IRC log of wai-wcag on 2012-01-23
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 17:00:50 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag
- 17:00:50 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/01/23-wai-wcag-irc
- 17:00:52 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 17:00:52 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #wai-wcag
- 17:00:54 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG
- 17:00:55 [Zakim]
- I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
- 17:00:55 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
- 17:00:55 [trackbot]
- Date: 23 January 2012
- 17:01:03 [MichaelC]
- zakim, this will be 9224
- 17:01:03 [Zakim]
- ok, MichaelC; I see Team_(wai-wcag)17:00Z scheduled to start now
- 17:01:35 [MichaelC]
- zakim, this is 9224
- 17:01:35 [Zakim]
- ok, MichaelC; that matches Team_(wai-wcag)17:00Z
- 17:01:42 [Zakim]
- +Christophe_Strobbe
- 17:01:48 [MichaelC]
- zakim, IPcaller is Joshue_O_Connor
- 17:01:48 [Zakim]
- +Joshue_O_Connor; got it
- 17:02:33 [MichaelC]
- agenda: http://www.w3.org/mid/4F184ED4.1040708@oracle.com
- 17:02:55 [LeonieW]
- LeonieW has joined #wai-wcag
- 17:03:13 [Zakim]
- +chris.a
- 17:03:39 [MichaelC]
- zakim, chris.a is Loretta_Guarino_Reid
- 17:03:39 [Zakim]
- +Loretta_Guarino_Reid; got it
- 17:03:50 [Loretta]
- Loretta has joined #WAI-WCAG
- 17:04:05 [Zakim]
- +??P10
- 17:04:30 [MichaelC]
- zakim, ??P10 is Léonie_Watson
- 17:04:30 [Zakim]
- +Léonie_Watson; got it
- 17:04:32 [Zakim]
- +??P21
- 17:04:34 [MichaelC]
- chair: James_Nurthen
- 17:04:37 [jongund]
- zakim, ??P21 is jongund
- 17:04:37 [Zakim]
- +jongund; got it
- 17:04:53 [Joshue108]
- scribe: Joshue
- 17:05:10 [MichaelC]
- scribeNick: Joshue108
- 17:06:59 [MichaelC]
- regrets: Bruce_Bailey, Tim_Boland
- 17:07:26 [Joshue108]
- JN: This is a good time for Bruce and Tim, but they just cannot make this call.
- 17:07:52 [Joshue108]
- MC: Discusses scribing list credits
- 17:08:16 [Joshue108]
- JN: If in PF style we should get PF credit!
- 17:08:25 [Zakim]
- + +1.703.890.aaaa
- 17:08:34 [Joshue108]
- DMcD: We should get both
- 17:08:48 [MichaelC]
- zakim, aaaa is Katie_Haritos-Shea
- 17:08:48 [Zakim]
- +Katie_Haritos-Shea; got it
- 17:09:08 [Joshue108]
- MC: We will work it off line
- 17:09:31 [Joshue108]
- JN: I don't object to chairs scribing
- 17:10:01 [Joshue108]
- JOC: +1
- 17:10:58 [Joshue108]
- TOPIC: Which members can particpate
- 17:11:26 [Joshue108]
- MC: You do have to a member of either WCAG or PF to contribute.
- 17:11:47 [Joshue108]
- MC: If people who are interested are not in either, contact me and I will try to facilitate them
- 17:12:08 [Joshue108]
- s/particpate/participate
- 17:12:24 [Joshue108]
- zakim, mute me
- 17:12:24 [Zakim]
- Joshue_O_Connor should now be muted
- 17:12:38 [Joshue108]
- MC: So is this acceptable?
- 17:12:57 [Joshue108]
- JN: The WCAG outputs are in the public space, and PF is private.
- 17:13:11 [Joshue108]
- JN: This should be in the public space
- 17:13:14 [Joshue108]
- MC: Agreed
- 17:13:20 [Joshue108]
- JN: Objections?
- 17:13:23 [Joshue108]
- <silence>
- 17:13:35 [Joshue108]
- JN: Ok, anyone not here we can discuss on list.
- 17:13:44 [Joshue108]
- JN: We can draft a proposed resolution.
- 17:13:59 [Joshue108]
- MC: I'd write a resolution.
- 17:14:17 [Joshue108]
- RESOLUTION: James and Josh to draft resolution
- 17:14:31 [Joshue108]
- zakim, unmute me
- 17:14:31 [Zakim]
- Joshue_O_Connor should no longer be muted
- 17:14:32 [MichaelC]
- s/RESOLUTION: James and Josh to draft resolution//
- 17:15:34 [Joshue108]
- RESOLUTION: Work to take place in WCAG space, to particpate members will need to join WCAG.
- 17:15:48 [Joshue108]
- RESOLUTION: All materials will be public
- 17:15:56 [Joshue108]
- zakim, mute me
- 17:15:56 [Zakim]
- Joshue_O_Connor should now be muted
- 17:16:29 [Joshue108]
- MC: Minutes and pointers will be sent to both WGs.
- 17:16:45 [Joshue108]
- JN: Will we send stuff to Xtech?
- 17:16:52 [Joshue108]
- KHS: What about a keyword?
- 17:17:15 [cstrobbe]
- s/particpate/participate/
- 17:17:26 [Joshue108]
- TOPIC: Times for meetings
- 17:17:44 [Joshue108]
- JN: Does this time work for people on call?
- 17:17:47 [Joshue108]
- <some dissent>
- 17:18:05 [Joshue108]
- JN: We will propose times, length etc.
- 17:18:28 [Joshue108]
- zakim, unmute me
- 17:18:28 [Zakim]
- Joshue_O_Connor should no longer be muted
- 17:18:56 [Joshue108]
- JN: The above is the suggested time
- 17:19:04 [Joshue108]
- JN: Anyone else? Please let us know
- 17:19:11 [Joshue108]
- zakim, mute me
- 17:19:11 [Zakim]
- Joshue_O_Connor should now be muted
- 17:19:34 [Joshue108]
- < Discussion on best day and time>
- 17:19:35 [MichaelC]
- proposed: Mondays 16:30 to 18:00 UTC (Standard Time)
- 17:19:56 [Joshue108]
- LW: When is WCAG call?
- 17:20:08 [Joshue108]
- JN: Thursday at 9pm GMT
- 17:20:28 [Joshue108]
- JN: We'll put it on the survey
- 17:21:12 [Joshue108]
- MC: These times aren't great for the Antipodes.
- 17:22:02 [Joshue108]
- JN: I also think, every other week we could have varied meeting times. In order to make progress etc
- 17:22:08 [Joshue108]
- JOC: +1
- 17:22:21 [Joshue108]
- JG: It could be risky..
- 17:22:30 [Joshue108]
- JN: We need good calendaring!
- 17:22:33 [Joshue108]
- zakim, unmute me
- 17:22:33 [Zakim]
- Joshue_O_Connor should no longer be muted
- 17:23:16 [Joshue108]
- JOC: In principle, is yes - I'm up for that.
- 17:23:56 [Joshue108]
- JN: It could be worth experimenting
- 17:24:06 [cstrobbe]
- s/JG: It/CS: It/
- 17:24:07 [Joshue108]
- LW: Consistency would be important
- 17:24:29 [Joshue108]
- +q
- 17:24:45 [Loretta]
- q+
- 17:25:14 [Joshue108]
- JG: Its not really two sub groups but just one flexible big one with convenient times
- 17:25:38 [Joshue108]
- JN: We can put it in the survey, similar to the time question.
- 17:25:39 [Loretta]
- q-
- 17:25:43 [Joshue108]
- <agreement>
- 17:26:08 [Joshue108]
- ack me
- 17:27:37 [Joshue108]
- ACTION: Meeting logistics to be worked out offline by Josh and James
- 17:27:37 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - Meeting
- 17:28:06 [Joshue108]
- TOPIC: Priorities of Work
- 17:28:25 [Joshue108]
- JN: Should we look at ARIA side first? Or the HTML5 side?
- 17:29:22 [Loretta]
- q
- 17:29:25 [Joshue108]
- JG: Some low hanging fruit would be ARIA, and HTML5 forms. So not an either or scenario. Devs will need guidance.
- 17:29:30 [Loretta]
- q+
- 17:29:48 [Joshue108]
- JG: Form a11y is number 1 prob on the web.
- 17:31:14 [jamesn]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Techniques/HTML5
- 17:31:15 [Loretta]
- ack me
- 17:31:15 [Joshue108]
- L: I'm not sure if we should approach by technlogy or subject error. It's going to be a challenge. There will be scripting techniques that need to be written.
- 17:31:45 [Joshue108]
- JN: In the WCAG WG, there is a list of HTML5 techniques available.
- 17:31:55 [Joshue108]
- JN: Also ARIA techniques?
- 17:32:28 [Joshue108]
- L: It would be nice to pubish ARIA techniques
- 17:33:01 [Joshue108]
- JN: We need to have techqniues for content that needs to adhere to WCAG.
- 17:33:15 [Joshue108]
- L: There is a desire to work on HTML5 a11y techs.
- 17:33:26 [Joshue108]
- L: To avoid gaping holes.
- 17:34:13 [jamesn]
- JOC: on 1 level the HTML processes have been tough doing the work in the lion's den
- 17:34:37 [jamesn]
- JOC: At this stage they may even find the work we do useful - with gap analysis etc.
- 17:35:11 [jamesn]
- JOC: might be good to link in to some of those with influence within the HTML5 Ally task force
- 17:36:16 [MichaelC]
- q+
- 17:37:29 [Joshue108]
- MC: Some housekeeping
- 17:37:44 [adam]
- adam has joined #wai-wcag
- 17:38:03 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 17:38:30 [adam]
- zakim, IPcaller is adam_solomon
- 17:38:30 [Zakim]
- +adam_solomon; got it
- 17:39:14 [Joshue108]
- JOC: There are some people who I can think of to take up different HTML5 and ARIA aspects.
- 17:39:28 [Joshue108]
- JN: People should work on areas of interest.
- 17:40:01 [MichaelC]
- q+ to talk about WG review process
- 17:40:33 [jamesn]
- JOC: rather than picking on HTML5 or ARIA pick on something like forms and look at how the 2 technologies wortk together on these areas
- 17:40:56 [jamesn]
- JOC: developers in general don't really care whether ARIA or HTML5 etc. - they just want to do something
- 17:41:40 [Joshue108]
- MC: We will have to deal with getting review from the parent working groups.
- 17:42:03 [Joshue108]
- MC: We need a strategy for working between the WG, how items are reviewed.
- 17:42:19 [Joshue108]
- JOC: Good point Michael.
- 17:42:33 [Joshue108]
- JN: Will our materials be reviewed by both groups?
- 17:42:52 [Joshue108]
- MC: Yes, nominally. The PF will have a light hand.
- 17:43:05 [Joshue108]
- L: We will have to look at making the content fit the WCAG form.
- 17:43:11 [Joshue108]
- JN: We can discuss this later.
- 17:43:28 [Joshue108]
- JN: Most of use will need some training on how to write techs.
- 17:43:37 [MichaelC]
- ack me
- 17:43:37 [Zakim]
- MichaelC, you wanted to talk about WG review process
- 17:43:47 [Joshue108]
- JN: A draft class, or creating templates.
- 17:44:21 [MichaelC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Techniques Techniques page on WCAG wiki, includes link to instructions and template
- 17:44:36 [Joshue108]
- JN: We have been discussing whether we will want to modify existing techniques or write new ones.
- 17:44:50 [Loretta]
- q+
- 17:45:30 [Joshue108]
- JN: Discussion of possibilities
- 17:46:11 [Loretta]
- ack me
- 17:46:15 [Joshue108]
- L: This is interesting in cases where HTML4 and 5 are identical. There are also situation where the approach is different.
- 17:46:26 [Joshue108]
- JN: There are also techs that aren't valid anymore.
- 17:46:28 [adam]
- q+
- 17:46:36 [Joshue108]
- JN: We will need a mix and match IMO.
- 17:46:47 [Joshue108]
- L: We need to avoid document bloat.
- 17:48:01 [Joshue108]
- JN: What's feasible Michael in the Quick Ref?
- 17:48:27 [Joshue108]
- MC: Stacking is harder but we have preference for that.
- 17:48:31 [Joshue108]
- zakim, mute me
- 17:48:31 [Zakim]
- Joshue_O_Connor should now be muted
- 17:48:48 [Joshue108]
- MC: We shouldn't restrict ourselves based on how it currently is.
- 17:49:05 [jamesn]
- zakim, who is noisy?
- 17:49:20 [Zakim]
- jamesn, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Christophe_Strobbe (29%)
- 17:49:24 [cstrobbe]
- zakim, mute me
- 17:49:24 [Zakim]
- sorry, cstrobbe, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you
- 17:49:24 [Joshue108]
- MC: The EAOG are discussing this at the moment and there may be a redesign. it is timely.
- 17:49:38 [cstrobbe]
- zakim, I am Christophe_Strobbe
- 17:49:38 [Zakim]
- ok, cstrobbe, I now associate you with Christophe_Strobbe
- 17:49:38 [Joshue108]
- zakim, unmute me
- 17:49:39 [Zakim]
- Joshue_O_Connor should no longer be muted
- 17:50:04 [MichaelC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-wcag2-checklist.html EO plans for update of How to Meet WCAG 2.0
- 17:50:13 [Joshue108]
- zakim, mute me
- 17:50:13 [Zakim]
- Joshue_O_Connor should now be muted
- 17:50:21 [Joshue108]
- JN: We need to check that.
- 17:50:24 [Joshue108]
- JOC: Yup
- 17:50:48 [Joshue108]
- zakim, unmute me
- 17:50:48 [Zakim]
- Joshue_O_Connor should no longer be muted
- 17:52:12 [Joshue108]
- DMcD: We should do it in a couple of passes.
- 17:52:33 [Joshue108]
- DMcD: Go fo the easy stuff first, and then make a pass at the applications.
- 17:53:12 [Joshue108]
- JOC: Can we have a backchannel etc?
- 17:55:13 [Joshue108]
- JOC: It could be a bin for ideas.
- 17:56:05 [jongund]
- I have to go to another call
- 17:56:09 [Zakim]
- -jongund
- 17:56:33 [Joshue108]
- JN: Is [html5-techs] good for mails to list etc?
- 17:56:38 [Zakim]
- -Léonie_Watson
- 17:56:47 [David_]
- ps Joshue... its DMacD (not McD) us Scottish background Canadians are sensitive about that stuff. :)
- 17:57:19 [Joshue108]
- s/DMcD/DMacD
- 17:57:23 [MichaelC]
- s/[html5-techs]/[html-techs]/
- 17:58:06 [Joshue108]
- JOC: Will we be meeting weekly or bi-weekly?
- 17:58:26 [Joshue108]
- MC: Thats a question for the survey.
- 17:58:38 [Joshue108]
- MC: We should meet weekly.
- 17:58:41 [Joshue108]
- JN: Agreed
- 17:59:20 [jamesn]
- RESOLUTION: we will use #html-techs-tf channel and the [html5-techs] prefix for mails to mailing lists
- 17:59:34 [MichaelC]
- s/[html5-techs]/[html-techs]/
- 17:59:37 [Zakim]
- -adam_solomon
- 18:00:11 [Joshue108]
- JN: Thats it, please be vocal
- 18:01:01 [Zakim]
- -Katie_Haritos-Shea
- 18:01:03 [Zakim]
- -Loretta_Guarino_Reid
- 18:01:03 [Zakim]
- -David_MacDonald
- 18:01:05 [Zakim]
- -James_Nurthen
- 18:01:12 [Zakim]
- -Marc_Johlic
- 18:01:14 [Zakim]
- -Christophe_Strobbe
- 18:01:42 [Joshue108]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 18:01:42 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/23-wai-wcag-minutes.html Joshue108
- 18:04:50 [Zakim]
- -Cooper
- 18:04:54 [Zakim]
- -Joshue_O_Connor
- 18:04:55 [Zakim]
- Team_(wai-wcag)17:00Z has ended
- 18:04:57 [Zakim]
- Attendees were David_MacDonald, James_Nurthen, Marc_Johlic, Cooper, Christophe_Strobbe, Joshue_O_Connor, chris, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Léonie_Watson, jongund, +1.703.890.aaaa,
- 18:05:00 [Zakim]
- ... Katie_Haritos-Shea, adam_solomon
- 18:05:10 [MichaelC]
- trackbot, end meeting
- 18:05:10 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 18:05:10 [Zakim]
- sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is
- 18:05:13 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 18:05:13 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/23-wai-wcag-minutes.html trackbot
- 18:05:14 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 18:05:14 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2012/01/23-wai-wcag-actions.rdf :
- 18:05:14 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Meeting logistics to be worked out offline by Josh and James [1]
- 18:05:14 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/01/23-wai-wcag-irc#T17-27-37