Silver Survey Strategy

[reviewing the proposal from Dave Sloan on the strategy for Silver Task Force creating their own surveys

https://docs.google.com/document/d/11HdeZc3a-D5GdFSRXd3jU9GLSDHq6SDtUNtPdC-4CZI/edit#

Various stakeholder groups are being assigned to each question.

High Priority Research Questions: How well does the current content of W3C Accessibility Guidelines meet the accessibility needs of people with disabilities?

scribe: What are the needs of people with disabilities who are under-served from a standards perspective?
... How well does the current conformance model for W3C Accessibility Guidelines serve accessibility for people with disabilities short-term and long-term?
... How flexible are the current web accessibility standards in supporting emerging consumer technology trends?

Medium Priority Research Questions:

scribe: How well does the current structure of W3C Accessibility Guidelines serve different stakeholder groups?
... How well do W3C Accessibility Guidelines support the creation of tools for evaluating accessibility?
... (also send to the Testing Task Force, and ask them if they can suggest followup or related survey questions).

Low Priority Research Questions

scribe: How well does the current structure of W3C Accessibility Guidelines support learning and remembering key principles of web accessibility?

Shawn: Some of the questions we will want to ask on a more technical level for different technical stakeholders. Non-technical questions can be sent to different groups. More policy oriented questions can be sent to the groups that are policy oriented.

Dave: I want to get started writing the questions, and then we can refine them and identify ones that would only be asked of different subsets. We can use branching logic to hide questions from the widest audience of people who wouldn't want to think about that question.
... I will take one research question and develop the list of survey questions so others can see how we might classify and refine the questions.
... Once we have a set a questions, we can figure out how to ask them in the most appropriate way.

<scribe> ACTION: sloandr to draw up a list of survey questions for the research question "How well does the current conformance model for W3C Accessibility Guidelines serve accessibility for people with disabilities short-term and long-term?" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/09/01-silver-minutes.html#action01]

* trackbot is creating a new ACTION.

<trackbot> Created ACTION-118 - Draw up a list of survey questions for the research question "how well does the current conformance model for w3c accessibility guidelines serve accessibility for people with disabilities short-term and long-term?" [on David Sloan - due 2017-09-08].

Shawn: I will miss the next meeting (Friday September 8)

Interviews

<Jan> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vDzSCO-mEnPB7jaAzIhOOLf92b0pCuzzR8u_GSWTw_M/

Jan: Michael Heron said he will make it a requirement of students in his course to do the diary survey.

Jennison: I asked 4 people who were all too concerned about time.

Jan: I had the same problem with developers I know. It is a problem in the industry that people are too busy.

Jennison: He may have to delay a week.

Jan: I will send an email introducing him to Michael.
... regrets Tuesday

Shawn: regrets Friday

trackbot, end meeting

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152  of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/What are the needs/... What are the needs/
Default Present: DaveS, jeanne, Shawn, Jan, Jennison
Present: DaveS jeanne Shawn Jan Jennison
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: jeanne
Inferring Scribes: jeanne

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 01 Sep 2017
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/09/01-silver-minutes.html
People with action items: sloandr