[Odrl-version2] New ODRL v2.0 Model
Susanne Guth
Susanne.Guth at gmx.net
Mon Feb 6 01:37:52 EST 2006
Hi,
I don't have a problem with the two rights expressions below. Why do we want
to relate certain actions to duties only?
For example, if there's one special accountant in a company that is allowed
to do payments that are over 5000 he requires an according permission.
I think, that if we constrain a certain vocabulary to permissions/ or duties
we reduce the flexibility of our language.
I think, the software/system that uses ODRL v2 rights expressions would have
to decide what actions make sense as permissions and duties. I don't think
its our work to do. Discussion opened :)
So long
Susanne
>
>
> On 1 Feb 2006, at 01:43, Alapan Arnab wrote:
>
> >
> > But from purely an implementation point of view - if payment is an
> > action, wouldn't both the following code fragments be correct?
> >
> > <duty id="1" relaxed="true">
> > <payment>
> > <amount currency="EUR">1</amount>
> > </payment>
> > </duty>
> >
> > <permission>
> > <payment>
> > <amount currency="EUR">1</amount>
> > </payment>
> > </duty>
>
> True...
>
> We need a way to constrain some Actions to Permissions and some to
> Duties only...
>
> Cheers
>
> Renato Iannella
> ODRL Initiative
> http://odrl.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ODRL-Version2 mailing list
> ODRL-Version2 at odrl.net
> http://lists.odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2
>
--
Susanne Guth
susanne at odrl.net
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net/
Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie
More information about the Odrl-version2
mailing list