ISSUE-25: How is audience measurement adressed under DNT? (permitted use or otherwise)

AudienceMeasurement

How is audience measurement adressed under DNT? (permitted use or otherwise)

State:
PENDING REVIEW
Product:
Compliance Current
Raised by:
Kathy Joe
Opened on:
2011-09-21
Description:
Audience Measurement is needed to determine ad pricing and for a range of other statistical functions. Audience measurement needs exact and exhaustive data for correct measurement. This is why data collection under DNT:1 is needed and a permitted use is suggested.

Note change proposals: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Audience_Measurement
Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. Batch closing of old issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2015-03-24)
  2. Re: Call for Objection on Audience Measurement (ISSUE-25) DUE OCTOBER 9th (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-10-08)
  3. Re: Call for Objection on Audience Measurement (ISSUE-25) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-10-08)
  4. Call for Objection on Audience Measurement (ISSUE-25) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-10-08)
  5. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-09-25)
  6. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-09-25)
  7. Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-09-24)
  8. Call for Objection on Audience Measurement (ISSUE-25) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-09-24)
  9. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-09-24)
  10. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-09-23)
  11. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-09-23)
  12. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2014-09-23)
  13. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-09-23)
  14. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-09-23)
  15. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25), Viewable Impressions (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2014-09-19)
  16. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-09-19)
  17. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-09-19)
  18. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-09-18)
  19. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2014-09-18)
  20. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2014-09-18)
  21. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-09-18)
  22. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-09-18)
  23. RE: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2014-09-17)
  24. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2014-09-17)
  25. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-09-17)
  26. RE: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2014-09-17)
  27. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-09-17)
  28. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-09-12)
  29. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-09-12)
  30. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-09-12)
  31. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2014-09-12)
  32. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-09-12)
  33. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-09-12)
  34. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-09-12)
  35. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-09-11)
  36. Re: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2014-09-11)
  37. RE: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-09-11)
  38. RE: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-09-11)
  39. RE: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-09-11)
  40. RE: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2014-09-11)
  41. RE: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-09-11)
  42. Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2014-09-10)
  43. Agenda for September 10 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-09-09)
  44. Personalization (ISSUES-222, -230, -234, -236) and Audience Measurement (ISSUE-25) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-09-08)
  45. Agenda for September 3 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-09-02)
  46. Agenda for August 20 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-08-19)
  47. Agenda for August 2 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-08-19)
  48. Re: Agenda for August 6 TPWG call (from kulick@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-08-06)
  49. Re: Agenda for August 6 TPWG call (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2014-08-06)
  50. Agenda for August 6 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-08-05)
  51. Re: Agenda for January 29, 2014, ISSUE-25 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-01-29)
  52. Re: Agenda for January 29, 2014, ISSUE-25 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-01-29)
  53. ISSUE-25 proposed changes (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-10-17)
  54. Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-10-15)
  55. Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-10-15)
  56. TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V01) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-09)
  57. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-09)
  58. Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2013-10-08)
  59. Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-10-08)
  60. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-08)
  61. Re: change proposal to issue-25 (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-10-08)
  62. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-08)
  63. Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2013-10-07)
  64. RE: change proposal to issue-25 (from Susan_Israel@Comcast.com on 2013-10-07)
  65. RE: change proposal to issue-25 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-10-07)
  66. Re: change proposal to issue-25 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-10-07)
  67. RE: change proposal to issue-25 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-10-07)
  68. Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-10-07)
  69. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from singer@apple.com on 2013-10-07)
  70. Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2013-10-07)
  71. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-07)
  72. TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-07)
  73. Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (from robsherman@fb.com on 2013-10-07)
  74. Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from robsherman@fb.com on 2013-10-07)
  75. Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from robsherman@fb.com on 2013-10-07)
  76. ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-10-04)
  77. Re: ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-10-03)
  78. ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-10-03)
  79. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-03)
  80. TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-03)
  81. Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from robsherman@fb.com on 2013-10-03)
  82. Re: change proposal to issue-25 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-10-02)
  83. Re: change proposal to issue-25 (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2013-10-02)
  84. Re: change proposal to issue-25 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-10-02)
  85. Re: change proposal to issue-25 (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-10-02)
  86. change proposal to issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-10-02)
  87. TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V02) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-02)
  88. ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-10-02)
  89. Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (from tien@eff.org on 2013-10-01)
  90. RE: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (from Susan_Israel@Comcast.com on 2013-10-01)
  91. Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-10-01)
  92. RE: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (from Susan_Israel@Comcast.com on 2013-10-01)
  93. Agenda for the October 02 call (V01) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-01)
  94. Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-10-01)
  95. Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-10-01)
  96. Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-10-01)
  97. Compliance document updates for review before next WD publication (was CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-09-28)
  98. Agenda for the Sept 25 call (V01) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-09-24)
  99. Re: issue-25: amendment period on audience measurement (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2013-07-25)
  100. issue-25: amendment period on audience measurement (from tlr@w3.org on 2013-07-25)
  101. Re: ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research : answers to questions (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-07-23)
  102. Re: ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research : answers to questions (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-23)
  103. ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research : answers to questions (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-07-23)
  104. Re: extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-07-22)
  105. RE: issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-07-22)
  106. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-22)
  107. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-22)
  108. RE: issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-07-22)
  109. Re: issue-25 (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-07-22)
  110. Re: issue-25 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-07-22)
  111. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-22)
  112. Re: issue-25 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-07-22)
  113. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-22)
  114. Re: issue-25 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-07-22)
  115. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-22)
  116. RE: issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-07-22)
  117. Re: extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-07-20)
  118. Re: extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-07-20)
  119. Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-07-20)
  120. Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-07-19)
  121. Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-19)
  122. Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-07-19)
  123. Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-07-19)
  124. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-19)
  125. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-19)
  126. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-19)
  127. RE: issue-25 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-07-19)
  128. RE: issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-07-19)
  129. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-19)
  130. Re: extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2013-07-19)
  131. extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-07-18)
  132. RE: issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-07-18)
  133. RE: issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-07-18)
  134. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-18)
  135. RE: issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-07-18)
  136. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-18)
  137. RE: issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-07-18)
  138. Re: issue-25 (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2013-07-18)
  139. issue-25 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-07-18)
  140. Re: ISSUE-25: text to be discussed in today's call (from dan@eff.org on 2013-07-17)
  141. Fwd: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-07-17)
  142. Re: ISSUE-25: text to be discussed in today's call (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-07-17)
  143. Re: ISSUE-25: text to be discussed in today's call (from felten@CS.Princeton.EDU on 2013-07-17)
  144. ISSUE-25: text to be discussed in today's call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-07-17)
  145. ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-07-17)
  146. ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-07-17)
  147. Re: Agenda for DNT Call July 17 -- amendment (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-07-16)
  148. Re: Agenda for DNT Call July 17 (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2013-07-16)
  149. Agenda for DNT Call July 17 (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-07-16)
  150. Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-07-10)
  151. DAA: please provide real examples on data change practices (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-07-10)
  152. Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-07-10)
  153. ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-07-10)
  154. Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-07-10)
  155. RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-07-10)
  156. RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-07-10)
  157. Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-09)
  158. RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2013-07-09)
  159. Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-09)
  160. RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2013-07-09)
  161. Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-09)
  162. RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from Susan_Israel@Comcast.com on 2013-07-09)
  163. RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-07-09)
  164. Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-09)
  165. RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-07-09)
  166. Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-09)
  167. Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-07-09)
  168. RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-07-09)
  169. Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-09)
  170. Re: DNT Agenda for Wednesday, July 10 (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-07-09)
  171. DNT Agenda for Wednesday, July 10 (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-07-09)
  172. ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-07-09)
  173. Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-07-03)
  174. Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-07-03)
  175. Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-07-03)
  176. RE: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-07-02)
  177. Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-02)
  178. Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-07-02)
  179. Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-07-02)
  180. Re: June Change Proposal: text for audience measurement (Issue-25) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-25)
  181. June Change Proposal: text for audience measurement (Issue-25) (from tien@eff.org on 2013-06-25)
  182. Re: June change proposal: 5.2 Audience measurement Issue-25 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-06-22)
  183. Re: June change proposal: 5.2 Audience measurement Issue-25 (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-21)
  184. Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
  185. issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
  186. Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
  187. Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
  188. Re: ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-05-01)
  189. Re: ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-04-24)
  190. Re: ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-04-23)
  191. Re: ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-04-23)
  192. ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-04-23)
  193. questions, Re: ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-04-16)
  194. ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-03-27)
  195. DNT: financial accounting slides for Wednesday call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-26)
  196. ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-03-26)
  197. DNT: Agenda for March 27 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-26)
  198. Re: DNT: Agenda for March 20 call (revised) (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-19)
  199. Re: DNT: Agenda for March 20 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-03-19)
  200. DNT: Agenda for March 20 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-19)
  201. ISSUE-25 research exception (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-02-25)
  202. Agenda for 26 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-25)
  203. Re: Agenda for 12 September 2012 call (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-09-12)
  204. Agenda for 12 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-11)
  205. Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
  206. Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
  207. Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
  208. Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-04)
  209. FW: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2012-09-04)
  210. Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-04)
  211. post-call housekeeping & upcoming discussions (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-18)
  212. agenda: 18 April 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-18)
  213. Updated response to Aleecia's Template, Issue-10, Issue-17, Issue-19, Issue-22, Issue-24, Issue-25, Issue-31, Issue-49, Issue-73 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-04-07)
  214. deeper look at agenda items (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-07)
  215. Revised template for parties and business uses (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-03-28)
  216. template for parties and business uses (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-03-28)
  217. RE: RE: FW: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-21)
  218. RE: Agenda for 2012-Feb-14 call (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-16)
  219. Agenda for 2012-Feb-14 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-02-16)
  220. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-15)
  221. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-15)
  222. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-15)
  223. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-14)
  224. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from K.Joe@esomar.org on 2012-02-14)
  225. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-13)
  226. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-13)
  227. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from K.Joe@esomar.org on 2012-02-13)
  228. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-12)
  229. RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-12)
  230. Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track (from rob@blaeu.com on 2012-02-12)
  231. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-02-10)
  232. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mgroman@networkadvertising.org on 2012-02-10)
  233. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-02-10)
  234. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  235. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-10)
  236. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-10)
  237. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-10)
  238. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
  239. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
  240. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-02-10)
  241. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-10)
  242. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  243. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-10)
  244. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
  245. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  246. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  247. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  248. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-10)
  249. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  250. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  251. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  252. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mike@iab.net on 2012-02-10)
  253. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  254. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  255. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  256. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  257. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-02-10)
  258. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  259. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
  260. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  261. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  262. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ed@felten.com on 2012-02-10)
  263. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-10)
  264. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2012-02-09)
  265. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-09)
  266. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
  267. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-09)
  268. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
  269. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-09)
  270. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-09)
  271. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-09)
  272. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-09)
  273. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
  274. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
  275. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-09)
  276. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
  277. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
  278. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
  279. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-09)
  280. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-08)
  281. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-08)
  282. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
  283. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  284. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
  285. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  286. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
  287. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  288. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2012-02-08)
  289. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-08)
  290. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
  291. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
  292. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  293. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  294. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  295. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  296. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  297. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-07)
  298. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-07)
  299. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-07)
  300. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-07)
  301. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-07)
  302. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-07)
  303. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-07)
  304. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-06)
  305. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ed@felten.com on 2012-02-06)
  306. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mike@iab.net on 2012-02-06)
  307. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2012-02-06)
  308. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-06)
  309. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-06)
  310. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
  311. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-06)
  312. Issue 25: Possible exemption for research purposes covered by conditions for outsourcing and issue 34: Exemption for aggregated data (from K.Joe@esomar.org on 2012-02-06)
  313. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
  314. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
  315. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
  316. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-06)
  317. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-05)
  318. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-05)
  319. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-05)
  320. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-05)
  321. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-05)
  322. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-04)
  323. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-03)
  324. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-02)
  325. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-02)
  326. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-02)
  327. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-02)
  328. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-02)
  329. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-02)
  330. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-02)
  331. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-01)
  332. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-01)
  333. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-01)
  334. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-01)
  335. Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-01)
  336. Re: Compliance issues (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-12-07)
  337. Compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-06)
  338. Next steps on compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-03)
  339. More details for tomorrow AM (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-09-22)
  340. ISSUE-25: Possible exemption for research purposes (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-21)

Related notes:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2013Mar/0335.html

Normative:
 
Information may be collected, retained and used by a third party for audience measurement research where the information is used to calibrate or validate data collected from opted-in panels, which in part contains information collected across sites and over time from user agents. Audience measurement is centered around specific content, not around a user.
 
A third party eligible for an audience measurement research permitted use MUST adhere to the following restrictions. The data collected by the third party:
 
•     Must be pseudonymised before statistical analysis begins, and
•     Must not be shared with any other party unless the data are de-identified prior to sharing, and
•     Must be deleted or de-identified as early as possible after the purpose of collection is met and in no case shall such retention, prior to de-identification, exceed 53 weeks and
•     Must not be used for any other independent purpose.
 
•     In addition, the third party must be subject to an independent certification process under the oversight of a generally-accepted market research industry organization that maintains a web platform providing user information about audience measurement research. This web platform lists the parties eligible to collect information under DNT standards and the audience measurement research permitted use and it provides users with an opportunity to exclude their data contribution.

Rigo Wenning, 8 May 2013, 17:52:01

Remark from Justin:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2013May/0041.html

OK, I've had a couple more conversations with folks that require a revision to my view on market research, but nothing that is intractable, I think. Lots of people want to be able count unique ad impressions around the web, but they don't care where those ads show up. I think this could be accomplished with double-keyed cookies or limited retention or a hash of a content-specific ID, but I think this is solvable, as no one needs information about where a user went around the web.

Rigo Wenning, 8 May 2013, 17:52:27

Opened during issue cleanup. Has previously been referred to as "market research" or "research" in general, but the group has been tending towards "audience measurement" as the key term.

Nick Doty, 29 May 2013, 01:04:28

Removed placeholder for this permitted use (back in November; behind on updating the Tracker list) per CfO result:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking-commit/2014Nov/0002.html

Nick Doty, 18 Feb 2015, 05:08:36

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 25.html,v 1.1 2019/02/01 09:32:39 vivien Exp $