<jeanne> Research Summary doc <- https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1POs7orJ4ALB0bq5_vyo4v8RxDcr-5ctwD1noVgpXuJc/edit?usp=sharing
Jeanne: The Job Stories are
complete, and we are waiting for final publish. I will put it
on community group as a draft, and move to final status
later.
... Problem Statements are also complete.
Shari: I have uploaded the
Summaries into the Google Drive.
... The Internet of Things is good, and the research is
good.
Jeanne: Next action is to add it
to the summary. I think I can do that.
... The Mike Crabbe papers - we'll need to tie up some loose
ends there.
... The Eleanor Acanoa (sp?) paper is done, that needs to be
published.
<jeanne> Research Status Overview <- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ropTpocIdthjnkaGILjZRPrerAFGDNGXVstSOny45Zo/edit?usp=sharing
Jeanne: [Eleanor Lioacono]
... The Usability survey - the conclusions for the summary are
sort of done.
<jeanne> Summary Report Slide Deck <- https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1POs7orJ4ALB0bq5_vyo4v8RxDcr-5ctwD1noVgpXuJc/edit?usp=sharing
Jeanne: Slide 18 - Dave was able to pull from a usability study.
Shawn: People will wonder what
makes these SC usable vs unusable.
... The ones marked most usable all have simpler rules.
Concrete and easy to understand.
... Some of the others are more about prevention, and cover
more ground.
... Even if we don't have stats on why some are more usable, we
can still do analysis on differences between the two
(columns).
... This is helpful, it can inform further research on our part
after the design sprint. We can keep it in mind during the
design sprint.
Jeanne: The international translations probably won't make the design sprint.
<Charles> key findings: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iOut3_i1JBQu5_16plZ8u7xCd66T4TbW2zPR1KmWWF4/edit?usp=sharing
Kelsey: The WCAG Conformance
Survey Key Findings - we had 49 participants, and 8 declined to
report on demographic questions.
... We've been organizing the data from the most common
answers.
... We made brief claims based on the research findings, we'll
probably expand on that in the conclusions.
... It's not complete yet.
Charles: I'll work on fleshing out the conclusions and key opportunities over this weekend.
Jeanne: It would be great if we could send it out for Monday.
Charles: The sample size is
small, but the Roles is significant.
... My expectation is that this needs to be closer to an
academic paper, for a research summary.
... I'd like the introductory part to say that it's
statistically significant, based on the types of people who
participated.
Jeanne: I'll contact Sarah Horton about the stats part.
Jennison: I think our sample is a convenient sample, so it's as significant as we could get.
Shari: These are not empirical research studies. The professors used students who were available. But it does have some relevance / significance.
Imelda: With a smaller sample size, it limits what can be put into an academic format.
Kelsey: 25 of the people who took the survey have "accessibility" in their job title. Several of the other roles were technical.
Charles: I'll work on the key opportunities over the weekend.
Jeanne: We'll finish the legacy interviews this week.
<Charles> reminder, I have to drop off the call @10:25
Jeanne: Jan and I just need to polish up the document.
<Kelsey> Here's the draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zrzm9i9AsNo4_0qZY7GXrYYZy1o399kg_92Lc3wDSdc/edit#
Jeanne: The Conference feedback
draft doc is almost done, just needs polishing.
... The Literature Review is being reviewed, we'll have it
shortly.
... We'll make it a priority next week.
<jeanne> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1POs7orJ4ALB0bq5_vyo4v8RxDcr-5ctwD1noVgpXuJc/edit?usp=sharing
Shawn: We should also share these slides as HTML and PDF, and share links to all 3.
Jeanne: Shawn, can you work on drafting the email to the participants?
Shawn: This afternoon I
can.
... Can we make sure all the participants are in the
spreadsheet? Because there were some late additions.
Jeanne: Shawn: That was the link for the Silver Design Sprint Agenda.
Jennison: We need to talk about the CSUN presentation - maybe next week - we can leverage pieces of the slide deck.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: JaEunJemmkuj Jan WARNING: Fewer than 3 people found for Present list! No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: JohnM Inferring Scribes: JohnM Found Date: 02 Mar 2018 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]