[Odrl-version2] RE: ODRL-Version2 Digest, Vol 20, Issue 2
Vicky Weissman
vickyw at cs.cornell.edu
Thu Feb 8 00:43:37 EST 2007
Hi All,
Sorry I haven't been around for awhile. I want to comment on Steven's last
email.
-------
<From Steven Rowat on Tuesday, Feb. 6.>
I have Greg [Heileman]'s permission to quote from his response; these parts
seem like they may be of interest:
It is theoretically possible to "chunk" ODRL or XrML into parts - some that
would be part of a core REL, and others that would be identified as
middleware or even application-level parts. From our perspective, it seems
that ODRL is better suited for this than XrML. Or perhaps we can define a
core, and then show how it maps to specific parts of ODRL and XrML - this
might get around some of the standards issues you mention.
------
I took a rough stab at this a few years ago by defining a "core" language
that I called "Rosetta". I'm currently trying to refine the ideas and would
be happy to mail the results to anyone who's interested. (Hopefully I'll
have a first draft in time for CCS.)
Best,
Vicky
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.odrl.net/pipermail/odrl-version2/attachments/20070207/53695c60/attachment.html
More information about the Odrl-version2
mailing list