16:47:31 RRSAgent has joined #personalization 16:47:31 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/10/02-personalization-irc 16:47:53 rrsagent, make logs public 16:51:14 agenda+ Additional introductions 16:51:16 agenda+ Updates (wiki up and running, user needs table and proposed time lines (mature draft before December?) https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki 16:51:18 agenda+ How often do we want to meet 16:51:19 agenda+ Meeting at TPAC 16:51:26 agenda+ Reviewing the draft (feedback on what needs to be done by section) https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Task-list-for-semantics https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics (and issues) 16:51:26 Other ideas: Do we want it as a vocabulary? should we trim the specification? 17:01:18 Thaddeus has joined #personalization 17:01:36 +Present Thaddeus 17:01:40 + Thaddeus 17:01:45 present+ 17:02:03 present+ 17:03:14 AndyHeath has joined #personalization 17:03:14 can someone post the call in number please 17:03:28 Present+ 17:03:30 scribe: andyheath 17:03:48 clapierre has joined #personalization 17:04:09 present+ 17:04:12 thad can you access this page https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_personalization 17:05:05 regrets, jan 17:05:12 regrets: jan 17:05:19 zakim, next item 17:05:19 agendum 1. "Additional introductions" taken up [from lisa] 17:05:52 zakim, next item 17:05:52 agendum 1 was just opened, lisa 17:05:58 Texthelp will be joining when they get through the process things 17:06:01 zakim, next item 17:06:01 agendum 1 was just opened, lisa 17:06:09 zakim, close item 17:06:09 I don't understand 'close item', lisa 17:06:16 scribe: AndyHeath 17:06:17 zakim, item 2 17:06:17 I don't understand 'item 2', lisa 17:06:27 zakim, open item 2 17:06:27 agendum 2. "Updates (wiki up and running, user needs table and proposed time lines (mature draft before December?) https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki" taken up 17:06:30 ... [from lisa] 17:08:06 If you want to add more pages/links on the wiki you can 17:08:59 q? 17:09:12 https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Task-list-for-semantics 17:09:30 I cant get in to the right now 17:09:30 https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_personalization 17:09:37 On the emantics page we are collecting sub-issues 17:09:37 are you allowed to paste in the number 17:09:53 s/emantics/semantics 17:10:30 Collect comments when reviewing documents in this place 17:11:24 Thad, i opened a private chat window 17:11:41 https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Task-list-for-semantics 17:12:12 thadd i put the info into a privat chat 17:12:33 GreggVan has joined #personalization 17:13:18 The semantics page is stuff for the documents and a todo list 17:13:21 https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Task-list-for-semantics 17:13:33 https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/ 17:13:39 present+ 17:14:08 present+ 17:14:28 present+ 17:14:43 present+ 17:15:26 present+ 17:15:39 q+ to ask for some more about what the wcag 2.1 tie in is 17:16:36 Can we get a straw draft out for early December to be useful for WCAG 2.1 17:17:43 Janina - why are we on a WCAG timeeline at all given that ARIA ia all about tecnniques 17:18:06 Lisa - the more supportive techniques the better and we have some 17:19:01 Lisa - there is already a draft of our techniques 17:19:10 Andy agrees with Janina too 17:19:30 Michael agrees with Janina 17:20:53 q? 17:21:43 Lisa/Gregg - ARIA is limited to markup languages 17:21:56 q+ 17:23:14 Debate about whether there are sufficeint techniques 17:23:32 ack j 17:23:32 janina, you wanted to ask for some more about what the wcag 2.1 tie in is 17:23:36 q- 17:23:39 ack j 17:23:42 ack ja 17:24:37 There isn’t agreement on whether we care about the WCAG 2.1 schedule 17:24:42 Gregg - its too late 17:25:39 https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/ 17:25:53 Lisa - do we want 2pwd for 5th december 17:27:14 Janina - updating the draft by 5th december but focussing on wcag may not be the way to go 17:27:17 zakim, next item 17:27:17 agendum 1. "Additional introductions" taken up [from lisa] 17:28:00 zakim, next item 17:28:00 agendum 1 was just opened, lisa 17:28:07 zakim, open item 3 17:28:07 agendum 3. "How often do we want to meet" taken up [from lisa] 17:29:17 Lisa and Charles wants us to meet every week 17:29:59 q+ 17:31:02 ack a 17:32:05 For now one call per week in the cuyrrent timeslot 17:33:16 I am fine joining a weekly meeting 17:33:54 Gregg - wcag used surveys and the meetings followed to resolve unresolved things 17:36:09 q+ 17:37:09 q+ 17:37:49 Jason - what are the objectives for a specification ? 17:38:27 Jason - do we want it tight and small or larger and take longer to progress 17:39:14 q? 17:39:20 ack q 17:39:25 ack j 17:39:25 ack jason 17:40:19 +1 to weekly meetings unless cancelled 17:40:35 +1 to weekly meetings unless cancelled 17:41:13 Lisa - “I would like a weekly call supplemented by surveys where useful” 17:42:06 +1 to using surveys 17:42:18 +1 to using surveys 17:42:27 q+ 17:42:38 +1 for weekly call + surveys 17:42:42 ack g 17:43:11 zakim, open item 4 17:43:11 agendum 4. "Meeting at TPAC" taken up [from lisa] 17:43:23 Gregg - “surveys - make sure that links always open up on a new page" 17:45:11 q+ 17:45:15 q+ 17:45:45 Charles “TPAC - I’ll be there for the week. Digital Publishing Monday and Tuesday,Thurs and Fri = publisjing summit” 17:46:00 ack Jan 17:46:25 I will be 17:46:48 Discussion - how/whether to have a meeting at TPAC on personalisation 17:48:06 ack l 17:48:09 Janina - propose talk some personalisation in joint meeting for ARIA and CSS Media Queries sometime on Minday or Tues. 17:49:02 Lisa +1 for pesonalisation in joint meeting + should meet with dig pub 17:50:20 Charles - will propose jont meeting to dig pub 17:50:54 Janina - meet with CSS best Mon or Tues 17:52:29 Lisa, Charles, Janina take this offline 17:52:37 action: charles sort out tpac 17:52:53 zakim, open item 5 17:52:54 agendum 5. "Reviewing the draft (feedback on what needs to be done by section) https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Task-list-for-semantics 17:52:56 ... https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics (and issues)" taken up [from lisa] 17:54:09 Lisa = “its a long spec and people more familiar with the metadata side 17:55:34 Lisa - |lets try to focus effort on things people are implementing while not throwing stuff out" 17:55:55 Lisa - “want more use cases but for a narrower scope” 17:56:29 Lisa/Charles - don’t throw anything out 17:57:17 q+ 17:58:12 ack jas 17:58:16 First agenda # for next week - discussion of potential restructuring of spec 17:58:42 q+ 17:59:13 Jason - “conventional way to think about it is start with preferences” 18:00:33 q? 18:00:59 Jason - “but its not clear how all the pieces of this can fit together” 18:01:59 ack 18:02:22 Lisa - “architecture coming second" 18:02:38 agreed 18:02:58 thank you 18:03:02 Lisa - “we can make a wiki page where we discuss the architectural issues" 18:03:20 action: lisa to make page on actectures 18:03:51 Everyone please look at the specirication 18:04:16 should some things be considered “at risk" 18:04:49 Please add to the wiki pages 18:05:34 rrsagent, create minutes 18:05:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/10/02-personalization-minutes.html lisa 18:06:01 zakim, please part 18:06:01 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Thaddeus, jasonjgw, lisa, AndyHeath, clapierre, janina, GreggVan, MichaelC 18:06:01 Zakim has left #personalization 18:06:18 rrsagent, please part 18:06:18 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2017/10/02-personalization-actions.rdf : 18:06:18 ACTION: charles sort out tpac [1] 18:06:18 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/10/02-personalization-irc#T17-52-37 18:06:18 ACTION: lisa to make page on actectures [2] 18:06:18 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/10/02-personalization-irc#T18-03-20