IRC log of aria on 2016-09-01
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:28:32 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #aria
- 16:28:32 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/09/01-aria-irc
- 16:28:34 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 16:28:34 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #aria
- 16:28:36 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 16:28:36 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 16:28:37 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference
- 16:28:37 [trackbot]
- Date: 01 September 2016
- 16:28:48 [Rich]
- RRSAgent, make log public
- 16:28:57 [Rich]
- chair: Rich
- 16:29:14 [janina]
- present+ Janina
- 16:31:34 [joanie]
- present+ Joanmarie_Diggs
- 16:31:37 [fesch]
- fesch has joined #aria
- 16:31:52 [Rich]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Aug/0259.html
- 16:31:55 [jaeunjemmaku]
- jaeunjemmaku has joined #aria
- 16:32:42 [Rich]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Sep/att-0000/00-part
- 16:33:19 [Rich]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Aug/0259.html
- 16:34:10 [LJWatson]
- LJWatson has joined #aria
- 16:34:21 [LJWatson]
- present+ LJWatson
- 16:34:58 [janina]
- scribe: Janina
- 16:35:01 [jaeunjemmaku]
- present+ jaeunku
- 16:35:08 [janina]
- topic: Publishing HTML AAM
- 16:35:28 [jongund_]
- jongund_ has joined #aria
- 16:35:29 [janina]
- rs: Expected last week we would have a CfC handing this to Web Platforms
- 16:35:43 [janina]
- rs: However, there were concerns, mainly about resources over time
- 16:36:14 [jongund_]
- present+ jongund
- 16:36:14 [Rich]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Sep/att-0000/00-part
- 16:36:37 [LJWatson]
- q+
- 16:36:46 [janina]
- rs: Web Platforms is now saying they want ARIA to own it alone, if it can't be exclusively Web Platform's
- 16:37:17 [janina]
- rs: We also had informal advice of an FO if kept joint
- 16:37:29 [janina]
- rs: This started to sound like some level of mistrust
- 16:37:37 [janina]
- rs: Don't believe that's a general feeling
- 16:38:00 [janina]
- rs: Also, noting comments on WAICC sharing the resourcing concern over time
- 16:38:07 [cyns]
- cyns has joined #aria
- 16:38:15 [janina]
- rs: Meanwhile, the contributors have said we'll continue working whoever owns it
- 16:38:48 [janina]
- rs: Leonie has agreed to a one month review before major transition, i.e. CR
- 16:38:49 [cyns]
- present+
- 16:39:04 [janina]
- lw: Yes. We'd be looking to sync with HTML transitions
- 16:39:37 [janina]
- rs: Seems it needs to be one group or the other
- 16:40:05 [cyns]
- q+
- 16:40:15 [janina]
- mc: Don't understand why joint isn't acceptable
- 16:40:48 [janina]
- mc: It provides process protections to both groups,
- 16:41:15 [janina]
- mc: Influencing consistancy is important to ARIA, imo
- 16:41:37 [janina]
- mc: I have gone out of my way to absorb publication process from wp
- 16:41:51 [janina]
- rs: If they give us a 2 month review, why is that an issue?
- 16:41:58 [janina]
- mc: That helps in reviewing content
- 16:42:12 [janina]
- mc: Well, we also have structure and tooling involved
- 16:42:34 [janina]
- lw: We're not saying we don't want to work with ARIA
- 16:42:48 [janina]
- lw: We have one member saying no joint deliverables, but not ARIA specific
- 16:43:24 [janina]
- lw: Chairs concerned that objections need to be dealt with in two different places when they arise, and that complicates things
- 16:43:54 [janina]
- lw: We've different tooling, i.e. github; this group email
- 16:43:59 [MichaelC]
- q+
- 16:44:17 [MichaelC]
- q+ to say many of the ¨have to coordinate on xyz¨ are features not bugs
- 16:44:28 [janina]
- lw: Happy to work out good coordination, just not want official process in two different places
- 16:44:29 [MichaelC]
- q+ to say I am not aware of process burdens having been a problem for HTML-AAM
- 16:44:59 [janina]
- lw: WP also has many a11y people, well represented
- 16:44:59 [MichaelC]
- q+ to say we would be open to setting up infrastructure to ensure there aren´t things like duplicate issues, e.g., standalone github repository already in the works
- 16:45:04 [Rich]
- q?
- 16:45:16 [MichaelC]
- q+ Matt
- 16:45:18 [MichaelC]
- ack l
- 16:45:23 [Rich]
- ack LJWatson
- 16:45:40 [janina]
- cs: Microsoft is generally in favor of single point of ownership and accountability.
- 16:45:46 [LJWatson]
- ack me
- 16:45:51 [janina]
- cs: I plan to work on this doc regardless of where it lives
- 16:45:56 [Rich]
- ack cyns
- 16:46:03 [MichaelC]
- ack me
- 16:46:03 [Zakim]
- MichaelC, you wanted to say many of the ¨have to coordinate on xyz¨ are features not bugs and to say I am not aware of process burdens having been a problem for HTML-AAM and to
- 16:46:06 [Zakim]
- ... say we would be open to setting up infrastructure to ensure there aren´t things like duplicate issues, e.g., standalone github repository already in the works
- 16:46:21 [janina]
- mc: Most of the points on accountability and process are actually features, imo, not bugs
- 16:46:47 [janina]
- mc: I'm simply not aware that there have been any process problems to date
- 16:47:14 [janina]
- mc: I believe we can minimize issues in two places, other kinds of duplicative process concerns
- 16:47:49 [janina]
- lw: Believe only one CfC so far, for fpwd
- 16:48:39 [janina]
- lw: believe mappings had 3 cfcs via HTML-A11y TF, PF, and HTML -- but mostly the same people
- 16:48:55 [janina]
- lw: ARIA in HTML is already sole ownership of WP
- 16:49:02 [janina]
- mc: Believe that's a different niche
- 16:49:12 [Rich]
- q?
- 16:49:23 [Rich]
- ack Matt
- 16:49:24 [janina]
- mc: The AAM mappings are different, part of a suite of AAMs that involve multiple groups
- 16:50:06 [janina]
- mk: Wondering whether issues of joint ownership could be solved by single repo, single process/issues, logging, etc
- 16:50:50 [janina]
- rs: To me one of the big problems is serialized signoffs
- 16:51:02 [cyns]
- +1 to Rich
- 16:51:07 [janina]
- mc: No reason not to do it in parallel
- 16:51:26 [janina]
- mc: But however we structure it, we're still looking for sign off from both groups
- 16:51:55 [janina]
- lw: Wondering what input is at risk if it's input via wide review? Rather than ownership?
- 16:52:21 [janina]
- mc: 1.) structurally can't insure it fits the larger suite of aams, divergence over time
- 16:52:29 [janina]
- mc: 2.) insure that it gets completed
- 16:53:03 [janina]
- mc: Not saying this will happen, but such things do happen. We wouldn't be able to pick up the work should that happen
- 16:53:32 [janina]
- lw: Should we amend our Charter to clarify this? Would that do it?
- 16:53:52 [janina]
- mc: We coordinate via aria eeditors, we don't have a single doc that lays it out
- 16:53:59 [mck]
- mck has joined #aria
- 16:54:16 [janina]
- mc: common toc, certain items the doc covers, relationship to host docs, some tooling that facilitates all this
- 16:54:35 [janina]
- mc: Don't believe the editors attend coord calls
- 16:54:43 [janina]
- mc: No, but they follow the list and respond
- 16:54:55 [janina]
- mc: They do use the tools, and they pose questions to the other editors
- 16:55:05 [janina]
- mc: They do avail themselves of this infrastructure
- 16:55:06 [mck]
- /me Yay, got on to chatzilla ... now will JAWS read this back to me?
- 16:55:26 [janina]
- rs: It doesn't sound like web platforms won't accept joint ownership
- 16:55:51 [janina]
- mc; We're being told one member won't accept, that shouldn't speak for the entire w3c that way.
- 16:56:00 [janina]
- mc: It's a precedent for other groups as well
- 16:56:21 [janina]
- lw: Notes that this is a very active discussion, not just aria, currently
- 16:56:39 [janina]
- rs: Expect we should put out two proposals and decide between them
- 16:57:05 [janina]
- rs: if WP takes ownership, what are the stiuplations?
- 16:57:36 [janina]
- mk: seems, aria owns, wp owns, and joint -- is any one of these actually going to clearly achieve consensus
- 16:58:13 [janina]
- rs: Note this has been discussed on several calls, in several contexts
- 16:58:27 [janina]
- rs: reminds me of role=text
- 16:58:46 [janina]
- mk: wonder if laying out the options, then discussing at tpac might be helpful
- 16:59:12 [janina]
- lw: Noting this the one thing holding us back from advancing our Charter
- 16:59:30 [janina]
- rs: So, if WP owns, what are the stipulations? 2 month review?
- 16:59:49 [janina]
- jn: 1 month should be enough. More, and people would just delay
- 17:00:05 [janina]
- mk: what transition?
- 17:00:12 [janina]
- rs: major milesont, specifically cr
- 17:00:27 [janina]
- rs: so 1 month, cr, major pub
- 17:00:37 [janina]
- rs: make that cr and pr
- 17:00:59 [janina]
- rs: Second stipulation, github? a common github for all aams?
- 17:01:11 [janina]
- mk: we're looking at this anyway, i think
- 17:01:55 [janina]
- mk: Noting we had some informal agreements, like feature freeze ahead of cr.
- 17:02:07 [janina]
- rs: like unofficial last call? since no more official last call?
- 17:02:32 [janina]
- lw: so the cfc proposing cr is the lc now
- 17:03:03 [janina]
- mc: we just did a pseudo lc, which is recommended by process and many groups that review
- 17:03:14 [janina]
- mc: even though not mandating, mor and more groups are adopting that
- 17:03:25 [janina]
- rs: would wp agree to feature complete ahead of cr?
- 17:03:27 [janina]
- lw: probably not
- 17:03:38 [janina]
- rs: so objections on cr, just return to cr
- 17:04:22 [janina]
- mk: how do nonmembers participate while aam changes are ongoing prior to cr?
- 17:04:27 [janina]
- lw: filing issues on github
- 17:05:06 [janina]
- mk: input from the outside wouldn't be possible unless one were involved and aware
- 17:05:18 [janina]
- lw: it would be easy to keep this call informed
- 17:05:27 [janina]
- mk: aria cfc's are public
- 17:05:31 [janina]
- lw: same for us
- 17:06:12 [janina]
- mc: PF was the only nonpublic, and migrated some years ago -- of the a11y groups
- 17:06:28 [janina]
- rs: 2nd option is aria ownership. any stipulations?
- 17:06:42 [janina]
- mc: would want the same review reqs on us
- 17:07:01 [janina]
- lw: month's review would be ok
- 17:07:24 [janina]
- rs: if joint -- we need to paralelize the process, imo
- 17:08:24 [janina]
- mc: we rs: so both groups have to sign off? so two cfc's?
- 17:08:33 [janina]
- rs: so if one agrees and the other doesn't?
- 17:08:50 [janina]
- mc: but that's exactly what we need to resolve, regardless of whether single or joint
- 17:09:04 [janina]
- lw: but that divides the discussion
- 17:09:13 [Stefan_]
- Stefan_ has joined #aria
- 17:09:13 [janina]
- mc: I think we would move to a joint discussion to resolve
- 17:09:46 [janina]
- rs: so if joint, would need to resolve disagreements in joint discussion
- 17:10:19 [Stefan2]
- Stefan2 has joined #aria
- 17:10:38 [janina]
- janina: suggesting best as wbs
- 17:10:47 [janina]
- mc: soonest late today, probably tomorrow
- 17:11:00 [janina]
- rs: OK, just don't want to hold up charters. we know how that's problematic!
- 17:11:13 [janina]
- topic: name from author --action 1723
- 17:11:16 [janina]
- action-1723?
- 17:11:16 [trackbot]
- action-1723 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Editorial - create sections listing the roles that provide (1) nameFrom:author and (2) nameFrom:contents -- due 2016-08-17 -- OPEN
- 17:11:16 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1723
- 17:11:25 [janina]
- jd: nothing changed
- 17:11:35 [janina]
- jd: needs to know what clown needs
- 17:11:37 [janina]
- rs: ok
- 17:11:43 [janina]
- topic: blockers for entering cr
- 17:12:05 [janina]
- rs: need error message, details mapping, a few others resolved
- 17:12:10 [janina]
- rs: people have been away
- 17:12:40 [janina]
- rs: nvda wanted to concatinate -- didn't think it was appropriate
- 17:12:49 [janina]
- rs: had issues from matt
- 17:12:51 [cyns]
- cyns has joined #aria
- 17:13:02 [chaals]
- chaals has joined #aria
- 17:13:16 [fesch_]
- fesch_ has joined #aria
- 17:13:54 [janina]
- cyns: will take a pass, but there are some we don't have mapped
- 17:14:09 [janina]
- cyns: do i have an action?
- 17:14:56 [Rich]
- Action: Cynthia provide UIA mappings for new ARIA construct gaps (rich to provide)
- 17:14:57 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2113 - Provide uia mappings for new aria construct gaps (rich to provide) [on Cynthia Shelly - due 2016-09-08].
- 17:15:27 [janina]
- rs: need to go through the several platforms, probably apple last
- 17:15:39 [janina]
- topic: testable statements
- 17:15:47 [janina]
- rs: had good discussion on automated
- 17:16:20 [janina]
- cyns: fred has provided testable statements with great detail that are convertible to json
- 17:16:25 [janina]
- cyns: he has scripts for that
- 17:16:32 [janina]
- cyns: microsoft has tooling to test
- 17:16:41 [janina]
- cyns: we import the json
- 17:17:06 [janina]
- cyns: I need to add some of the uia -- but it's all moving along, even with some staffing changes here
- 17:17:19 [janina]
- cyns: we need people to create test cases based on the statements
- 17:17:35 [janina]
- cyns: believe JF's India people working on that, but more people would be helpful
- 17:18:03 [janina]
- cyns: Also jg has student o work on ia2 connector for the automated testing
- 17:18:26 [janina]
- rs: msaa and ia2 will need to be done together,otherwise not automatable
- 17:18:39 [Rich]
- https://www.w3.org/wiki/ARIA_1.1_Testable_Statements
- 17:18:39 [janina]
- rs: anyone spoken to jcraig about osx?
- 17:18:45 [janina]
- [crickets]
- 17:18:54 [janina]
- rs: OK, I'll reach out
- 17:19:14 [janina]
- cyns: jg has a student for ia2, maybe could get another?
- 17:19:28 [janina]
- jg: Yes, first priority is msaa/ia2, which is the priority
- 17:19:37 [janina]
- jg: but if they complete that, could work on os10
- 17:20:03 [janina]
- jg: believe overall theme here is to create a generalized test suite for all of aria
- 17:20:17 [chaals]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:20:17 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/09/01-aria-minutes.html chaals
- 17:20:23 [janina]
- jg: would be nice to have someone else on os10
- 17:20:52 [janina]
- cyns: suggest that it's a good intern project
- 17:22:02 [janina]
- jg: can i just reach out? or need to do all the w3c structure?
- 17:22:09 [janina]
- mc: use judgement.
- 17:22:33 [janina]
- rs: I am finding some isues, formatting, and results
- 17:22:36 [Rich]
- https://www.w3.org/wiki/ARIA_1.1_Testable_Statements#aria-busy_on_a_listbox_Rich_Start
- 17:23:05 [LJWatson]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:23:05 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/09/01-aria-minutes.html LJWatson
- 17:23:29 [janina]
- rs: for global tests, i suggest 3, representable list should suffice
- 17:23:40 [fesch]
- q+ to say I have uploaded the perl script to convert wiki to JSON
- 17:23:49 [LJWatson]
- rrsagent, set logs world-visible
- 17:24:01 [janina]
- rs: I have several sections on me, i will do a few, then will discuss on how to hand some of this over
- 17:24:15 [janina]
- jg: should we discuss next wednesday?
- 17:24:21 [janina]
- rs: we need jf for that
- 17:24:46 [janina]
- rs: we're not in cr yet because mainly we should get some of the mapping done and convince ourselves nothing is at risk
- 17:24:51 [janina]
- topic: tapc coordination
- 17:25:03 [Rich]
- ARIA Working Group Meetings: https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2016
- 17:25:04 [Rich]
- - APA Working Group Meetings: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2016
- 17:25:05 [fesch]
- ack me
- 17:25:05 [Zakim]
- fesch, you wanted to say I have uploaded the perl script to convert wiki to JSON
- 17:25:13 [Rich]
- - Web Component ARIA Issue: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/552
- 17:25:13 [Rich]
- - Web Component and Extensibility Issue: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/553
- 17:25:13 [janina]
- rs: when can we meet with web components
- 17:25:17 [jamesn]
- jamesn has joined #aria
- 17:25:24 [janina]
- lw: need to speak with chaals
- 17:25:26 [jamesn]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:25:26 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/09/01-aria-minutes.html jamesn
- 17:25:29 [janina]
- rs: hasn't been responding to email
- 17:25:36 [janina]
- lw: will try and chase him down
- 17:26:19 [janina]
- rs: any other points?
- 17:26:27 [janina]
- mc: no
- 17:26:38 [janina]
- jn: is agenda finalized? can times still be moved?
- 17:26:45 [janina]
- jn: ok if not involving another wg
- 17:27:05 [janina]
- jn: have conflict with AC 3PM
- 17:27:11 [janina]
- rs: had to move for jcraig
- 17:27:21 [janina]
- jn: could it be earlier in the day?
- 17:27:31 [janina]
- jn: perhaps the 11am slot?
- 17:28:05 [janina]
- lw: progress, the ab meeting no longer at the same time!
- 17:28:16 [janina]
- rs: I'll send a note
- 17:28:31 [janina]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:28:31 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/09/01-aria-minutes.html janina
- 17:28:51 [janina]
- zakim, bye
- 17:28:51 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Janina, Joanmarie_Diggs, LJWatson, jaeunku, jongund, cyns
- 17:28:51 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #aria
- 17:28:57 [janina]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:28:57 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/09/01-aria-minutes.html janina
- 17:59:43 [mck_]
- mck_ has joined #aria
- 18:09:21 [Rich]
- Rich has joined #aria
- 18:59:56 [Rich]
- Rich has joined #aria
- 19:42:49 [Rich]
- Rich has joined #aria
- 20:36:41 [Rich]
- Rich has joined #aria
- 22:33:56 [Rich]
- Rich has joined #aria
- 22:37:18 [chaals]
- chaals has joined #aria
- 22:52:43 [chaals]
- chaals has joined #aria