at them, and see how to reassign by begging someone else to take them, or release, or whatever. There are a couple like Ruby where I have been doing work and expect to get stuff done.
LJW: OK. Anyone else have questions about current milestone?
LJW: We are 2% done on this milestone.
<tink> https://github.com/whatwg/html/pulls?q=is%3Apr+closed%3A%3E2018-06-22
LJW: We made good progress on
triaging commits from WHATWG over the last year for
compatibility. Doing that more often would be good, so we can
keep up more easily.
... suggest we should look through the commits on these calls
to get a quick sense.
<tink> https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/3791
<Scott_O> i'll try to hunt it down
LJW: We should check that one, it is fixinga typo. Can someone look at this?
PA: Wasn't a typo, they seem to have reverted this...
<pati-gallardo> https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/4e9c466713c4ce8e07a55effaf2a6f4bfd42669c
<tink> https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/3785
CMN: 3785 not relevant to us.
<Scott_O> will do
LJW: putting "editorial" in commit title is helpful. Using labels has been patchy, and this is important. So propose we request people actually say "editorial: ..." in comit titles.
[+1]
<Scott_O> agreed.
PA: +1
<xiaoqian_> +1
LJW: A couple of people requested updates to mintes from last week. Xiaoqian, can you please make the changes?
XW: Sure. Please send me requests.
LJW: Will do
XW: PLH as the content in email logs, how should we handle them - re-raise them?
LJW: Think we should have individual issues for each one...
[+1]
<pati-gallardo> [+]
<pati-gallardo> [+1]
XW: Will ask PLH to send us those issues
CMN: What does that mean specifically?
LJW: If you forward it all to me I will create the issues again.
[We'lll get it on team-editors list, and deal with it]
Any other business?
XW: We are the only ones who seems to have a webex problem. Maybe we can just create a new one.
LJW: sure.
XW: Raised a biekshed issue, Tab is working on it. Seems only a few WG have this problem.
LJW: OK.
[adjourned]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/present Sco/present+ Scott_O/ Succeeded: s/rrsagennt, draft minutes/rrsagent, draft minutes/ Succeeded: s/ott_Ott/ott/ Present: Léonie Scott_O xiaoqian chaals patricia Regrets: Sangwhan Terence Shwetank Found Scribe: chaals Inferring ScribeNick: chaals WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]