<Lisa_Seeman> trackbot, start meeting

<Lisa_Seeman> agenda: this

<MichaelC> Draft template for SC

<Lisa_Seeman> Scribe: KurtM

<Thaddeus> + Thaddeus

<Thaddeus> Thaddeus present. Will have to leave on the half hour

Deadline for Success Criteria draft language is December 1

reviewed existing action items

<Lisa_Seeman> next item

<Lisa_Seeman> no items to close

<Lisa_Seeman> no items to close

<Lisa_Seeman> next item

<Lisa_Seeman> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/wiki/Proposals-for-new-Success-Criteria

<Lisa_Seeman> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/template.html

Two similar templates for new Success Criteria, existing new SC need to be re-written into a template by December 1

clarification, existing new means new SC from ongoing COGA work

WCAG WG request for new Success Criteria content represents a lot of work which needs to be completed to make the 12/1 date (e.g. adding evidence of user benefits content)

Looking for additional information from WCAG WG meeting on 8/9/16 to clarify the request

Goal is to avoid having a SC rejected due to misunderstand request from WCAG WG

<Lisa_Seeman> next item

<Lisa_Seeman> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/support-personalization.html

<Thaddeus> I need to leave on the half hour. Feel free to assign and action item to me. I will be on the tables call tomorrow morning

<Lisa_Seeman> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/index.html

<Lisa_Seeman> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/wiki/Proposals-for-new-Success-Criteria

Assistance with writing Success Criteria information in template format may be provided by putting the information into a Word or .txt doc, however use of GitHub is preferred.

<JohnRochford> Now that I see 3 formats for "present" I don't know which is correct. Rich?

<Lisa_Seeman> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/support-personalization.html

WCAG 2.1 may have new Guidelines as well as new or extended Success Criteria

Content format (template) used to present new Success Criteria may not survive WCAG WG process, hence content is what matters most

List looking to provide a means for group to know who is working on which COGA Success Criteria

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144  of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: KurtM
Inferring ScribeNick: KurtM

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Present: KurtM MichaelC kirkwood JohnRochford Rich_Schwerdtfeger Lisa_Seeman EA Thud
Regrets: Deborah Dahl

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 08 Aug 2016
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/08/08-coga-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report