<kaz> scribenick: kawaguch

Results and Issues for Burlingame Plugfest

Summary of achievements

<kaz> Matsukura's slides (PDF)

Fujitsu's proxy servients have thing directory

Fujitsu used stun while Siemens used tunneling

About 10 protocols are connected under local proxy

Matsukura-san will update preparation.md based on this slide.

<inserted> kaz: it would be easier for people to understand if we could clarify all the combination separately

Kaz suggests to describe every combinations achieved using table

including which TD and protocol (and request/response) was used

<kaz> Koster also suggests we list all of the servers each client (application) discovered and interacted with as a way to organize the detailed plugfest results

Issues for the next plugfest

<kaz> preparation document for Burlingame PlugFest

appendix A inter servient interface

between remote and local proxy we use stun protocol

Appendix 3 shows substitute of 2 using websocket

inter servient interface should be clarified

proxy servient function should be specified

firewall, NAT and security consideration

<kaz> mccool: having local TD and remote TD

thing directory, life cycle management and local/remote td should be clarified

TD Model such as event, action, semantic annotations and binding to other protocols

Kaz: it's better to add section 6 to preparation.md as plugfest result

and 7 as issues for the next

interservient interface can be in ether section 7, 8 or appendix

<inserted> matsu: ok to add them directly to the prep document?

Kaz: it might be better to copy the preparation.md to another guideline document (e.g., guideline.md) and add new content to that file under the 2017-burlingame area
... and also should create a template for the Prague PlugFest under the 2018-prague area

next call

we will have next call on next week

<kaz> Dec. 20

McCool: cordinate updated with iotschema.org

Koster: we will have iotschema.org call tomorrow
... we can bring something to IETF hackerthon
... we can discuss and come back next week

Matsukura-san will prepare skelton for Prague

<kaz> kaz: any other points from Koster?

<kaz> koster: haven't prepared anything today myself

<kaz> ... Matsukura-san's slides captured issues well

<kaz> ... also we need to think about collaboration with iotschema.org as McCool mentioned

Koster: see issue on protocol adaptation

McCool: we need to think local and remote endpoints
... event representation in TD is also issue
... proxy, NAT traversal and thing directory are not written in architecture document

Kaz: do we want to record those issue at the W3C/wot repository as part of the PlugFest work?

scribenick: kaz

koster: sounds like a good starting point
... we can move it somewhere later if needed

kaz: we can put a label of "PlugFest" for a while

koster: ok
... that's all what I wanted to mention
... getting good shape in logistics

kaz: Koster and McCool, do you want to create GitHub issues based on today's discussion?

mccool: can do that but let's see the feedback from the iotschema.org call, etc.

matsu: any other comments?

kaz: Matsukura-san and Koster should have some discussion about the plan/logistics for the upcoming PlugFest calls :) ?

matsu: ok
... will talk with Koster-san

koster: we can start email discussion, etc.
... will collaborate on GitHub

matsu: unless any other questions, let's close the meeting

[ adjourned ]