16:50:13 RRSAgent has joined #webauthn 16:50:13 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/09/06-webauthn-irc 16:50:15 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:50:15 Zakim has joined #webauthn 16:50:17 Meeting: Web Authentication Working Group Teleconference 16:50:17 Date: 06 September 2017 16:50:23 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2017Sep/0034.html 16:50:29 weiler has changed the topic to: agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2017Sep/0034.html 16:50:36 present+ weiler 16:50:57 present+ JohnBradley 16:55:55 dmitriz has joined #webauthn 17:00:05 present+ dmitriz 17:00:24 present+ 17:01:04 Ketan has joined #webauthn 17:01:22 jeffh has joined #webauthn 17:01:27 present+ jcj_moz 17:01:55 Rolf has joined #webauthn 17:01:59 John_Bradley has joined #webauthn 17:02:18 present+ ChristiaanBrand, AkshayKumar, battre, Ketan, Rolf, nadalin 17:02:28 present+ jeffh 17:03:05 present+ angelo, jfontana 17:03:37 jfontana has joined #webauthn 17:03:50 gmandyam has joined #webauthn 17:03:58 present+ gmandyam 17:04:34 chair: nadalin, jfontana 17:06:42 angelo has joined #webauthn 17:07:18 scribenick: angelo 17:07:48 scribenick:john 17:08:39 JeffH hasn't had time to work on 498 17:08:54 539 is ongoing 17:09:29 Rolf will take this up this week 17:10:58 topic: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/544 17:11:48 angelo: wondering about how to handle user switching tabs 17:12:01 jcj_moz: 17:12:20 WD07 has joined #webauthn 17:13:08 WD07 has joined #webauthn 17:13:16 angelo: there's the new abort feature in the DOM, as far as he knows, FF implements it 17:13:36 ... talked with akshay and it is difficult to avoid race conditions in edge+windows 17:13:50 ... will be different for every platform+browser 17:14:15 gmandyam: will this work the same if we ever enable webauthn with service workers? 17:15:02 jcj_moz: will be different -- they dont get backgrounded. with tabs they are checking visibility, but svc wkrs dont have that notion...... but 'visibility' is always visible (?) so might just work.... 17:15:17 JC: Tab switch will need a special case for service workers 17:15:51 angelo: one of the dom events might help.... tho a document might be in a iframe, checking visibility might affect performance.... 17:15:53 fwiw, https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f7a53ff2f8cb is the Firefox implementation 17:16:41 angelo will revise PR #544 17:19:22 link: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3AWD-07 17:21:27 thanks jcj_moz 17:21:49 that is the view I was obtaining and that Tony was not seeing for some reason.... 17:29:49 topic link? 17:30:09 #125? 17:31:31 topic: authenticator nonce portion of PR #539 -- https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/539 17:33:19 angelo: raising the procedural issues of not having us discuss the protocol details here in W3C 17:35:41 rolf: notes that the assertion format is defined in the webauthn spec, and the ctap spec is only about the transport protocols between authnrs and the platform 17:36:55 tony. send issue to the list 17:44:35 no. 17:44:37 no 17:45:48 topic: 540 editorial. 17:46:04 Angelo will create a PR 17:47:02 jeffH: this also needs to get addressed in CTAP spec also 17:49:03 gmandyam: wondering about the "cancel operation" issues -- and promises cannont be aborted in ecmascript, how are we doing this? 17:49:19 Tony: there are still some issues we need to call through for CR 17:49:19 angelo: see the PR#544, it is a new DOM feature... 17:49:40 tony: we left off at 184. I am now on CR issues right now 17:50:19 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/milestone/3 17:50:34 topic: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/milestone/3 17:50:46 topic: #204 17:51:09 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/204\ 17:51:22 also related to #184 17:52:03 tony: is there still a concern here? we;ll leave it on the list for now 17:52:22 tony: i'll update it. 17:52:47 topic: #210 everyone will review. 17:52:54 topic: #217 17:53:10 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/217 17:53:17 jeffH is looking at this. 17:53:44 topic: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/227 17:54:04 jeffH: i need to eval. to see if it is still a problem 17:54:53 Giri says he will look at this issue. based on my understanding, the user agent are going to drop this extension in initial releases 17:55:08 giri: this is my assumption going into creating a proposal 17:55:10 s/giri/gmandyam/ 17:55:14 angleo: I agree. 17:55:24 topic: #231 17:55:33 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/231 17:55:39 tony is this still valid> 17:55:53 angelo: i don't think so. tony will assign to angelo to close 17:56:18 topic: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/233 17:56:38 jeffH this is valid and we still need to address it. right now authN data in a table. 17:56:48 jeffH: this items need to be named? 17:57:43 jeffH: I believe cleanup is needed here. 17:58:08 tony: I believe #248 is no longer valid. 17:58:33 JeffH: let me add it to my list. He will close it if it is no longer valid. 17:59:19 topic: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/257 17:59:31 will be closed 17:59:50 topic #280 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/280 18:00:25 jeffH: our language is confusing in places, needs to clarify. worth looking into 18:00:26 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/06-webauthn-minutes.html weiler 18:00:36 topic: #294 18:00:40 jeffH; same 18:01:27 topic #296 18:01:42 jeffH we need to explain things can be managed by an authenticator 18:01:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/06-webauthn-minutes.html weiler 19:25:01 Zakim has left #webauthn 21:22:30 rrsagent, bye 21:22:30 I see no action items 22:24:47 RRSAgent has joined #webauthn 22:24:47 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/09/06-webauthn-irc 22:25:43 s/scribenick:john/scribenick: jfontana/ 22:25:50 rrsagent, draft minutes 22:25:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/06-webauthn-minutes.html wseltzer