See also: IRC log
DS: I'm prepping SVG 2.0 for CR.
FE: Has the shadow tree/shadow DOM terminology issue been resolved?
DS: Don't know.
<shepazu> https://www.w3.org/TR/shadow-dom/#events
<shepazu> https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/interact.html#PointerEvents
<shepazu> https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/struct.html#UseElement
DS: Noting that we don't have
quorum.
... So suggest we raise an issue about whether to include
references to Shadow DOM - given that it is still a WD.
<shepazu> https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/99
This 201 on Shadow DOM and styling is worth reading http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/webcomponents/shadowdom-201/
FE: Have been trying to encourage people working on maps to join the TF.
DS: Suggest that until the TF is seen to be working on maps, there is little of interest to maps people here.
FE: If we can bring them to the table we'll be able to identify the problems they have.
LW: Can we ask the maps people
for a problem statement, we could start looking at it as a
technical problem.
... Then we would have something the maps people could review,
and that might encourage them to join.
FE: But what is a problem statement for something like slippy maps?
LW: No idea. But that's what the
maps people will be able to tell us about.
... We need to identify problems before we go looking for
solutions.
FE: Do you use maps LĂ©onie?
LW: No, not really.
FE: There is an app that gives directions.
LW: Lots of apps that do that, but they're directions based rather maps based.
FE: Should there be a11y
requirements for slippy maps? Those are things that let you pan
etc. like a Google map.
... Might have points of interest on it.
LW: Probably for exploring a map
for a maps sake.
... Like discovering where a country is in the world.
FE: Or discovering a map of the Grand Canyon.
LW: Yes.
FE: so can we start looking at these things?
LW: I don't think that's a clear enough problem statement. We need to talk to lots more people to find out what people typically want to do with maps first.
DS: Also what the map itself is trying to accomplish.
FE: It's hard to make an interactive decision tree accessible for ATs.
DS: Think this is too speculative
at the moment.
... Suggest we focus on things like graphs first.
LW: +1
FE: Meeting adjourned for lack of quorum
<scribe> scribenick: LJWatson
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/FE: How would someone claim accessibilitFE: It's hard to make an interactive decision tree accessible for ATs./FE: It's hard to make an interactive decision tree accessible for ATs./ Found ScribeNick: LJWatson Inferring Scribes: LJWatson Present: Fred LJWatson Shepazu Got date from IRC log name: 02 Aug 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/08/02-svg-a11y-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]