[Odrl-version2] New ODRL v2.0 Model
Susanne Guth
Susanne.Guth at gmx.net
Mon Jan 30 10:29:08 EST 2006
Hi Alapan,
one comment to our discussion:
Maybe there is still a misunderstanding, what the action element is.
It simply "names" the action that always comes with a permission or duty or
prohibition.
For example a duty to pay some amount would look like that:
o-ex20:duty id="d01" relaxed="true">
<o-ex20:payment>
<o-ex20:amount currency="EUR">0,50</o-ex20:amount>
</o-ex20:payment>
<o-ex20:hasConstraint id="c02"/>
</o-ex20:duty>
where "payment" is the action element. There is no duty without an action or
"if there's no action defined then there is not duty".
And after all: when expressing a prohibtion the duty element is optional
(and implicitly the action element too).
Does that make sense to you or is still something unclear?
Susanne
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Mail history:
4.5.4 Parties & Duties
<sg> I need some more information on this issue because I don't understand
the conflict that you have. Is it because the Duty always refers to an
Action?
<aa> Yes - a duty requires an action. However, you might want a prohibition
license that allows everything - hence there will be no action to link
with the duty.
--
Susanne Guth
susanne at odrl.net
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net/
Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie
More information about the Odrl-version2
mailing list