16:59:08 RRSAgent has joined #aria-apg 16:59:08 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/04/11-aria-apg-irc 16:59:16 rrsagent, make log world 17:01:16 jongund has joined #aria-apg 17:01:31 Agenda+ Review section 2.13 Grid (Simple Data Tables) https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/practices/aria-practices.html#grid 17:01:31 Agenda+ Review section 2.14 Actionable, Sortable Column Header in a Grid https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/practices/aria-practices.html#sortablegrid 17:01:31 Agenda+ Review new examples and update pattern work assignments https://github.com/w3c/aria/wiki/Aria-Authoring-Practices-Patterns-Status 17:01:41 Agenda+ MathML issue https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/290 17:01:41 Agenda+ updated Landmarks proposal based on discussions last week. Please review https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/JN_Landmarks/practices/aria-practices.html#aria_landmark 17:02:06 regrets+ Leonie Jemma Matt 17:02:53 present+ JamesNurthen 17:03:02 present+ AnnAbbott 17:03:07 present+ Teresa 17:03:11 IanPouncey has joined #aria-apg 17:04:19 present+ JonGunderson 17:06:36 boerst has joined #aria-apg 17:07:03 agenda? 17:08:06 New meeting URL, for next meeting mail: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m4b54b847795d432ef8a2ba82e488fea2 17:09:57 scribe: jamesn 17:10:02 zakim, take up item 5 17:10:02 agendum 5. "updated Landmarks proposal based on discussions last week. Please review https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/JN_Landmarks/practices/aria-practices.html#aria_landmark" taken up 17:10:05 ... [from jamesn] 17:11:17 present+ IanPouncey 17:14:08 jn: describes the changes 17:14:22 jn: added 2nd bullet to Step 3. 17:14:36 Birkir has joined #aria-apg 17:14:44 aa: sugest adding 2nd sentence to bullet to find more information. 17:15:05 tb: add a 2nd sentence to point to section below 17:15:07 ...I can't believe our WebEx client has an inaccessible CAPTCHA .. but it does. 17:15:49 present+ Birkir 17:16:02 jg: would like to take another shot at the example based on the current text 17:16:53 jg: have some ideas how to organize the example so more useful 17:17:02 jg: will try to get done by friday 17:17:14 jn: got rid of tables 17:17:37 jn: removed the section linking to aria spec and just linked the term 17:18:30 aa: we called it out specifically before 17:19:20 jn: editorial decision. Doesn't change the text of the document 17:19:29 jn: need to have the document to be consistent 17:19:54 tb: how about an intro section. 17:20:15 jn: assuming anyone reads it 17:22:21 tb: we have to assume some level of intelligence 17:22:32 bg: how about changing to banner role 17:23:06 jg: more concerned about linking from the spec to the APG 17:23:26 jn: I don't think we can link from the spec to the APG 17:24:19 tb: sometimes i find too many words loses the crispness of thinks 17:24:25 s/thinks/things/ 17:24:48 aa: people who are not savvy to w3c things aren't aware that there is a difference between the APG and the spec 17:24:57 tb: that is an issue beyond this 17:25:11 tb: a few lines in this document - how to use this docuemnt 17:26:53 jn: i was wrong about not being able to link to the APG from the spec 17:28:23 JN: my opinion is that making links to the spec called-out explicitly just makes the document longer and not more clear. 17:28:41 JG: something like really good examples will get linked to 17:28:51 JG: most people will come through the examples 17:29:11 JG: the oaa website can just fwd people to the w3c examples 17:30:57 JN: removed patterns row heading and moved into prose in the top. 17:31:26 JN: then added HTML5 techniques and ARIA techniques sub heading 17:33:07 JN: 17:33:25 JG: first bullet - Break the page into perceivable areas of content. 17:33:52 JN: good with that 17:35:55 agenda? 17:37:11 TB: what is the value of 2nd bullet 17:37:22 AA: could help define landmarks? 17:37:29 TB: I don't know what it means 17:38:33 .. landmarks are a way to create same division of content programmatically, e.g. for those who are unable to see the visual distinction. 17:38:55 JG: to me this brings in designers 17:39:16 JG: we want to not just talk to developers but also designers 17:41:28 TB:
  • Break the page into perceivable areas of content which typically, designers indicate visually using alignment and spacing.
  • 17:42:39 JN: sold 17:43:09 agenda? 17:43:15 zakim, close item 5 17:43:15 agendum 5, updated Landmarks proposal based on discussions last week. Please review https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/JN_Landmarks/practices/aria-practices.html#aria_landmark, closed 17:43:18 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:43:18 1. Review section 2.13 Grid (Simple Data Tables) https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/practices/aria-practices.html#grid [from jamesn] 17:43:29 zakim, take up item 3 17:43:29 agendum 3. "Review new examples and update pattern work assignments https://github.com/w3c/aria/wiki/Aria-Authoring-Practices-Patterns-Status" taken up [from jamesn] 17:43:50 JN: any updates? 17:43:51 no 17:44:02 zakim, close item 3 17:44:02 agendum 3, Review new examples and update pattern work assignments https://github.com/w3c/aria/wiki/Aria-Authoring-Practices-Patterns-Status, closed 17:44:04 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:44:04 1. Review section 2.13 Grid (Simple Data Tables) https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/practices/aria-practices.html#grid [from jamesn] 17:44:07 agenda? 17:45:00 zakim, take up item 4 17:45:00 agendum 4. "MathML issue https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/290" taken up [from jamesn] 17:45:16 jn: does anyone know anything about mathml? 17:45:34 aa: i know nothing about mathml 17:46:14 BG: MSFT said they will not support it. The Moz implementation has >130 issues logged against it which makes it unuseable 17:46:22 BG: most use mathjax 17:46:44 JG: LaTEX and MathML are the 2 used 17:47:00 JN: Q is what does role=math mean 17:47:34 JN: I don't think we have expertise in Math 17:47:59 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/290 17:49:21 JN: need to either fix the example or remove it. Need a good math example for role=math (if one exists). 17:49:32 JG: need to find out if it helps anyone or not 17:49:41 JG: being in higher ed math is a big deal 17:49:58 JG: have people doing things with accessible math 17:50:09 JG: have some specialists in this 17:50:37 BG: I worked in accessible math for a while 17:50:52 BG: so i can do some of that 17:52:02 JN: editors are looking for recommendations as to how to resolve this 17:52:34 JN: please make updates in issue 290 17:52:53 JG: everyone says you need to use mathjax for math on the web 17:53:54 JN: need to ensure that we don't over-complicate things 17:54:46 JN: thanks Jon and Birhkir 17:54:59 s/Birhkir/Birkir/ 17:56:12 zakim, close this item 17:56:12 agendum 4 closed 17:56:13 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:56:13 1. Review section 2.13 Grid (Simple Data Tables) https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/practices/aria-practices.html#grid [from jamesn] 17:56:16 agenda? 17:57:48 I need to go today 18:02:02 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/323 18:02:05 @annabbott, if you go to https://github.com/; there is a form on the frontpage 18:03:46 zakim, please part 18:03:46 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been JamesNurthen, AnnAbbott, Teresa, JonGunderson, IanPouncey, Birkir 18:03:46 Zakim has left #aria-apg 18:03:51 rrsagent, make minutes 18:03:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/04/11-aria-apg-minutes.html jamesn 18:04:00 Meeting: ARIA APG TF 18:04:07 chair: JamesNurthen 18:04:09 rrsagent, make minutes 18:04:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/04/11-aria-apg-minutes.html jamesn