See also: IRC log
-> https://github.com/w3c/tvcontrol-api TV Control WG's GitHub repo
ryan: gives update on the TV Control WG's work
... lot of use cases are similar
paul: VW attended the f2f meeting
in Burlingame and explained their proposal
... Kevin sent a note
-> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-autowebplatform/2016Nov/0001.html Kevin's note
paul: any comments?
(no specific comments)
philippe: Philippe Colliot is
busy now
... btw, there is news on Toyota's announcement on vehicle
connectivity
-> http://newsroom.toyota.co.jp/en/detail/14129306
philippe: KDDI is mentioned here
paul: good to know
rudi: mentions Genivi's security work
paul: opportunity to learn about security more?
rudi: not completely open but
there is a mailinglist
... and you can join it
... corporation address should be used instead of free mail
address
kaz: Edited REC has just been published
-> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-geolocation-API-20161108/ Geolocation API Edited REC
wonsuk: looking at the existing BG Charter, think we should update it
paul: should add LBS
-> https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/automotive-and-web-platform-business-group-charter/ BG Charter
wonsuk: agree
paul: what else?
kaz: wondering about the media
work
... Ryan, is it OK to continue to work with the TV Control
WG?
... they're removing "TV" from the API definition
ryan: OK with working with
them
... automotive input
... there is a lot of energy in that group
kaz: good
... on the other hand, maybe at some point (not now) we should
think about low-level websocket interface for media tuner and
LBS as well
paul: btw, are rechartering the BG?
wonsuk: we need to update the
Charter
... adding LBS, media tuner
... input from VW as well
... they have media portion as well
kaz: from the W3C process
viewpoint, BGs don't have actual charter period
... but the Charter wiki should be updated based on our
work
wonsuk: right
... new use cases as well
paul: agree
... Ryan working on media tuner
... Philippe Colliot and Qing An working on LBS
... new proposal from VW
... security is another big one
... Genivi security by Stacy is good one
... helpful for this group
... device interaction as well
kaz: including bluetooth?
paul: will put the note from on of the previous meetings
kaz: the list from the Ann Arbor meeting?
Ann Arbor f2f meeting minutes (Member-only)
paul: yes
wonsuk: not sure if "device
interaction" includes voice interaction
... but there was interest in that as well
... voice interaction for driving
... like Amazon echo
kaz: we had joint discussion with Glen shires from Google in Santa Clara
philippe: if you want to get update on speech from Genivi, you should talk with Philippe Colliot
paul: ok
philippe: Philippe Colliot is completing PoC by the end of year
paul: will send a list of
collected topics
... we should start media at the next meeting
... sounds good?
wonsuk: yes
... one of the ideas I have is
... how about making a TF for use cases?
... keep discussion on use cases
... what the industry situation is like
paul: good idea
... e.g., for payments
... anything about IoT would be related to automotive
... communication with traffic company should be also
important
... should discuss what kind of capability is required
... based on use cases
... VSS is a good example, media tuner is another good
example
kaz: during the Paris meeting,
Urata-san and Hira-san mentioned they organized a hackathon
using the vehicle api
... that event included several interesting use cases
wonsuk: can dig the resource about that?
kaz: will do
wonsuk: can we put all the information together?
paul: we should do that
kaz: we can start with wiki?
paul: think so
... mailinglist as well
... will take an action item to send the topic list
... everybody wants VSS and the BG should be complementary to
the WG
wonsuk: we have previous use
cases and we can revisit them as well
... also can get new use cases
... should think about what actual industry use cases are
... in case of the media stuff, there are existing Web services
like podcast
... would be beneficial for the media tuner capability
paul: sounds good
... we should start larger group discussion
... you and I should coordinate with each other
... Genivi guys as well
... should I send an email to the BG?
wonsuk: yes, please
paul: ok
... please respond, everybody
[ adjourned ]