See also: IRC log
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option
Overview of all the Methods
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Designing_Silver -< Home
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Process_for_designing_the_Process <- Master list of methods
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option <- 1st Option: Design Driven
Sarah: Need a comparison document
Shawn: Tie it back to the goals.
<SarahHorton> Shawn: Back to ranking, looking at Low Cost
<SarahHorton> Jeanne: Will need volunteer with experience to help design survey
<SarahHorton> ACTION: Jeanne will explore possible partners for survey [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/08/30-silver-minutes.html#action01]
Low Cost option will be items that can be done with no budget but could be finished within two years.
<SarahHorton> Sarah: Some low cost options will have narrower scope and rigor
Secondary research in the Low cost option will have a narrow scope
Sarah: when does the scope become so low that it really isn't worth doing, there is no value to it.
Shawn: Analysis is needed for every option, because we need to be able to write the report, We will do them differently in each option.
Sarah: We can leave it as high, but we need to point out that it won't be as inclusive or as well thought out.
Jeanne: I think we should split
off the grouping.
... We have to do some report
Shawn: It will be more
limited
... Ideation: the Face to Face could be a teleconference voice
to voice.
Sarah: Online workshop would be low impact because we wouldn't have time to engage the people
Shawn: medium for Voting and high for choice by the Subgroup
Jeanne: I think the user journeys and desireability are likely to happen, the others are too time-consuming
Sarah: If we force people to
choose a single response we could get useful data for
Desireability Testing
... Refine prototype -- if we are keeping the cost low, we
probably wouldn't do much.
Jeanne: voting: Who would vote, how would it work? it would take a lot of effort to promote something enough to get people to vote. I have real doubts about this.
Sarah: Establishing Resources and Partnerships, and taksforce would be high. And Hiring an editor would be low.
Jeanne: crowdourcing is not low
cost. Software has to be developed or purchased. There is a
cost of maintaining it and protecting it from trolls.
... Writing workshop is a higher cost because of travel.
Creation by individual writers is the status quo.
Sarah: Jeanne could reach out to the new version of RDWG to ask for help in creating a professional survey.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: jeanne Inferring Scribes: jeanne Present: AWK jeanne Sarah Shawn WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 30 Aug 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/08/30-silver-minutes.html People with action items: jeanne[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]