13:35:53 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #csvw
13:35:53 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/09/23-csvw-irc
13:35:55 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
13:35:55 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #csvw
13:35:57 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be CSVW
13:35:57 <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
13:35:58 <trackbot> Meeting: CSV on the Web Working Group Teleconference
13:35:58 <trackbot> Date: 23 September 2015
13:36:02 <ivan> zakim, code?
13:36:02 <Zakim> no conference has been identified yet, ivan
13:36:16 <ivan> zakim, this is WebEx URL: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m519efc112dcd9e5d3ada58b1eef9d39a Conf Code: 649 989 326 passwd csvw
13:36:16 <Zakim> got it, ivan
13:36:25 <danbri> danbri has joined #csvw
13:36:47 <ivan> zakim, save this conference description
13:36:47 <Zakim> this conference description has been saved, ivan
13:48:33 <gkellogg> gkellogg has joined #csvw
13:59:03 <jtandy> hi- just finishing another call ... 2 or 3 mins
14:00:01 <gkellogg> Do we have JenI today?
14:00:04 <JeniT> JeniT has joined #csvw
14:03:56 <danbri> hi. running late - with you in 2min
14:04:07 <danbri> yes when i get there!
14:04:35 <JeniT> it’s ok
14:04:51 <JeniT> jtandy: I promise I will deliver my commitments against mid October
14:05:27 <jtandy> q+
14:05:38 <JeniT> jenit: I have started work on the Primer
14:05:57 <JeniT> gkellogg: the number tests are in, and they’re awaiting review & merge
14:06:14 <JeniT> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/pull/740
14:06:33 <JeniT> gkellogg: there are some things that might require discussion there
14:06:50 <JeniT> … I’m also aiming to integrate the date/time min/max values, which I expect to do in the next week
14:07:00 <JeniT> … the HTML note is also on my plate, and I’m hoping danbri will help with that
14:07:06 <danbri> ack
14:07:08 <JeniT> ivan: the deadline for that Note is Feb
14:07:15 <JeniT> … it’s not urgent
14:08:05 <danbri> scribenick: danbri
14:08:08 <JeniT> ack jtandy
14:08:52 <danbri> jtandy: regarding Primer, reporting back on conv w/ Simon Cox about units of measure. He has published on list to say that adding something to primer about units of measure for scaled numbers, + a mentiion in docs, would be enough
14:08:58 <danbri> i.e. editorial changes only
14:09:02 <JeniT> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/741
14:09:03 <danbri> ivan: also mentioned in github
14:09:17 <danbri> jenit: looks like editorial change on the model doc
14:09:29 <danbri> jtandy: model doc is the right place; people are most likely to expect units of measure there
14:09:37 <danbri> ivan: do we want to have an actual label for the primer?
14:09:41 <danbri> jenit: that would be useful
14:10:18 <danbri> jenit: given that I'm on the Primer, shall I take action for change to the model doc, to keep them in sync? I might ask for help on the text specifics. Mention of 3 options, Gregg outlined two.
14:10:22 <danbri> jtandy: other one is Data Cube
14:10:47 <danbri> jtandy: Simon would probably review if asked
14:11:15 <danbri> See also http://www.qudt.org/ (rocket science...)
14:11:30 <danbri> jenit: only other issue to discuss, thing about the decimal dot resolution
14:11:35 <JeniT> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/742
14:12:04 <danbri> JeniT: I believe he wants to make sure the spec says you mustn't do what the portuguese natural language apps are doing, i.e. stripping dots from numbers in a normal decimal form
14:12:09 <danbri> … I think that we do that
14:12:21 <danbri> … my only question is whether and how that fact should be highlighted within the doc set
14:12:41 <danbri> gkellogg: we describe that pretty well, handling number formats
14:12:57 <danbri> … to make sure other agents do that is outside the work of the specs
14:13:15 <danbri> ivan: I didn't understand where he wants a change.
14:13:21 <danbri> gkellogg will comment in the issue
14:13:34 <danbri> jtandy: nothing stops anyone creating an impl of our specs that does it wrong
14:13:49 <danbri> gkellogg: we have tests for that … alternate decimal formats
14:14:02 <danbri> jtandy: and for conversion into rdf / json
14:14:07 <danbri> s/jtandy/jenit/
14:14:22 <danbri> jtandy: conversion always comes out with what we might call the 'standard decimal notation'
14:14:27 <danbri> aob?
14:14:42 <danbri> ivan: what do we do w/ issues from rufus?
14:14:51 <danbri> jenit: #722 is editorial, he may or may not work on
14:22:14 <JeniT> PROPOSAL: We will close remaining technical issues (#702, #712, #713, #716, #717, #720, #721) that do not have wide support in the Working Group as continuing discussion will threaten eventual success of the group
14:22:17 <jtandy> +1
14:22:18 <JeniT> +1
14:22:18 <gkellogg> +1
14:22:20 <ivan> +1
14:22:22 <danbri> +1
14:22:40 <JeniT> RESOLVED: We will close remaining technical issues (#702, #712, #713, #716, #717, #720, #721) that do not have wide support in the Working Group as continuing discussion will threaten eventual success of the group
14:22:40 <ivan> RESOLUTION: We will close remaining technical issues (#702, #712, #713, #716, #717, #720, #721) that do not have wide support in the Working Group as continuing discussion will threaten eventual success of the group
14:22:49 <ivan> rrsagent, pointer?
14:22:49 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2015/09/23-csvw-irc#T14-22-49
14:27:49 <danbri> [discussion of implementation, pinging of contacts etc.]
14:28:51 <danbri> ivan: not formally req'd for P.R. stage, but it would be good to know of groups using the specs
14:30:40 <danbri> see also http://blog.schema.org/2013/06/schemaorg-and-json-ld.html
14:32:36 <danbri> gkellogg: see also W3C RDF testing Community Group
14:34:05 <danbri> (Davide was looking at this in R btw)
14:34:21 <gkellogg> http://w3c.github.io/csvw/tests/reports/
14:35:15 <JeniT> q+ danbri to ask something
14:35:21 <JeniT> ack danbri
14:35:21 <Zakim> danbri, you wanted to ask something
14:36:16 <danbri> jenit: let's keep meeting weekly but briefly - tests next week
14:36:49 <danbri> rrsagent, please draft minutes
14:36:49 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/09/23-csvw-minutes.html danbri
14:37:08 <danbri> has anyone used D3.js 's CSV parser w/ CSVW yet? e.g. made utility functions on top…
14:38:53 <danbri1> danbri1 has joined #csvw
14:42:41 <JeniT>  not yet
15:00:34 <gkellogg> gkellogg has joined #csvw
15:04:35 <gkellogg_> gkellogg_ has joined #csvw
15:07:25 <danbri> danbri has joined #csvw
15:10:30 <danbri1> danbri1 has joined #csvw
15:39:07 <gkellogg_> gkellogg_ has joined #csvw
15:56:58 <JeniT> JeniT has joined #csvw
16:07:41 <gkellogg_> gkellogg_ has joined #csvw
16:33:25 <gkellogg_> gkellogg_ has joined #csvw
16:48:34 <Zakim> Zakim has left #csvw
18:18:48 <gkellogg_> gkellogg_ has joined #csvw
20:34:23 <gkellogg_> gkellogg_ has joined #csvw
21:33:17 <danbri> danbri has joined #csvw