[Odrl-version2] Dates and times in constraints

[Myles, Stuart]

Ø  We can say that we "strongly recommend the use of timezones when times are specified in dateTime"....

 

Makes sense to me...

 

Ø  BTW, the only use case I can think of is if I sell you the world-wide rights to play "Auld Lang Syne" after 2011-12-31T23:59:59 :-)

 

I'll take it! (If not too expensive).

 

Regards,

Stuart

 

 

 

From: odrl-version2-bounces at odrl.net [mailto:odrl-version2-bounces at odrl.net] On Behalf Of ri at odrl.net
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2011 8:22 PM
To: ODRL-Version2
Subject: Re: [Odrl-version2] Dates and times in constraints

 

 

On 19 Feb 2011, at 05:43, Myles, Stuart wrote:





I am not opposed to having the ODRL core model allow for floating times, if there's a use case. And, as we've already said, we can always rely on profiles of ODRL to tighten the requirements for making timezone offsets required, as needed.

 

We can say that we "strongly recommend the use of timezones when times are specified in dateTime"....

 

BTW, the only use case I can think of is if I sell you the world-wide rights to play "Auld Lang Syne" after 2011-12-31T23:59:59 :-)

 

Cheers

 

Renato Iannella

ODRL Initiative

http://odrl.net





 



The information contained in this communication is intended for the use
of the designated recipients named above. If the reader of this 
communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that you have received this communication in error, and that any review,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
notify The Associated Press immediately by telephone at +1-212-621-1898 
and delete this e-mail. Thank you.
[IP_US_DISC]
msk dccc60c6d2c3a6438f0cf467d9a4938
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://odrl.net/pipermail/odrl-version2_odrl.net/attachments/20110221/dbeeb5eb/attachment-0001.html>