[Odrl-version2] Core Model: Roles, Parties and Assets

[ri at odrl.net]

On 6 Nov 2010, at 02:54, Francis Cave wrote:

> 2. If it is mandatory for a Permission / Prohibition to have at least one associated Party, does this contradict Figure 3.1 (Set), in which apparently a Policy does not have a Party? The model for a Ticket also seem to contradict 2.1.

That is true. I think we were "thinking" of Agreements/Offers when we made that change (in Nancy).

I will change the cardinalities on the Model for Party to "0..*" and let the TYPE definitions mandate the cardinalities.

Cheers

Renato Iannella
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://odrl.net/pipermail/odrl-version2_odrl.net/attachments/20101108/bc5b40d4/attachment.html>