15:36:33 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/11/27-rdf-wg-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/11/27-rdf-wg-irc ←
15:36:35 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
15:36:37 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 73394
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 73394 ←
15:36:37 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 24 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 24 minutes ←
15:36:38 <trackbot> Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference
15:36:38 <trackbot> Date: 27 November 2013
15:45:47 <AndyS> gavinc - I did the reply for ISSUE-172 (covers TTL and TriG).
(No events recorded for 9 minutes)
Andy Seaborne: gavinc - I did the reply for ISSUE-172 (covers TTL and TriG). ←
15:45:54 <gavinc> Thanks AndyS
Gavin Carothers: Thanks AndyS ←
15:46:04 <gavinc> Sorry for seeming to vanish into the night
Gavin Carothers: Sorry for seeming to vanish into the night ←
15:46:12 <AndyS> Separately, what's your opinion on the ECHAR issue?
Andy Seaborne: Separately, what's your opinion on the ECHAR issue? ←
15:46:32 <gavinc> Jury Duty + moving platform from hardware to Google Compute
Gavin Carothers: Jury Duty + moving platform from hardware to Google Compute ←
15:46:58 <gavinc> This is " vs ' yes?
Gavin Carothers: This is " vs ' yes? ←
15:47:32 <gavinc> and my unclear guidance in N-Triples c14n?
Gavin Carothers: and my unclear guidance in N-Triples c14n? ←
15:48:10 <gavinc> and the missing \
Gavin Carothers: and the missing \ ←
15:51:27 <AndyS> Aside from the editorial on \ (that's fixed), I noticed the CR texts has ' in the ECHAR for NT and NQ. "abc\'def" is allowed even though ''-strings aren't
Andy Seaborne: Aside from the editorial on \ (that's fixed), I noticed the CR texts has ' in the ECHAR for NT and NQ. "abc\'def" is allowed even though ''-strings aren't ←
15:51:42 <AndyS> ''-string == single quoted string.
Andy Seaborne: ''-string == single quoted string. ←
15:52:28 <gavinc> I think the following: N-Triples should allow \' to stay compatible with the escaping process in Turtle/TriG eg, \' are allowed in '' strings, and c14n N-Triples should continue to say (by accident) to escape them?
Gavin Carothers: I think the following: N-Triples should allow \' to stay compatible with the escaping process in Turtle/TriG eg, \' are allowed in '' strings, and c14n N-Triples should continue to say (by accident) to escape them? ←
15:52:55 <gavinc> N-Triples c14n is already very much NOT Test Cases N-Triples
Gavin Carothers: N-Triples c14n is already very much NOT Test Cases N-Triples ←
15:53:14 <AndyS> Works for me - no one seemed to care very much. I'll do go docs.
Andy Seaborne: Works for me - no one seemed to care very much. I'll do go docs. ←
15:53:47 <gavinc> I have lost my link to the dbpedia limited Turtle format...
Gavin Carothers: I have lost my link to the dbpedia limited Turtle format... ←
15:53:48 <gavinc> mmm
Gavin Carothers: mmm ←
15:57:40 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has now started ←
15:57:47 <Zakim> +pfps
Zakim IRC Bot: +pfps ←
15:58:38 <Zakim> +GavinC
Zakim IRC Bot: +GavinC ←
15:58:55 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
15:59:01 <AndyS> zakim, IPcaller is me
Andy Seaborne: zakim, IPcaller is me ←
15:59:01 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←
15:59:04 <gavinc> scribe: gavinc
(Scribe set to Gavin Carothers)
15:59:29 <Zakim> +Guus_Schreiber
Zakim IRC Bot: +Guus_Schreiber ←
15:59:40 <Guus> chair: Guus
16:00:45 <Guus> zakim, who is here?
Guus Schreiber: zakim, who is here? ←
16:00:45 <Zakim> On the phone I see pfps, GavinC, AndyS, Guus_Schreiber
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see pfps, GavinC, AndyS, Guus_Schreiber ←
16:00:46 <Zakim> On IRC I see pfps, gkellogg, AndyS, Guus, Zakim, RRSAgent, TallTed, ivan, gavinc, ericP, manu, yvesr, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see pfps, gkellogg, AndyS, Guus, Zakim, RRSAgent, TallTed, ivan, gavinc, ericP, manu, yvesr, trackbot ←
16:00:56 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip
Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip ←
16:00:56 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made ←
16:00:58 <Zakim> +Ivan
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan ←
16:01:09 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software
Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software ←
16:01:18 <TallTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me ←
16:01:18 <Zakim> +TallTed; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +TallTed; got it ←
16:01:20 <Zakim> +??P18
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P18 ←
16:01:22 <Zakim> +??P16
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P16 ←
16:01:28 <gkellogg> zakim, I am ??P16
Gregg Kellogg: zakim, I am ??P16 ←
16:01:29 <Zakim> +gkellogg; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +gkellogg; got it ←
16:01:34 <ivan> zakim, mute me
Ivan Herman: zakim, mute me ←
16:01:35 <Zakim> Ivan should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan should now be muted ←
16:01:37 <yvesr> Zakim, ??P18 is me
Yves Raimond: Zakim, ??P18 is me ←
16:01:37 <Zakim> +yvesr; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +yvesr; got it ←
16:01:45 <gavinc> Topic: Admin
16:02:14 <gavinc> PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 20 Nov telecon https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-11-20
PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 20 Nov telecon https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-11-20 ←
16:02:19 <pfps> minutes look fine
Peter Patel-Schneider: minutes look fine ←
16:02:21 <gavinc> RESOLVED: accept the minutes of the 20 Nov telecon
RESOLVED: accept the minutes of the 20 Nov telecon ←
16:02:32 <gavinc> subtopic: action items
16:03:47 <gavinc> subtopic: JSON-LD
16:03:56 <ivan> zakim unmute me
Ivan Herman: zakim unmute me ←
16:03:57 <gavinc> Guus: Votes from AC going well
Guus Schreiber: Votes from AC going well ←
16:04:01 <ivan> zakim, unmute me
Ivan Herman: zakim, unmute me ←
16:04:01 <Zakim> Ivan should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan should no longer be muted ←
16:04:07 <AndyS> q+
Andy Seaborne: q+ ←
16:04:24 <gavinc> ivan: 18 votes earlier today, all positive.
Ivan Herman: 18 votes earlier today, all positive. ←
16:04:42 <Zakim> +David_Wood
Zakim IRC Bot: +David_Wood ←
16:04:47 <Guus> ack AndyS
Guus Schreiber: ack AndyS ←
16:05:37 <gavinc> AndyS: Nice that votes are going to the comments list, but worried that commenter trying to ack replies on that mailing list may turn off the mailing list
Andy Seaborne: Nice that votes are going to the comments list, but worried that commenter trying to ack replies on that mailing list may turn off the mailing list ←
16:05:37 <gavinc> +q
+q ←
16:05:49 <gavinc> -q
-q ←
16:05:51 <Zakim> +Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: +Arnaud ←
16:06:11 <gavinc> ivan: Not sure why all the votes are going to the comments list
Ivan Herman: Not sure why all the votes are going to the comments list ←
16:06:24 <gavinc> ... but it is done
... but it is done ←
16:07:05 <gavinc> topic: CR implementations
16:07:39 <gavinc> PROPOSED: The WG approves the test suites for TriG, N-Triples and N-Quads
PROPOSED: The WG approves the test suites for TriG, N-Triples and N-Quads ←
16:08:39 <gkellogg> +1
Gregg Kellogg: +1 ←
16:08:39 <gavinc> AndyS: We have tests, gkellogg has set them up. Everything is working, we should move them to their official test locations
Andy Seaborne: We have tests, gkellogg has set them up. Everything is working, we should move them to their official test locations ←
16:08:40 <AndyS> +1
Andy Seaborne: +1 ←
16:08:41 <ivan> +1
Ivan Herman: +1 ←
16:08:41 <gavinc> +1
+1 ←
16:08:45 <pfps> +3
16:08:47 <yvesr> +1
Yves Raimond: +1 ←
16:08:47 <Guus> +1
Guus Schreiber: +1 ←
16:08:48 <Arnaud> +1
Arnaud Le Hors: +1 ←
16:08:51 <davidwood> +1
David Wood: +1 ←
16:08:56 <TallTed> +1
Ted Thibodeau: +1 ←
16:09:20 <gavinc> RESOLVED: The WG approves the test suites for TriG, N-Triples and N-Quads
RESOLVED: The WG approves the test suites for TriG, N-Triples and N-Quads ←
16:10:40 <gavinc> gkellogg: the tests will ALSO be in hg
Gregg Kellogg: the tests will ALSO be in hg ←
16:11:15 <gavinc> Guus: Which W3C team person can place the tests in the official locations?
Guus Schreiber: Which W3C team person can place the tests in the official locations? ←
16:11:29 <gavinc> AndyS: Are we linking to a specific revision, or are we making a copy?
Andy Seaborne: Are we linking to a specific revision, or are we making a copy? ←
16:11:40 <gavinc> +1 to linking to a specific revision that's tagged
+1 to linking to a specific revision that's tagged ←
16:12:40 <gavinc> AndyS: Right now it links to dvcs on the default branch, we can point it to a specific revision
Andy Seaborne: Right now it links to dvcs on the default branch, we can point it to a specific revision ←
16:12:42 <gavinc> +q
+q ←
16:12:55 <Guus> ack gavinc
Guus Schreiber: ack gavinc ←
16:14:15 <Zakim> +karima
Zakim IRC Bot: +karima ←
16:14:32 <FabGandon> Zakim, karima is me
Fabien Gandon: Zakim, karima is me ←
16:14:32 <Zakim> +FabGandon; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +FabGandon; got it ←
16:14:35 <AndyS> ACTION AndyS Mark tests approved and email the list.
Andy Seaborne: ACTION AndyS Mark tests approved and email the list. ←
16:14:35 <trackbot> Created ACTION-328 - Mark tests approved and email the list. [on Andy Seaborne - due 2013-12-04].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-328 - Mark tests approved and email the list. [on Andy Seaborne - due 2013-12-04]. ←
16:15:48 <gavinc> subaction: Semantics Tests
16:16:06 <gavinc> Guus: ??? has nearly completed an implementation of the semantics tests
Guus Schreiber: Michael Schneider has nearly completed an implementation of the semantics tests ←
16:16:19 <ivan> s/???/Michael Schneider/
16:16:29 <gavinc> pfps: Sent out announcements, but haven't heard back from them, even acks.
Peter Patel-Schneider: Sent out announcements, but haven't heard back from them, even acks. ←
16:16:39 <ivan> s/subaction/subtopic/
16:18:33 <gavinc> ivan: Is there somewhere a pointer or description of which are the new tests that are relevant for this round?
Ivan Herman: Is there somewhere a pointer or description of which are the new tests that are relevant for this round? ←
16:18:47 <gavinc> ... only looking at 1.1 tests, not 1.0
... only looking at 1.1 tests, not 1.0 ←
16:18:58 <gavinc> pfps: Things that haven't changed should just work.
Peter Patel-Schneider: Things that haven't changed should just work. ←
16:19:28 <gavinc> ivan: Thinking of trying to contact rdflib folks if we know what tests we need to run
Ivan Herman: Thinking of trying to contact rdflib folks if we know what tests we need to run ←
16:19:52 <gavinc> pfps: ran them with owl reasoner, but they didn't pass. Wasn't too much work to do
Peter Patel-Schneider: ran them with owl reasoner, but they didn't pass. Wasn't too much work to do ←
16:22:19 <gavinc> ... not sure what we can do to get people to send in responses
... not sure what we can do to get people to send in responses ←
16:23:04 <gavinc> pfps: at this moment we have 0 results
Peter Patel-Schneider: at this moment we have 0 results ←
16:23:08 <gavinc> ivan: that's not much
Ivan Herman: that's not much ←
16:23:14 <gavinc> Guus: One promised
Guus Schreiber: One promised ←
16:24:57 <gavinc> Guus: Do we just build a reasoner?
Guus Schreiber: Do we just build a reasoner? ←
16:25:10 <gavinc> pfps: I had hopped it was easy using something from oxford, but it wasn't
Peter Patel-Schneider: I had hopped it was easy using something from oxford, but it wasn't ←
16:25:53 <gavinc> ivan: If someone has an old reasoner, what is the extra work that needs to be done to create a 1.1 reasoner?
Ivan Herman: If someone has an old reasoner, what is the extra work that needs to be done to create a 1.1 reasoner? ←
16:26:36 <Zakim> +??P0
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P0 ←
16:26:56 <az> zakim, ??P0 is me
Antoine Zimmermann: zakim, ??P0 is me ←
16:26:56 <Zakim> +az; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +az; got it ←
16:28:13 <gavinc> pfps: forwarding one of the personal requests to the RDF-WG mailing list
Peter Patel-Schneider: forwarding one of the personal requests to the RDF-WG mailing list ←
16:29:15 <Guus> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Nov/0139.html
Guus Schreiber: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Nov/0139.html ←
16:31:45 <gavinc> pfps: Will work a bit on some Oxford stuff to see if I can get it to produce test results
Peter Patel-Schneider: Will work a bit on some Oxford stuff to see if I can get it to produce test results ←
16:32:07 <Zakim> +ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: +ericP ←
16:33:21 <gavinc> ericP: ??? passed all of OWL2, might pass the RDF Semantics tests
Eric Prud'hommeaux: Euler passed all of OWL2, might pass the RDF Semantics tests ←
16:33:34 <ivan> s/???/Euler/
16:35:06 <gavinc> FabGandon: Oliver says "passing the entailments"
Fabien Gandon: Olivier Cory says "passing the entailments" ←
16:35:18 <gavinc> FabGandon: Asked him to send pfps an email
Fabien Gandon: Asked him to send pfps an email ←
16:35:46 <gavinc> ivan: That may mean we are fine, if Michael's works too
Ivan Herman: That may mean we are fine, if Michael's works too ←
16:36:10 <gavinc> s/Oliver/Olivier Cory/
16:36:33 <gavinc> pfps: So if I ping Olivier Cory he should send me test results back?
Peter Patel-Schneider: So if I ping Olivier Corby Cory he should send me test results back? ←
16:36:36 <FabGandon> s/Olivier/Olivier Corby/
16:37:02 <FabGandon> s/Olivier Cory/Olivier Corby/
16:38:01 <gavinc> Topic: CR comments
16:38:43 <gavinc> ericP: waiting on 5 from Dave Robillard
Eric Prud'hommeaux: waiting on 5 from Dave Robillard ←
16:38:49 <gavinc> AndyS: I sent reply on @base @prefix
Andy Seaborne: I sent reply on @base @prefix ←
16:38:59 <gavinc> ... comment 37 on turtle
... comment 37 on turtle ←
16:39:10 <gavinc> ... comment 6 on the other documents list
... comment 6 on the other documents list ←
16:40:16 <AndyS> ACTION-328 done
Andy Seaborne: ACTION-328 done ←
16:40:22 <AndyS> ACTION-328 close
Andy Seaborne: ACTION-328 close ←
16:40:46 <AndyS> to ivan, ericP - please update the test pages
Andy Seaborne: to ivan, ericP - please update the test pages ←
16:41:10 <AndyS> The version is d2aa3c0cdec7
Andy Seaborne: The version is d2aa3c0cdec7 ←
16:43:09 <gavinc> http://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.LRH.2.02.1311171537260.23626@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com
http://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.LRH.2.02.1311171537260.23626@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com ←
16:44:02 <AndyS> Ivan - http://www.w3.org/2013/N-TriplesTests/ http://www.w3.org/2013/N-QuadsTests/ http://www.w3.org/2013/TrigTests/
Andy Seaborne: Ivan - http://www.w3.org/2013/N-TriplesTests/ http://www.w3.org/2013/N-QuadsTests/ http://www.w3.org/2013/TrigTests/ ←
16:44:15 <ericP> ACTION: ericP to respond to http://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.LRH.2.02.1311171537260.23626@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com
ACTION: ericP to respond to http://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.LRH.2.02.1311171537260.23626@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com ←
16:44:54 <gavinc> Topic: RDF Schema
16:45:34 <gavinc> Guus: Only real change might consider is the title of the document
Guus Schreiber: Only real change might consider is the title of the document ←
16:45:50 <gavinc> ... RDF 1.1 Vocabulary Description Language: RDF Schema
... RDF 1.1 Vocabulary Description Language: RDF Schema ←
16:45:57 <gavinc> ... would we be allowed to change the name?
... would we be allowed to change the name? ←
16:45:59 <pfps> I vote for tradition :-)
Peter Patel-Schneider: I vote for tradition :-) ←
16:46:15 <gavinc> ivan: I know we have changed the names for RDFa, but only a small change
Ivan Herman: I know we have changed the names for RDFa, but only a small change ←
16:46:28 <gavinc> ... so no, I don't know if we can change the name
... so no, I don't know if we can change the name ←
16:46:50 <gavinc> ericP: The objection to the change would be that we're hiding the document
Eric Prud'hommeaux: The objection to the change would be that we're hiding the document ←
16:47:09 <gavinc> ... did we change to something that's not true, but we're saying we're changing to something that's more true
... did we change to something that's not true, but we're saying we're changing to something that's more true ←
16:47:29 <gavinc> ivan: We will see, if the director objects we can change it back. Not a big deal.
Ivan Herman: We will see, if the director objects we can change it back. Not a big deal. ←
16:47:58 <gavinc> Guus: taking action to propose a new time
Guus Schreiber: taking action to propose a new time ←
16:48:00 <gavinc> +q
+q ←
16:48:40 <gavinc> -q
-q ←
16:48:44 <Guus> ack gavinc
Guus Schreiber: ack gavinc ←
16:50:18 <gavinc> Topic: RDF/XML
16:50:30 <AndyS> q+
Andy Seaborne: q+ ←
16:50:33 <gavinc> Guus: Change URI Refrence to IRI
Guus Schreiber: Change URI Refrence to IRI ←
16:50:44 <gkellogg> I believe "URI Reference" is replaced with just "IRI"
Gregg Kellogg: I believe "URI Reference" is replaced with just "IRI" ←
16:51:01 <AndyS> "RDF URI Reference" -> "IRI"
Andy Seaborne: "RDF URI Reference" -> "IRI" ←
16:52:27 <Zakim> +PatH
Zakim IRC Bot: +PatH ←
16:52:42 <Zakim> -David_Wood
Zakim IRC Bot: -David_Wood ←
16:53:00 <AndyS> ack me
Andy Seaborne: ack me ←
16:53:24 <gavinc> Topic: What's new in RDF
16:53:38 <pfps> sign me up
Peter Patel-Schneider: sign me up ←
16:53:51 <gavinc> Guus: Who can check the document?
Guus Schreiber: Who can check the document? ←
16:54:52 <gavinc> ACTION GavinC add syntax sections to What's new in RDF 1.1
ACTION GavinC add syntax sections to What's new in RDF 1.1 ←
16:54:52 <trackbot> Error finding 'GavinC'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users>.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Error finding 'GavinC'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users>. ←
16:54:59 <gavinc> ACTION gavinc add syntax sections to What's new in RDF 1.1
ACTION gavinc add syntax sections to What's new in RDF 1.1 ←
16:54:59 <trackbot> Error finding 'gavinc'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users>.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Error finding 'gavinc'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users>. ←
16:55:04 <gavinc> ACTION gcarothe add syntax sections to What's new in RDF 1.1
ACTION gcarothe add syntax sections to What's new in RDF 1.1 ←
16:55:04 <trackbot> Created ACTION-329 - Add syntax sections to what's new in rdf 1.1 [on Gavin Carothers - due 2013-12-04].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-329 - Add syntax sections to what's new in rdf 1.1 [on Gavin Carothers - due 2013-12-04]. ←
16:55:20 <gavinc> Topic: Primer
16:55:53 <gavinc> Guus: In general we have a very informal example in the beinging. PatH doesn't like it. Thinking of ways of making more informal.
Guus Schreiber: In general we have a very informal example in the beinging. PatH doesn't like it. Thinking of ways of making more informal. ←
16:57:02 <yvesr> maybe the (new) diagram would help a little?
Yves Raimond: maybe the (new) diagram would help a little? ←
16:57:08 <gavinc> path: objection is that it seems to transition from natural language examples to IRI examples without anything in between
Patrick Hayes: objection is that it seems to transition from natural language examples to IRI examples without anything in between ←
16:57:39 <gavinc> Guus: I can't seem to get rid of the term RDF Schema itself.
Guus Schreiber: I can't seem to get rid of the term RDF Schema itself. ←
16:57:55 <gavinc> ... schema is used in the outside world in many ambiguous ways
... schema is used in the outside world in many ambiguous ways ←
16:58:32 <gavinc> path: Maybe just call it RDFS?
Patrick Hayes: Maybe just call it RDFS? ←
16:58:43 <gavinc> Guus: Just call it RDFS, without explaining what the S is.
Guus Schreiber: Just call it RDFS, without explaining what the S is. ←
16:59:25 <gavinc> ... schema.org, it's a vocabulary
... schema.org, it's a vocabulary ←
16:59:39 <yvesr> in the primer now - there's no mention of Schema, without 'RDF ' or 'XML ' prefixing it
Yves Raimond: in the primer now - there's no mention of Schema, without 'RDF ' or 'XML ' prefixing it ←
17:00:20 <gavinc> ivan: If we change the title of the RDF Schema document it should have language in the SOTD referring to the old name
Ivan Herman: If we change the title of the RDF Schema document it should have language in the SOTD referring to the old name ←
17:01:39 <Zakim> -AndyS
Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS ←
17:02:21 <gavinc> Guus: Rest of primer discussion can happen via email
Guus Schreiber: Rest of primer discussion can happen via email ←
17:02:54 <gavinc> ... hopefully next week we have a version that's nearer to consensus
... hopefully next week we have a version that's nearer to consensus ←
17:03:33 <gavinc> Topic: Timing
17:04:13 <gavinc> Guus: As long as we have completed all our comments by the end of December if we extend for one or two months we'll likely get it.
Guus Schreiber: As long as we have completed all our comments by the end of December if we extend for one or two months we'll likely get it. ←
17:04:24 <gavinc> ... for things like the Primer and Notes.
... for things like the Primer and Notes. ←
17:06:21 <gavinc> Adjourned!
Adjourned! ←
17:06:24 <Zakim> -pfps
Zakim IRC Bot: -pfps ←
17:06:25 <Zakim> -Ivan
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan ←
17:06:26 <Zakim> -gkellogg
Zakim IRC Bot: -gkellogg ←
17:06:26 <Zakim> -Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: -Arnaud ←
17:06:28 <Zakim> -ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: -ericP ←
17:06:28 <Zakim> -PatH
Zakim IRC Bot: -PatH ←
17:06:30 <Zakim> -FabGandon
Zakim IRC Bot: -FabGandon ←
17:06:31 <Zakim> -GavinC
Zakim IRC Bot: -GavinC ←
17:06:32 <Zakim> -TallTed
Zakim IRC Bot: -TallTed ←
17:06:34 <Zakim> -yvesr
Zakim IRC Bot: -yvesr ←
17:06:35 <Zakim> -Guus_Schreiber
Zakim IRC Bot: -Guus_Schreiber ←
17:17:26 <Guus> trackbot, end meeting
(No events recorded for 10 minutes)
Guus Schreiber: trackbot, end meeting ←
17:17:26 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, list attendees ←
17:17:26 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been pfps, GavinC, AndyS, Guus_Schreiber, Ivan, TallTed, gkellogg, yvesr, David_Wood, Arnaud, FabGandon, az, ericP, PatH
Zakim IRC Bot: As of this point the attendees have been pfps, GavinC, AndyS, Guus_Schreiber, Ivan, TallTed, gkellogg, yvesr, David_Wood, Arnaud, FabGandon, az, ericP, PatH ←
17:17:34 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, please draft minutes ←
17:17:34 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/11/27-rdf-wg-minutes.html trackbot
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/11/27-rdf-wg-minutes.html trackbot ←
17:17:35 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, bye ←
17:17:35 <RRSAgent> I see no action items
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I see no action items ←
Formatted by CommonScribe