W3C

- DRAFT -

WebFonts Working Group Teleconference

10 Feb 2016

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
sergeym, kuettel, Vlad, RSheeter, chrisl, kenlundeadobe, jfkthame, MysteryObservers
Regrets
Khaled
Chair
vlad
Scribe
RSheeter

Contents


<Vlad> scribenick: RSheeter

Enter The Chris

<ChrisL> https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html

disposition of comments on WOFF 2.0

https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html

<ChrisL> https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html#issue-6

<ChrisL> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2015May/0041.html

CTS Review

Wherein the colors of text may be changed

(red – need WG review/input, grey – not yet implemented, black – done)

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustRejectInvalidBase128

Rod: not entirely sure tests cover all specified scenarios. We do have some tests here.

<ChrisL> oh, oops sorry!

action rsheeter Check UA test https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustRejectInvalidBase128

<trackbot> Created ACTION-195 - Check ua test https://www.w3.org/fonts/wg/wiki/testplan20-useragent#mustrejectinvalidbase128 [on Roderick Sheeter - due 2016-02-17].

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustAcceptAllTransforms

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustLoadFontCollection

Vlad: contingent on browser support

ChrisL: they don't and it hasn't been entirely clear how they should to date

<ChrisL> ah okay, good that OTS has the support

(discussion of whether any browser supports, what might be needed to make it happen)

ChrisL: I have created a normative reference for how to refer to fonts in a collection

(link?)

<ChrisL> https://github.com/svgeesus/ietf-justfont/commit/b47e71a16040ea7d4e837287b968dd80f61caa71

(pause for reduction in wishy washy)

<ChrisL> <t hangText="Fragment Identifiers">Optional, for collections encoded as WOFF 2.0. A positive integer.

<ChrisL> + For example, #2 refers to the second font

<ChrisL> + in the collection. If a fragment is not specified, it is the same as #1 i.e. the first font

<ChrisL> + in the collection (or the only font, if it is not a collection). If a fragment is specified, and

<ChrisL> + the WOFF does not encode a collection, the fragment is ignored.</t>

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustBeRejected-FailTransform

(needs revision; refers to transform 3 as invalid but 3 is now valid)

Vlad: points out that 1 and 2 are undefined still and thus usable

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustCheckLSBFlags

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool#mustClearEmptyBBox, needs description

action vlad Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs

<trackbot> Created ACTION-196 - Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs [on Vladimir Levantovsky - due 2016-02-17].

<KenLundeAdobe> Adobe Blank: https://github.com/adobe-fonts/adobe-blank

<KenLundeAdobe> Adobe Blank 2 (uses the Format 13 'cmap' subtable): https://github.com/adobe-fonts/adobe-blank-2

(discussion of AT LSB tests)

Vlad: test verifies collections with hmtx shared are handled intelligently (only xform if valid for all pairings)

action sergeym Investigate font collections; how are glyf/hmtx shared in practice

<trackbot> Created ACTION-197 - Investigate font collections; how are glyf/hmtx shared in practice [on Sergey Malkin - due 2016-02-17].

Action Items

action-186?

<trackbot> action-186 -- Roderick Sheeter to Try time (decode) and size for null glyf/loca xform vs regular vs woff1 -- due 2016-03-02 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/186

(kicked date out a few weeks)

Vlad: There was some question of face to face. After discussion, no immediate need for face to face

Other Topics

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.144 (CVS log)
$Date: 2016/02/10 21:58:50 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144  of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found ScribeNick: RSheeter
Inferring Scribes: RSheeter

WARNING: Replacing list of attendees.
Old list: (no_one)
New list: sergeym kuettel Vlad RSheeter chrisl kenlundeadobe jfkthame

Default Present: sergeym, kuettel, Vlad, RSheeter, chrisl, kenlundeadobe, jfkthame
Present: sergeym kuettel Vlad RSheeter chrisl kenlundeadobe jfkthame MysteryObservers
Regrets: Khaled
Found Date: 10 Feb 2016
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/02/10-webfonts-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]