13:57:57 RRSAgent has joined #wcag2ict 13:57:57 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/09/18-wcag2ict-irc 13:57:59 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:57:59 Zakim has joined #wcag2ict 13:58:01 Zakim, this will be 2428 13:58:01 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 13:58:02 Meeting: WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference 13:58:02 Date: 18 September 2012 13:58:20 chair: Andi_Snow-Weaver 13:58:52 WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has now started 13:59:00 + +1.202.272.aaaa 13:59:12 regrets: Allen_Hoffman, Loïc_Martínez_Normand 13:59:43 +Mary_Jo_Mueller 13:59:44 zakim, aaaa is bbailey 13:59:44 +bbailey; got it 14:00:16 +Gregg 14:00:36 +Andi_Snow_Weaver 14:00:40 greggvanderheiden has joined #wcag2ict 14:00:41 Mike has joined #wcag2ict 14:00:54 +??P10 14:01:06 zakim, ??P10 is Mike_Pluke 14:01:06 +Mike_Pluke; got it 14:01:15 Judy has joined #wcag2ict 14:01:16 korn has joined #wcag2ict 14:01:17 zakim, bbailey is Bruce_Bailey 14:01:17 +Bruce_Bailey; got it 14:01:19 +[Microsoft] 14:01:21 Kiran has joined #wcag2ict 14:01:23 +[Oracle] 14:01:28 Zakim, Oracle has Peter_KOrn 14:01:28 +Peter_KOrn; got it 14:01:36 zakim, [Microsoft] hs Alex_Li 14:01:36 I don't understand '[Microsoft] hs Alex_Li', Andi 14:01:39 Zakim, Oracle has Peter_Korn 14:01:39 Peter_KOrn was already listed in [Oracle], korn 14:01:42 alex has joined #wcag2ict 14:01:43 zakim, [Microsoft] has Alex_Li 14:01:43 +Alex_Li; got it 14:01:54 Zakim, Peter_KOrn is Peter_Korn 14:01:54 sorry, korn, I do not recognize a party named 'Peter_KOrn' 14:01:59 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:01:59 On the phone I see Bruce_Bailey, Mary_Jo_Mueller, Gregg, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Mike_Pluke, [Microsoft], [Oracle] 14:02:02 [Microsoft] has Alex_Li 14:02:02 [Oracle] has Peter_KOrn 14:02:27 +Kiran_Kaja 14:02:31 q+ 14:02:46 +??P22 14:02:52 zakim, ??p22 is me 14:02:52 +shadi; got it 14:03:24 janina has joined #wcag2ict 14:03:26 scribe: MaryJo 14:03:33 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag2ict-tf/2012Sep/0089.html 14:03:36 +??P29 14:03:37 +Judy 14:03:39 zakim, next item 14:03:40 I see nothing on the agenda 14:03:45 zakim, ??P29 is Janina_Sajka 14:03:45 +Janina_Sajka; got it 14:05:09 topic: US Access Board News 14:05:55 q+ 14:06:12 The board meets every other month. Would like WCAG2ICT work done by November for U.S. Access board meeting in January. 14:06:53 ack bbailey 14:07:19 ack judy 14:09:38 agenda? 14:09:41 Our team is shooting for beginning of October to complete WCAG2ICT content for M376 and will probably be complete enough for U.S. Access Board use. 14:10:18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag2ict-tf/2012Sep/0089.html 14:11:48 topic: Note clarifying 'content' in non-web environment 14:13:44 q+ 14:13:46 The definition of 'content' should make reference to 'user agent' and vice versa. 14:14:33 There was a list of examples gathered for content for documents and for software.. 14:14:56 q+ 14:15:11 [Judy clarified above on previous topic that the WCAG2ICT TF is aiming to publish an updated draft at the beginning of Oct; and the Access Board is free to point to that as needed, as an informative document.] 14:17:00 q+ 14:18:26 WCAG2ICT uses the terms 'software' and 'electronic documents' which are not defined and we rely on these words. 14:18:27 -[Oracle] 14:18:34 +David_MacDonald 14:18:45 +[Oracle] 14:19:02 Zakim, Oracle has Peter_Korn 14:19:02 +Peter_Korn; got it 14:19:42 David has joined #wcag2ict 14:19:43 s/topic: US Access Board News/topic: U.S. Access Board 508 NPRM Status Update 14:20:07 M376 instead refers to 'content' and 'software' alone. In M376 there are separate sections for 'content' and 'software. 14:23:00 https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/1-perceivable/13-create-content-that-can-be-presented-in-different-ways/132-meaningful-sequence 14:23:38 ack Andi 14:23:38 In 1.3.2, we interpret this to apply to both content as well as the software UI. 14:25:25 M376 says that content is only what is made available to the user through a user agent. 14:25:49 -shadi 14:26:02 zakim, judy has shadi 14:26:02 +shadi; got it 14:27:12 q? 14:30:21 Here is what is in the minutes from September 3rd: content: information and sensory experience to be communicated to the user by means of ICT, including any structure, presentation, and interaction 14:30:25 ack korn 14:31:20 Concern is that it isn't clear when there is software doesn't have a distinctly loadable module to easily distinguish what is content. The user experience presented in the software is content. 14:32:40 Content might be embedded in software or it may be separable from the software. The user agent may only have embedded content or may also be able to act upon spearable content. 14:33:50 Outside of Web, the clarity of 'content' and 'user agent' isn't such a clear separation. 14:34:03 ack gregg 14:38:23 q+ 14:39:14 Possible additional note: Software that provides a user agent contains all of the characteristics of content (information, sensory experience, structure, presentation and interactivity) and, all of the success criteria that refer to "content" can be applied to software that provides a user agent. 14:41:48 q? 14:48:10 Javascript is a program, and the interactivity is part of the program because you can't separate it out. 14:50:24 q+ 14:50:30 ack korn 14:53:29 We just need make sure that the broader categories are used so that the right requirements are still applied to cover its accessibility. 14:53:35 q+ 14:53:57 ack judy 14:54:43 ack gregg 14:55:03 q+ 14:55:04 q+ 14:56:59 -Bruce_Bailey 14:57:36 +1 14:57:57 q- 14:59:36 q+ 15:00:07 We may just want to advise that if you don't know which to use ('content' or 'software'), then use 'software'. 15:00:15 q? 15:01:32 ack david 15:02:54 If something doesn't meet 'content' definition which means there is clearly a user agent, then 'software' definition should be applied. 15:03:32 s/which means there is clearly a user agent/(meaning there is clearly a user agent)/ 15:05:38 q+ 15:06:17 ack mike 15:06:19 The action item team will continue to meet offline to clarify the words for the survey. They have clearly made progress. 15:07:11 ack alex 15:08:11 zakim, next item 15:08:11 I see nothing on the agenda 15:08:28 topic: Comments on the WCAG2ICT draft 15:08:58 https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-wcag2ict-20120727/ 15:09:10 Everything is in there except for ICT and Microsoft comments. Mary Jo will finish up entering the comments. 15:09:36 There are some themes. Some problems, like closed systems, just haven't been addressed yet. 15:09:59 LC-2661: https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-wcag2ict-20120727/2661 15:10:04 s/addressed yet/addressed by our working group yet/ 15:10:09 LC-2672: https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-wcag2ict-20120727/2672 15:10:18 LC-2666: https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-wcag2ict-20120727/2666 15:10:26 LC-2656: https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-wcag2ict-20120727/2656 15:10:27 q+ 15:10:41 q+ 15:11:31 ack korn 15:11:48 We need to make clear more than we did that there are definitely additional requirements that are needed for software, closed products, etc. WCAG 2.0 was clearly not intended to be the full list of requirements for non-Web content. 15:11:56 ack mike 15:13:46 q+ greggvanderheiden 15:13:50 q+ 15:14:12 ack judy 15:14:25 q+ 15:14:25 q+ 15:16:19 ack gregg 15:16:23 We could say that there are other standards that cover specific topics and formats, but we don't typically directly reference other standards in a technical repor. We could explore putting something more general on our landing page. 15:16:39 s/repor/report/ 15:18:07 q+ 15:19:33 ack mike 15:19:53 q+ 15:20:15 q- later 15:20:49 ack korn 15:20:58 We shouldn't be saying that readers should refer to other standards that are unnamed, so wording should be carefully written. 15:22:19 171 was not written as a standard that could be enforced through regulation. It was designed as a collection of good things to do. 15:22:48 q+ 15:24:32 ack judy 15:25:15 ack korn 15:25:19 q+ 15:28:18 -Andi_Snow_Weaver 15:28:19 We really need people to start proposing resolutions for the comments. We need to be done in 2 weeks. 15:28:28 -[Microsoft] 15:28:34 -Kiran_Kaja 15:28:51 -Mary_Jo_Mueller 15:29:40 -[Oracle] 15:29:48 korn has left #wcag2ict 15:29:52 -David_MacDonald 15:30:01 -Judy 15:30:03 -Gregg 15:30:18 -Janina_Sajka 15:30:23 -Mike_Pluke 15:30:24 WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has ended 15:30:24 Attendees were +1.202.272.aaaa, Mary_Jo_Mueller, Gregg, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Mike_Pluke, Bruce_Bailey, Peter_KOrn, Alex_Li, Kiran_Kaja, shadi, Janina_Sajka, David_MacDonald 15:30:25 janina has left #wcag2ict 16:14:52 greggvanderheiden has left #wcag2ict 16:30:27 present+: Judy_Brewer 17:40:33 Zakim has left #wcag2ict 18:03:02 rrsagent, make minutes 18:03:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/09/18-wcag2ict-minutes.html MaryJo 18:03:17 rrsagent, make minutes 18:03:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/09/18-wcag2ict-minutes.html MaryJo 18:03:37 zakim, bye 19:22:48 Mike has left #wcag2ict