08:56:33 RRSAgent has joined #wot 08:56:33 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/10-wot-irc 08:56:35 RRSAgent, make logs public 08:56:35 Zakim has joined #wot 08:56:37 Zakim, this will be 08:56:37 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 08:56:38 Meeting: Web of Things Interest Group Teleconference 08:56:38 Date: 10 March 2015 08:56:47 zakim, this will be 9681 08:56:47 ok, dsr; I see UW_WOTIG()5:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 08:57:24 chair: Joerg Heuer 08:57:32 UW_WOTIG()5:00AM has now started 08:57:39 +[IPcaller] 08:57:50 zakim, ipcaller is me 08:57:50 +dret; got it 08:57:53 +jheuer 08:58:17 DanhLePhuoc has joined #wot 08:58:39 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wot-ig/2015Mar/0021.html 08:58:40 present+ Thomas Usländer, Fraunhofer IOSB, Germany 08:59:05 present+ Dave Raggett 08:59:39 Claes has joined #wot 08:59:42 present+ Erik Wilde 08:59:52 +[IPcaller] 08:59:55 taki has joined #wot 09:00:06 JonathanDing has joined #wot 09:00:17 present+ Johnnes_Hund 09:00:21 + +47.23.69.aaaa 09:00:22 +Dsr 09:00:40 lbolstad_ has joined #wot 09:00:53 + +35385740aabb 09:00:56 Arne has joined #wot 09:01:06 + +46.7.03.79.aacc 09:01:06 +??P5 09:01:12 + +49.721.6.aadd 09:01:38 -??P5 09:01:49 kaz has joined #wot 09:01:57 zakim, call kazuyuki-617 09:01:57 ok, kaz; the call is being made 09:01:58 +Kazuyuki 09:02:00 +??P5 09:02:06 Zakim, aabb is me 09:02:06 +DanhLePhuoc; got it 09:02:17 Zakim, ??P5 is me 09:02:17 +defnordic; got it 09:02:24 i can do the first 30min 09:02:33 +??P8 09:02:38 who's doing the second 30min? 09:02:39 +[IPcaller.a] 09:02:44 I can pick up after that 09:02:52 scribenick: dret 09:02:55 Henny_Swan has joined #wot 09:02:56 great, thanks! 09:03:12 present+ Florian Salmhofer, Joanneum Research 09:03:35 Joerg explaining the agenda 09:03:49 nobody asking for any additions to the agenda. 09:04:24 Joerg explaining work on the use case document 09:04:25 + +8821aaee 09:04:33 k_nimura1 has joined #wot 09:04:45 present+ Danh Le Phuoc 09:04:45 dsr giving a short intro of the taxonomy 09:05:16 taxonomy is based on initial brainstroming, please everybody look at it and make suggestions for additions/improvements 09:05:43 Present+ Claes_Nilsson 09:05:45 starting from the application domains, start collecting use cases across all of them 09:05:46 present+ kaz 09:05:53 rrsagent, make log public 09:06:02 rrsagent, draft minutes 09:06:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/10-wot-minutes.html kaz 09:06:23 JonathanDing has left #wot 09:06:32 JonathanDing_ has joined #wot 09:06:54 starting with a short story, followed by a more technical description, which can be based on more than one application domain 09:07:18 zakim, who is making noise? 09:07:35 dret, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: jheuer (59%) 09:07:56 taxonomy and links to use cases in wiki https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Use_cases_across_application_domains 09:08:26 joerg explains that we want to see use cases than span across application domains 09:08:43 +[IPcaller.aa] 09:08:52 collecting use cases is important so that we have good coverage of the application areas 09:09:16 is that you, johannes? 09:09:20 yusuke has joined #wot 09:09:26 you were muted. 09:10:12 jhund asks if anybody has a domain that is not covered in the taxonomy: do we have white spots? 09:10:32 tuslaender points out that the health domain is missing 09:11:06 jhund points to subtopics, but tuslaender things that more coverage would be better 09:11:18 +q 09:11:29 ack DanhLePhuoc 09:11:33 - +8821aaee 09:11:45 -dret 09:11:57 dsr asks tuslaender about submitting a use case, and he agrees to do that. 09:11:59 +q 09:11:59 + +8821aaff 09:12:13 ack DanhLePhuoc 09:12:16 Suggestion for use case on early detection of epidemics, e.g. cholera 09:12:20 +[IPcaller.aaa] 09:12:30 zakim, ipcaller.aaa is me 09:12:30 +dret; got it 09:12:40 sorry, i dropped... 09:12:47 zakim, 8821aaff is me 09:12:47 sorry, JonathanDing_, I do not recognize a party named '8821aaff' 09:13:10 cannot quite understand DanhLePhuoc's comment... 09:13:40 "search" as a domain is mentioned by joerg. 09:13:42 He suggests that search engines and discovery is important for web of things 09:13:52 thanks, dsr! 09:14:32 q? 09:15:37 zakim, mute me 09:15:37 Kazuyuki should now be muted 09:15:50 - +8821aaff 09:16:08 + +8821aagg 09:16:19 zakim, +8821aagg is me 09:16:19 +JonathanDing_; got it 09:17:01 agriculture is identified as missing by jhund(?) do we have experts on the call or in the group? 09:17:57 any suggestions for outreach how to find experts in areas that we have no coverage for? 09:18:29 dsr says that we should probably assign actions for identifying and involving experts from new areas. 09:18:48 q+ 09:18:52 we should have a wiki page for identifying these areas. jhund, is that part of your action as well? 09:19:05 +1 for assigning a moderator for each UC domain 09:19:08 ack k 09:19:08 yes, dret. 09:19:19 jhund agrees to create the wiki page and look for agriculture experts. 09:19:42 action: thomas to look for agriculture experts to advise of taxonomy and use cases 09:19:43 Created ACTION-2 - Look for agriculture experts to advise of taxonomy and use cases [on Thomas Usländer - due 2015-03-17]. 09:19:48 -> https://www.w3.org/community/agri/ agriculture cg 09:19:52 zakim, mute me 09:19:52 Kazuyuki should now be muted 09:20:35 maybe ACTION-2 should be moved from thomas to jhund? 09:20:40 sorry dsr, that action was on me (or so i fear) 09:21:41 joerg points out that we have only 2 months to create a good foundation for our use case collection 09:22:19 action: me to set up expert outreach section and seek expert for agriculture domain 09:22:19 Error finding 'me'. You can review and register nicknames at . 09:22:32 action: jhund to set up expert outreach section and seek expert for agriculture domain 09:22:32 Created ACTION-3 - Set up expert outreach section and seek expert for agriculture domain [on Johannes Hund - due 2015-03-17]. 09:22:55 JonathanJ1 has joined #wot 09:23:52 ask yourself: what is user motivation? how does it translate to a technical description? how does it relate to other domains? what interaction patterns with or between things can we observe? what is *not* part of the use case? 09:24:56 work item for all IG members: please focus on these questions and look at the things we have already collected. 09:24:56 -[IPcaller.a] 09:26:00 q+ 09:26:11 ack tuslaender 09:26:33 trackbot, close action-2 09:26:33 Closed action-2. 09:26:49 -dret 09:26:55 tuslaender says the technical requirements should be looked at, and should encompass a list of services for the use case, to classify the services required in the IoT, how to map them to existing services in the internet and applciation domains 09:27:01 tuslaender suggests that we should look at the template that was provided 09:27:01 it has one important element in there which is... (call dropped again... sorry, could somebody else scribe from here on? thanks!) 09:27:49 johannes asks what "requirements" are in that context. interaction opatterns, atomic or elementary use cases, have been mentioned. need to define the most basic thing to happen 09:28:11 the nature of "requirements" should be further defined 09:28:48 tuslaender gives an example of searching for information, where the metadata has to be standardized 09:29:08 if you request a sensor to pick up data/images/video, you need a "sensor actuation service" or similar 09:30:05 +[IPcaller.a] 09:30:18 in search engines you could have types to choose from, metadata categories, catalogue services 09:30:27 zakim, IPcaller.a is me 09:30:27 +dret; got it 09:30:31 this would require a more rigid structure of metadata 09:30:54 thanks, flosal++, for taking over. 09:30:56 go for universal search engines? or applciation domain specirfic search? 09:31:13 +q 09:31:22 different solutions for how to achieve what is needed for application 09:31:33 dret: nP, just don't know if Im picked up as scribe or w/e 09:32:16 scribenick: flosal 09:32:47 out of domain specific use cases, generic issues /UC have to be defined, which can be mapped to technical requirements of the infrastructure. this could be something that doesn't need the application domain experts 09:32:57 interaction between domain experts and architects is needed 09:33:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 09:33:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/10-wot-minutes.html kaz 09:33:41 q+ 09:33:47 ack Dan 09:34:03 data provider have to find a way to provide data, and indexers/search engines extract the metadata. should agree on vocabulary taxonomy to expose sensor data 09:34:31 schema.org 09:34:36 ack dsr 09:35:02 i/tuslaender says/scribenick: flosal/ 09:35:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 09:35:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/10-wot-minutes.html kaz 09:36:28 good discussion topic to have, but seems more about technology landscape discussion, which is planned to follow. whole series of issues of how to encourage people to document new vocabularies and why not using existing ones 09:36:42 should come up with use cases that cover didffferent aspects of search&discovery. 09:37:21 s/didffferent/different/ 09:38:08 Dave: good topic but probably for the technology landscape study we want to start once the use case work picks up. Now we would benefit from use cases for metadata 09:38:08 DanhLePhuoc suggests hierarchy of design similar to schema.org, extend vocabulary. lot of different domains, maybe volunteer for a subtask to integrate 09:38:54 jhund? suggests a further exchange over email on this aspect 09:39:06 s/jhund/joerg/ 09:39:09 +1 09:39:54 should clarify what interaction patterns between things can be observed. edit and add in the wiki. 09:40:11 another question is, what do the users think is important in that aspect? 09:40:48 user might not want to understand the detailled difference in search queries, and more a "free text" input 09:41:13 less technical requirement, but more usability focussed - like in home appliances where simplicity in interaction would be preferred 09:41:56 have this as a second question after user motivation? 09:42:23 johannes mentions that it is important how well the user is acquainted with the action 09:43:20 how transparent the whole itneraction with the web of things is to the user 09:43:42 dave? says that is part of the story 09:44:43 any more updates on the use case writing style? 09:45:01 action: joerg to propose a question statement for the user expectation on the use case 09:45:02 Created ACTION-4 - Propose a question statement for the user expectation on the use case [on Joerg Heuer - due 2015-03-17]. 09:45:24 enough for everyone to submit one use case in the next weeks? 09:46:04 some people already volunteering on use cases, continue this until next week, and compile a list of "maintainers" for the essential parts 09:47:22 everyone should try and compile a use case that they are comfortable with and describe it 09:48:12 About the F2F meeting in April: from the 20th to 22nd April, Mo - We, a site in Munich tbd 09:48:20 -JonathanDing_ 09:48:49 directions available, 2-3 hotels suggested to keep the group together 09:49:19 -dret 09:49:49 also need to organize the agenda, please send in suggestions, first proposal and structuring this week 09:50:59 early start on Mo morning, about 08:30 registration, 09:00 start - details on the wiki, start setting up a page with agenda details, also inviting people for theopen day, especially areas with no expertise ingroup 09:51:11 -[IPcaller.aa] 09:51:36 topic suggestions for F2F: look at use cases and brainstorming, technical landscape with some technical contributions and looking at the relation with other organisations, what they are working on 09:52:28 setting up registration, through the wiki or a regular web form 09:53:03 action: dsr to set up registration mechanism for the Munich f2f 09:53:03 Created ACTION-5 - Set up registration mechanism for the munich f2f [on Dave Raggett - due 2015-03-17]. 09:53:22 johannes volunteers for checking accessibility constraints if anyone needs special considerations 09:54:58 joerg wants to put emphasis again on domain discussions, move forward with proposals for volunteering for use cases, also indicate willingness about sharing insights into domains, previous projects 09:55:14 Can we have a demo session in F2F meeting ? 09:55:53 maybe put up a table on the wiki with an overview who is doing what, easier to track who is contributing to whcih ara 09:56:29 a demo session is seen as a good idea for F2F 09:57:14 if demo session is possible, I'd like to show you our wot.js project 09:58:04 maybe have an agenda point for talking about expertise in domain areas for further telcos 09:59:31 again a call on participants to contribute to the wiki page, make sure their interests are represented and contribute their experiences 09:59:47 end of session, thx 09:59:50 rrsagent, make minutes 09:59:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/10-wot-minutes.html dsr 09:59:52 - +49.721.6.aadd 09:59:53 - +47.23.69.aaaa 09:59:55 -Kazuyuki 09:59:55 -[IPcaller] 09:59:56 -jheuer 09:59:57 -??P8 09:59:59 -DanhLePhuoc 10:00:10 -defnordic 10:00:12 thanks to the scribes 10:00:34 - 10:00:39 - +46.7.03.79.aacc 10:00:43 thanks 10:00:48 JonathanJ1 has left #wot 10:01:14 I still don't know people by voice, so I just didn't put names unless I was reasonably sure, hope it is legible 10:01:46 zakim, drop dsr 10:01:46 Dsr is being disconnected 10:01:48 UW_WOTIG()5:00AM has ended 10:01:48 Attendees were dret, jheuer, [IPcaller], +47.23.69.aaaa, Dsr, +35385740aabb, +46.7.03.79.aacc, +49.721.6.aadd, Kazuyuki, DanhLePhuoc, defnordic, +8821aaee, +8821aaff, JonathanDing_ 10:02:22 and tuslaender 10:02:49 present- tuslaender 10:05:10 taki has left #wot 11:53:28 dsr has joined #wot 12:17:14 Zakim has left #wot 14:28:58 dsr has joined #wot