See also: IRC log
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/WD-AERT/ED-AERT
SAZ: document maturing
... the framework seems stable
... should start thinking about a public WD to get more feedback
... but lots of scrubbing and editing needed
SM: also agree that it is looking much more
mature
... congratulate Carlos on these improvements
... have several minor comments
... but otherwise good to get broader feedback
SAZ: yes, now is the time to start nit-picking
... and improve these aspects
SM: HTTP headers, for example for language
versions of the pages
... but also other types of content negotiation
<samuelm> E-Tag
SM: also need to consider these to report the context of evaluation
CV: like the idea of content negotiation
<samuelm> SM: WG created HTTP in RDF because of that
<samuelm> http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.13.3972&rep=rep1&type=pdf
SM: text for localization should better address the aspects of internationalization
CV: agree, good input
SAZ: me too
SM: we don't talk about customizing the view on
the results
... as opposed to filtering or sorting the results
SAZ: think one of the issues is that the features
are sometimes not very clear
... need to have clear "checks" to tell if a tool has a feature or not
SM: to me some sorts of customization are not
filtering
... for example functions that aid navigation and manipulation
SAZ: agree that we are talking about two types of
customization
... one retrieves the data and the other works with that data
CV: agree, will try to make clearer
[[agreement that section 2.3.2 should include description for both types of customizations discussed above]]
CV: one sentence "check" will repeat the title
... don't like it a lot
... maybe better to improve the section text instead
SM: adding a one-sentence "check" could be
dangerous
... will be a tough task
... maybe better to try to improve the text