15:34:49 RRSAgent has joined #lvtf 15:34:49 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-lvtf-irc 15:34:51 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:34:53 Zakim, this will be 15:34:53 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 15:34:54 Meeting: Low Vision Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 15:34:54 Date: 16 December 2015 15:35:09 Zakim, who is here? 15:35:09 Present: shawn, wayne, erich, chuck, AWK, Laura 15:35:11 On IRC I see RRSAgent, AWK, ChuckOp, Erich, Wayne, laura, jeanne, allanj, JohnRochford, shawn, MichaelC, Zakim, trackbot 15:35:22 +ChuckOp 15:35:28 +jeanne 15:35:40 +allanj 15:35:49 +JohnRochford 15:36:29 Topic: FPWD 15:36:40 JA: plan for first public working draft 15:37:03 Chuck: feels it is good to have a deadline 15:38:15 JA: WCAG needs chance to review and approve 15:38:35 present+ Laura 15:38:57 Chuck: What state does document need to be in before then? 15:39:35 AWK: Not likely to be a session where in-depth content review takes place, higher level 15:40:14 AWK: at CSUN 15:40:39 JA: Feb 10th target deadline for FPWD 15:40:57 WD: Will we be putting forward succes criteria? 15:41:25 LC: Overview, not success criteria, just yet 15:41:42 s/ LC: Overview, not success criteria, just yet/ SLH: Overview, not success criteria, just yet 15:41:51 JA: Other concerns? 15:42:11 John Rochford: offer to copy-edit first draft when available 15:43:14 SLH: Draft can be edited in the wiki 15:44:05 John Rochford: would prefer to review final drafT before CSUN 15:44:23 close item 2 15:44:33 open item 3 15:44:42 topic: survey results 15:44:50 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/81151/fineTuneOverview/results 15:45:30 JA: Thanks to all who took the time to complete the survey 15:45:46 ...: we have a few areas that are well done, and a few that are languishing 15:45:47 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Overview_of_Low_Vision 15:48:54 q+ 15:50:18 JA: Under CLARITY section, Erich suggests changing "changes" to "increases" 15:50:33 AWK: Suggested change would be fine 15:50:57 JA: Change made, as well as removal of duplicate "of" 15:52:04 JA: Verified he is seeing 5 replies, which Shawn is not seeing, and will continue checking 15:52:21 s/JA: Verified he is seeing 5 replies, which Shawn is not seeing, and will continue checking/ 15:52:34 topic: perceptual area 15:54:46 q+ to sak if scotoma is adequately covered in other field loss? 15:55:00 ack a 15:55:04 JA: Taking a look at PERCEPTUAL section, Erich raised the idea of including "scotoma" description and symptoms 15:55:27 ack s 15:55:27 shawn, you wanted to sak if scotoma is adequately covered in other field loss? 15:56:11 AWK: We could include numerous highly medical terms, though want to be mindful of the target audience 15:57:43 +1 to functional, not medical approach 15:57:46 Shawn: It is important that we include the effects of scotoma under "Other Field Loss", but not necessarily the medical term 15:59:38 AWK: We could include that there is detailed medical terminology in the appendix, if not found in the body 15:59:59 inclde at top of document, it covers all topics 16:00:00 I'm not afraid of pictures, just pictures of all of you. 16:00:12 s/I'm not afraid of pictures, just pictures of all of you./ 16:00:13 s/inclde/include 16:01:17 JA: Environmental field loss is something we could address at another time, in deference to remaining agenda topics 16:01:50 ACTION: Shawn integrate https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/issues/2 into github version 16:01:51 Created ACTION-16 - Integrate https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/issues/2 into github version [on Shawn Henry - due 2015-12-23]. 16:02:01 WD: Feels Environmental field loss is worthy of inclusion 16:03:31 AWK: Notes potential for blurring of categorical lines between symptoms and causes 16:06:02 LC: Commingling could potentially be its own section 16:07:35 JA: Should Andrew attempt to include to learn how it fits? 16:07:49 WD: Feels it is a good idea 16:07:55 perhaps tie 'environmental fieldloss' to clarity last sentence. 16:08:00 +1 16:08:25 AWK: Is okay with trying it out to see how it fits 16:09:11 scribe: erich 16:09:22 AWK: asks John Rochford for clarification on earlier statement relative to low-vision field loss 16:09:40 ... "Some low vision users experience field loss, or a reduction in their perceptual area." 16:11:21 John Rochford: Finds specific statement confusing and needing clarification 16:11:36 WD: Suggests removing "or" 16:12:06 JA: Asks John Rochford if this would be agreeable 16:13:19 John Rochford: Field Loss is not the only cause of reduction of perceptual area 16:14:22 JA: Feels in our context, where our focus is primarily the web and computer screen, our definition can suffice and does not need the added nuance 16:14:30 John Rochford: Agrees 16:17:16 AWK: Wonders if adding "due to" could help achieve needed clarification or adds confusion 16:17:29 John Rochford; Since we say "Some", fine with "due to" 16:17:51 WD: Seems redundant 16:18:04 trying this: Some low vision users experience field loss - a reduction in their perceptual area. 16:18:24 +1 16:18:36 +1 16:18:42 +1 16:18:42 +1 16:18:57 +1 16:19:07 topic: Luminance 16:20:21 JA: Overview of feedback received 16:21:01 WD: willing to formulate for this section in plain language 16:21:36 WD: Willing to take an ACTION 16:21:39 I propose that this section be re-titled to be more about the functional limitation, like the others — e.g.: Light Sensitivity and Contrast Sensitivity (or Light and Contrast Sensitivity) {Shawn} 16:21:55 I prefer the latter form 16:22:11 +1 to Light and Contrast Sensitivity 16:22:13 Action: Wayne to write the Light and Contrast Sensitivity 16:22:13 Created ACTION-17 - Write the light and contrast sensitivity [on Wayne Dick - due 2015-12-23]. 16:22:28 AWK: Shawn has suggestion of Light and Contrast Sensitivity 16:22:47 +1 to Light and Contrast Sensitivity 16:23:07 +1 to Light and Contrast Sensitivity 16:23:44 q+ to mention separate color or combined 16:23:48 ack me 16:23:48 shawn, you wanted to mention separate color or combined 16:25:48 SLH: Color Perception seems to potentially have too much weight to be separate 16:26:06 topic: Color 16:26:24 John Rochford: Laura has a great write-up 16:26:25 good point, Laura, probably want this *much* simplier and plain language 16:26:41 action: Laura to write first draft plain english of Color Perception 16:26:41 Created ACTION-18 - Write first draft plain english of color perception [on Laura Carlson - due 2015-12-23]. 16:26:41 JA: Laura would you be willing to attempt putting in to plain language? 16:26:50 LC: Willing to take an action 16:28:28 JA: John had a statment of Marsha Use Case, which I had to search down in the document 16:28:36 agenda? 16:28:44 close item 3 16:28:57 AWK: likely holdover 16:28:57 action: Use cases for WCAG issues assigned to Low Vision 16:28:57 Error finding 'Use'. You can review and register nicknames at . 16:29:12 action: Wayne Use cases for WCAG issues assigned to Low Vision 16:29:13 Created ACTION-19 - Use cases for wcag issues assigned to low vision [on Wayne Dick - due 2015-12-23]. 16:29:33 JA: No meeting for the next two weeks due to holiday schedule, and next call will be Jan 6th, 2016 16:30:09 Attendance Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/81151/LVTF-telecons/ 16:30:22 ...: Issue on drop shadow contrast referred to us by Wcag 16:30:34 gotta go, folks 16:30:47 topic: wcag issue#98 16:31:00 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/98) 16:31:06 JA: Can use of drop shadow allow to meet the contrast requirement 16:32:10 q+ 16:32:17 AWK: Not likely to have an automatic answer to this, though worthy of inclusion and exploration, good to be discussed on the GitHub issue itself and comment 16:32:21 ack me 16:32:41 q+ 16:32:54 SLH: Curious about people's first reactions to it 16:32:59 q+ 16:33:04 ack wa 16:34:10 WD: Has done some testing, just black and white with controlled luminance, with drop shadow going all the way around 16:34:24 ack a 16:34:33 q+ 16:34:38 SLH: Wayne include example in the GitHub dialog 16:35:53 q+ 16:35:56 ack a 16:36:04 WD: Some pixels in his testing could meet the standard, but not all 16:36:20 ack s 16:36:21 Apologies, have to drop out. 16:37:18 SLH: Thinking more about a possible study of whether people can see it and designing a test 16:37:38 ChuckOp has left #lvtf 16:37:45 Action: shawn work with wayne and jim on study design for https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/98 16:37:45 Created ACTION-20 - Work with wayne and jim on study design for https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/98 [on Shawn Henry - due 2015-12-23]. 16:38:10 Bye. Happy Holiday’s. 16:38:18 trackbot, end meeting 16:38:18 Zakim, list attendees 16:38:18 As of this point the attendees have been shawn, wayne, erich, chuck, AWK, Laura, ChuckOp, jeanne, allanj, JohnRochford 16:38:26 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:38:26 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-lvtf-minutes.html trackbot 16:38:27 RRSAgent, bye 16:38:27 I see 6 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-lvtf-actions.rdf : 16:38:27 ACTION: Shawn integrate https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/issues/2 into github version [1] 16:38:27 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-lvtf-irc#T16-01-50 16:38:27 ACTION: Wayne to write the Light and Contrast Sensitivity [2] 16:38:27 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-lvtf-irc#T16-22-13 16:38:27 ACTION: Laura to write first draft plain english of Color Perception [3] 16:38:27 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-lvtf-irc#T16-26-41 16:38:27 ACTION: Use cases for WCAG issues assigned to Low Vision [4] 16:38:27 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-lvtf-irc#T16-28-57-1 16:38:27 ACTION: Wayne Use cases for WCAG issues assigned to Low Vision [5] 16:38:27 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-lvtf-irc#T16-29-12 16:38:27 ACTION: shawn work with wayne and jim on study design for https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/98 [6] 16:38:27 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-lvtf-irc#T16-37-45 16:38:49 rrsagent, set logs public