IRC log of aapi on 2014-11-18
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 19:55:17 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #aapi
- 19:55:17 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-aapi-irc
- 19:55:19 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs member
- 19:55:19 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #aapi
- 19:55:21 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be WAI_PF
- 19:55:21 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(AAPI)3:00PM scheduled to start in 5 minutes
- 19:55:22 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
- 19:55:22 [trackbot]
- Date: 18 November 2014
- 19:55:49 [clown]
- chair: Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 19:55:51 [clown]
- agenda: this
- 19:55:59 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-587/ACTION-1528: (David) Investigate the proper ia2 mappings for aria-current.
- 19:56:06 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-587/ACTION-1527: (Cynthia) Investigate the proper uia mappings for aria-current.
- 19:56:13 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-587/ACTION-1529: (Joseph) Investigate the proper atk/at-spi mappings for aria-current.
- 19:56:19 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-587: (All) discuss use of events when aria-current changes.
- 19:56:27 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-435/ACTION-1391: (David) investigate ia2 mapping of role="text".
- 19:56:34 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-433/ACTION-1532: (Joanie) investigate atk/at-spi mapping of role="text".
- 19:56:40 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-435/ACTION-1530: (Cynthia) investigate ia2 mapping of role="text"
- 19:56:47 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-568: (All) need actions for mappings or aria-modal for all AAPIs.
- 19:56:55 [clown]
- agenda+ ACTION-1104: (Cynthia) Define the UIA mapping for aria-describedby when the element does not exist in the accessibility tree such as when css: display:none applies.
- 19:57:03 [clown]
- agenda+ ACTION-1445/ISSUE-661: (Cynthia) Investigate ideal mapping for role presentation in tables and lists.
- 19:57:10 [clown]
- agenda+ Continue with ACTIONs/ISSUEs for core-aam 1.1: https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/23
- 19:57:15 [clown]
- agenda+ be done.
- 19:57:49 [Zakim]
- WAI_PFWG(AAPI)3:00PM has now started
- 19:57:56 [Zakim]
- +[GVoice]
- 19:58:13 [clown]
- zakim, GVoice is Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 19:58:13 [Zakim]
- +Joseph_Scheuhammer; got it
- 19:58:21 [clown]
- zakim, I am Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 19:58:21 [Zakim]
- ok, clown, I now associate you with Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 19:58:24 [clown]
- zakim, who's here?
- 19:58:24 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 19:58:26 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, davidb, clown, MichaelC, joanie, trackbot
- 19:59:10 [Zakim]
- + +1.416.848.aaaa
- 19:59:29 [davidb]
- Zakim, 1.416.848.aaaa is David_Bolter
- 19:59:29 [Zakim]
- sorry, davidb, I do not recognize a party named '1.416.848.aaaa'
- 19:59:39 [davidb]
- Zakim, aaaa is David_Bolter
- 19:59:39 [Zakim]
- +David_Bolter; got it
- 20:00:04 [Zakim]
- +Joanmarie_Diggs
- 20:00:18 [joanie]
- Zakim, I am Joanmarie_Diggs
- 20:00:18 [Zakim]
- ok, joanie, I now associate you with Joanmarie_Diggs
- 20:00:47 [dalek]
- exterminate
- 20:01:19 [Zakim]
- +Bryan_Garaventa
- 20:02:51 [joanie]
- Regrets+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger
- 20:02:55 [davidb]
- davidb has joined #aapi
- 20:03:03 [joanie]
- scribenick: joanie
- 20:03:23 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up item 1
- 20:03:23 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "ISSUE-587/ACTION-1528: (David) Investigate the proper ia2 mappings for aria-current." taken up [from clown]
- 20:03:28 [clown]
- action-1528?
- 20:03:28 [trackbot]
- action-1528 -- David Bolter to Bolter to investigate the proper ia2 mappings for aria-current -- due 2014-11-18 -- OPEN
- 20:03:28 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1528
- 20:03:37 [joanie]
- JS: There's a new aria-current in the spec.
- 20:04:10 [joanie]
- JS: Briefly, if you're in a navigational structure like a TOC off to the side, your current location is your place in the TOC.
- 20:04:22 [joanie]
- JS: You could also use it in a wizard or other step-by-step process.
- 20:04:28 [joanie]
- DB: Do we have a status role for that?
- 20:04:36 [joanie]
- JS: We're not changing the role.
- 20:04:49 [joanie]
- DB: I'm wondering if this could be done in another way.
- 20:05:07 [joanie]
- JS: The GNOME people are going to go with ATK_STATIC_ACTIVE
- 20:06:28 [davidb]
- q+ who wants aria-current and how does it help the user experience?
- 20:06:36 [joanie]
- https://bug740044.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=290571
- 20:07:04 [clown]
- scribenick: clown
- 20:07:17 [clown]
- JD: reads the docs on ATK_STATE_ACTIVE
- 20:08:38 [clown]
- Indicates a window is currently the active window, or an object is the active subelement within a container or table. ATK_STATE_ACTIVE should not be used for objects which have ATK_STATE_FOCUSABLE or ATK_STATE_SELECTABLE: Those objects should use ATK_STATE_FOCUSED and ATK_STATE_SELECTED respectively. ATK_STATE_ACTIVE is a means to indicate that an object which is not focusable and not selectable is the currently-active item within its parent container.
- 20:09:53 [clown]
- DB: regarding this change, you could still have a clickable thing be an ACTIVE thing?
- 20:09:55 [clown]
- JD: Sure.
- 20:10:18 [clown]
- DB: When you say, "objects should use ATK_STATE_FOCUSED and ATK_STATE_SELECTED respectively". Is that and/or or both?
- 20:10:43 [clown]
- JD: It can be either. Something can be unselected in a mult-select list box, but still focussed.
- 20:11:36 [clown]
- DB: does ATK have a multi-selected state?
- 20:11:45 [clown]
- JD: multi-selecatable.
- 20:12:17 [clown]
- JD: The new definition is to anticipate a complaint that isn't aria-current just focused?
- 20:12:29 [clown]
- DB: who want aria-current, and what's it for?
- 20:12:40 [clown]
- JD: Here's my use case.
- 20:12:55 [clown]
- JD: <describes ordering online>
- 20:13:22 [clown]
- JD: <describles a wizard step-by-step process>
- 20:14:24 [clown]
- BG: Let me clarify. The primary reason for aria-current is there are situations on the web where an element is marked as current in a collection.
- 20:14:41 [clown]
- BG: It could be a list of items, or a group of images, or a list of dates.
- 20:14:54 [clown]
- BG: Also pagination links, where one is current.
- 20:15:11 [clown]
- BG: There is not textual way to indicate which one is current.
- 20:15:27 [clown]
- BG: Sighted users can see some sort of highlighting.
- 20:16:30 [joanie]
- scribenick: joanie
- 20:16:49 [joanie]
- JS: I'm looking for the aria-current spec text.
- 20:17:48 [joanie]
- DB: I'm going through the process of, whenever you see a proposed aria attribute:
- 20:17:55 [clown]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2014Nov/0039.html
- 20:17:59 [joanie]
- 1) Is it really needed?
- 20:18:12 [joanie]
- DB: 2) Is it as powerful as it can get?
- 20:18:27 [joanie]
- s/1) Is it really needed?/DB: 1) Is it really needed?/
- 20:18:44 [joanie]
- DB: I think we have met 1.
- 20:19:02 [joanie]
- DB: [Describes example in which a live region wouldn't work]
- 20:19:19 [joanie]
- JS: aria-current has nothing to do with focus
- 20:19:32 [joanie]
- JS: Go back to Joanie's shopping cart example.
- 20:19:37 [joanie]
- JS: You're not focused on the step.
- 20:19:40 [joanie]
- DB: I totally get that.
- 20:20:02 [joanie]
- DB: The use case I'm trying to imagine is a web page in which you might have one or more aria-currents on a page.
- 20:20:19 [joanie]
- DB: I'm thinking of a dynamic page in which one or more aria-current's change.
- 20:20:50 [joanie]
- DB: So my example -- bad example -- is the colors of a legend changing depening on what country you selected.
- 20:21:07 [joanie]
- JS: The one (example) that was originally proposed was for aria-selected.
- 20:21:15 [joanie]
- JS: But that was rejected as being different.
- 20:21:29 [joanie]
- DB: A screen reader has to know if aria-current changes for some reason.
- 20:21:36 [joanie]
- BG: I don't think that's needed necessarily.
- 20:22:02 [joanie]
- BG: The author can surround nested regions with labels if needed.
- 20:22:12 [joanie]
- BG: It's obvious from the context that the element refers to that region.
- 20:22:28 [joanie]
- BG: So I don't think it's necessary to expose anything other than that the element is current.
- 20:23:21 [joanie]
- DB: Is there a situation in which some screen reader notices this is aria-current. Does it need to know the relationship between it and what makes it current?
- 20:23:41 [joanie]
- BG: I don't think so. Dominic from Google mentioned it in the context in of shadow DOM.
- 20:23:58 [joanie]
- JS: I mentioned aria-currentfor if you have multiple aria-currents on the page
- 20:24:07 [joanie]
- JS: But Matt, James, and others said it wasn't needed.
- 20:24:18 [joanie]
- DB: Is it expected that you'll only have one?
- 20:24:30 [joanie]
- JS: No, as far as I know that is not necessarily expected.
- 20:24:46 [joanie]
- BG: [Agrees] but I don't think that's a problem.
- 20:24:58 [joanie]
- JS: [Describes example of page with multiple portlets]
- 20:25:06 [joanie]
- BG: I think it depends on context.
- 20:25:14 [joanie]
- JS: I remember others saying that too.
- 20:25:52 [joanie]
- DB: I'm just wondering about getting people to use it.
- 20:25:58 [joanie]
- DB: It has to be clear how to use it.
- 20:26:00 [joanie]
- JS: True.
- 20:26:32 [joanie]
- JS: aria-currentfor got dropped; aria-current is all we need.
- 20:27:06 [joanie]
- BG: Cynthia said she was going to try to put it in UIA in January, I think
- 20:28:30 [joanie]
- JS: Is there something similar to STATE_ACTIVE in IA2?
- 20:28:38 [joanie]
- JS: ATK and IA2 are pretty similar.
- 20:28:52 [joanie]
- DB: Does ATK have STATE_ARMED? Or was that Java?
- 20:28:57 [joanie]
- JS: Java
- 20:29:07 [joanie]
- JD: Actually ATK too, but it's stupid and I want it deprecated.
- 20:29:30 [joanie]
- JS: The "it" there is ambiguous.
- 20:29:42 [joanie]
- JD: [Makes no comment]
- 20:30:09 [joanie]
- DB: So there's a STATE_ACTIVE, but it's about the active window.
- 20:30:28 [clown]
- http://accessibility.linuxfoundation.org/a11yspecs/ia2/docs/html/_accessible_states_8idl.html#aafecbfb195aaf7050dc8f75a7833bd5fabf466265c1f5b45dd53c86deb28220bc
- 20:30:37 [clown]
- scribenick: clown
- 20:30:50 [clown]
- JD: Years ago, ACTIVE was just for windows.
- 20:31:04 [clown]
- JD: But then, it was modified to include "sub-elements">
- 20:31:31 [clown]
- JD: We fixed the docs for ATK to clarify it.
- 20:31:41 [clown]
- JD: Couldn't we do the same for IA2?
- 20:32:01 [clown]
- s/IA2/IA2 docs/
- 20:32:27 [clown]
- JD: It would mean little change to the IA2 implementation.
- 20:33:47 [clown]
- Note: IA2 documentations for STATE_ACTIVE is: "Indicates a window is currently the active window, or is an active subelement within a container or table."
- 20:35:32 [joanie]
- scribnick: joanie
- 20:35:41 [joanie]
- JS: We've been discussing this for 1/2 an hour now.
- 20:36:05 [joanie]
- JS: David should ask Alex Surkov about using STATE_ACTIVE in IA2 for this.
- 20:36:09 [joanie]
- DB: Agreed.
- 20:36:22 [joanie]
- DB: I think I'll assign the action to him.
- 20:37:23 [joanie]
- JS: The current due date is today. Next tuesday?
- 20:37:29 [joanie]
- DB: Sure.
- 20:38:33 [joanie]
- Topic: Do we meet next week?
- 20:38:45 [joanie]
- JS: In the States it's Thanksgiving Holiday week.
- 20:38:51 [joanie]
- JS: I'll be here. David will be here.
- 20:38:56 [joanie]
- JD: I will be here.
- 20:39:06 [joanie]
- BG: I'll be around on Tuesday.
- 20:39:41 [joanie]
- RESOLUTION: We'll have a meeting next week as usual.
- 20:39:48 [joanie]
- DB: When do we break for holidays?
- 20:40:17 [joanie]
- JS: The 16th might be iffy for me, though I'm not sure. I'll definitely be out on the 23rd and 30th.
- 20:40:38 [joanie]
- JS: The above refer to December.
- 20:40:59 [joanie]
- Zakim, next item
- 20:40:59 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "ISSUE-587/ACTION-1527: (Cynthia) Investigate the proper uia mappings for aria-current." taken up [from clown]
- 20:41:06 [joanie]
- JS: Cynthia is not here
- 20:41:11 [joanie]
- Zakim, close item 2
- 20:41:11 [Zakim]
- agendum 2, ISSUE-587/ACTION-1527: (Cynthia) Investigate the proper uia mappings for aria-current., closed
- 20:41:13 [Zakim]
- I see 10 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 20:41:13 [Zakim]
- 3. ISSUE-587/ACTION-1529: (Joseph) Investigate the proper atk/at-spi mappings for aria-current. [from clown]
- 20:41:25 [clown]
- action-1529?
- 20:41:25 [trackbot]
- action-1529 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Investigate the proper atk/at-spi mappings for aria-current -- due 2014-11-18 -- OPEN
- 20:41:25 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1529
- 20:41:30 [joanie]
- JS: This is mine because it was originally Joanie's and she's done the work.
- 20:41:39 [joanie]
- JS: Given her notes, I'm ready to add the mappings.
- 20:42:19 [joanie]
- JS: I guess I need to wait until the other platforms.
- 20:42:34 [davidb]
- JD: what about Mac?
- 20:43:28 [clown]
- action: James Craig to investigate the AXAPI mappings for aria-current.
- 20:43:29 [trackbot]
- 'James' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., jcraig, jhawkins2, jnurthen).
- 20:43:40 [clown]
- action: jcraig to investigate the AXAPI mappings for aria-current.
- 20:43:40 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-1535 - Investigate the axapi mappings for aria-current. [on James Craig - due 2014-11-25].
- 20:43:41 [joanie]
- JS: [Creates new action for AX API mappings]
- 20:43:49 [clown]
- action-1535?
- 20:43:49 [trackbot]
- action-1535 -- James Craig to Investigate the axapi mappings for aria-current. -- due 2014-11-25 -- OPEN
- 20:43:49 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1535
- 20:44:37 [joanie]
- Zakim, next item
- 20:44:37 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "ISSUE-587/ACTION-1529: (Joseph) Investigate the proper atk/at-spi mappings for aria-current." taken up [from clown]
- 20:45:00 [joanie]
- Zakim, close item 3
- 20:45:00 [Zakim]
- agendum 3, ISSUE-587/ACTION-1529: (Joseph) Investigate the proper atk/at-spi mappings for aria-current., closed
- 20:45:02 [Zakim]
- I see 9 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 20:45:02 [Zakim]
- 4. ISSUE-587: (All) discuss use of events when aria-current changes. [from clown]
- 20:45:03 [joanie]
- Zakim, next item
- 20:45:04 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "ISSUE-587: (All) discuss use of events when aria-current changes." taken up [from clown]
- 20:45:24 [joanie]
- JS: When Joanie passed back action-1529, I wondere if aria-current should spawn an event.
- 20:45:35 [joanie]
- JS: In which case we need to add this to the event mapping table.
- 20:45:42 [joanie]
- JS: I brought this up yesterday at the meeting.
- 20:45:55 [joanie]
- JS: James Craig thought we should make it a "MAY"
- 20:46:13 [clown]
- scribenick: clown
- 20:46:25 [clown]
- JS: ATK is going to just make such an event.
- 20:46:29 [clown]
- JD: That's not quite right.
- 20:46:37 [joanie]
- action-1529
- 20:46:37 [trackbot]
- action-1529 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Investigate the proper atk/at-spi mappings for aria-current -- due 2014-11-18 -- OPEN
- 20:46:37 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1529
- 20:47:22 [clown]
- JD: Well, there's the events table (i.e. ARIA), and there's what is expected when the state of an accessible object changes in <insert any ATK implementation here, including desktop applications and toolkits>.
- 20:47:41 [clown]
- JD: With respect to the latter, the expectation has always been that as a general rule, when the state changes, a state-change notification is expected.
- 20:47:54 [clown]
- JD: Otherwise, how is an AT on the platform to know?
- 20:48:32 [clown]
- JD: It says in the ATK documentation that implementors are expected to provide notiifcations of state changes.
- 20:50:05 [clown]
- JD: ATK doesn't magically do the event. It is still expected that the implementor will do the event.
- 20:50:25 [joanie]
- scribenick: joanie
- 20:50:55 [joanie]
- JS: When I said "ATK is going to do this anyway" I really meant "A proper ATK implementation is going to do this anyway."
- 20:51:16 [joanie]
- JS: James Craig wants it to be a MAY because we currently have no consensus that it's needed or wanted by any AT.
- 20:51:31 [joanie]
- JS: Cynthia wanted it to be a SHOULD because she wanted it to be stronger.
- 20:52:21 [joanie]
- JS: I will put it in as a MAY for AX API and a MUST for ATK. But that means we have different normative requirements for platforms.
- 20:52:31 [joanie]
- JS: I'm not sure what to do for UIA.
- 20:52:36 [joanie]
- JS: Cynthia wants a SHOULD.
- 20:52:58 [joanie]
- JS: James Craig went on to say that if this is useful and we all agree, we can then change it to a MUST.
- 20:53:04 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 20:53:09 [joanie]
- JS: In other words he's being cautious.
- 20:53:23 [cyns]
- cyns has joined #aapi
- 20:53:59 [Zakim]
- -David_Bolter
- 20:54:09 [joanie]
- Zakim, [Microsoft] is Cynthia_Shelly
- 20:54:09 [Zakim]
- +Cynthia_Shelly; got it
- 20:54:18 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up item 2
- 20:54:18 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "ISSUE-587/ACTION-1527: (Cynthia) Investigate the proper uia mappings for aria-current." taken up [from clown]
- 20:54:28 [joanie]
- JS: We've been talking about mappings for aria-current.
- 20:54:34 [joanie]
- JS: We pretty much have ATK finished.
- 20:54:43 [clown]
- action-1527
- 20:54:44 [trackbot]
- action-1527 -- Cynthia Shelly to Investigate the proper uia mappings for aria-current -- due 2015-01-31 -- OPEN
- 20:54:44 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1527
- 20:54:49 [joanie]
- JS: David is going to follow up with Surkov on IA2.
- 20:54:56 [joanie]
- JS: What should we use for UIA?
- 20:55:20 [joanie]
- CS: Selection -- it would become a selected item.
- 20:55:36 [joanie]
- CS: Which means that it needs to have -- there's a container that's required.
- 20:55:41 [joanie]
- CS: I put notes in the bug.
- 20:55:48 [joanie]
- CS: The closest thing we have is selected.
- 20:55:56 [joanie]
- CS: But that means we need to have a container.
- 20:56:08 [joanie]
- CS: I think this is related to what Joanie was talking about the other day on the call.
- 20:56:16 [joanie]
- CS: About traversing the tree, etc.
- 20:56:44 [joanie]
- CS: I could ask for a new UIA API, but I'd need additional justification for why this isn't selection.
- 20:57:32 [joanie]
- BG: It is possible to have something with a current and a selected at the same time. And they wouldn't be the same thing.
- 20:57:36 [joanie]
- CS: What's the difference?
- 20:58:00 [joanie]
- BS: If you have a tree, and the current item in the tree is a book and there is a current page.
- 20:58:13 [joanie]
- CS: That sounds like the difference between focus and selection
- 20:58:22 [joanie]
- s/BS/BG/
- 20:58:55 [joanie]
- BG: When you're arrowing through it, you can have something selected and not be current at the same time.
- 20:59:15 [joanie]
- BG: But one could be both selected and current.
- 20:59:26 [joanie]
- BG: [Gives an example with JAWS]
- 20:59:44 [joanie]
- CS: How does that work for tabs?
- 20:59:56 [joanie]
- CS: Or multiple selections in a listbox?
- 21:00:31 [joanie]
- BG: With tabs you have aria-expanded.
- 21:00:45 [joanie]
- JS: You can have multiple tabs expanded, but only one is selected.
- 21:01:00 [joanie]
- CS: I was talking about browser tabs
- 21:01:57 [joanie]
- BG: [example with remote callback]
- 21:02:18 [joanie]
- CS: We already have focus and selection.
- 21:02:37 [joanie]
- CS: The difference between focus and selection seems to be the difference between selection and current.
- 21:02:49 [joanie]
- BG: This also applies to static.
- 21:03:40 [joanie]
- BG: People didn't want aria-selected because it's going to cause confusion with interactive widgets.
- 21:03:50 [joanie]
- BG: People will start putting it on the wrong widgets.
- 21:03:53 [joanie]
- CS: Why is that?
- 21:04:17 [joanie]
- BG: If you can put aria-selected on everything, people are going to start putting it on everything
- 21:04:28 [joanie]
- CS: I think the best mapping in UIA is going to be selected.
- 21:04:41 [joanie]
- CS: I think that's what we do with similar native widgets in Windows.
- 21:05:27 [joanie]
- BG: [Asks about experience in Windows on calendar]
- 21:05:33 [joanie]
- CS: [Describes it]
- 21:05:51 [joanie]
- BG: So basically it's the distinction between selected and focused is not always the same.
- 21:06:01 [joanie]
- CS: Correct. Selection and focus are not always the same.
- 21:06:11 [joanie]
- BG: In the spec, there are many cases where they are the same.
- 21:06:20 [joanie]
- CS: And in the mapping you'll see that they are all different
- 21:06:28 [joanie]
- CS: Sometimes they are the same, but not always.
- 21:06:37 [joanie]
- JS: Can I break in to say the meeting is over?
- 21:07:07 [joanie]
- BG: Can you post this (the Windows mapping) to the list?
- 21:07:14 [joanie]
- CS: I can post that to the list.
- 21:07:25 [joanie]
- CS: I think I posted something last week, but I can do it again.
- 21:07:41 [joanie]
- CS: I think we've gotten as far as we can without further input.
- 21:08:27 [joanie]
- action-1530
- 21:08:27 [trackbot]
- action-1530 -- Cynthia Shelly to Investigate uia mapping of role="text" -- due 2014-11-18 -- OPEN
- 21:08:27 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1530
- 21:08:50 [Zakim]
- -Joanmarie_Diggs
- 21:08:51 [Zakim]
- -Bryan_Garaventa
- 21:08:52 [Zakim]
- -Cynthia_Shelly
- 21:08:54 [Zakim]
- -Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 21:08:55 [Zakim]
- WAI_PFWG(AAPI)3:00PM has ended
- 21:08:55 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Joseph_Scheuhammer, +1.416.848.aaaa, David_Bolter, Joanmarie_Diggs, Bryan_Garaventa, Cynthia_Shelly
- 21:09:09 [joanie]
- Zakim, part
- 21:09:09 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #aapi
- 21:09:32 [joanie]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 21:09:32 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-aapi-minutes.html joanie
- 21:10:11 [joanie]
- RRSAgent, stop
- 21:17:32 [joanie]
- s/scribnick/scribenick/
- 21:17:38 [joanie]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 21:17:38 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-aapi-minutes.html joanie
- 21:18:20 [joanie]
- RRSAgent, stop