[Odrl-version2] Make it Simpler?
Susanne Guth
Susanne.Guth at gmx.net
Tue Feb 6 21:31:54 EST 2007
Hi Renato,
this is a viable alternative for me to the ODRLv2 document structure we currently have. Any other comments of the ODRL community members?
Susanne
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:11:00 +1000
Von: Renato Iannella <renato at odrl.net>
An: "ODRL Version 2.0" <odrl-version2 at odrl.net>
CC:
Betreff: Re: [Odrl-version2] Make it Simpler?
>
> On 4 Feb 2007, at 01:30, Susanne Guth wrote:
>
> > I see what you mean. Maybe we can declare core elements and then
> > make suggestions for complemenatary elements, such as Negotiation
> > and so on. In the same chapter we should encourage the ODRL users
> > to define their own additional elements. However, I think we should
> > keep this all in one document, or would you suggest to have the
> > core only in our ODRL V2 Document?
>
> I was thinking that the "ODRL V2 Core" is a separate document
> (a cut down version of what we have now).
>
> Then we can have the extensions:
> "ODRL V2 - Negotiation"
> "ODRL V2 - Payments"
> etc
>
>
> What do others think?
>
> Cheers
>
> Renato Iannella
> ODRL Initiative
> http://odrl.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ODRL-Version2 mailing list
> ODRL-Version2 at odrl.net
> http://lists.odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2
--
Susanne Guth
cantoergosum at guth.it
http://cantoergosum.guth.it/
"Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail?ac=OM.GX.GX003K11713T4783a
More information about the Odrl-version2
mailing list