08:12:19 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 08:12:19 logging to https://www.w3.org/2018/05/31-dxwgdcat-irc 08:12:39 Meeting: DCAT sub-group 2018-05-31 08:22:13 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.05.31 08:22:40 PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat 08:23:12 regrets: Lars 08:25:00 present+ 08:25:07 chair: SimonCox 08:26:50 present+ 08:26:57 Webex https://csiro.webex.com/csiro/j.php?MTID=m90c9cd8d1e6b406fe4b68e5cf0c09d78 08:28:14 roba has joined #dxwgdcat 08:29:26 present+ 08:35:59 arminhaller has joined #dxwgdcat 08:37:20 present+ 08:39:44 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 08:39:51 present+ AndreaPerego 08:41:09 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.05.31 08:41:11 riccardoAlbertoni has joined #dxwgdcat 08:41:43 scribenick: arminhaller 08:41:59 topic: confirm agenda 08:42:10 regrets+ Makx, Alejandra, DaveB 08:42:42 insert briefing from from roba and nick 08:42:46 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.05.31 08:42:57 topic: Approve minutes from last meeting – https://www.w3.org/2018/05/24-dxwgdcat-minutes 08:43:00 +1 08:43:06 +1 08:43:10 0 - not there 08:43:14 present+ 08:43:15 +1 08:43:22 +1 08:43:24 0 (missed it, conflicting meeting) 08:43:29 RRSAgent, make logs world 08:43:31 Stijn_Goedertier_AIV has joined #dxwgdcat 08:43:35 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 08:43:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/05/31-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 08:44:06 resolved: minutes of last meeting approved 08:44:08 present+ 08:44:22 topic: Need a volunteer to do analysis of national DCAT-AP profiles to verify that all added classes are on our agenda https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018May/0401.html 08:44:55 q+ 08:45:00 q+ 08:45:01 ack AndreaPerego 08:45:37 AndreaPerego: Max was in charge of the work of an analysis of the adoption of DCAT-AP 08:45:52 ... i can help as well, but it depends on how much work that would entail 08:46:16 action: AndreaPerego to check if Makx is available 08:46:57 ack roba 08:47:12 roba: At yesterday's plenary meeting I prepared a use case around DCAT-AP 08:47:51 About the report on the use of DCAT-AP (that may be used as a starting point for a comparative analysis of national implementations): https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/document/report-dcat-ap-use 08:47:56 ... glaring obvious omission in the use cases and requirements IMHO 08:48:13 ... Phil Archer pointed to Stijn as a potential contributor 08:48:43 q? 08:48:58 Jaroslav_Pullmann has joined #dxwgdcat 08:49:02 present+ 08:49:15 I am sorry for being late! 08:49:20 happy to contribute to the analysis 08:49:42 topic: roba & nick to brief on profiledesc work 08:50:16 roba: Developed a new alignment file 08:50:40 ... matches the example of best practice of cataloging that Max gave in the F2F 08:50:55 See https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/profiledesc/profiledesc_dcat_alignment.ttl 08:51:24 Again about DCAT-AP national extensions, this study could be even more relevant: https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/document/national-extensions-analysis-dcat-ap 08:51:34 ... also made some small changes the profiledesc vocabulary 08:51:34 required some tweaks to https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/profiledesc/profiledesc.ttl 08:51:53 ... and maybe this one as well: https://datos.gob.es/sites/default/files/doc/file/report_dcat-ap_and_its_extensions.pdf 08:52:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 08:52:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/05/31-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 08:52:23 ... Nick did some work on updating the examples and put in some normative resource pointers 08:52:44 ... request the DCAT-AP experts to validate the examples 08:52:53 Examples https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/gh-pages/profiledesc/examples 08:53:22 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/profiledesc/examples/profiledesc_examples.ttl 08:53:32 and https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/profiledesc/examples/eg_dcat-ap2.png 08:53:53 NicholasCar has joined #dxwgdcat 08:54:01 https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/solutions/dcat-application-profile-data-portals-europe_en 08:54:19 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/profiledesc/examples/profiledesc_examples.ttl 08:54:25 in particular check these URIs 08:54:51 I can send you the "official" URIs for DCAT-AP etc. 08:55:02 SimonCox: You used a subclass from the new DCAT:resource 08:55:17 s/DCAT/dcat 08:55:26 q? 08:55:29 q+ 08:55:57 q? 08:56:04 ack AndreaPerego 08:56:14 Nick: you will be able to get distributions through content negotiations in this proposal 08:56:27 https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/#bib-DCAT-AP 08:56:30 AndreaPerego: The URIs are included in the reference 08:56:47 look at https://www.specref.org/ 08:56:48 https://www.specref.org/?q=dcat-ap 08:57:04 https://www.difi.no/fagomrader-og-tjenester/digitalisering-og-samordning/standarder/standarder/dcatdata-catalog-vocabulary 08:57:39 https://doc.difi.no/dcat-ap-no/ 08:57:39 Namespaces for DCAT-AP etc.: http://data.europa.eu/URI.html 08:57:49 GeoDCAT-AP - data.europa.eu/930/ 08:58:01 DCAT-AP - data.europa.eu/r5r/ 08:58:14 Action: AndreaPerego to assist verification of the URIs in the DCAT-AP profiledesc examples 08:58:51 Here're the examples in HTML 08:58:53 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profiledesc/examples/ 08:59:04 AndreaPerego: Is there are relationships between different versions of DCAT-AP's? 08:59:24 https://github.com/difi/dcat-ap-no/issues 09:00:13 roba: Versioning in general would be a different type of relationship. dcat:revision to be a backward compatible, i.e. original DCAT would become a profile of the new DCAT 09:00:34 s/to be a/to be 09:01:10 AndreaPerego: I am not sure if these two relations can be modelled with the same relationship type. 09:01:30 roba: Suggest to remove the versioning example. 09:02:38 q? 09:03:44 SimonCox: All of the conversation was about the relationships between versioning and resources. 09:04:09 ... most of that will be covered in the profile work item. 09:04:18 topic: Discussion of priorities and actions 09:04:26 * Nick - we should split the version example into a separate file, with a more exploratory status... 09:05:09 SimonCox: Most of the discussion on the mailing list recently has been on the profile discussion, rather than on DCAT itself 09:05:15 maybe look here https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestones 09:06:10 q? 09:06:13 +q 09:06:19 SimonCox: This should give us some view on what areas need some work. 09:06:24 ack riccardoAlbertoni 09:06:59 riccardoAlbertoni: I have added an issue on Quality in DCAT. 09:08:09 suggestion: relationships between resources (including datasets, profiles) 09:08:28 related to versioning 09:08:35 SimonCox: I know that you nick were interested in qualified relationships in general. 09:08:36 related to partonomy 09:08:57 q? 09:09:05 q+ 09:09:10 ack NicholasCar 09:09:26 NicholasCar: I am keen to do some work with qualified relations. 09:09:43 ... introduce some modelling patterns from some other W3C working groups/ 09:09:46 q+ 09:10:53 qualified forms works for agent relations, dataset relationships, versioning relationships, using code-list for role of relationship 09:10:58 ack AndreaPerego 09:11:18 I included some examples here: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/Provenance-patterns 09:11:26 AndreaPerego: I added some examples on qualified and non-qualified forms on the wiki page 09:11:38 s/I have added an issue on Quality in DCAT./I have added an milestone on Quality in DCAT collecting two issues. 09:11:39 ... they are taken from the use cases 09:12:46 ... we ended up using the PROV ontology, and we validated the use of PROV with the working group members 09:13:23 q? 09:13:24 ... they did not use a specific relation that is in PROV, i.e. hadRole themselves 09:13:26 q+ 09:13:27 q+ 09:13:40 ack SimonCox 09:13:49 ... so it would be worth checking with the PROV people on the examples 09:14:28 SimonCox: Are these qualified relations changing the DCAT vocabulary, or are they just best practices how to use the vocabulary in combination with other vocabularies 09:14:59 AndreaPerego: Yes, we don't need to add anything. We just recommend how properties can be used in qualified relations using the PROV ontology 09:15:43 ... look at PROV mappings to DC as exemplars? 09:15:52 ... we have already a good starting point from the PROV working group where they proposed examples on how to use Dublin Core with PROV 09:16:38 q+ 09:16:42 ... just guidance on how to use the PROV ontology to qualify resources 09:16:45 ack NicholasCar 09:17:05 NicholasCar: The examples with agent role is just an easy one, but the real one would be around Datasets and Distributions 09:17:08 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 09:17:08 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/05/31-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 09:17:18 NicholasCar: real target of qualified form is dataset-dataset relations, ... 09:17:47 q+ 09:17:56 ... we have done some thinking in the RDA working group how to do that, i.e. model the Dataset as a prov:entity 09:17:59 ... dataset a prov:Entity ! 09:18:24 ack AndreaPerego 09:18:26 q- 09:19:28 AndreaPerego: Another example besides roles, are use cases around the funding source, i.e. context of the dataset creation 09:19:52 ... especially with scientific datasets 09:19:57 1. agent roles 09:20:03 2. dataset-relations 09:20:07 3. dataset context 09:20:28 +1 09:20:32 yes 09:20:33 q? 09:20:45 ack roba 09:21:08 roba: what is the method to hand this over to the guidance group? 09:21:23 +1 to have more guidance in dcat document 09:21:36 SimonCox: My assumption is that the DCAT document needs to include more documentation, guidance and examples. 09:21:48 ... expectation is that we have more example in the document. 09:22:05 Indeed, the lack of examples in DCAT 1.0 has always been an issue. 09:22:10 ... preference is that the document becomes more guiding rather than just a spec 09:22:57 ... however, guidance around application profiles will be in other documents rather than in the DCAT spec 09:23:55 +1 09:25:10 +1 09:25:17 no 09:25:19 q+ 09:25:25 SimonCox: All PROV relations are dealing with change. They do not include static relations. 09:25:28 ack NicholasCar 09:25:57 NicholasCar: I have not looked into non-PROV qualified relations that we can include 09:26:34 qualifiedAttribution can support static relations! 09:26:37 ... qualified attribution pattern is something that we need to include 09:26:57 ... and can include static relations 09:27:41 I can help for sure, but don't have time for being in charge of it. 09:27:44 seriously injured child, must go 09:28:13 Sorry to hear that, Nick. 09:28:28 action: SimonCox to coordinate qualified relations topics 09:28:51 q? 09:29:33 q+ 09:29:40 q- 09:29:42 q+ 09:29:43 ack riccardoAlbertoni 09:29:59 ack AndreaPerego 09:30:32 AndreaPerego: Qualified relations will also help with the quality modelling 09:30:43 yes 09:30:58 it is probably related to issue 58 09:31:46 bye 09:31:48 byee 09:31:50 thanks all 09:31:56 bye! 09:32:03 rrsagent draft minutes v2 09:32:04 present- 09:32:14 [meeting adjourned] 09:32:19 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 09:32:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/05/31-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 09:34:34 s/rrsagent draft minutes v2// 09:34:36 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 09:34:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2018/05/31-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 11:59:40 Zakim has left #dxwgdcat