ISSUE-153: Should open/closed data be addressed in the Data Usage Vocabulary?
open/closed DUV
Should open/closed data be addressed in the Data Usage Vocabulary?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Data Usage Vocabulary
- Raised by:
- Eric Stephan
- Opened on:
- 2015-04-10
- Description:
- How should feedback and usage instructions be handled that are either in themselves sensitive or discussing details about data that is closed. How should the model handle personally identifiable information (PII) in feedback. We should also take into account the privacy interest group, are there aspects of usage http://www.w3.org/2012/dnt-ws/report.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [Minutes] 2016-07-15 (from phila@w3.org on 2016-07-15)
- Re: Tasks to complete by Fri 17th June, so that we can vote for moving BP doc to CR on Fri 24 June (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2016-06-10)
- Tasks to complete by Fri 17th June, so that we can vote for moving BP doc to CR on Fri 24 June (from deirdre@derilinx.com on 2016-06-10)
- [Minutes] 2016-06-10 (from phila@w3.org on 2016-06-10)
- [Minutes] 2016-05-20 (from phila@w3.org on 2016-05-20)
- dwbp-ISSUE-153 (Eric Stephan): Should open/closed data be addressed in the Data Usage Vocabulary? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-04-10)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
