See also: IRC log
<alfonso> Hi
<phila> scribe: phila
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> Hi
<armin> the zakim number on the email seems to not work for me
The number is +1.617.761.6200
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> I cannot dial in via +1.617.761.620
<linda> neither can I
<armin> right, there was a 0 missing
<eparsons> thanks linda much better
<Danh-DERI> +3539149aagg is me, Danh Le Phuoc
<jtandy> am hearing very well!
kerry: Introduces herself
... Describes scribing and lets people know that you, yes, you,
will need to take your turn in due course!
... Reads OGC IPR statement
... https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call
... any responses?
... none heard
chrislittle: The OGC people by default have this consensus by silence. We don't all have to explicitly say "no"
kerry: Introduces herself
... In the context of this meeting - a lot of you attended the
workshop we had in London last March http://www.w3.org/2014/03/lgd/report
... lots of work since then to get us to this point today
... I'm co-chairing with Ed Parsons
... bit of a learning curve for us all as we learn each other's
methods
eparsons: Hi, I work for Google,
based in London
... background in traditional GIS, ex-CTO at Ordnance
Survey
... want to make sure that the work we do has application for
end users, keeping developers in mind
... Kerry and I cover both hemispheres. We're going to have to
handle the differnet time zones
... don't be afraid to make yourself heard
... we'll all have to get used to the way W3C systems work
It's the middle fo summer!
Kerry: Please introduce yourself
in about 15 seconds
... Introduces the queue system
<Zakim> chaals, you wanted to introduce myself
chaals: Hi, I'm Charles, I work
for Yandex
... primary representative for Yandex will prob be Sergei
Konstantinov
<Zakim> jtandy, you wanted to introduce jtandy
jtandy: Hi, work for UK Met
Office, members of both SDOs
... my interest is in how OGC standards can fit into the wider
Web architecture
chrislittle: I'm working with Jeremy at the Met Office
<Danh-DERI> +q
chrislittle: been involved in OGC
for last 5 yaers, Chaired a couple of OGC groups
... need to coinvince the world that that's it's not 3D but 5D.
WE work a lot with the WMO
<Zakim> linda, you wanted to introduce myself
linda: I work for Geonovum, nat standards body for geospatial data. Also co-chair of Dutch National Linked Data
kerry: Explains that the OGC group here is a sub group of a group that Linda chairs
aharth: Andreas Harth, worked on NeoGeo vocabulary
armin: zakim, mute eparsons
... zakim, unmute eparsons
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> lot of noise
<armin> armin: worked at CSIRO with kerry until recently, working with ssn in various projects
<armin> … now lecturer at Australian National University, also in Canberra
<armin> … W3C Office Manager for Australia
Krzysztof_Janowicz: Introduces self, following Armin
Ashok_Malhotra: I'm with Oracle.
I;m an old standards hand
... been doing W3C stuff since late 90s
... XML schema, query, Web Services, RDB to RDF and now Linked
Data
... what I also ought to mention is that oracle is very
interested in this WG because we have an old spatial data
product that you can work with spatial data
... you can work with spatial on an Oracle DB
JoshLieberman: I'm affiliated
with the OGC and the Harvard Centre for Geographic
analysis
... I also chaired the geospatial inclubaot back in 2006 so I
have had some involvement with W3C in the past
AndreaP: I'm Andrea Perego from
the Joint Research Centre at the EC on the INSPIRE
implementation
... also contributed to development at the locn vocab
... co-chair of the LOCADD CG
Payam: I'm at the University of Surrey on IoT and Sem Web, was involved in SSN, work on smart cities etc.
Cory_Henson: I'm now at BOSCH Research and Tech centre. Worked with Kerry, Krystof and Kerry, now working on IoT
emilio: I am Emilio from CTIC,
working in the smeantic team here (CTIC is in Northern
Spain)
... working on EMERGEL ontology with developed geographical
model
guillermo: I work with Emilio. I have a more tech background on SemWeb. Helping auto-generation and vis of data
alfonso: Also from CTIC. here to see what we can contribute
ThiagoA??
ramonalcarria: This is Ramon from
University Polytechnic Madrid. Working on Smart Open Data
project with PhilA. Interested in geo systems
... my first time accessing W3C group
<chaals> AlejandroLlaves: you're not in the queue
Danh-DERI: We're from Ireland,
Nat Uni of Ireland. Used to be DERI
... lots of work on SemWeb. Now on IoT and SMart Cities
... projects on sensorware, middleware etc.
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> RachelH: call +16177616200
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> the number in the email was missing the last 0
Danh-DERI: Contributed to SSN and RDF Stream Data
<ThiagoA> 'm from Universidade Federal de Alagoas and Planning Department of Alagoas State Government, Brazil. I coordinate the implementation of Alagoas Open Data Portal (http://dados.al.gov.br) and GIS center of the Department. Now i am researching at University about Semantic Web and linked data for government.
<ThiagoA> It is my first meeting at W3C
<ioannis> +q
RachelH: I've been at the British geological Survey for 15 years+. Ontology development, RDB, worked on our Linked Data output a while back
ioannis: I'm with Demokritos in Greece, worked on Agricultural spatial data
<chaals> s/AlejandroLlaves: you're not in the queue//
<chaals> scribe: chaals
Phila: Working for W3C, very pleased to see this group get going.
… You'll notice some people on IRC are very active - and have used it before
… the thing they are doing with s/something/another thing/ is a live correction for the minutes.
… minutes and IRC are important.
<AlejandroLlaves> Hi, I'm Alejandro Llaves. I work as a postdoc at Universidad Politécnica de Madrid on spatio-temporal modelling of sensor data streams. I was previously located at University of Münster, and involved in FP7 projects working with the SSN ontology. I also have been involved in the OGC Geosemantics group and the Workflow group. There are two more colleagues joining from my group (Ontology Engineering Group): Raúl García, who was also involve[CUT]
<phila> kerry: Anyone else who hasn't spokeN/
… Please recall that everything in the group is publshed to the Web and publicly available.
<phila> kerry: Good to know that AlejandroLlaves will be in Aus in the near future
… and resolutions etc in meetings are recorded by IRC.
<scribe> scribe: phila
kerry: We're expecting to have
the meetings weekly, running like we a re now - although we'll
get better at it
... we're expecting 2 f2f meetings per year
<chaals> rrasgent, draft minutes
kerry: the first one is planned
for 11 March in Barcelona
... This is all on the wiki of course
<chaals> rrsasgent, draft minutes
<AlejandroLlaves> Oscar Corcho, who was involved in the SSN ontology and working on the Spanish initiative for Linked Data and using GeoSPARQL in the spin-off Localidata.
kerry: we'll be using these tools
to record the meeting and allow remote participation
... it's being held within the OGC's TC meeting
... other people attending the OGC TC meeting can come in but
only WG members get to vote
... Second f2f probably at TPAC in Japan, last week of
October
... we don't want to spend to long introuducing the IRC bots
today, but there's a lot of info on the wiki
<kerry> www.w3.org/2015/spatial
kerry: the wiki is a really
important communication device for the WG
... The wiki will have things like agendas, text etc. It's a
tool that, like the minutes, is publicly visible (but only
writable by WG members and W3C staff)
... intention is to keep development as public as possible
<Zakim> jtandy, you wanted to ask whether we will also be using github
jtandy: As I've been contributing to the CSV on the Web WG, we've found our GitHub repository very useful
kerry: phila Advised us to use GitHub for the docs
<JoshLieberman> https://github.com/w3c/sdw
<Zakim> jtandy, you wanted to ask if phil will add us automatically
<jtandy> (thanks)
kerry: Describes scribe
duties
... all members of the WG can expect to be a scribe in turn
<chaals> [/me volunteers to scribe next week]
kerry: On voting, the W3C process
is a consensus approach
... votes etc. go into the minutes
... it's not a majority vote systen, it's can I live with this?
If the voting outcome is that everyone can live with it, then
that's consensus. There are formal processes for handling
Formal Objections if needed
... ultimately, formal objections can be taken to the
Director
<chaals> The W3C Process document (evolving)
kerry: please try and keep the wiki tidy. See the CSVW Wiki as a good example of how to keep it so
kerry: This time (09:00Z) works for Canberra and London but...
<jtandy> (we, CSV on the web, also make extensive use of GitHub repository too)
<kerry> MEETING TIMES http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?iso=20150129T20&p1=0&p2=57&p3=136&p4=224&p5=263&p6=37&p7=33 UTC (Time Zone) Thursday, 29 January 2015 at 8:00:00 PM UTC Canberra (Australia - Australian Capital Territory) Friday, 30 January 2015 at 7:00:00 AM AEDT UTC+11 hours London (United Kingdom - England) Thursday, 29 January 2015 at 8:00:00 PM GMT UTC
kerry: It gets more complicated with daylight saving times
<armin> +1
kerry: We're going to use UTC!
<kerry> queue
<jtandy> -1 ... could manage 30-mins later
<JoshLieberman> UTC - 5
Ashok_Malhotra: What would be the ET time?
kerry: 15:00 Thursday
<Zakim> phila, you wanted to ask a question on behalf of Alex Coley
<jtandy> (me too; Thursday evening is not great)
<chaals> [I can probably resolve a current conflict, but it's not a very Moscow-friendly time]
<AndreaP> me too
<Cory_Henson> +1
phila: Alex C was happy with the time but not he day of the week
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> day and tune work great for me
chrislittle: Most of the times
are OK but not on Thursday
... Tues or Wed would be better for mew
... (Assuming UK evening)
<AndreaP> +1 to chrislittle
RachelH: So that's 7am London?
kerry: No, 8PM UK, 7AM
Canberra
... Reads the times from the World Clock
... Beijing is 04:00 - but do we have any Chinese people?
<chaals> [Proposed time: 2000Z (also known as GMT, UTC) - 8pm London, 9pm western europe, 11pm Moscow, 4am Beijing, 9am Canberra (in southern summer)…]
eparsons: Moscow could be hard
kerry: Let's do a vote practice
<Ashok_Malhotra> +1 to time
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> +1 to time
PROPOSED: That the Time (not Day) shall be 20:00 UTC
<chaals> +1 for the time
<JoshLieberman> +1 to time
<AndreaP> +1 to time
<aharth> +1
<linda> +1 to time
<eparsons> +1
<chrislittle> +1
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> +1
<ioannis> +1
<Payam> +1
+1
<kerry> +1
<armin> +1
<Cory_Henson> +1
<jtandy> +0 (but not on Tue or Thu ... could do 30 mins later)
<ramonalcarria> +1
<alfonso> 0 for the time
<Ingo> +1
<emilio> +0
<guillermo> +0
<RachelH> +1
<Danh-DERI> +0
<alfonso> +0
RESOLUTION: That the Time (not Day) shall be 20:00 UTC
<Zakim> chaals, you wanted to suggest that Doodle is much better than meeting times for choosing a time to meet.
<AlejandroLlaves> 0
<chrislittle> +1 doodle
chaals: There are 2 reasons why you don't choose the meeting time during the meeting as it's the consensus of the people who can already turn up. And Doodle is really good
kerry: My experience is that
Doodle doesn't always lead to consensus
... but we will for the next one
... So now we need to pick a day
<jtandy> (suggest wednesday)
<AndreaP> +1 to wed
<chrislittle> +1 wed
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> (Thursday works great for me)
I would object to Friday!
<jtandy> Tue & Thu are not good for me
<chaals> [object to friday - others are fine]
<aharth> friday (evening) is bad
<RachelH> -1 wed
<linda> -1 friday
<armin> -1 friday
<eparsons> -1 Friday
<ramonalcarria> -1 wed
<kerry> -1 friday
<Danh-DERI> -1 for Tuesday and Friday
<Cory_Henson> -1 Friday
<ioannis> -1 for Mon Tues
<chrislittle> -1 tues because OGC architecture board
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> -1 Tuesday, Wednesday
<AndreaP> -1 to Mon and Thu
<JoshLieberman> -1 Tuesday
chaals: You do a Doodle and the least unpolular wins
phila: I agree, but it looks like Wednesday to me
<ThiagoA> Wed and Thu Is great for me. 9,10 or 11 am is the best time for the meeting
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> and then the times (of the day) will change as well anyway
chrislittle: My experience of Doodle is that it works but you might have to change the time to be nice to other parts of the world
<chrislittle> mute me
<ThiagoA> But I prefer that we decide this question by Doodle
<eparsons> Doodle will need short time limit
<chaals> [unfortunately we are going to have someone left out. But when daylight savings changes everything, in a couple of months, we'll be able to change and should try to share the pain around]
kerry: I was going to...
... work through the charter but I'll leave that as your
homework
... there is a very tight time frame in the charter
... the second part of your homework is to start on use
cases
... you'll see from the WG homepage the link to
https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements
... please edit the wiki and add your use case(s)
... I took the template from the CSVW
... I'd really like you to indicate which deliverables in the
charter your use case refers to
... any questions?
<kerry> queue/
<JoshLieberman> Just to confirm - is the intent to have weekly calls?
kerry: Yes, we know the time but
not the day
... watch the wiki, the mailing list etc.
... Closes the meeting
... regrets absensce next week, Ed will chair then
<jtandy> (thanks to Kerry for chairing & phila / chaals for scribing)
<JoshLieberman> Thanks
<linda> thanks!
<eparsons> thanks bye
<Cory_Henson> bye
<guillermo> bye!
<AlejandroLlaves> thanks, Kerry! bye
<chrislittle> thanks.. ciao
<RachelH> thanks bye
<alfonso> bye
<emilio> bye
<Krzysztof_Janowicz> bye
<ramonalcarria> bye
<JoshLieberman> bye
[End of minutes]