[Odrl-version2] New ODRL v2.0 Model

[Alapan Arnab]

Hi

Hi,
> > So if "print" is an action, how do I put a constraint to it?
> 
> Have a look at a example here:
> 
>    <http://odrl.net/2.0/issues/issueslist-1_10.html>
> 
> (We are not saying this is the final way, but is a proposal...)
Thanks - I think I understand.

However, I still think that the action element does not really serve a
purpose. In the issues-list, the example is:
         <o-ex20:permission assigner="party99">
          <o-ex20:play/>
           <o-ex20:object>asset01</o-ex20:object>
           <o-ex20:beneficiary id="party01"/>
           <o-ex20:hasConstraint id="c01"/>
           <o-ex20:hasDuty id="d01"/>
         </o-ex20:permission>
However, I think the permission model from ODRL 1.0 is much more
elegant, and the above example would look:
         <o-ex20:play assigner="party99">
           <o-ex20:object>asset01</o-ex20:object>
           <o-ex20:beneficiary id="party01"/>
           <o-ex20:hasConstraint id="c01"/>
           <o-ex20:hasDuty id="d01"/>
         </o-ex20:permission>
I do understand that the current approach was due to the prohibition
model - but _if_ the prohibition model is changed, then the action model
is not really necessary.

Alapan
-- 
Alapan Arnab
Data Networks Architecture (DNA) Laboratory
Department of Computer Science
University of Cape Town
Rondebosch, 7700
South Africa

Tel: +27 21 650 3127
Web: http://people.cs.uct.ac.za/~aarnab/
Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com
----------
"You must always believe that you can be the best, but you must never
believe you have achieved it".
Juan Manuel Fangio