See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 04 February 2014
<scribe> scribenick: joesteele
<paulc> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Feb/0000.html
paulc: Heartbeat CFC sent out
<paulc> Copy of CfC on public-html-admin@w3.org: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Feb/0002.html
paulc: please respond to the
version on the admin list if you respond
... possible that CFC may take a week to get published even if
it closes this week
paulc: in Adrians original order
-- some that were not in the original list though
... some are in editors queue already, we will skip those
... need to check status on others
... some need discussion, would like to know how we will
process.
... generate a deadline if possible
<paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17673
paulc: minutes indicate David was going to split off isTypeSupported and talk to David Singer -- any progress?
ddorwin: no progress this week
adrianba: sent mail to David Singer, no reply yet. Will follow up
<paulc> ddorwin: will try to do this this week
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17750
paulc: don't think we touched on
it last week
... last entry is a question from David on Jan 25th -- no
responses since then
<paulc> David's question: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17750#c25
paulc: David any thoughts?
ddorwin: reading ...
... believe the issue is that we have state checks but the
checks are all done synchronously
paulc: any questions or comments?
adrianba: haven't looked at all
the cases in detail, but suspect that David is right about
needing to include some language in the check -- in the release
case think it might be ok
... since the close can happen at any time without the app
doing anything
... would be unfortunate if the app tried to call release but
the CDM had already closed the session and generated an error
because of this
... could generate a no-op in this case
... might need just moving those checks
paulc: more input needed?
ddorwin: yes -- more comments in the bug
<adrianba> 17750 is a tricky one and will need careful analysis
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21798
paulc: bugs says that the constants were reviewed, need to add them, how will that happen? what are you waiting for?
ddorwin: just a lower priority - need to go thtough whole thread and generate a response
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23619
paulc: last week you said you
needed more time Adrian to consider comment #9
... no reply as yet
<adrianba> i need to discuss with travis
<paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23619#c9
paulc: can it be done in a week?
adrianba: think so
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24025, https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24082
paulc: linked in the agenda
... mark you mentioned these
markw: think it was use cases for extensibility
<paulc> Mark's use case for 24025: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Feb/0001.htmlhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Feb/0001.html
markw: /msg adrianba thanks!
<paulc> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Feb/0001.html
paulc: please add your comments
to 24025
... any other responses?
+1
paulc: if you need time to review -- indicate you are not sure
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24027
paulc: Adrian suggested John could review Pavels proposal
johnsim: think I agree with the
proposal -- general approach looks right
... as long as there is support for multiple key ids
<paulc> Pavel's support: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24027#c2
<paulc> Mark's comments: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24027#c4
<glenn> +1
markw: we have found it useful to
include a hash of the key to allow the client to quickly
determine it has the right key
... decoder should be robust, but might have lost the context
by the time you hit a failure
ddorwin: when would you get the wrong key?
+q
scribe: still need to come up with a format
markw: misconfiguration,
confusion about which file goes with which content
... could be cases where an attacker supplies the wrong key
joesteele: we have seen misconfiguration lead to this issue
s/miconfirguration/misconfiguration/
paulc: closed the action
... heard David say we need more data in the proposal -- mark
can you propose an extension
<markw_> yes - I will make a proposal
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24216
paulc: Last week we said Jerry was looking at this
adrianba: he has been
delayed
... travelling
... delayed by the SuperBowl
... parade in downtown Seattle tomorrow so may be some delay
there as well
paulc: on the agenda for next week
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24323
paulc: need feedback from TF -- have seen none?
ddorwin: boils down to whether we need to fire a needkey if initData was not provided
<ddorwin> "This allows something other than Initialization Data to trigger this algorithm."
joesteele: this would impact us -- I will take a look
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24368
paulc: Jerry was to review -- assume this moves to next week
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24381
paulc: Adrian you thought this had been reported before -- have you found the dup?
adrianba: no time last week
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24419
paulc: not discussed last week at all
ddorwin: currently keymessage is
some undefined value extracted from initData, proposal is to
make a JSON based license format
... this is a mirror of the license done in JSON WebKey
<markw_> you mean the keymessage, not needkey, right ?
paulc: on your queue to implement?
joesteele: that sounds right -- thanks mark
s/needKey is/keyMessage is/
paulc: any comments on this one?
<paulc> s/17682 is on your queue to implement/17682 is on queue to implement/
<ddorwin> yes, I meant the [key]message event.
paulc: what do you need David? is there a question?
ddorwin: if noone objects I will implement
<adrianba> we haven't discussed it
paulc: any objections?
... gone through the items on my list -- skipped a few
... scan through agenda item#5 for other items to discuss
... next week will break agenda item #5 into 2-3 parts
... low priority, items we have discussed, maybe one other
category
... encourage folks to work on these items so we can make
progress
adrianba: there is a lot of work
to do at the moment -- long queue
... how do people feel about the cadence of our weekly
meetings? is that effective? or move back to two weeks?
paulc: I was thinking about this also -- I tend to agree. Not seeing a lot of progress made
+1 -- I could use this hour for reviewing
<ddorwin> +1
paulc: might be tempted to assign
very explicit action items to make sure folks know what they
are working on
... motion from the floor for next meeting to be Feb 18th. Any
objections?
... thinkg I have some notes that I can send out some prompts
to people about actions resulting from todays discussion
... I will make sure there is something in the email archive
about items waited on as well
... maybe this will help
... thanks for that suggestion Adrian
... any other comments?
... let's adjourn
<scribe> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Feb/0000.html
s/\/msg //
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/EME status and bugs/Heartbeat/ Succeeded: s/this is/17750 is/ Succeeded: s/accessibility/extensibility/ Succeeded: s/multipl/multiple/ Succeeded: s/key adds/key ids/ FAILED: s/miconfirguration/misconfiguration/ Succeeded: s/miconfiguration/misconfiguration/ Succeeded: s/paulc;/paulc:/ Succeeded: s/needKey/keymessage/ FAILED: s/needKey is/keyMessage is/ FAILED: s/on your queue to implement/17682 is on queue to implement/ Succeeded: s/will implements/will implement/ Succeeded: s/plsit off/split off/ WARNING: Bad s/// command: s/\/msg adrianba thanks!// Succeeded: s/adrianba thanks!/ / Succeeded: s/Makr's/Mark's/ Succeeded: s/can you proposed/can you propose/ Succeeded: s/tim implement/to implement/ Succeeded: s/on your queue/17682 is on your queue/ Found ScribeNick: joesteele Inferring Scribes: joesteele Default Present: glenn, joesteele, davide, markw, johnsim, paulc, adrianba, [IPcaller], BobLund, +1.425.605.aaaa, ddorwin Present: glenn joesteele davide markw johnsim paulc adrianba [IPcaller] BobLund +1.425.605.aaaa ddorwin Regrets: jdsmith Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Feb/0000.html Found Date: 04 Feb 2014 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/02/04-html-media-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]