16:00:09 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #digitaloffers
16:00:09 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-digitaloffers-irc
16:00:11 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #digitaloffers
16:00:16 <Ian> Meeting: Digital Offers CG
16:00:19 <Ian> Chair: Linda
16:00:21 <Ian> Scribe: Ian
16:00:35 <Ian> agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digitaloffers/2017Mar/0000.html
16:01:52 <Ian> present+ Linda
16:01:56 <Ian> present+
16:02:08 <Ian> present+ Adam
16:02:29 <Ian> present+ Bob
16:02:48 <dezell> dezell has joined #digitaloffers
16:03:39 <Ian> present+ Amber
16:04:32 <Ian> present+ David
16:05:32 <manu> Present+ Manu
16:06:16 <ltoth> Access Code: 389-946-949   You can also dial in using your phone.  United States +1 (571) 317-3116
16:07:12 <Ian> use cases =>  https://www.w3.org/community/digitaloffers/discussion-topics-for-discussion-at-march-2017-ig-face-to-face-meeting/
16:07:22 <Ian> form for prioritization =>  https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/73816/digoff201703/
16:07:56 <Ian> ltoth: One question - in a number of cases we had notes.
16:08:54 <Ian> IJ: I left them in because we did not "approve" them
16:09:59 <Ian> +1
16:10:47 <manu> q+ to mention something wrt. poll.
16:15:34 <dezell> Manu: I think we don't want to go to the DRM question, as long as it handles "no more than one use."
16:15:39 <dezell> Ian: sounds fine.
16:16:16 <dezell> LGTM
16:16:46 <dezell> Ian: second thing - the "form" for prioritization.
16:17:00 <dezell> Ian: the IG is not the final authority on the CG work.
16:17:22 <dezell> Ian: the form should make it clear it's for feedback.
16:17:26 <manu> q-
16:17:36 <manu> q+ to provide feedback on the use case prioritization form.
16:17:57 <Ian> IJ: Intended for real-time gathering of data at the meeting
16:17:59 <Ian> ack manu
16:17:59 <Zakim> manu, you wanted to provide feedback on the use case prioritization form.
16:18:18 <Ian> manu: I went to try out the form ... some feedback ... I read that each person has tokens and I didn't know what I was selecting.
16:18:25 <dezell> Manu: form feedback - didn't understand "tokens" and then how to apply to the dropdown.
16:18:33 <dezell> Ian: got it.
16:19:11 <dezell> Manu: I found it painful to allocate the tokens (i.e. we gave the right number).  Finally, I found I had to go back and forth between the "poll" and the "page".
16:19:51 <dezell> Manu: I think a "tickler phrase" from the page on the poll would help people to remember what's what.
16:21:25 <dezell> Ian: I have anchors in the report for this purpose, but haven't added them yet.  Or I could number them, but that's a brittle way to link thinks (moving anything breaks it.)
16:21:45 <dezell> Ian: I think easiest is to put a reminder structure at the bottom.
16:22:36 <dezell> Manu: links are fine, but broad categories are probably better in terms of links.
16:22:49 <dezell> Ian: but then I can't allocate 9 tokens for all of them.
16:24:06 <dezell> Manu: how about category and specific use case?
16:24:18 <dezell> Ian: I can do that, but I would find it distracting.
16:25:39 <Ian> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/73816/digoff201703/
16:28:20 <dezell> Manu: how about moving recap to the top.
16:28:26 <dezell> Ian: OK with that.
16:28:47 <dezell> Manu: also a health warning that moving off the page will invalidate the form.
16:29:18 <dezell> Linda: Is this just the IG opinion, or does it include the CG.
16:30:06 <dezell> Ian: it's to inform CG decisions, but it's a poll for the IG.
16:31:09 <dezell> q?
16:32:15 <dezell> David: who will send the message out?
16:33:20 <dezell> Ian: I'm not sure we should send a message.
16:33:42 <dezell> Linda: I think we could use the same form for the CG.
16:34:02 <dezell> Ian: though I think we will make some modifications of some sort.
16:34:30 <dezell> q?
16:36:36 <dezell> Ian:  my idea is to have them fill out this form at the F2F after they have some context.
16:36:49 <dezell> (consensus - OK).
16:39:24 <dezell> Linda: our schedule is 45 (use cases) 45 (demo and capabilities) 30 (summary topics).
16:39:39 <dezell> Ian: I suggest we do the survey at the end of the discussion.
16:40:21 <Ian> Manu: is discussion of technology specific solutions in order?
16:40:33 <Ian> ...e.g., blockchain approach to avoiding N > 1 redemptions
16:40:39 <Ian> q+
16:40:41 <dezell> Manu: we have a "blockchain" use case to prevent multiple redemption. I don't want people to be surprised.
16:40:54 <dezell> ack i
16:41:33 <dezell> Ian: I'm not sure how that affects W3C work.
16:41:45 <dezell> Manu: blockchain CG has work in this area.
16:42:08 <dezell> Linda:
16:42:10 <Ian> https://www.w3.org/community/digitaloffers/digital-offers-community-group-charter/
16:42:18 <dezell> Linda: so after the voting, what's next.
16:42:25 <adam> q+
16:42:52 <dezell> Ian: charter says "we will deliver a report" and then "develop an analysis that will help us address the use cases".
16:42:55 <adam> q-
16:43:08 <dezell> Ian: there might be a further CG filtering of the use cases.
16:44:25 <dezell> Ian:  Nirvana is "lots of industry folks are ready to attempt to implement".  But we can change that based on results.
16:45:16 <Ian> Here's the list of use cases we came up with in June 2015 that led to the WPWG => https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page/FTF_June2015/Summary
16:45:58 <Ian> topic: Next meeting
16:46:02 <Ian> Linda: Will figure out at FTF
16:46:06 <Ian> RRSAgent, make minutes
16:46:06 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/13-digitaloffers-minutes.html Ian
16:46:09 <Ian> RRSAgent, set logs public