W3C

- DRAFT -

SVG Working Group Teleconference

25 Aug 2016

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Tav, nikos, stakagi, shepazu, AmeliaBR, shepazu_
Regrets
Chair
Nikos
Scribe
nikos

Contents


SVG 2 CR publication update

nikos: We are all about ready to go - have given three weeks for review and haven't had any comments
... DoC is all ready to go and I'm putting together an archive for publication
... then we need to send a transition request email to plh
... I can do that - think we've met all the criteria required

shepazu: Yes, we'll potentially need to schedule a call with plh
... so next Tuesday is probably too soon to aim for publication

nikos: I'm away next week - but happy to have a call

shepazu: Why don't we have the call the week after, and mention that in your transition request email

AmeliaBR: Monday the week after is a holiday in the US

nikos: If anyone wants to push small changes, I can still rebase the cr branch

AmeliaBR: I pushed some small ones this morning. I'm still looking at the Conformance chapter and will probably add an introduction and do some rework
... I'll have processing modes first and then referencing modes because that's the order in which they're defined

nikos: The only big thing I've done is get rid of all the ready for review markup
... since CR should be reviewed as a whole

AmeliaBR: The only other thing - we want at the same time to get SVG Animations WD published

nikos: That's on my list - should be easy once I've got SVG 2 ready to go

TPAC meeting plans

nikos: We have about 8 people registered for TPAC - not the usual attendees, so it might be a good opportunity to talk about some different things
... we probably won't work through issues, but it might be a good opportunity to talk about some different things
... maybe the test suite, or increasing participation in the group

shepazu: talking to the testing people will be really important

nikos: Yeah, I was planning to spend the week prior getting my head around all the testing stuff
... I'll send out an agenda request to www-svg and see if we get any response

AmeliaBR: Most important i think is getting test suite prepared and rechartering
... getting some clear commitments from the larger players

shepazu: don't know if we'll recharter, but we might extend the charter

AmeliaBR: it's a conversation that needs to be started
... As far as testing, it's important because all the browsers have their own test suite. It's a matter of leveraging those and getting those contributed and vetted to make sure they're testing what needs to be tested

<AmeliaBR> trackbot, end telcon

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.144 (CVS log)
$Date: 2016/08/25 23:16:34 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144  of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: nikos
Inferring Scribes: nikos
Default Present: Tav, nikos, stakagi, shepazu, AmeliaBR, shepazu_
Present: Tav nikos stakagi shepazu AmeliaBR shepazu_
Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2016Aug/0062.html
Found Date: 25 Aug 2016
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/08/25-svg-minutes.html
People with action items: 

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]