IRC log of wpwg on 2017-02-10
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:54:58 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wpwg
- 16:54:58 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/02/10-wpwg-irc
- 16:55:02 [Ian]
- Meeting: Merchant Adoption Strategy
- 16:55:04 [Ian]
- Chair: IAn
- 16:55:07 [Ian]
- Chair: Ian
- 16:55:20 [Ian]
- Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-strategy/2017Feb/0003.html
- 16:56:25 [adamR]
- regrets+
- 16:56:47 [Ian]
- present+
- 17:02:13 [zkoch]
- zkoch has joined #wpwg
- 17:03:01 [Ian]
- present+ Koalie
- 17:03:04 [Ian]
- present+ Rouslan
- 17:03:07 [Ian]
- present+ zkoch
- 17:03:36 [Ian]
- present+ Molly
- 17:03:50 [koalie]
- koalie has joined #wpwg
- 17:03:54 [koalie]
- present+ Coralie
- 17:03:55 [rouslan]
- rouslan has joined #wpwg
- 17:04:01 [Ian]
- agenda+ Identity
- 17:04:06 [Ian]
- present- Koalie
- 17:04:12 [Molly]
- Molly has joined #wpwg
- 17:04:13 [Ian]
- agenda+ Dev resources
- 17:04:16 [Ian]
- zakim, take up item 1
- 17:04:16 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Identity" taken up [from Ian]
- 17:04:58 [Ian]
- zkoch: Having various discussions and there seems to be support for an open checkout identity
- 17:05:33 [Ian]
- ...still need more time to make internal progress
- 17:06:15 [Ian]
- IJ: What can we do to help?
- 17:06:41 [Ian]
- zkoch: It would be helpful to hear from others that they would be available to advocate for an open web checkout
- 17:06:56 [Ian]
- molly: I will check
- 17:07:17 [koalie]
- IJ: Had a chat with Adam yesterday
- 17:08:30 [adamR]
- zkoch: I have a query in to our head of marketing
- 17:09:20 [Ian]
- IJ: Time frame zach?
- 17:09:22 [Ian]
- zkoch: next call
- 17:11:03 [Ian]
- IJ: Ken, how does it look from the Amex side to drive an identity for open web checkout?
- 17:14:40 [Ian]
- Andrew: The identity effort resonates for me
- 17:14:55 [Ian]
- ..having some branding will help merchants
- 17:15:05 [Ian]
- ...they may be familiar with w3c but not payment request API
- 17:15:21 [zkoch]
- I like that!
- 17:15:28 [Ian]
- Ken: We'd be interested in supporting a proposal from zach that improves participation of all the different parties
- 17:15:35 [Ian]
- ..there's definitely good well
- 17:15:43 [zkoch]
- s/well/will
- 17:16:07 [rouslan]
- present+
- 17:16:08 [Ian]
- Ken: It would be helpful to build out a matrix that helps different merchants understand how they will participate
- 17:16:11 [Ian]
- present+ Andrew
- 17:16:13 [Ian]
- present+ Ken
- 17:16:16 [Ian]
- zakim, how's here?
- 17:16:16 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, Ian.
- 17:16:20 [Ian]
- zakim, who's here?
- 17:16:20 [Zakim]
- Present: Ian, Rouslan, zkoch, Molly, Coralie, Andrew, Ken
- 17:16:22 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Molly, rouslan, koalie, zkoch, RRSAgent, Zakim, adamR, dlehn, davidillsley_, canton_, pea13, AdrianHB, emschwartz, oyiptong, nicktr, adrianba, JakeA, Dongwoo,
- 17:16:22 [Zakim]
- ... slightlyoff, mkwst, manu, dlongley, Ian, ShaneM, hober, schuki, trackbot
- 17:16:53 [Ian]
- Ken: What I haven't seen is some sort of matrix that outlines the different types of merchants out there; what would appeal to them about w3c specs, and how those specs will help them.
- 17:17:04 [Ian]
- ...I don't think that there is a one-size fits all approach here
- 17:18:15 [Ian]
- IJ: Would it be useful to hear from larger WG next week on this?
- 17:18:16 [Ian]
- zkoch: Yes
- 17:18:38 [Ian]
- q?
- 17:19:12 [zkoch]
- New open web proposal: “Zach Pay” -> I shall present at the f2f
- 17:19:55 [Ian]
- zakim, close this item
- 17:19:55 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 closed
- 17:19:56 [Zakim]
- I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
- 17:19:56 [Zakim]
- 2. Dev resources [from Ian]
- 17:20:00 [Ian]
- zakim, take up item 2
- 17:20:00 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Dev resources" taken up [from Ian]
- 17:20:12 [Ian]
- https://github.com/w3c/payment-request-info
- 17:21:54 [Ian]
- IJ: Where to start/ Who will take assignments?
- 17:22:22 [Ian]
- Ken: when the charter was written, I am assuming that the merchant role in adopting the PR API was balanced against other roles in the ecosystem
- 17:24:45 [Ian]
- IJ: We did not have an outreach plan at charter time.
- 17:24:54 [Ian]
- Ken: One approach is to start with pilots, or showcase examples
- 17:25:08 [Ian]
- ...these are used to bolster the business case and advocate for greater adoption
- 17:25:24 [Ian]
- ...identify the incentives (both carrots and sticks)
- 17:26:03 [Ian]
- ...if we don't have demos right now that are public, we should look at creating some
- 17:26:41 [Ian]
- ...from an Amex perspective, a high-level swath would be: (1) pilot project in four regions (e.g., N.A., S.A., EMEA, Asia-Pacific)
- 17:26:46 [Ian]
- ...we could find some high-profile partners
- 17:27:11 [Ian]
- ...and if those are favorable, use those to drive additional adoption
- 17:27:49 [Molly]
- I'm sorry everyone, I have to run!
- 17:28:33 [Ian]
- IJ: could Amex take the lead on such a project?
- 17:28:48 [Ian]
- Ken: We would like to support the effort.
- 17:29:46 [Ian]
- ...an effort should have both technical and business components
- 17:31:09 [Ian]
- ...I mean the business component as directed toward the merchant
- 17:31:24 [zkoch]
- :)
- 17:31:32 [Ian]
- ...understanding pain points
- 17:31:39 [Ian]
- ...big obstacle I've found is how to communicate it
- 17:32:01 [Ian]
- ...it seems like w3c work requires a lot of pictures
- 17:32:35 [zkoch]
- Unfortunately I have to head out to make next meeting… This is interesting. Would like to continue at our next chat
- 17:32:53 [Ian]
- Topic: next meeting?
- 17:33:11 [Ian]
- Proposed 24 Feb at 8am PT
- 17:33:18 [Ian]
- (an hour earlier than usual)
- 17:34:06 [Ian]
- Andrew: Agree with some of the challenges Ken cited, and articulating the story for the merchant
- 17:34:15 [Ian]
- https://github.com/w3c/payment-request-info/blob/master/README.md
- 17:34:19 [Ian]
- ...we'd like to continue to help
- 17:34:29 [Ian]
- --
- 17:34:30 [Ian]
- Code examples
- 17:34:30 [Ian]
- User experience patterns
- 17:34:30 [Ian]
- Answers to common questions
- 17:34:30 [Ian]
- Implementation status
- 17:34:31 [Ian]
- Branding guidance
- 17:34:32 [Ian]
- Value proposition
- 17:34:34 [Ian]
- ---
- 17:37:29 [Ian]
- Andrew: For generating new stuff, I need to check internally
- 17:42:04 [Ian]
- Ken: I could see doing some trial runs (e.g., a few slides) and then testing them
- 17:42:28 [Ian]
- ...people want simple, illustrated
- 17:42:39 [Ian]
- ...questions like "how does this work with big merchants who already have a checkout button"
- 17:42:57 [Ian]
- ...or "if merchants already have checkout buttons by contract, how does this work"?
- 17:43:37 [Ian]
- Andrew: I have heard similar questions to the ones Ken has raised
- 17:43:50 [Ian]
- ...and also agree that different sized merchants have different questions
- 17:43:56 [Ian]
- ...also have questions about promotions are applied.
- 17:45:17 [Ian]
- PROPOSED: Gather questions (and draft answers) from merchants (or senior managements)
- 17:45:40 [Ian]
- ACTION: Ken to gather some questions from merchants/others
- 17:45:40 [trackbot]
- Error finding 'Ken'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/track/users>.
- 17:45:49 [Ian]
- ACTION: Andrew to gather some questions from merhcants/others
- 17:45:49 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-51 - Gather some questions from merhcants/others [on Andrew Paliga - due 2017-02-17].
- 17:46:05 [Ian]
- IJ: Any other questions or thoughts?
- 17:46:17 [Ian]
- https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Adoption2017
- 17:47:34 [koalie]
- thanks all, bye!
- 17:47:36 [Ian]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 17:47:36 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/02/10-wpwg-minutes.html Ian
- 17:47:44 [Ian]
- RRSAgent, set logs public
- 19:02:04 [adamR]
- adamR has joined #wpwg
- 19:57:01 [manu]
- manu has joined #wpwg
- 19:57:30 [dlongley]
- dlongley has joined #wpwg
- 20:09:19 [manu]
- manu has joined #wpwg
- 20:09:50 [dlongley]
- dlongley has joined #wpwg
- 20:37:37 [davidillsley_]
- davidillsley_ has joined #wpwg
- 21:06:25 [adamR]
- adamR has joined #wpwg
- 23:56:05 [adamR]
- adamR has joined #wpwg