See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: janina
jgw: Before we finalize on captcha, suggest we consider this WCAG page
ds: Seems a complimentary collection since the note publication
<jasonjgw> Janina notes that there is also a PF page that we have looked at earlier.
jgw: This one interesting as a
concise presentation
... Very few suggestions work cross disability
ds: Also seems to be based on collected examples, not on any research
jgw: Each alternative appears to require some sensory or reasoning
ds: Is there value in referencing
this doc somehow?
... Could work up a comparison between this and what we
have
... That might help us decide on this
jgw: My remaining action is to make certain I haven't missed something
[crickets]
ds: Looked through proceedings at CHI, and found nothing on Teuring tests
ds: Found 8 papers from CHI for
us
... Not disability specific, but simply authentication
issues
<sloandr> CHI papers on authentication: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/wiki/Authentication_references#References_to_follow_up_from_CHI_2017
ds: Should all be available for the time being
jgw: Will be reading some of these as well
ds: Thermal trace could be
different for different disability conditions
... Skimmed abstracts, all had some interest for us
... Noted one looking at authentication based on group
jgw: One captcha approach would
relate for authentication, where one identifies a friend
... Noted that personal data is sometimes requested to
authenticate, if the site has access to credit dbs
... Not sure how COGA will view this approach
jb: Wondering whether and when we might invite Wendy Selser
jgw: Yes
jb: Hmmm, there's a time conflict
for her ...
... Want to talk through the items now to prepare ...
... A range of alternative approaches?
jgw: That's one
... Captcha says we're human, vs authentication identifies the
user as a particular human
<Judy> [JB grabs Jason's question "Are there are cross-disability techniques that establish that a user is human without disclosing their identity?"
jgw: jb: The first captcha missed a key point, imo, where the captcha might establish human vs machine, but incidentally also established certain individuals as pwds
jb: One approach might be a set of tests, pick the ones you want to use
jgw: Back to the wider
authentication topic ...
... We're concerned whether risk approaches disadvantage pwd
scoring in some way
<jasonjgw> Janina suggests that site-by-site establishing of identity is problematic, and we need a scheme of trust sharing across sites.
<jasonjgw> Janina suggests that if there is a relationship with a trust broker, any disability-related information that might be inadvertently disclosed is only disclosed to the (trusted) broker rather than to relying parties that depend on it.
jb: Schedule next few weeks
unclear, but will ask Wendy and get back
... So, maybe next week--or not
jgw: Let's find a mutually
agreeable time
... And a clear list of topics
<jasonjgw> Janina notes the forthcoming publication of the COGA papers - first public working draft.
jgw: Anything else for today?
ds: Would note there were quite a few autonomous vehicle papers in CHI
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Default Present: janina, sloandr, jasonjgw, Judy Present: janina sloandr jasonjgw Judy Found Scribe: janina Inferring ScribeNick: janina WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 10 May 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/05/10-rqtf-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]